<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sex and Control</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2009/08/26/sex-and-control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2009/08/26/sex-and-control/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:57:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noli Irritare Leones &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Scattered thoughts on other people&#8217;s posts</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2009/08/26/sex-and-control/comment-page-1/#comment-6640</link>
		<dc:creator>Noli Irritare Leones &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Scattered thoughts on other people&#8217;s posts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=1265#comment-6640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Tushnet&#8217;s Against Safewords parts one and two. (The first one&#8217;s by her, the second a link by her to a piece in First [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tushnet&#8217;s Against Safewords parts one and two. (The first one&#8217;s by her, the second a link by her to a piece in First [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Heard</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2009/08/26/sex-and-control/comment-page-1/#comment-6631</link>
		<dc:creator>John Heard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=1265#comment-6631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I. Consider Baudrillard (Simulacra and Simulations):

http://www.stanford.edu/dept/HPS/Baudrillard/Baudrillard_Simulacra.html

We might have Baudrillard&#039;s &quot;successive phases of the image&quot; of sex:

1. Marital sex, &quot;the reflection of a basic reality&quot; - sacrament;

2. Contraception (safe / clean sex), would appear to fit within what Baudrillard calls &quot;an evil appearance: of the order of malefice&quot;. 

We might speculate on what comes next:

3. (Masturbation?), &quot;mark[ing] the absence of a basic reality&quot;; and

4. (Pornography / pornovision?), &quot;bear[ing] no relation to any reality whatever: it is its own pure simulacrum&quot;.

Although, there would appear to be some overlap between masturbation and pornography, and I might be too unimaginative to think of what might count as a pure simulacrum in this context. 

II. Safe sex / clean sex &quot;...the very thing which causes damage should already be the medicine&quot;. 

This made me think of Dante and contrapasso: the very thing which causes the error will be the remedy (eschatological doom chords). 

- JH]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I. Consider Baudrillard (Simulacra and Simulations):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.stanford.edu/dept/HPS/Baudrillard/Baudrillard_Simulacra.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.stanford.edu/dept/HPS/Baudrillard/Baudrillard_Simulacra.html</a></p>
<p>We might have Baudrillard&#8217;s &#8220;successive phases of the image&#8221; of sex:</p>
<p>1. Marital sex, &#8220;the reflection of a basic reality&#8221; &#8211; sacrament;</p>
<p>2. Contraception (safe / clean sex), would appear to fit within what Baudrillard calls &#8220;an evil appearance: of the order of malefice&#8221;. </p>
<p>We might speculate on what comes next:</p>
<p>3. (Masturbation?), &#8220;mark[ing] the absence of a basic reality&#8221;; and</p>
<p>4. (Pornography / pornovision?), &#8220;bear[ing] no relation to any reality whatever: it is its own pure simulacrum&#8221;.</p>
<p>Although, there would appear to be some overlap between masturbation and pornography, and I might be too unimaginative to think of what might count as a pure simulacrum in this context. </p>
<p>II. Safe sex / clean sex &#8220;&#8230;the very thing which causes damage should already be the medicine&#8221;. </p>
<p>This made me think of Dante and contrapasso: the very thing which causes the error will be the remedy (eschatological doom chords). </p>
<p>- JH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2009/08/26/sex-and-control/comment-page-1/#comment-6521</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 06:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=1265#comment-6521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Err... my name is not Slavoj Žižek?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Err&#8230; my name is not Slavoj Žižek?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rj</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2009/08/26/sex-and-control/comment-page-1/#comment-6512</link>
		<dc:creator>rj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=1265#comment-6512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you think marijuana is just popular among liberals, you must know a very unrepresentative group of under-30 conservatives.  To a lot of people, it&#039;s beer without the bloat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think marijuana is just popular among liberals, you must know a very unrepresentative group of under-30 conservatives.  To a lot of people, it&#8217;s beer without the bloat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Poulos</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2009/08/26/sex-and-control/comment-page-1/#comment-6486</link>
		<dc:creator>James Poulos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=1265#comment-6486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s true that pro-pot-legalization arguments boil down to the empirical claim that pot is a BETTER drug than the others -- legal and illegal. Hilariously, however -- Zizek fascinates me in the way I imagine some of my brilliant friends who are able to sit through trash courtroom reality TV are fascinated by that -- I can hardly think of a product more diametrically opposed to artificial choco-lax than a multi-purpose weed which grows all by itself right out of the ground. Trouble for me and Zizek on this point comes courtesy of the biopolitics of superpot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true that pro-pot-legalization arguments boil down to the empirical claim that pot is a BETTER drug than the others &#8212; legal and illegal. Hilariously, however &#8212; Zizek fascinates me in the way I imagine some of my brilliant friends who are able to sit through trash courtroom reality TV are fascinated by that &#8212; I can hardly think of a product more diametrically opposed to artificial choco-lax than a multi-purpose weed which grows all by itself right out of the ground. Trouble for me and Zizek on this point comes courtesy of the biopolitics of superpot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
