<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Election Day Comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2010/11/02/election-day-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2010/11/02/election-day-comments/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:49:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Hancock</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2010/11/02/election-day-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-12256</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Hancock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 01:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=2561#comment-12256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am eager to learn from any possible disagreement with Peter or our anonymous &quot;reader.&quot;  But I can&#039;t quite make out what the disagreement(s) is/are supposed to be.  What puzzles is me is that I thought it was clear that I by no means accept the emancipation of &quot;the philosopher&quot; from the cave.  There is no absolute inside/outside of the cave.  And ordinary people &quot;politicized?&quot;  Well, maybe, depending on what that means.  If it means that every understanding of transcendence is partial and therefore partisan, and therefore generally (by default) colored by the practical finalities/necessities of a given cave -- yes, then &quot;politicized.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am eager to learn from any possible disagreement with Peter or our anonymous &#8220;reader.&#8221;  But I can&#8217;t quite make out what the disagreement(s) is/are supposed to be.  What puzzles is me is that I thought it was clear that I by no means accept the emancipation of &#8220;the philosopher&#8221; from the cave.  There is no absolute inside/outside of the cave.  And ordinary people &#8220;politicized?&#8221;  Well, maybe, depending on what that means.  If it means that every understanding of transcendence is partial and therefore partisan, and therefore generally (by default) colored by the practical finalities/necessities of a given cave &#8212; yes, then &#8220;politicized.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
