<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting Lost in Percy’s Cosmos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2011/07/10/getting-lost-in-percy%E2%80%99s-cosmos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2011/07/10/getting-lost-in-percy%e2%80%99s-cosmos/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 01:42:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Lawler</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2011/07/10/getting-lost-in-percy%e2%80%99s-cosmos/comment-page-1/#comment-14044</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lawler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=3328#comment-14044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great topic, of course.  The exhaustion of language is a great opportunity for the novelist.
Percy wasn&#039;t a &quot;decline and fall man&quot; and my opinion he becomes less dark.  LANCELOT I&#039;m told is a very Voegelian book, and it&#039;s certainly anti-gnostic.  THE THANATOS SYNDROME is anti-romantic, among other things.  LOVE IN THE RUINS should be read with the last part of the sci-fi ending of LOST IN THE COMOS about the reality of love in the ruins and the end of pop Cartesian loneliness...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great topic, of course.  The exhaustion of language is a great opportunity for the novelist.<br />
Percy wasn&#8217;t a &#8220;decline and fall man&#8221; and my opinion he becomes less dark.  LANCELOT I&#8217;m told is a very Voegelian book, and it&#8217;s certainly anti-gnostic.  THE THANATOS SYNDROME is anti-romantic, among other things.  LOVE IN THE RUINS should be read with the last part of the sci-fi ending of LOST IN THE COMOS about the reality of love in the ruins and the end of pop Cartesian loneliness&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Cheeks</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2011/07/10/getting-lost-in-percy%e2%80%99s-cosmos/comment-page-1/#comment-14043</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cheeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=3328#comment-14043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bob Dylan has a line, &quot;..no direction home,&quot; that may be an element in Ms. Flannery&#039;s work. I just happen to be re-reading &quot;A Good Man is Hard to Find&quot; (and I&#039;m looking but can&#039;t remember where I placed the darn book!), and while I&#039;ve always thought that Flannery was critiquing modernity, your blog comments are directing me toward a more differentiated analysis, namely that she was concerned with portraying the individual/personal corruption and the collapse of man&#039;s necessary apperceptive abilities while living in a condition/state of sin. In choosing to &#039;sin&#039; Flannery shows us that anything (grotesqueries) is possible/justified including murder, torture, rape, ....as long as the self is sated!
Jason, great post!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob Dylan has a line, &#8220;..no direction home,&#8221; that may be an element in Ms. Flannery&#8217;s work. I just happen to be re-reading &#8220;A Good Man is Hard to Find&#8221; (and I&#8217;m looking but can&#8217;t remember where I placed the darn book!), and while I&#8217;ve always thought that Flannery was critiquing modernity, your blog comments are directing me toward a more differentiated analysis, namely that she was concerned with portraying the individual/personal corruption and the collapse of man&#8217;s necessary apperceptive abilities while living in a condition/state of sin. In choosing to &#8216;sin&#8217; Flannery shows us that anything (grotesqueries) is possible/justified including murder, torture, rape, &#8230;.as long as the self is sated!<br />
Jason, great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Eric Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2011/07/10/getting-lost-in-percy%e2%80%99s-cosmos/comment-page-1/#comment-14041</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Eric Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 05:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=3328#comment-14041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My favorite of the Percy novels is the loopy Love in the Ruins.   Something about the idea of late-60s-style societal break-down being fought out on golf courses appeals to my suburban soul.  The Moviegoer has plenty of priceless moments, but I find it hard to get fully on board with Binx&#039;s angst/alienation.  The later companion to Love in the Ruins, The Thanatos Syndrome, is perhaps the one to start with, because it really works as a mystery thriller, and it seems to be all that&#039;s great in Percy but in presented in a more subtle way. Ideas that seem a bit extremist or zany in the other novels come across in it as fully plausible. Of course, that makes some of them creepier.

Haven&#039;t read Lancelot or The Second Coming.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite of the Percy novels is the loopy Love in the Ruins.   Something about the idea of late-60s-style societal break-down being fought out on golf courses appeals to my suburban soul.  The Moviegoer has plenty of priceless moments, but I find it hard to get fully on board with Binx&#8217;s angst/alienation.  The later companion to Love in the Ruins, The Thanatos Syndrome, is perhaps the one to start with, because it really works as a mystery thriller, and it seems to be all that&#8217;s great in Percy but in presented in a more subtle way. Ideas that seem a bit extremist or zany in the other novels come across in it as fully plausible. Of course, that makes some of them creepier.</p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t read Lancelot or The Second Coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
