Speaking of the Beach Boys’ Pet Sounds is somewhat cliché when it comes to rock criticism. Its awesome harmonic sonorities in terms of the then latest of pop/rock music of the day, as well as the studio technique on the multi-track recorder, is indeed unparalleled. Pet Sounds is what Pink Floyd fans would refer to as “head phone” music. It is a musical feast. Moreover, we all know that Pet Sounds had a great influence on the Beatles’ Sgt. Peppers, so we have no need to belabor this point regarding the endless praise given to this album. It must be said that, despite its immense listenability, Pet Sounds does not suffer from Dylan’s statement from authority in the “Ballad of the Thin Man” that you (being Mr. Jones) must wear ear-phones. One need not be as closed off as Dylan would have it in order to be open to a musical experience beyond cynicism, even if it means highly produced pop and rock music like Pet Sounds
One can sincerely dig rock and roll music. Peter, Paul and Mary pointed out that if they really said it, then the radio wouldn’t play it, unless they laid it between the lines. Let me suggest that despite the beautiful music and earnest lyrics, Pet Sounds has much that is between the lines.
Like I said, speaking of Pet Sounds is the cliché of current rock criticism. God bless Carl Eric Scott for not wishing to enter into this minefield (but then perhaps Carl has bigger fish to fry). I kid, because Carl has explored the depths of rock more than anyone I have ever read. So let me offer a few thoughts apposite, if more personal, to what Carl would have written of Pet Sounds if he had so chosen to pick this musical obsession.
One of the great things of the Pet Sounds album has to do with its song lyrics. After a few general remarks, I will return shortly to the lyrics, but it must be said that as a whole, these songs musically capture a feeling of longing and loneliness for which I suspect there is not as direct a comparison in most rock music. Sgt Peppers, to which Pet Sounds is often compared, is too impersonal with its knowledge of holes that allegedly fill the Albert Hall when you’re sixty-four. The Cocteau Twins, to make a later reference, make beautiful compositions pointing toward transcendence, but their lyrics are indecipherable. By contrast, the Beach Boys have simple lyrics and transcendent compositions without Beatleseque imagist obscurantism.
Listening to the Beach Boys’ Pet Sounds album again (for the umpteenth time) makes me appreciate the great musical arrangements, but for once and for all (as I had definitely thought in the past) the issue of loneliness truly was evident on this album. It wasn’t simply a question of not being made for these times. To my ears the entire album expressed a kind of loneliness, even if sentimental. But more than this sentimentality there is on this album an intimation of a kind of ineradicable loneliness that resembles a kind of malignancy. It is a beautiful and lonely kind of music which is troubling in its naive honesty. One wonders why Pet Sounds was made in the first place. Perhaps it was made despite the banalities of typical loneliness (in terms of pop music), but which also simultaneously intended to provide a bracing sentiment for dealing with a world far from sentimentality. Sometimes I feel very sad when Brian Wilson sings.
There is good reason why this collection of Beach Boys songs captures the imagination. The songs are excellent even if they are morose.
Is Pet Sounds a precursor to “emo” music of today? If the album were nothing but “In My Room” (not on Pet Sounds) one might think such is the case. Rather than emo, each song relentlessly takes the listener to his vulnerable loneliness. Perhaps this is a kind of emo, but it does not exhibit entitlement. It simply accepts loneliness as it is, and if it whines, it whines in solitude. Solitude is the key of Pet Sounds, as when by yourself you talk to your cat or dog—or yourself. Okay, I admit that I talk to my cat, but don’t worry for my sanity because he doesn’t talk back to me. That said, my domestic animal is good listener! To give a bit in favor of madness, usually these monologues to the cat happen when I am washing dishes or folding laundry, and they deal with various topics—for example the distinction between vainglory and the fear of violent death in Hobbes. Yes, I truly wonder what my cat does when I fall asleep. I kid.
Regarding vulnerable loneliness, the one song on Pet Sounds not written (but arranged) by the Wilson brothers , i.e., “The Sloop John B,” speaks of a boy stuck by himself Robert Louis Stevenson style on a ship for which he can only wish to go home. Surely the men on the ship will not indulge such sentimental weakness. I wanna go home, but he can’t.
Then there is the nice confessional song “That’s Not Me”—which has a very interesting rhythm (what is the time signature? 7/5?).
I had to prove that I could make it alone
But that’s not me
I wanted to show how independent I’d grown now
But that’s not me
Amazing that a writer of a song, a songwriter of great talent and ambition, still seeks recognition but is not willing to call it me. Me is known to be other than that which has left home in its own independence. The folks back home—and especially the girl—when he writes them, don’t get his ambition to get he hell out of the place they call home. Nonetheless, he found out that his lonely life outside of his home wasn’t so pretty, but then the song keeps the refrain in a repetitive manner which leads one to doubt the sentiment that home is where the heart is.
I once had a dream
So I packed up and split for the city
I soon found out that my lonely life wasn’t so pretty
I’m glad I went now I’m that much more sure that we’re ready
The song’s refrain ends with the exciting life of proving that one could make it alone. In its “once,” the song says that this is surely impossible in this case, and it is interesting that “the city” is the place where one’s own self sufficiency becomes doubtful.
Allegedly he returns home glad to meet his girl who is now ready. Why wasn’t she ready before? What if he had found some degree of satisfaction outside of the return? What if the city provided what he needed outside what was not him? What if “That’s Not Me” became the basis of who he was?
This is only a riff on one song. “I Know There’s an Answer”—or its Bowiesque outtake “Hang Onto Your Ego”—surely would have more to say regarding this issue of ambition in relation to home.
The loneliness of these songs, like a Culture of Narcissism or Souls Without Longing, haven’t been surpassed despite emo, neo-Pink Floyd, psychedelic, XTC, paisley pop.
So emo rightly understood is okay, but it is always a little self-indulgent.


September 25th, 2011 | 8:23 am
Pet Sounds has beautiful melodies and is very soft emo. That is: not at all rebellious and the longings are for a girl friend, family, friends in general–even “in my room” is a combination of inner solitude and presupposing the security of a middle-class family. PS is not for Carl because it’s not at all political. “God only knows…” is heartfelt and simple and close to universal for those with a personal antidote for the loneliness we all share. It may be a sign of my lack of manliness that I much prefer Brian Wilson to Bowie.
September 25th, 2011 | 8:36 am
I hate to disagree, however, Brian Wilson represents the stereotypical modern; confused, derailed, and eventually mad. His oelivre is such that he’d have served his fellow man better as a janitor. But, this is just a difference of opinion, not a question of salvation.
September 25th, 2011 | 11:46 am
No, Peter. I love Pet Sounds. To fit the cliche, to agree heartily with the critic-masses, it is probably my favorite rock-pop album, in competition perhaps only with the Zombies’ Odessey and Oracle and a few others, such as the Modern Lovers. I try to keep my wife from playing it too much, so as not become deadened to its magic. But it doesn’t seem to matter how many times I hear it.
And I think it seeks to convey a healthier sort of sentimentality (less solitude-oriented) than John is suggesting, despite its main creator’s own descent into solitude-aggravated madness.
If in the unlikely event I have time later this week, I will maybe have a post considering John’s probing of “That’s Not Me.” I have never delved big-time into the lyrics of the album, but I sure hope John is wrong about that song’s surface(?) anti-individualism message actually containing contradicting notes.
And I really detest Sgt. Pepper’s. I have some sort of irrational reaction there to a general aroma of smugness. Pet Sounds is the real Love Album of the 60s, precisely because it is more vulnerable, sentimental, Christian, American, and couple-oriented than the musical evocations of “Love” others were beginning to push.
September 25th, 2011 | 1:49 pm
The beach boys only get lonelier after “Pet Sounds.” You can witness Brian Wilson’s descent from modern to POMO in the fragments we have of the “SMiLE” album. The semi-completed song “Heroes and Villains” is one of the most disturbing and nihilistic tracks I’ve ever heard. It has that effect on me because Beach Boys were the embodiment of the American (and Californian) dream, and you can almost hear the upward mobility sputter out and come crashing down. “SMiLE” purportedly was going to be a celebration of American culture, but many of the songs have the opposite effect in my opinion
September 25th, 2011 | 3:25 pm
Pet Sounds, from my listening experience, is the most perfect musical expression of longing outside of hymns and other church music. It’s longing for home, love, and youth. The only real outlier here is Here Today, which brings a dose of disillusionment about hoping in romance. Brian somehow made an album that is innocent without being naive.
And, John and Carl, I’m glad to hear that y’all dislike Sgt Pepper’s. At its core, it really can’t compare with Pet Sounds or even lesser Beach Boys albums like Sunflower and Today. That album’s ability to spout such nonsense with smug pretentiousness is unequaled.
September 26th, 2011 | 10:22 am
Like all rock criticism, which generally is written by people who are English Majors, not Music Majors, this review and its responses focuses largely on the lyrics and not the music.
This is why I quit reading Rolling Stone and its ilk 25 years ago.
October 4th, 2011 | 4:07 pm
[...] John Presnall looked at “That’s Not Me” from the album a couple weeks back, he made two particularly interesting [...]
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact