<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Right (I Think), For The Wrong Reasons (Probably)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/05/02/right-i-think-for-the-wrong-reasons-probably/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/05/02/right-i-think-for-the-wrong-reasons-probably/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:13:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Bridges</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/05/02/right-i-think-for-the-wrong-reasons-probably/comment-page-1/#comment-19129</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bridges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 05:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=6767#comment-19129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frum is on point. Latinos is a very ambiguous term. Most Latinos could not relate to Rubio&#039;s story, no matter how you try to spin it. It&#039;s analogous to how blacks regard Herman Cain. 

All indicators show that Jindal will be in Louisiana for 4 more years, so any talk about him ending up on a 2012 ticket is moot. But since this is being discussed anyway, I will add my 2 cents. He might add some Asian vote, but the fact of the matter is that the Asian demographic is small in respect to the Latino/black populations, and Asians lean Democrat about as much as Latino group does, but less than black. Mind you, the Asian demographic is relatively well off, so Frum&#039;s analysis that Latinos don&#039;t vote Republican simply because conservative policy doesn&#039;t embrace the poor is misguided. Look at how Asians vote Democrat despite having success anyway(the last time Republicans won an Asian majority was in 1996). I&#039;m going to be really blunt here. Republicans have trouble getting non-white votes. That&#039;s the only conclusion I can come up with, based on numbers and logic. The media could be to blame here, and the party simply putting a minority on the ticket will be another failed attempt, kinda like Palin was in &#039;08. 

However Pete, one thing you touched upon was that Jindal has a solid resume. (On a side note, it is a great distraction in politics, when personal abilities are taking backseat to ethnicity- when it should be the other way around). This means that even if he doesn&#039;t miraculously turn over Asian voters, he&#039;d still be a good VP pick regardless. This is also the problem- it&#039;s the cursed VP spot. Jindal, like Christie, has an insatiable appetite for power. If he ends up on the ticket, it would jeopardize his shot at actually running for presidency in &#039;16 or &#039;20, clearly not a gamble he&#039;s willing to take. This goes back to the statement I prefaced my comment with. He will cling on to Louisiana, simply for the sake of not having to say &quot;I will not take a VP spot under any circumstance&quot;. I agree that military experience could have made Jindal a more attractive candidate- but keep in mind he&#039;s only 40, and he&#039;s already squeezed in an entire lifetime&#039;s worth of leadership experience.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frum is on point. Latinos is a very ambiguous term. Most Latinos could not relate to Rubio&#8217;s story, no matter how you try to spin it. It&#8217;s analogous to how blacks regard Herman Cain. </p>
<p>All indicators show that Jindal will be in Louisiana for 4 more years, so any talk about him ending up on a 2012 ticket is moot. But since this is being discussed anyway, I will add my 2 cents. He might add some Asian vote, but the fact of the matter is that the Asian demographic is small in respect to the Latino/black populations, and Asians lean Democrat about as much as Latino group does, but less than black. Mind you, the Asian demographic is relatively well off, so Frum&#8217;s analysis that Latinos don&#8217;t vote Republican simply because conservative policy doesn&#8217;t embrace the poor is misguided. Look at how Asians vote Democrat despite having success anyway(the last time Republicans won an Asian majority was in 1996). I&#8217;m going to be really blunt here. Republicans have trouble getting non-white votes. That&#8217;s the only conclusion I can come up with, based on numbers and logic. The media could be to blame here, and the party simply putting a minority on the ticket will be another failed attempt, kinda like Palin was in &#8217;08. </p>
<p>However Pete, one thing you touched upon was that Jindal has a solid resume. (On a side note, it is a great distraction in politics, when personal abilities are taking backseat to ethnicity- when it should be the other way around). This means that even if he doesn&#8217;t miraculously turn over Asian voters, he&#8217;d still be a good VP pick regardless. This is also the problem- it&#8217;s the cursed VP spot. Jindal, like Christie, has an insatiable appetite for power. If he ends up on the ticket, it would jeopardize his shot at actually running for presidency in &#8217;16 or &#8217;20, clearly not a gamble he&#8217;s willing to take. This goes back to the statement I prefaced my comment with. He will cling on to Louisiana, simply for the sake of not having to say &#8220;I will not take a VP spot under any circumstance&#8221;. I agree that military experience could have made Jindal a more attractive candidate- but keep in mind he&#8217;s only 40, and he&#8217;s already squeezed in an entire lifetime&#8217;s worth of leadership experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Spiliakos</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/05/02/right-i-think-for-the-wrong-reasons-probably/comment-page-1/#comment-19009</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Spiliakos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 01:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=6767#comment-19009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Henry, Gates seems like a quite prudent and competent guy.  I don&#039;t know where he stands on any domestic policy issues.  I guess I could say the same thing about Romney (heh, heh.  You are right that it worked out with Eisenhower, but I&#039;d like to know what Gates thinks about what kinds of candidates should be nominated to the Supreme Court, his opinions on health care policy, abortion, etc.  He would no doubt make for a wise choice for Secretary of State.

I wish Jindal had more private sector and/or military experience.  That is one reason why I&#039;m leaning at least equally in the direction of say Bob McDonnell.  But Jindal has more (and better) experience as a political executive than Romney and more experience as a federal legislator than Rubio and quite extensive experience in public administration before he ever ran for office.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henry, Gates seems like a quite prudent and competent guy.  I don&#8217;t know where he stands on any domestic policy issues.  I guess I could say the same thing about Romney (heh, heh.  You are right that it worked out with Eisenhower, but I&#8217;d like to know what Gates thinks about what kinds of candidates should be nominated to the Supreme Court, his opinions on health care policy, abortion, etc.  He would no doubt make for a wise choice for Secretary of State.</p>
<p>I wish Jindal had more private sector and/or military experience.  That is one reason why I&#8217;m leaning at least equally in the direction of say Bob McDonnell.  But Jindal has more (and better) experience as a political executive than Romney and more experience as a federal legislator than Rubio and quite extensive experience in public administration before he ever ran for office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Clemens</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/05/02/right-i-think-for-the-wrong-reasons-probably/comment-page-1/#comment-19005</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Clemens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 19:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=6767#comment-19005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jindal is an admirable man, but not yet qualified for the Presidency.  One whose qualities are neon-like on a dark night is Robert Gates.  Secretary of Defense, head of the CIA, President of two respected universities.  A Republican Party establishment that was not cowed by the yahoos would be beating a path to his door to solicit his acceptance of the Vice-Presidential nomination.  Hell, a Republican Party establishment (and surely such a thing exists in some form or another) would have solicited his acceptance of the Presidential nomination!  Sixty years ago they did it for Eisenhower, and one can argue that we have not had a better President since.  But such an effort would require the acknowledgement that expertise in foreign affairs is a) not easily or quickly obtained, and is b) of overriding importance to our national interests.  And as many tell me: nobody cares about foreign policy; it&#039;s the economy, stupid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jindal is an admirable man, but not yet qualified for the Presidency.  One whose qualities are neon-like on a dark night is Robert Gates.  Secretary of Defense, head of the CIA, President of two respected universities.  A Republican Party establishment that was not cowed by the yahoos would be beating a path to his door to solicit his acceptance of the Vice-Presidential nomination.  Hell, a Republican Party establishment (and surely such a thing exists in some form or another) would have solicited his acceptance of the Presidential nomination!  Sixty years ago they did it for Eisenhower, and one can argue that we have not had a better President since.  But such an effort would require the acknowledgement that expertise in foreign affairs is a) not easily or quickly obtained, and is b) of overriding importance to our national interests.  And as many tell me: nobody cares about foreign policy; it&#8217;s the economy, stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Jindal for VP, says&#8230;David Frum &#124; Race 4 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/05/02/right-i-think-for-the-wrong-reasons-probably/comment-page-1/#comment-18978</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Jindal for VP, says&#8230;David Frum &#124; Race 4 2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 13:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=6767#comment-18978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] bedfellows.  First Things contributor Pete Spiliakos echoes Frum, while also questioning his premises. David Frum thinks that Bobby Jindal would be a better vice presidential candidate than Marco [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bedfellows.  First Things contributor Pete Spiliakos echoes Frum, while also questioning his premises. David Frum thinks that Bobby Jindal would be a better vice presidential candidate than Marco [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
