<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gotta Like Mitt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/05/23/gotta-like-mitt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/05/23/gotta-like-mitt/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 17:35:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Deco</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/05/23/gotta-like-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-19350</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Deco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 21:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=6984#comment-19350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is amusing is that you do not hear partisan Democrats making the converse argument.  We&#039;ve not had a president out of the working class in the post-reconstruction period, but we have had presidents (and candidates for that office) whose social backgrounds, while formally bourgeois, were fairly impecunious for their time and place.  Ronald Reagan and Robert Dole stand out in this regard.  Richard Nixon&#039;s family was better off - just.  None of them got any credit for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is amusing is that you do not hear partisan Democrats making the converse argument.  We&#8217;ve not had a president out of the working class in the post-reconstruction period, but we have had presidents (and candidates for that office) whose social backgrounds, while formally bourgeois, were fairly impecunious for their time and place.  Ronald Reagan and Robert Dole stand out in this regard.  Richard Nixon&#8217;s family was better off &#8211; just.  None of them got any credit for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Deco</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/05/23/gotta-like-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-19349</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Deco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 21:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=6984#comment-19349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Smith, the Kennedy clan is liberally studded with men who are warped and John Kennedy Sr. was frankly bizarre.  I do not think the ordinary rhythms of work and leisure were things with which he was familiar.

Franklin Roosevelt had his most industrious wife keeping him apprised of many things outside his daily experience.  Also, the principles of management he favored made for messes but they did have the virtue of forcing information up the chain of command (because someone with authority had to clean up the mess).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Smith, the Kennedy clan is liberally studded with men who are warped and John Kennedy Sr. was frankly bizarre.  I do not think the ordinary rhythms of work and leisure were things with which he was familiar.</p>
<p>Franklin Roosevelt had his most industrious wife keeping him apprised of many things outside his daily experience.  Also, the principles of management he favored made for messes but they did have the virtue of forcing information up the chain of command (because someone with authority had to clean up the mess).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip C. Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/05/23/gotta-like-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-19347</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip C. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 17:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=6984#comment-19347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some individuals and democratic party strategists continue to try and present Mitt Romney as a rich man out of touch with the American people. Have there been earlier presidential candidates or presidents who were rich men, and were they out of touch? Let me mention three:
	*George Washington – definitely out of touch with Americans? Staying at home rather than hanging out with his troops?
	*Franklin Delano Roosevelt – did not relate well to Americans, definitely out of touch? Was not liked by the rank and file?
	*John F. Kennedy – could not relate, thus definitely out of touch? Did not care about minority issues?
The “out of touch” arguments are nonsense. We can expect that those who use them know in their hearts that this is the case. What can we say of those who present arguments they know are not accurate?

Phillip C. Smith, Ph.D.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some individuals and democratic party strategists continue to try and present Mitt Romney as a rich man out of touch with the American people. Have there been earlier presidential candidates or presidents who were rich men, and were they out of touch? Let me mention three:<br />
	*George Washington – definitely out of touch with Americans? Staying at home rather than hanging out with his troops?<br />
	*Franklin Delano Roosevelt – did not relate well to Americans, definitely out of touch? Was not liked by the rank and file?<br />
	*John F. Kennedy – could not relate, thus definitely out of touch? Did not care about minority issues?<br />
The “out of touch” arguments are nonsense. We can expect that those who use them know in their hearts that this is the case. What can we say of those who present arguments they know are not accurate?</p>
<p>Phillip C. Smith, Ph.D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/05/23/gotta-like-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-19344</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=6984#comment-19344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, well studies(1) also show that the candidate for president who people think will make them pay less in taxes always wins, so I think Mitt&#039;s got a pretty good shot in November, no matter his myriad weaknesses.

(1) Brian, in prep.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, well studies(1) also show that the candidate for president who people think will make them pay less in taxes always wins, so I think Mitt&#8217;s got a pretty good shot in November, no matter his myriad weaknesses.</p>
<p>(1) Brian, in prep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Lawler</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/05/23/gotta-like-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-19342</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lawler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 13:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=6984#comment-19342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Art Deco, My students know that any time I say studies show I&#039;m not being entirely serious.

The whole Bain issue bores me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Art Deco, My students know that any time I say studies show I&#8217;m not being entirely serious.</p>
<p>The whole Bain issue bores me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23 May 2012 &#124; MormonVoices</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/05/23/gotta-like-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-19340</link>
		<dc:creator>23 May 2012 &#124; MormonVoices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 13:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=6984#comment-19340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/05/23/gotta-like-mitt/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/05/23/gotta-like-mitt/" rel="nofollow">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/05/23/gotta-like-mitt/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Deco</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/05/23/gotta-like-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-19339</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Deco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 12:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=6984#comment-19339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;that studies show that the more likable candidate almost always win.&quot;

The quotations you make use of from Walter Russell Mead do not say that.  They refer to a specific bloc of five national elections each of which incorporated confounding variables of consequence.  (Economic conditions, land war in the Near East, &amp;c.) 

For your students, just what is the value-added of your critical assessments of their work?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;that studies show that the more likable candidate almost always win.&#8221;</p>
<p>The quotations you make use of from Walter Russell Mead do not say that.  They refer to a specific bloc of five national elections each of which incorporated confounding variables of consequence.  (Economic conditions, land war in the Near East, &amp;c.) </p>
<p>For your students, just what is the value-added of your critical assessments of their work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond Takashi Swenson</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/05/23/gotta-like-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-19335</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond Takashi Swenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 04:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=6984#comment-19335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The people who actually know Romney describe him as a person who is very much interested in individual people.  As an unpaid parttime pastor for his Mormon congregation in Boston, Romney devoted ten or more hours a week in personal meetings with  members suffering from  unemployment, severe or  chronic illness, marital  difficulties, or crises of faith.           He also showed up at their homes to help with repairs and in one case to remove a hornet nest for the homeowner who had  broken his arm trying to remove the nest.  Reporters have the responsibility to let their readers know him, but most journalists in the mainstream media would rather reinforce the stereotype that he is rich and therefore out of touch with real people. 

Yet the Romneys did not have a nanny to raise their five boys.  Ann Romney did that herself, and taught the boys to clean up after themselves.  When they were a young married couple at Brigham Young University,  they lived in a small apartment. When they went on family vacations, they packed their five boys into a station wagon and Mitt drove for hours. They didn&#039;t take a jet. They have five families full of grandchildren, and they attend church with ordinary Mormons wherever they are on Sundays. In Boston, the Mormons they went to church with included Haitian immigrants and Cambodian refugees.  Because of his unpaid leadership, he spent many hours each week focused on the.individual financial and spiritual needs of his Mormon neighbors. Mr Obama has never done anything so unselfish.  The reporters who don&#039;t report this are concealing Romney from the public. 

The Obama effort to tie great wealth to aloofness is ironic, given the large personal income of so many of Obama&#039;s supporters who work in the news and entertainment industries.  Barbara Walters criticized Romney for being wealthy and allegedly out of touch, when she is almost as rich as he is, with income of $14 million per year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The people who actually know Romney describe him as a person who is very much interested in individual people.  As an unpaid parttime pastor for his Mormon congregation in Boston, Romney devoted ten or more hours a week in personal meetings with  members suffering from  unemployment, severe or  chronic illness, marital  difficulties, or crises of faith.           He also showed up at their homes to help with repairs and in one case to remove a hornet nest for the homeowner who had  broken his arm trying to remove the nest.  Reporters have the responsibility to let their readers know him, but most journalists in the mainstream media would rather reinforce the stereotype that he is rich and therefore out of touch with real people. </p>
<p>Yet the Romneys did not have a nanny to raise their five boys.  Ann Romney did that herself, and taught the boys to clean up after themselves.  When they were a young married couple at Brigham Young University,  they lived in a small apartment. When they went on family vacations, they packed their five boys into a station wagon and Mitt drove for hours. They didn&#8217;t take a jet. They have five families full of grandchildren, and they attend church with ordinary Mormons wherever they are on Sundays. In Boston, the Mormons they went to church with included Haitian immigrants and Cambodian refugees.  Because of his unpaid leadership, he spent many hours each week focused on the.individual financial and spiritual needs of his Mormon neighbors. Mr Obama has never done anything so unselfish.  The reporters who don&#8217;t report this are concealing Romney from the public. </p>
<p>The Obama effort to tie great wealth to aloofness is ironic, given the large personal income of so many of Obama&#8217;s supporters who work in the news and entertainment industries.  Barbara Walters criticized Romney for being wealthy and allegedly out of touch, when she is almost as rich as he is, with income of $14 million per year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond Takashi Swenson</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/05/23/gotta-like-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-19334</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond Takashi Swenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 03:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=6984#comment-19334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Democratic mayor of Nrwark, New Jersey, pointed out that Bain Capital and other private equity forms are ensuring the solvency of New Jersey&#039;s public employee pensions.  In other words, they are an example of the private sector supporting the public sector without taxes.

You have to be totally clueless about money if you think Bain Capital bought a steel company, invested $100 million in it, and held it for eight years just for the fun of taking it into bankruptcy, which does not make them, the equity owners, any money.  

The real vulture capitalist is Obama, who froze out General Motors&#039; creditors so he could give the company to the United Auto Workers union.  Would you loan GM money, now or in the future, knowing that your investment might be arbitrarily stolen by the president without compensation to you?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Democratic mayor of Nrwark, New Jersey, pointed out that Bain Capital and other private equity forms are ensuring the solvency of New Jersey&#8217;s public employee pensions.  In other words, they are an example of the private sector supporting the public sector without taxes.</p>
<p>You have to be totally clueless about money if you think Bain Capital bought a steel company, invested $100 million in it, and held it for eight years just for the fun of taking it into bankruptcy, which does not make them, the equity owners, any money.  </p>
<p>The real vulture capitalist is Obama, who froze out General Motors&#8217; creditors so he could give the company to the United Auto Workers union.  Would you loan GM money, now or in the future, knowing that your investment might be arbitrarily stolen by the president without compensation to you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandt Hardin</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/05/23/gotta-like-mitt/comment-page-1/#comment-19330</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandt Hardin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 21:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=6984#comment-19330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mitt Romney’s Magic Mormon Underwear protects him from the evils of the world including socialism, illegal immigrants, homosexuals and taxes on his inherited wealth.  Can these sacred garments also make it rain down enough cash for a victory in this race since well over 90% of public offices are bought in our country by Big Money?  Drop by to discuss these mysterious tighty whities and the role of money in politics at http://dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/2012/05/mitt-romneys-magic-mormon-underwear.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney’s Magic Mormon Underwear protects him from the evils of the world including socialism, illegal immigrants, homosexuals and taxes on his inherited wealth.  Can these sacred garments also make it rain down enough cash for a victory in this race since well over 90% of public offices are bought in our country by Big Money?  Drop by to discuss these mysterious tighty whities and the role of money in politics at <a href="http://dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/2012/05/mitt-romneys-magic-mormon-underwear.html" rel="nofollow">http://dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/2012/05/mitt-romneys-magic-mormon-underwear.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
