<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Spin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/06/28/no-spin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/06/28/no-spin/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:27:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obamacare readings &#124; POTUS NEWS</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/06/28/no-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-20408</link>
		<dc:creator>Obamacare readings &#124; POTUS NEWS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 15:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=7605#comment-20408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] America. Not impossible, but not easy, and I would guess probably beyond Romney’s power&#8230;.Pete Spiliakos, Postmodern [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] America. Not impossible, but not easy, and I would guess probably beyond Romney’s power&#8230;.Pete Spiliakos, Postmodern [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Spiliakos</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/06/28/no-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-20376</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Spiliakos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 22:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=7605#comment-20376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The individual mandate is only a small part of Obamacare.&quot;  Small but important as it makes (or intends to make, or pretends to intend to make) Obamacare&#039;s guaranteed issue and community rating provisions sustainable.  It also raised troubling questions of the extent of federal power.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The individual mandate is only a small part of Obamacare.&#8221;  Small but important as it makes (or intends to make, or pretends to intend to make) Obamacare&#8217;s guaranteed issue and community rating provisions sustainable.  It also raised troubling questions of the extent of federal power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond Takashi Swenson</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/06/28/no-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-20373</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond Takashi Swenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 22:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=7605#comment-20373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The individual mandate is only a small part of Obamacare.  The notion that it is the ONLY partthat matters is a distortion based on the fsact that it was almost the ONLY part that couldbe attacked on constitutional grounds.  There is PLENTY of stuff in the law that is just stupid, even if not unconstitutional. 

Voters were lazily assuming that the court would take care of this infection for them, but now they have to realize that it is going to become a flesh eating bacteria on our economy if we don&#039;t amputate it immediately.  And that surgery has to be done by voters, en masse, kicking out Obama.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The individual mandate is only a small part of Obamacare.  The notion that it is the ONLY partthat matters is a distortion based on the fsact that it was almost the ONLY part that couldbe attacked on constitutional grounds.  There is PLENTY of stuff in the law that is just stupid, even if not unconstitutional. </p>
<p>Voters were lazily assuming that the court would take care of this infection for them, but now they have to realize that it is going to become a flesh eating bacteria on our economy if we don&#8217;t amputate it immediately.  And that surgery has to be done by voters, en masse, kicking out Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Spiliakos</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/06/28/no-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-20311</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Spiliakos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=7605#comment-20311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John, Santorum would have been better on health care than Romney, but Santorum revealed himself as too undisciplined when the pressure was on.  He wouldn&#039;t be mocked for having signed a state-level version of Obamacare.  But if the post-Iowa campaign is any guide, he would be facing biweekly self-created public relations disasters as he put his foot in his mouth or engaged in self-destructive arguments where he comes out the loser even if he wins the point in dispute (which he sometimes won&#039;t.)

I never assumed the Supreme Court would strike down Obamacare (though I did think that this knife in my back would have Anthony Kennedy&#039;s fingerprints.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, Santorum would have been better on health care than Romney, but Santorum revealed himself as too undisciplined when the pressure was on.  He wouldn&#8217;t be mocked for having signed a state-level version of Obamacare.  But if the post-Iowa campaign is any guide, he would be facing biweekly self-created public relations disasters as he put his foot in his mouth or engaged in self-destructive arguments where he comes out the loser even if he wins the point in dispute (which he sometimes won&#8217;t.)</p>
<p>I never assumed the Supreme Court would strike down Obamacare (though I did think that this knife in my back would have Anthony Kennedy&#8217;s fingerprints.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/06/28/no-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-20309</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=7605#comment-20309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pete, a very reasonable analysis.  I will go back to discussions on this blog during the primaries.  I believe I made the case at some point then that healthcare will be an issue and that it could be a winning issue for Republicans, and that Romney however would have a hard time running on it, to say the least, but that there were other candidates, for example Santorum, who could run credibly on it.  And there were national polls at the time that had Santorum running very close with Obama.  High level Republicans however focused on the fact that Santorum didn&#039;t yet have enough &quot;organization&quot; and that he&#039;d made 3-4 major gaffs.  And probably many had poured money and time into Romney&#039;s campaign.  They obviously decided to shut Santorum down after Illinois.  I hope Romney wins in November and I believe he would work to repeal the ACA out of expedience.  But for him to run on health care will be tough.  This spring Romney supporters confidently told me that the SCOTUS would overturn the ACA and that the only issue will be the economy.  Now, if there&#039;s any uptick in the economy ...I think (but hope not) its &quot;game over&quot; for Romney.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete, a very reasonable analysis.  I will go back to discussions on this blog during the primaries.  I believe I made the case at some point then that healthcare will be an issue and that it could be a winning issue for Republicans, and that Romney however would have a hard time running on it, to say the least, but that there were other candidates, for example Santorum, who could run credibly on it.  And there were national polls at the time that had Santorum running very close with Obama.  High level Republicans however focused on the fact that Santorum didn&#8217;t yet have enough &#8220;organization&#8221; and that he&#8217;d made 3-4 major gaffs.  And probably many had poured money and time into Romney&#8217;s campaign.  They obviously decided to shut Santorum down after Illinois.  I hope Romney wins in November and I believe he would work to repeal the ACA out of expedience.  But for him to run on health care will be tough.  This spring Romney supporters confidently told me that the SCOTUS would overturn the ACA and that the only issue will be the economy.  Now, if there&#8217;s any uptick in the economy &#8230;I think (but hope not) its &#8220;game over&#8221; for Romney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Eric Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/06/28/no-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-20308</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Eric Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=7605#comment-20308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Mirengoff at Powerline has a good summary of Robert&#039;s reasonable (yet chicken) decision:  http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2012/06/what-chief-justice-roberts-said-about-the-individual-mandate.php]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Mirengoff at Powerline has a good summary of Robert&#8217;s reasonable (yet chicken) decision:  <a href="http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2012/06/what-chief-justice-roberts-said-about-the-individual-mandate.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2012/06/what-chief-justice-roberts-said-about-the-individual-mandate.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Eric Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/06/28/no-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-20306</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Eric Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=7605#comment-20306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two corrections to the above:

1) While Roberts was part of the narrow-ruling Hein majority, it was actually Alito who wrote the majority.

2)  There is apparently some language in the law that speaks of the penalty as a tax.  Otherwise you would not have had the Tax Notes special report by Willis and Chung, (7/12/2010) arguing that &quot;The act&#039;s penalty is styled as a tax.  Congress arguably did this to finesse commerce clause problems.&quot;  These Tax Notes writers wanted Obamacare overturned--their argument was that assuming the penalty for not purchasing really was a tax, it was still unconstitutional because it was not an apportioned tax (see Article I, sect. 9).  I&#039;ve no opinion on that argument--what matters here is that these close readers of the mandate provisions of the law, say that in some way (regardless of what Obama said) it styled itself a tax.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two corrections to the above:</p>
<p>1) While Roberts was part of the narrow-ruling Hein majority, it was actually Alito who wrote the majority.</p>
<p>2)  There is apparently some language in the law that speaks of the penalty as a tax.  Otherwise you would not have had the Tax Notes special report by Willis and Chung, (7/12/2010) arguing that &#8220;The act&#8217;s penalty is styled as a tax.  Congress arguably did this to finesse commerce clause problems.&#8221;  These Tax Notes writers wanted Obamacare overturned&#8211;their argument was that assuming the penalty for not purchasing really was a tax, it was still unconstitutional because it was not an apportioned tax (see Article I, sect. 9).  I&#8217;ve no opinion on that argument&#8211;what matters here is that these close readers of the mandate provisions of the law, say that in some way (regardless of what Obama said) it styled itself a tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/06/28/no-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-20305</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=7605#comment-20305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My friend Ramsey urged me to jump in here. I have not had the time to read the opinions yet and my thoughts are still perculating. I just wanted to point out that while Roberts voted with the majority in Hein, Alito wrote the opinion. So to make statements about Robert’s jurisprudence from the Hein case might be a bit problematic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friend Ramsey urged me to jump in here. I have not had the time to read the opinions yet and my thoughts are still perculating. I just wanted to point out that while Roberts voted with the majority in Hein, Alito wrote the opinion. So to make statements about Robert’s jurisprudence from the Hein case might be a bit problematic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/06/28/no-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-20302</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=7605#comment-20302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My friend Ramsey urged me to jump in here. I have not had the time to read the opinions yet and my thoughts are still perculating. I just wanted to point out that while Roberts voted with the majority in Hein, Alito wrote the opinion. So to make statements about Robert&#039;s jurisprudence from the Hein case might be a bit problematic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friend Ramsey urged me to jump in here. I have not had the time to read the opinions yet and my thoughts are still perculating. I just wanted to point out that while Roberts voted with the majority in Hein, Alito wrote the opinion. So to make statements about Robert&#8217;s jurisprudence from the Hein case might be a bit problematic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Spiliakos</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/06/28/no-spin/comment-page-1/#comment-20301</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Spiliakos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=7605#comment-20301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Ramsey, that would cut more ice with me today if Roberts hadn&#039;t voted to overturn the Stolen Valor law (and I think I agree with him on that) and to partially overturn the Arizona immigration law.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Ramsey, that would cut more ice with me today if Roberts hadn&#8217;t voted to overturn the Stolen Valor law (and I think I agree with him on that) and to partially overturn the Arizona immigration law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
