SUBSCRIBER LOGIN

Search
First Things

Loading

RSS

Postmodern Conservative
Archive

Categories

Monthly


Blogroll



« Previous  |Home|  Next »         

Monday, July 9, 2012, 10:23 PM

“…repeat conservative language or ideas, even when arguing against them.”

So saith George Lakoff, Professor of Cognitive Science and Linguistics at U.C. Berkeley, the most prominent advocate for the view, that so many hard-core liberals and professional Democrats seem to buy into, that politics is all about “narrative framing” and such. It is an utterly impoverished viewpoint, both intellectually and morally, beginning with its quite literally Manichean view of inherently authoritarian conservatives and inherently egalitarian liberals. That is no exaggeration, as this must-read review from Zombie establishes, a review much more charitable to Lakoff than he deserves, and makes good arguments for why his approach hurts Democrats.  The “ironic” title that Lakoff gives his new book, The Little Blue Book: The Essential Guide to Thinking and Talking Democratic, co-authored by Elisbeth Wheling, displays his basic shamelessness.

What a miserable mental world to live in. At least guys like Lenin really believed in something grand when they played their language games. Wheling and Lakoff advise Democrats to refuse to discuss politics straightforwardly with two-thirds of their fellow citizens, and for what? To preserve policies like Obamacare?

I utterly reject, incidentally, the notion that being realistic about unavoidable role that rhetoric will play in politics, and to a lesser degree in life generally, gets one to such notions.

Anyhow, liberals, prove the man’s debased estimate of human nature and of your own intellectual abilities wrong: learn conservative arguments, and lay them out fulsomely before attacking them.

And a tip to conservative politicians and intellectuals—when confronted by obtuse mis-characterization of your views in an interview or on a panel, maybe that’s when it’s time to turn the tables and ask them about whether they repudiate the views of George Lakoff or not.

3 Comments

    John Lewis
    July 10th, 2012 | 1:39 pm

    In a twisted way this is interesting to me. I don’t think there is sufficent clarity as to how an idea or argument is conservative or liberal in the first place, or how conservatism or liberalism establish ownership of an idea. It would be possible to take Lakoff seriously and simply argue that the problem isn’t in the frameing or expression, but in the structuring of language as the property of a vague brand.

    Kate
    July 11th, 2012 | 10:41 am

    It would also be possible to take Lakoff’s book as in ironic joke about both liberals and conservatives. It probably isn’t, but based on what I am reading in Zombie’s review, we conservatives have some principles of argument in common with liberals. I am particularly thonking about “2. All politics is moral, and morality trumps policy. Talk about moral bases of your policy positions openly and regularly.” Exactly! We do that all the time.

    Iwas recenlty looking at David Mamet’s book about his conversion to conservatism which can be neatly summarized in this sentence: “Most of the countervailing ‘conservative’ arguments he seeks to suppress are rooted in inescapable economic, biological or physical reality that can’t be euphemized out of existence, no matter how hard you try.”

    People can play with rhetoric all they like and eventually their listeners will be mugged by reality and know that rhetoric for what it is.

    At least I hope that is true.

    The Party of Shrug » Postmodern Conservative | A First Things Blog
    August 14th, 2012 | 12:08 am

    [...] and Obama to abide by any sort of honor code? Who denounces the lying-and-incivility-recommending sophist George Lakoff for claiming to be an authority on “Talking Democratic”? Who scolds his university, his [...]


Leave a Comment