<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mending, Not Ending Is Conservative And Post-Partisan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/10/07/mending-not-ending-is-conservative-and-post-partisan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/10/07/mending-not-ending-is-conservative-and-post-partisan/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:21:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Night Lights Shine on Romney &#187; Postmodern Conservative &#124; A First Things Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/10/07/mending-not-ending-is-conservative-and-post-partisan/comment-page-1/#comment-28423</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Night Lights Shine on Romney &#187; Postmodern Conservative &#124; A First Things Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=8990#comment-28423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Tyler Cowen Will Wilkinson Wunderkammer      Amazon.com Widgets                          &#171; Previous&#160;&#160;&#124;Home&#124;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;  Friday Night Lights [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tyler Cowen Will Wilkinson Wunderkammer      Amazon.com Widgets                          &laquo; Previous&nbsp;&nbsp;|Home|&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;  Friday Night Lights [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Spiliakos</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/10/07/mending-not-ending-is-conservative-and-post-partisan/comment-page-1/#comment-28415</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Spiliakos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 03:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=8990#comment-28415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pseudoplotinus, Im not betting against romney but if I HAD to bet, it would be against.  You are right about point 1.  You are probably right about point 2, but over the medium-term, it depends on how public opinion (interacting with events of course) reacts to clashing proposals.  There is little chance of post-partisanship as Romney describes it, but it is a convenient pose for a challanger and I don&#039;t hold that against him]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pseudoplotinus, Im not betting against romney but if I HAD to bet, it would be against.  You are right about point 1.  You are probably right about point 2, but over the medium-term, it depends on how public opinion (interacting with events of course) reacts to clashing proposals.  There is little chance of post-partisanship as Romney describes it, but it is a convenient pose for a challanger and I don&#8217;t hold that against him</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pseudoplotinus</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/10/07/mending-not-ending-is-conservative-and-post-partisan/comment-page-1/#comment-28414</link>
		<dc:creator>Pseudoplotinus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 02:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=8990#comment-28414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this is a worthwhile topic now that the prospect of a President Romney has abruptly entered the realm of the plausible among us pomocons. 

Two observations, the second of which I&#039;ve mentioned in a previous thread. 

1. Ideology really has two aspects, the primary one is that it is an attempt to account for the way things are, and how that should inform policy. The secondary aspect is the more trivial but prominent in today&#039;s political atmosphere, and that is as a banner for one team in the team sport known as partisan politics. Romney&#039;s achievement was to make his arguments in the spirit of the former while resisting the pitfalls of the latter. Good on him!

2. However, I cannot envision how a post-partisan President Romney would succeed when the DC he is walking into is occupied by standard bearers more problem solvers. Lest we forget this was exactly the road a candidate Bush promised and we got a squishy compassionate conservatism and Bush Derangement Syndrome. It seems to me Romney is going to have to be willing to make enemies before he makes friends in the beltway. And I have a hard time envisioning that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a worthwhile topic now that the prospect of a President Romney has abruptly entered the realm of the plausible among us pomocons. </p>
<p>Two observations, the second of which I&#8217;ve mentioned in a previous thread. </p>
<p>1. Ideology really has two aspects, the primary one is that it is an attempt to account for the way things are, and how that should inform policy. The secondary aspect is the more trivial but prominent in today&#8217;s political atmosphere, and that is as a banner for one team in the team sport known as partisan politics. Romney&#8217;s achievement was to make his arguments in the spirit of the former while resisting the pitfalls of the latter. Good on him!</p>
<p>2. However, I cannot envision how a post-partisan President Romney would succeed when the DC he is walking into is occupied by standard bearers more problem solvers. Lest we forget this was exactly the road a candidate Bush promised and we got a squishy compassionate conservatism and Bush Derangement Syndrome. It seems to me Romney is going to have to be willing to make enemies before he makes friends in the beltway. And I have a hard time envisioning that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Cheeks</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/10/07/mending-not-ending-is-conservative-and-post-partisan/comment-page-1/#comment-28413</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Cheeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 01:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=8990#comment-28413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, a &#039;pre&#039; Bush status quo, would be better!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, a &#8216;pre&#8217; Bush status quo, would be better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
