<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Andrew Sullivan Wonders Whether Obama Has Thrown the Election Away</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/10/09/andrew-sullivan-wonders-whether-obama-has-thrown-the-election-away/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/10/09/andrew-sullivan-wonders-whether-obama-has-thrown-the-election-away/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:21:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/10/09/andrew-sullivan-wonders-whether-obama-has-thrown-the-election-away/comment-page-1/#comment-28475</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=9012#comment-28475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan is a bit of a drama queen, and certainly someone who takes copyright and the pagentry of election speech seriously.  Obama&#039;s now cast according to Nate Silver has always been above his election day forcast. (It still is). I have been wondering for a time how Nate Silver would get the Obama numbers from his now cast to dip to his projected election day numbers...and I am not saying that what Nate Silver does is pure science, but it is certainly the objective side of the New York Times. 

Albeit even here, Nate Silver&#039;s odds have always been above Intrade, and they have always been above the faux-bold 2-1 odds. 

Is Andrew Sullivan suggesting that Nate Silver&#039;s methodology is flawed and in this case clearly demonstrating a techno-bureaucratic liberal bias?  

I just want to know who is going to send Beer to Nate Silver and get a subscription to the New York Times.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Sullivan is a bit of a drama queen, and certainly someone who takes copyright and the pagentry of election speech seriously.  Obama&#8217;s now cast according to Nate Silver has always been above his election day forcast. (It still is). I have been wondering for a time how Nate Silver would get the Obama numbers from his now cast to dip to his projected election day numbers&#8230;and I am not saying that what Nate Silver does is pure science, but it is certainly the objective side of the New York Times. </p>
<p>Albeit even here, Nate Silver&#8217;s odds have always been above Intrade, and they have always been above the faux-bold 2-1 odds. </p>
<p>Is Andrew Sullivan suggesting that Nate Silver&#8217;s methodology is flawed and in this case clearly demonstrating a techno-bureaucratic liberal bias?  </p>
<p>I just want to know who is going to send Beer to Nate Silver and get a subscription to the New York Times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2012/10/09/andrew-sullivan-wonders-whether-obama-has-thrown-the-election-away/comment-page-1/#comment-28473</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=9012#comment-28473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t ever link to that man.  He&#039;s a horrible human being who should be shunned by all decent society for his woman-phobic and misogynistic lunacy.

Also, polls at this point should be taken just as seriously...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t ever link to that man.  He&#8217;s a horrible human being who should be shunned by all decent society for his woman-phobic and misogynistic lunacy.</p>
<p>Also, polls at this point should be taken just as seriously&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
