SUBSCRIBER LOGIN

Search
First Things

Loading

RSS

Postmodern Conservative
Archive

Categories

Monthly


Blogroll



« Previous  |Home|  Next »         

Friday, November 9, 2012, 6:58 PM

I guess a lot of you  have seen the video of Karl Rove disputing Fox News’s call of Ohio for Obama. It is interesting how hard the anchors, decision desk, and Michael Barone went at Rove. I also think it shows something of the divided nature of Fox News. A while back I wrote about the difference between two kinds of news outlets:

Culturally Biased News – The people who produce CBN are mostly trying to be fair most of the time. They aren’t trying to help either Team Red or Team Blue. They understand that “both sides” have to be presented within an intellectually honest context. They want their audience to be everybody who is willing to sit through a current events program. The problem is that these news programs are produced by people who are in sympathy with the same team.

Group Therapy – This programming has a “side” that is either Team Red or Team Blue. The commentary is overwhelmingly about why the home team is right and why the other side is wrong, and rarely tries to rebut strongest arguments of the other side. Those with opposing viewpoints are brought on to serve as piñatas. The purpose of these shows isn’t to change minds in the sense of trying to win over members of the other team or the uncommitted. The purpose of these shows is to make the audience feel good for having chosen the smarter and more moral team.

The difference between these kinds of news media is more obvious on the center-left. NBC is liberal-leaning, but they usually try to be fair. MSNBC is a lunatic asylum. The center-right doesn’t have a similar diversity of television outlets. Fox dominates the conservative television market in the production of both right-leaning hard news and ideological group therapy. The Bret Baier show at 6:00 PM is right-leaning news and it is terrific. Hannity is something else. There is some personnel overlap between the two sides, but there are also lines. Bret Baier doesn’t put on a Dick Morris to peddle his books. Bret Baier and Chris Wallace might cover something said by Donald Trump, but they won’t give Trump softball interviews to spread his birtherism. So why did Fox News go harder at Rove than they ever did at a malicious and cynical clown like Trump? They could have just let Rove’s comments slide and let him be proven wrong by the vote count. That’s probably what Hannity would have done. Instead the anchors kept going back at him until he was a bloody pulp. My sense is that Rove took on the hard news side of Fox on their own turf, and they reminded of the rules of real news.

4 Comments

    CJ Wolfe
    November 9th, 2012 | 11:10 pm

    Why don’t they split the hard news and commentary sides of Fox into two separate channels? Conservative versions of NBC and MSNBC in other words

    Pete Spiliakos
    November 10th, 2012 | 10:52 am

    CJ, I’m guessing media ecology. NBC News is a division of a mainly entertainment network. They don’t have to fill an entire primetime news block every day. It is pretty convenient for people who want thirty minutes of news in the course of their busy day. There are of course the Sunday shows and news magazines, special programming. Presumably, FOX could put more hard news programming on the main station (though it would mean changes with affiliates) but it would still just be FOX. Starting up an entirely right-leaning “hard” cable news station would likely be expensive and struggle to find an audience at first and FOX has a successful business model as it is.

    Going Forward » Postmodern Conservative | A First Things Blog
    November 10th, 2012 | 3:11 pm

    [...] conservative magazines one must make choices as no one with a job could read them all.  Then, as Pete notes, Fox News is full of it’s own kind of hooey.  I can’t stand to watch it.  Can you?  It [...]

    Mike Schilling
    November 17th, 2012 | 3:17 am

    Rove had a big financial interest in a Romney victory. and as such had no business acting as chief election analyst. Good for the real news folks making that clear.


Leave a Comment