<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Quick thought On The Founders And Contemporary Issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2013/01/23/a-quick-thought-on-the-founders-and-contemporary-issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2013/01/23/a-quick-thought-on-the-founders-and-contemporary-issues/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:23:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Quick thought On The Founders And Contemporary Issues &#124; CATHOLIC FEAST</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2013/01/23/a-quick-thought-on-the-founders-and-contemporary-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-32881</link>
		<dc:creator>A Quick thought On The Founders And Contemporary Issues &#124; CATHOLIC FEAST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 06:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=10413#comment-32881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] If Republicans were truly serious about extending the natural rights thinking of the Founders and explaining it to the public, wouldn&#8217;t they start with late-term abortion on demand?  That is Source: Postmodern Conservative&#160;&#160; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If Republicans were truly serious about extending the natural rights thinking of the Founders and explaining it to the public, wouldn&#8217;t they start with late-term abortion on demand?  That is Source: Postmodern Conservative&nbsp;&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken masugi</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2013/01/23/a-quick-thought-on-the-founders-and-contemporary-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-32878</link>
		<dc:creator>ken masugi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 04:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=10413#comment-32878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or almost as easy, sex-selection abortions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or almost as easy, sex-selection abortions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Spiliakos</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2013/01/23/a-quick-thought-on-the-founders-and-contemporary-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-32873</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Spiliakos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 01:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=10413#comment-32873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think that any kind of imperative from the Declaration demands the banning of contraception as distinct from banning the destruction of what is visibly a human being.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that any kind of imperative from the Declaration demands the banning of contraception as distinct from banning the destruction of what is visibly a human being.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2013/01/23/a-quick-thought-on-the-founders-and-contemporary-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-32872</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=10413#comment-32872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;If Republicans were truly serious about extending the natural rights thinking of the Founders and explaining it to the public, wouldn’t they start with late-term abortion on demand?&quot;

Yes, exactly.  They would start with late-term abortion on demand.

And they would keep going from there, and not stop until they overturned Griswold v. Connecticut.

Artificial contraception is a sin against God&#039;s will and the natural order.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If Republicans were truly serious about extending the natural rights thinking of the Founders and explaining it to the public, wouldn’t they start with late-term abortion on demand?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, exactly.  They would start with late-term abortion on demand.</p>
<p>And they would keep going from there, and not stop until they overturned Griswold v. Connecticut.</p>
<p>Artificial contraception is a sin against God&#8217;s will and the natural order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Lawler</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2013/01/23/a-quick-thought-on-the-founders-and-contemporary-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-32871</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lawler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=10413#comment-32871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That, of course, is an excellent point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That, of course, is an excellent point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
