<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Gay Marriage&#8221; and the End of Conservative Lockeanism (Part 2 of 3)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2013/01/30/gay-marriage-and-the-end-of-conservative-lockeanism-part-2-of-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2013/01/30/gay-marriage-and-the-end-of-conservative-lockeanism-part-2-of-3/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 23:22:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: “Gay Marriage” and the End of Conservative Lockeanism (Part 2 of 3) &#8211; First Things (blog)&#160;&#124;&#160;Conservatives for America</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2013/01/30/gay-marriage-and-the-end-of-conservative-lockeanism-part-2-of-3/comment-page-1/#comment-33102</link>
		<dc:creator>“Gay Marriage” and the End of Conservative Lockeanism (Part 2 of 3) &#8211; First Things (blog)&#160;&#124;&#160;Conservatives for America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 05:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=10530#comment-33102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] “Gay Marriage” and the End of Conservative Lockeanism (Part 2 of 3)First Things (blog)(This is a continuation of a post from yesterday; it will make most sense in that context.) When Maggie Gallagher answers John Corvino&#039;s individualist argument for “gay marriage” (in Debating Same-Sex Marriage), she relies mainly on a good and &#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “Gay Marriage” and the End of Conservative Lockeanism (Part 2 of 3)First Things (blog)(This is a continuation of a post from yesterday; it will make most sense in that context.) When Maggie Gallagher answers John Corvino&#039;s individualist argument for “gay marriage” (in Debating Same-Sex Marriage), she relies mainly on a good and &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Gay Marriage&#8221; and the End of Conservative Lockeanism (Part 2 of 3) &#124; CATHOLIC FEAST</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2013/01/30/gay-marriage-and-the-end-of-conservative-lockeanism-part-2-of-3/comment-page-1/#comment-33100</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Gay Marriage&#8221; and the End of Conservative Lockeanism (Part 2 of 3) &#124; CATHOLIC FEAST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 04:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=10530#comment-33100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (This is a continuation of a post from yesterday; it will make most sense in that context.) When Maggie Gallagher answers John Corvino’s individualist argument for “gay marriage” (in Debating Same-Sex Marriage), she relies mainly on a good and important argument for man-woman marriage based upon universal human and social necessities: Source: Postmodern Conservative&#160;&#160; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (This is a continuation of a post from yesterday; it will make most sense in that context.) When Maggie Gallagher answers John Corvino’s individualist argument for “gay marriage” (in Debating Same-Sex Marriage), she relies mainly on a good and important argument for man-woman marriage based upon universal human and social necessities: Source: Postmodern Conservative&nbsp;&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
