SUBSCRIBER LOGIN

Search
First Things

Loading

RSS

Postmodern Conservative
Archive

Categories

Monthly


Blogroll



« Previous  |Home|  Next »         

Wednesday, February 13, 2013, 6:42 AM

I only have a moment. But this is from the article translated by our Ralph in the new issue of FIRST THINGS:

I am one of those who believe that a human being is not an autonomous construction with no given structure, order, status, or role. I believe that the affirmation of freedom does not imply the negation of limits and that the affirmation of equality does not imply the leveling of differences. I believe that the powers of technology and of the imagination do not require that we forget that being is a gift, that life is prior to all of us, and that it has its own laws.

I long for a society in which modernity would have its full place but without implying the denial of elementary principles of human and familial ecology; for a society in which the diversity of ways of being, of living, and of desiring is accepted as fortunate, without allowing this diversity to be diluted in the reduction to the lowest common denominator, which effaces all differentiation; for a society in which, despite the technological deployment of virtual realities and the free play of critical intelligence, the simplest words—father, mother, spouse, parents—retain their meaning, at once symbolic and embodied; for a society in which children are welcomed and find their place, their whole place, without becoming objects that must be possessed at all costs, or pawns in a power struggle.

That, in fact, is the best statement in a long time of POSTMODERN REALISM. I will find the time to unpack that simple eloquence of each sentence later. But I too long for a world “in which modernity would have its full place” and in “the technological deployment of virtual realities” is possible without denying the truth of the “elementary principles” and “the simplest words” that correspond to who we really are.

And of course I long for a world full of truthful human diversity and free from reductionist dilution that “effaces all [real] differentiation.” That’s what Tocqueville also meant by “the affirmation of equality” without “the leveling of differences.” It’s true that all men and women are created equal and ARE mothers and fathers and parents and children and made to live in a world in which they are both free and welcome and so have a personal place. Being so understood really is a gift, and not worthless material we freely–if futilely–struggle to overcome.

6 Comments

    paul seaton
    February 13th, 2013 | 8:49 am

    Speaking of Jewish-Catholic relations, Charles Peguy, who loved and admired Bernard Lazare, would love this Rabbi and this statement (although he’d probably be more suspicious of technology than the good Rabbi). Good job, Ralph!

    Peter Lawler
    February 13th, 2013 | 9:07 am

    To show why we’re about fun and not the high pay grade of wit here: Every time I read the name Peguy, I want to say I actually prefer the work of his wife/daughter or whatever Miss Peguy. (Pop cultural reference)

    paul seaton
    February 13th, 2013 | 9:46 am

    “I can sing both high and low.” Shakespeare (talking about PoMo capaciousness)

    djf
    February 13th, 2013 | 5:01 pm

    Based on my familiarility with the famously “tolerant” non-Orthodox branches of American Judaism, I expect them soon to reinstitute the procedure of “cherem” (ex-communication) and apply to the good Rabbi Bernheim. I guess they would say that excommunicating him constitutes tolerance “rightly understood.”

    Robert Cheeks
    February 13th, 2013 | 7:12 pm

    ” But I too long for a world “in which modernity would have its full place” and in “the technological deployment of virtual realities” is possible without denying the truth of the “elementary principles” and “the simplest words” that correspond to who we really are. ”

    This is really good stuff.
    There is, however, a great deal to comment on and I look forward to any expansion of these comments. My first question is: Can man exist as man within modernity and its inclination to distort and deform reality, truth, and order (see Pres. Obama’s SOTU speech)?

    I’m with Dr. V on this, that political ideologies that “hypostatize society or history as an absolute, eclipsing personal existence and its meaning..” are false, dystopian, and downright dangerous. So the question is, how does one live in communion with the Divine while participating in a social order that has chosen to obliterate the Divine and its symbols, destroy children in the womb (the image of the Divine), and perhaps, in the not to distant future, practice state sponsored euthanasia?

    Steve Brizel
    February 18th, 2013 | 9:22 pm

    R Bernheim’s powerful article should be read by all , but especially by the MO rabbis who signed onto the “Statement of Principles.”


Leave a Comment