Most people are unaware of how utterly unhinged some members of the animal rights movement are becoming. That is why I occasionally provide a peek behind the curtain. Today, over at my other blog RPDB (for short), I cover a thinly veiled murderous screed on one of the animal rights Web sites. Here’s a disturbing sample:
If the corporatists and their faithful flock can shoot, trap, slash, cage, enslave, cut, gut, slit, slaughter, butcher, burn, shock, inject, beat, stomp, rape, wear, eat, and brutally murder voiceless sentient beings, how can we anti-speciesists, in good conscience, allow them to operate unchallenged and with impunity?…We needn’t worry about maintaining the moral high ground. Dante wrote an unpublished addendum to the Inferno that includes a Tenth Circle–just for our opposition.
In the corporatist state’s legal system, which principally serves to protect profit and property, an activist who killed a factory “farmer,” a vivisector or a hunter would be punished as a murderer. Yet in the court of nature’s higher laws, those who didn’t engage in some form of activism (be it direct or indirect, violent or non-violent) to defend nonhuman animals would be tried as accomplices to murder. Apathy is complicity. With whom do you want to ally? Thanatos or Gaia?
Understand this: These people mean what they say. They are anti human and appear to be coming closer to lethally lashing out. The only people who can stop the pot from boiling over are other animal rights believers. But most are quiet about the growing criminality as church mice.
If you want to read more, head on over to RPDB by hitting this link.
July 9th, 2009 | 8:35 pm
I’m quiet as a church mouse? First time anyone ever said that! I understand SHS’s concern but closer reading says it’s saying something quite different. They’re not on the side of Thanotos, either.
July 10th, 2009 | 12:19 am
Correct me if I am wrong Ianthe, but you seem to have, in the past, defended criminality in the name of animal rights. PETA refuses to condemn, etc. That is what I meant.
July 10th, 2009 | 1:02 pm
I’d be careful, if I were them (these animal rights extremists). Not to be too glib, but speaking for my fellow hunters, we’re the ones with the guns.
And we don’t take threats to our health and well being lightly. Plus, any violence done to those who are following the law in hunting, fishing, trapping, etc., will turn a public already not inclined to adhere to a radical animal rights agenda even more against these aggressors.
July 10th, 2009 | 1:05 pm
“Yet in the court of nature’s higher laws, those who didn’t engage in some form of activism (be it direct or indirect, violent or non-violent) to defend nonhuman animals would be tried as accomplices to murder.”
I don’t understand this. What law in nature says one animal must care about another (even one with a conscience)?
I’m also curious if vegans who own carnivorous pets are also accomplices to murder. Since they help keep factory farms in business by purchasing pet food, and help cause multiple animals to “suffer” so that they can have the joy of owning a pet.
July 10th, 2009 | 2:55 pm
Only humans could come up with this — good luck telling the lion it’s wrong to eat the gazelle.
July 11th, 2009 | 9:15 am
As you know Wesley, I have been involved debating these ARA people for years. Strange thing that I have noticed about them. Their collective silence when their own life needed resources are proven to be even more impacting then the hunter or capitalist meat machinery’s food provisions. Billions of sentient being die due to the collateral damage of insecticide & pesticide industries that are guilty of spending 40 billion dollars a year in knocking off those sentient beings. Not one ARA is seeking Welfare laws to protect those animals because in so doing, they would be effecting their own diets. I also notice they support the killing of rats through blood thinning coumarin type death to keep
July 11th, 2009 | 9:35 am
As you know Wesley, I have been involved debating these ARA people for years. Strange thing that I have noticed about them. Their collective silence when their own life needed resources are proven to be even more impacting then the hunter or capitalist meat machinery’s food provisions. Billions of sentient being die due to the collateral damage of insecticide & pesticide industries that are guilty of spending 40 billion dollars a year in knocking off those sentient beings. Not one ARA is seeking Welfare laws to protect those animals because in so doing, they would be effecting their own diets. I also notice they support the killing of rats through blood thinning coumarin type death to keep rat crap & pigeon poop out of their food but not the death of rats to keep major human health seeking Bio labs operational. When these type of hypocrisies are exposed they get all bent out of shape and vindictive to the person pointing out their transgressions but they are not stupid enough to demand the end of the capitalist crop production methodology such as this animal pulverizing machinery.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Axj8iVND8JI&feature=related
They also get bent out of shape when it is shown to them that the only humane kill in the natural world is at human hands. Those same self proclaimed compassionate people hate humans that kill excess animals in nature thus heading off the long term suffering associated with natures other culling methods such as disease , starvation, territorial infighting & winter kills.
July 11th, 2009 | 11:00 am
EDITED: Omnivore stupidity is funny (pathetic).
We live in “unnatural” world of high-tech and biotechnology, and yet still have – fishers and hunters and inhumane killers as “factory farmers”. Look people, i dont have nothing against meat-eaters (really), i even advocate more meat consumption for you – this way you gonna die faster. People rarely live to 100 years, so… yeah. Another thing – why meat-eaters now play the victims? Its something fishy: like men-rights movement, holocaust revisionists, creationists, conspiracy theorists and survivalist nuts as Alex Jones… really fishy…
according your idiotic logic…) to be anti “radical enviromentalism” (whatever that means, the right therm here is – ecologists) is to beat animals, to eat animals, to hurt animals… kinda retarded, dont you think? but what else i can expect by machos like you?
…
high tech things like – guns, are too unnatural for your carnivore “spirits” (freaks)…
buh bye!
July 11th, 2009 | 11:05 am
NOTE TO PETA GIRL: We don’t permit profanity and name calling here. You have been edited omitting those sections. Intelligent people can argue without resorting to such vulgarity.
To…Rawr”: i as a pet-owner of wonderfull big dog…can guarantee you that my dog eat perfect biotech food, without any real meat, but still taste great for him (i assume that: because the food have the aroma and taste of boar)… so you dont make any sense – how exactlu i support factory farms? typical meat eater. go read David Icke …favourite kind of books of the meat-eater mentally unbalansed world
July 11th, 2009 | 9:23 pm
What is the name of this biotech food (just curious)? Most vegans I have talked to feed their dogs, cats, ferrets, fish, etc. food containing meat/animal products.
Obviously, since you do not feed your dog meat, the question did not apply to you; no need to get nasty about it.
And what is wrong with men having rights? :(
July 12th, 2009 | 4:47 am
Why would I speak out against it? I’m all for violence against humans.
July 12th, 2009 | 5:47 am
“And what is wrong with men having rights? :(”
sorry, i didnt mean to say this. its other thing: like for example justifying males (very few percentage of males are so nasty) which are clearly rapists to make themself look like innocent angels destroyed by “feminist lawyers” (are they for real?)… so yeah. i understand that even in some cases “rape” can be legal (i know that with this statement im gonna get lot a trouble), for example: girl which knowingly accept sexual act, and after her “humiliation” (its a psychiatric disease in some females) she claim to be raped…
but i talked about veganism and stupidity of meat-eaters. I live in eastern europe, so here pet foods have different names than in USA or UK. another thing: is this site about bioethics or biotechnology? because i study biotechnology and such bizzare claims that vegans and vegetarians are against biotech companies are ludicrous. many of the food products which gonna be part of our future gonna be completelly vegan: synthetic meat is only one of them. i am pro-using of animals in medicine, but savage meat-eaters need to understand that this cant continue forever, and soon technology and medicine can progress without any animals or animal products… sorry to burst your omnivore bubble. what do you expect? forever to have hunters and fishers? only in third world countries buddy
July 12th, 2009 | 11:40 am
PETA Girl: If you believe in using animals in research, you really don’t believe in animal rights. Animal rights ideology claims humans have no right to make any instrumental use of animals.
Jimmy: My point is that the animal rights movement’s claim to being peaceable is made dubious by its general lack of condemnation of violence and criminality in the cause. Assuming you are part of that movement, that illustrates the point. But you should remember, violence is a two-way street once unleashed.
July 12th, 2009 | 12:38 pm
Hello mr. Smith.
with all my respect i believe generalising people (from vegans/animal right activists to secular humanists) is very low thing, and sign for biased person. here my simple question to you: do you believe that humans still gonna need from animal products in our future (30-70 years)? i think is highly unlikely for human species to rely on animals as some tribal shamanic people. but for now there is no aleternative in medicine, so i dont understand your “dislike” (i hope that this is not hatred) toward animal right activists and organizations as PETA… they just show some obvious things: usage of animal products is sign that we still live in modern “barbaric” civilization, and with no doubt this some day gonna change, dont you think?
i as most intelligent people do think that human species are (we) some kind of cancer. read articles of some academics in your country which writed about “massive human depopulation”. what do you want – humans to destroy our own planet simply because their (our) overpopulation, which can be avoided with simple things as – massive abortions and assisted suicides
human pain/abortion/assisted suicide i am pro these things. animals are not our possesion
i am PRO meat eating people – Obese disgusting ugly people are good for one thing – humiliation in school (when they are in school), being terrorized in their late teen lifes… some sort of toilets… and these meat eaters are good walkingadvertisings for veganism… meat eater females have the bodies of brutes and male meat eaters are impotent and bald, unlike the real carnivores ;P
July 12th, 2009 | 1:22 pm
PETA girl: Name calling doesn’t get you published. You have posted four, maybe five comments. All but one or two had obscenities and/or ad hominem attacks. We have a classier act here than that. It’s not that hard, really. Once more and you are permanently banned.
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact