“The scientists” continually assure us that biotech will be conducted ethically and with full control. It isn’t now, in my view, but it may soon get worse. Under new rules about to go into effect in the UK, scientists will be able to create cloned human/animal hybrid cloned embryos with tissue already taken from patients, and without their consent. From the story:
Tens of thousands of samples of human tissue will be offered for use in controversial human/animal hybrid embryo research without the consent of the patients who donated them. New rules coming into force next month will give scientists working on stem cell research access to samples of blood and tissue collected by NHS hospitals during biopsies and treatments, as well as to giant “tissue banks” which built up stores of material before the legislation was introduced.
Ethics experts, patients’ groups and churches described the change as “absolutely frightening” and liable to destroy trust among thousands who donate, whatever their views on the use of hybrid embryos for stem cell research.
While scientists will have to try to gain explicit consent before using cells from such stores, if the samples were collected before 1st October and the donor cannot be tracked down, the experiments will be allowed to go ahead regardless.
We have entered an “anything goes” era, in which there are no permanent boundaries, and where science is becoming an end, not just a means. And it is only going to move in ever more radical directions as we move toward extending experimental embryos beyond fourteen days and into fetal farming, genetic engineering, even reproductive cloning. My question is whether there is any area of experimentation in this area that the scientists will agree to permanently and forever ban? My answer is: Nope.




September 15th, 2009 | 1:40 pm
It is a disgrace. And in an inexcusable abuse of power this was slipped into the new legislation on embryology last year after the only free votes, in Committee with just 17 MPs present, without any further debate permitted in the Commons on the matter and with Labour MPs on a three line whip (forced to vote for it).
I sat in the visitors’ gallery watching the last “debate” (which because guillotined never got to this issue) and chatting with some tourists from over your side of the ‘pond’ during the votes. They were by no means “pro-life” but they were appalled at what was going on – and they didn’t know the half of it.
This aspect of the Bill received virtually no publicity either. But then the reporting on this odious Bill was effectively stage-managed throughout.
Don’t let it happen there.
Thank you for all you do.
September 17th, 2009 | 4:36 pm
My question is whether there is any area of experimentation in this area that the scientists will agree to permanently and forever ban? My answer is: Nope.
Well, you don’t even agree to permanently ban anything yourself, so how the heck are the scientists going to? You need to stop being so passive and start proposing some laws for the scientists to follow.
September 25th, 2009 | 12:17 am
[...] to use it for. Let’s face it, human embryos have become a hot commodity and, as Wesley Smith put it recently: We have entered an “anything goes” era, in which there are no permanent boundaries, and where [...]
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact