SUBSCRIBER LOGIN






Search First Things

Advanced Search

RSS

Secondhand Smoke
Archives

Categories

Monthly


« Previous  |Home|  Next »         

Sunday, September 27, 2009, 12:10 PM
Wesley J. Smith

Rita Marker, head of the International Task Force on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide has a new article out about assisted suicide in Washington and how it subtly (and not so subtly) undermines the equal worth of all human lives.  She describes a program held at a hospital in which a social worker taught suicide crisis negotiators how to prevent suicide by cancer patients, but then…well, I’ll let Rita tell the story. From her article:

As part of that recent training session, Amber Ford, a social worker from the hospital’s oncology department, presented a comprehensive two-hour discussion about the suicide risk among cancer patients.  According to one of the attendees, her presentation was sensitive and informative.  But, at the end, a jarring note was introduced.  Prefacing her comments by explaining that she was aware of I-1000′s controversial nature, Ford explained that assisted suicide, like hospice care, was among the alternatives available to cancer patients.  And, in keeping with providing all options now available in the state, she distributed a brochure from Compassion & Choices (C & C), the assisted-suicide advocacy group.

The brochure explains:  “C & C created the coalition that passed I-1000 into law and now stewards, protects and upholds Washington’s Death with Dignity Act.  There is never a fee for any service provided by C & C, and confidentiality is strictly protected.”  A toll-free number is provided to make access to assisted suicide only a phone call away.  The brochure notes that a C & C volunteer can help patients “locate physicians who support a patient’s choice to use the law” – in other words, to find a doctor willing to prescribe a deadly overdose of drugs.

The irony was not lost on one experienced negotiator in attendance: “I find it interesting that, as crisis negotiators, we are trying to talk people out of killing themselves.  But by the end of the afternoon, we had a social worker from the oncology department of the hospital talking about being able to assist people in killing themselves.”

So a social worker teaches suicide prevention and advertises suicide promotion in the same class. Talk about a mixed message!

Compassion and Choice is a mobile suicide clinic sanctioned by the state with a mutli million dollar budget funded by the George Soros Crowd (which should tell you everything you need to know about the group). Its advocacy is eroding the mental health professions’ commitment to suicide prevention, undermining the Hippocratic ethic of “do no harm.”, and subverting the sanctity/equality of life ethic. Regardless of intentions, the assisted suicide movement is a malign cultural force. I don’t know how else to describe it.

4 Comments

    Patricia
    September 27th, 2009 | 7:37 pm

    how unbelievably sad.
    But then, why should we be surprised. We’ve been talking and acting on “quality of life” re: unborn babies for the last 30 years.
    How fitting that the baby boomers who chose to kill their own unborn offspring will now either kill themselves or be killed off by those who survived the abortion holocaust.

    Tweets that mention How Assisted Suicide Undermines Suicide Prevention » Secondhand Smoke | A First Things Blog -- Topsy.com
    September 28th, 2009 | 1:52 pm

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Priscilla Brooks. Priscilla Brooks said: How Assisted Suicide Undermines Suicide Prevention » Secondhand … http://bit.ly/1h0Hzl [...]

    Kathleen Lundquist
    September 28th, 2009 | 4:07 pm

    “C[ompassion] & C[hoices] created the coalition that passed I-1000 into law and now stewards, protects and upholds Washington’s Death with Dignity Act.”

    Wow. I’ve never seen them come right out and say it before. This is precisely what they’ve been doing in Oregon for 12 years:

    - “stewarding” any negative information about actions taken under the DWDA,
    - “protecting” the public and health agencies from any information that could be used to produce useful statistics, and
    - “upholding” the idea in the public consciousness that disabled people have a duty to die, and no one should be forced by any circumstance to a) undergo any compromise of their personal autonomy or b) set their own needs aside to care for anyone with a disability.

    I would like to see this brochure. Any links online?

    Kathleen Lundquist
    September 28th, 2009 | 4:11 pm

    Oh, and I should add:

    -”stewarding” the use of the DWDA by providing counseling to reinforce the suicidal wish and resources to complete the suicidal act.

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact