The USA didn’t participate in Kyoto because Al Gore signed an agreement allowing the USA to be bound by carbon dioxide emission cuts, but not China and India–this despite a unanimous vote in the US Senate beforehand opposing such a proposal. You see, the impossibility of ratification didn’t matter to Clinton/Gore. What mattered was looking good in the eyes of certain international elites.
Now, apparently, everything old is new again. China and India refuse to permit any on site international oversight of their emissions releases, but the beat goes on anyway. From the story:
China and other major emerging economies will not allow international supervision of their actions to slow climate change to be part of a deal at U.N. talks in Copenhagen, a top Indian delegate said on Friday. Giving details of a common front by China, India, Brazil and South Africaat the meeting beginning next Monday, he also said the four opposed global goals for limiting climate change, except for the target of curbing warming to a maximum 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels. “This is more a framework document that is available for negotiation,” according to the top delegate, who has intimate knowledge of the proposal for the Dec. 7-18 negotiations. “The developing world is seeking an alternate architecture” for a new climate deal, he said. Speaking on condition of anonymity, he said the four nations would only agree to international supervision of their actions to slow climate change when they depended on donor money or technology — such as imported wind turbines or solar panels. Otherwise, supervision would be done by each nation.
That should kill a deal, at least as far as the USA is concerned. But Copenhagen isn’t really about global warming, it is about accruing power into the hands of international technocrats and the developing scientocracy. Think of the fun they will have as they spend decades living lavishly, while redistributing the West’s wealth and governing our most basic patterns of living. Nothing could do more to ensure employment opportunities for the drones sector! That’s why the fix is in regardless of what terms to which China and India refuse agreement.
Think I’m kidding? Obama wasn’t going to go to Copenhagen (which I never believed). Then, he was going to go at the open, meaning there would be no deal. Now, he’s going at the close, which means he will do a deal no matter what it takes–and don’t give him any bad news about Climategate and the profound doubt it casts on the entire field. From the story:
The announcement Friday that Obama is pushing back his appearance at the Copenhagen summit to its final weekend, the critical negotiating period, signals a willingness to pour significant political capital into his climate agenda – and raises expectations that the White House will reach agreements both internationally and at home.
The impact of the scheduling change is magnified by expectations that the Environmental Protection Agency will finalize a key move toward regulating greenhouse gases, with the final release of its endangerment finding expected as soon as Monday. “There’s no question that this is a game changer,” said Carter Roberts, president of the World Wildlife Fund. “It’s huge, it’s important, and it’s logical given the momentum that’s developing around the world and in next the two weeks.”
It won’t pass the Senate but the courts and EPA will just say that we must follow the international consensus. And thus freedom sickens.
The good news, if any is to be found, is that such threats also can create an intense political backlash. The American people aren’t up for further depressing our own economy, while sending billions and billions of dollars overseas–not when the “crisis” may be mostly manufactured and we have budget black holes that threaten economic implosion. If this goes the way it seems now, look for loud huzzahs in the media, but a major political thumbs down once POTUS gets home.




December 5th, 2009 | 5:52 pm
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Vince Humphreys, Wesley J. Smith. Wesley J. Smith said: Global Warming Hysteria: China and India Refuse Oversight–But The Fix is In » Secondhand Smoke | A First Things Blog – http://shar.es/aIAbX [...]
December 5th, 2009 | 6:31 pm
[...] the whole story here: Wesley J. Smith aggregated by [...]
December 5th, 2009 | 6:43 pm
Obama will let nothing stand in the way of social justice. This takes the form of health care, climate cap & trade, new taxes, stimulus bills and any other vehicle he can pass to transfer wealth.
December 6th, 2009 | 12:15 am
I could be paddling a rowboat down Market Street in San Francisco after the poles have melted, and there will still be conservative fanatics who deny that humans are responsible for Global Warming or that it is even real. I invite you to my web-pages devoted to raising awareness on this urgent issue: http://pltcldscsn.blogspot.com/2009/12/conservatives-still-deny-global-warming.html
Wesley J. Smith Reply:
December 6th, 2009 at 12:21 am
And polar bears could be increasing, but certain fanatics claim they are threatened. I guess it takes all kinds.
David: It’s mostly baloney.
December 6th, 2009 | 2:22 am
Even though I believe global warming is exaggerated, the Industrial Age has caused some problems. Over 100 years of pollution, with much of it hot, pouring into the atmosphere. Lies and distortions have been told and more dishonesty is at the door. It is called Cap and Trade. I’ve learned that big companies can purposely pollute the environment so they can get paid later to not pollute as bad. And if Al Gore really believes in all of this why is he a much bigger polluter than most of us?
Wesley J. Smith Reply:
December 6th, 2009 at 11:42 am
Yea, Brian. It is ironic, isn’t it? This is all about money.
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact