Each year, the CBC asks me to predict what will happen in the coming year in bioethics. I have done so. From my piece:
“Flash Forward” is a new and interesting television drama presented on the ABC Television Network. The premise is brilliant – due to reasons still unknown, everyone in the world (except the bad guys) blackout for two minutes seventeen seconds. Planes crash, people collapse on the streets, swimmers drown, it is an utter catastrophe that results in the deaths of 20 million people. Being unconscious, blackout victims experience a “flash forward” – a vision of precisely what they would be doing for two minutes and seventeen seconds at the same specific time in April 2010. Some have happy futuristic visions of new loves, some unhappy of broken marriages and deaths, some terrifying such as being murdered, one hilarious – an FBI supervisor is chagrined to admit he spent his entire flash forward on the toilet. Still others have nothing but blackness, indicating that they may be dead next April. The show raises several fascinating questions; whether free will exists, can “the future” be changed , indeed, can it really be predicted.
My main focus is Obamacare. Here is how I see it coming to pass:
I predict a health care reform bill will be signed into law in 2010. That’s the easy part. The question becomes, what will it look like? That is hard to say since many of the important details will be determined by the tens of thousands of regulations promulgated to carry out the law in over the next few years. Still, the outlines are growing clear in my crystal ball. Here is my personal Obamacare flash forward:
The Public Option. One of the biggest controversies surrounding Obamacare is whether there will be a government health care plan to compete with private insurance companies. I predict that the pure PO will not become law in 2010. Instead, there will be a hybrid alternative enacted permitting non-profit companies – and only non profit companies – to join a government authorized purchasing collective. Whether they will actually threaten the private insurance sector – which I believe is the intent – will not become clear until after the law goes into effect in 2013.
Heath Care Rationing. Obamacare doesn’t call explicitly for health care rationing, but creates its foundation with the establishment of cost/benefit/best practices boards that will be given tremendous sway over the standards of medical care and extent of coverage for both private and public plans. There is almost zero chance these boards will not be part of any law that passes. That means health care rationing will remain a looming specter and a cause for continuing societal debate for years to come.
Abortion. Companies participating in the public exchanges will be required to provide some abortion coverage, but there will not be direct public funding of most abortions. However, the law will permit regulators to require indirect public funding, for example, allowing abortion coverage to be purchased with government vouchers or tax credits.
End of Life Counseling. The provision allowing doctors to be compensated for providing end of life counseling will pass. But the law will require that it be voluntary and not directed to any particular decisions or outcomes.
Illegal Aliens. The law will not explicitly provide for coverage for people who are not legally in the country. But it will not require purchasers of government underwritten health insurance to provide proof of legal status, meaning that undocumented aliens will find ways to purchase health insurance under Obamacare.
I also discuss what I think will happen with assisted suicide, health care rationing/futile care theory, and embryonic stem cell research. Tune in to see the future. Or, I could be wrong. I have been both in years past. I am also interested in your predictions. Let’s have a little fun with this.




December 9th, 2009 | 7:45 pm
I suspect something equivalent to the “public option” will pass (your alternative is an equivalent), and that it will immediately begin destroying private insurance companies the moment it passes. As soon as an insurance company cannot reject new customers for any preexisting conditions, their ability to exist as a business is gone, because no one will have any reason to sign up until they get sick. By the time the lawsuits fighting the purchasing mandate are resolved, we’ll effectively be at single-payer anyway because of this. Then SEIU and the Dems will have accomplished their goal, and we’ll have a nation that is as well run as California, where they’ve had complete control for a decade, and have already destroyed the place.
December 9th, 2009 | 8:26 pm
What do you predict on mandatory purchase? How about the heavy regulation of currently private companies through the benefits decisions made for the healthcare exchange, as envisaged in the House version? Do you see that remaining in a final version?
Wesley J. Smith Reply:
December 9th, 2009 at 8:51 pm
I should have included that. I think it will be in the bill but I question its constitutionality.
December 9th, 2009 | 11:26 pm
Do you foresee mandatory prenatal testing and removal of coverage for babies who were diagnosed in utero with birth defects, or even genetic markers for adult-onset diseases? Essentially, “have an abortion or you’re on your own”?
Wesley J. Smith Reply:
December 9th, 2009 at 11:37 pm
Not yet.
December 10th, 2009 | 10:11 am
[...] Wesley Smith predicts what 2010 holds in bioethical issues. [...]
December 10th, 2009 | 10:44 am
“Perhaps the future is pre-determined by the character of those who shape it.” –Stargate Atlantis
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact