The sheer arrogance of the leaders of the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine is such that they seem to be practicing for the coming oligarchy rather than participating in an institution of democratic governance. Recently, it met–apparently in secret and in violation of open meeting laws–and refused to permit observers to attend. From California Stem Cell Report:
Here is the account that Stevens and Beeson sent to the California Stem Cell Report. “On Monday, June 14 we went to San Francisco’s Sutter Street Marriot Hotel to attend the CIRM – Medical Research Council Human SCNT Workshop. Both academics with long-standing interests in women’s health and research policy, we were heading for the session on, ‘Procurement of Human Oocytes: What has been the Experience to Date?’ Despite the fact that there was no public notice of an upcoming workshop on a topic of sustained interest to women’s health advocacy groups, we heard about it via the grapevine and decided to attend. But upon arrival, we were barred at the door. The session on egg procurement had been switched to an earlier morning time slot and already had taken place, we were told. Our printed agenda was outdated. Further, we would not be granted entrance to the meeting underway. Why? It was closed to the public because conferees maintain concerns over protecting their intellectual property. Questions remain. What intellectual property concerns could there be over oocyte procurement policy? Why was the agenda switched up? Why wasn’t a workshop concerning egg donation posted on the CIRM website in the first place when the topic is known to be of serious concern to the public, especially to women’s health advocates?”
The CSCR obtains a lame excuse from the CIRM and analyzes the legalities of the situation (probably not legal), which you can read for yourselves, and concludes:
Legalities aside, it is not in CIRM’s best interest to bar persons from any of its sessions – not to mention that it is not in the best interests of the people of California. CIRM needs to do more than meet the minimum standards of the state’s sunshine laws. To fail to do so will create a record that will surely harm CIRM’s public support and hamper its efforts to secure more funding after it runs out of the $2 billion it has left to spend.
I hope they don’t raise another dime because that just means we will be that much deeper in debt, plus interest.
It’s very simply, really. The CIRM demands billions of our borrowed money–as the state implodes financially–while, at the same time, they tell us to mind our own business. So much for the transparency we were promised during the Proposition 71 campaign. Good for the California Stem Cell Report for being such a valuable and committed watchdog over an out of control institute that is helping bankrupt the state.




June 19th, 2010 | 2:29 am
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Vince Humphreys and Stand In The Gap, Wesley J. Smith. Wesley J. Smith said: CIRM to People of California: Give Us Your Money and Mind Your Own Business! » Secondhand Smoke | A First Things Blog http://shar.es/miima [...]
June 19th, 2010 | 1:00 pm
Yep, I’ll bet the scientists are sweating bullets right now.
How dare they not disclose their research to the public, where they can get scooped. Can you imagine, scientists speaking amongst themselves on research issues before going public? What is this world coming to?
Oh no, we missed the sociologists from Cal State! What a tragedy! While they can’t figure out the difference between an invited meeting and a public workshop, I’m sure their invaluable scientific input will be greatly missed.
I guess they’ll just have to continue their pity party on the sideline with the other hacks.
So, should all/most money for research continuation be halted now? Given how critical research is for innovation, which (should) drive our economy, and given industry’s hesitancy to dive into research, it’s something to consider.
So, why single out CIRM? Why not further cut state funding to sociology departments at Cal State, too – they seem to have some rather inept professors there who build cases around whining over chicken and rice for lunch?
Interestingly, these two petty whiners at the CSRC are involved in an “institute” that has similar private meetings (see page 11):
ttp://www.thehumanfuture.org/about/ibhf_annual_report_08.pdf
Yep, no hypocrisy there; they’re sociologists, they know what they’re doing – and yet they wonder why their departments keep getting funding cuts.
Keep up the good work, gals.
Wesley J. Smith Reply:
June 19th, 2010 at 1:42 pm
David: They are using OUR money, borrowed via bonds. The CIRM is a quasi state agency established in the state constitution. There are laws that apply. It isn’t whether you think something is fair or proper or petty, it is whether they are breaking laws. Did you even bother to read the post I linked? Or if “the scientists” do it, it doesn’t matter to you?
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact