SUBSCRIBER LOGIN






Search First Things

Advanced Search

RSS

Secondhand Smoke
Archives

Categories

Monthly


« Previous  |Home|  Next »         

Wednesday, September 15, 2010, 1:46 PM
Wesley J. Smith

We hear often from assisted suicide advocates that most who die by doctor prescribed death in Oregon were in hospice–as if that makes it okay.  I have indicated here and elsewhere, that this merely means assisted suicide facilitators have interfered with proper medical treatment for these patients: One essential service provided by hospice is suicide prevention.  Bragging that a patient who committed assisted suicide without providing prevention is like denying the patient pain control and then patting yourself on the back when they ask to die.

Now, a study shows that my analysis is right on the money: Most hospices do not participate actively in Oregon assisted suicide. From a Hastings Center Report study:

During 2009, in order to assess the extent to which Oregon hospice programs participate in physician-assisted death, we requested policy statements, program guidelines, and staff education materials that had been developed by sixty-four hospice programs affiliated with the Oregon Hospice Association to address patient inquiries about the Death with Dignity Act. We received forty documents representing fifty-six programs. Our examination of these documents suggests that individual hospice programs generally assume a minor role in the decision-making process of patients who exercise their rights to physician-assisted death—a role largely confined to providing information about the law in a “neutral” manner. Moreover, hospices claim they will not assist with providing the medications necessary to hasten a patient’s death. This limited role indicates that questions of legal compliance and moral complicity inhibit hospice collaboration with patients seeking physician-assisted death.

This is important. Hospice philosophy is completely at odds with doctor prescribed suicide philosophy.  They cannot occupy the same space.  I am very pleased that Oregon hospices are generally keeping assisted suicide there at arm’s length. It has no place in proper end of life care.

8 Comments

    Assisted Suicide » Oregon Hospices Not Participating in Assisted Suicide – First Things (blog)
    September 15th, 2010 | 2:07 pm

    [...] First Things (blog) [...]

    Tweets that mention Oregon Hospices Not Participating in Assisted Suicide » Secondhand Smoke | A First Things Blog -- Topsy.com
    September 15th, 2010 | 2:16 pm

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Vince Humphreys, Stand In The Gap and southernmatrix, Wesley J. Smith. Wesley J. Smith said: Oregon Hospices Not Participating in Assisted Suicide » Secondhand Smoke | A First Things Blog http://t.co/As7Vmky [...]

    Craig Henry
    September 15th, 2010 | 10:01 pm

    “This is important. Hospice philosophy is completely at odds with doctor prescribed suicide philosophy.”

    Spot on. This point may be lost on some who don’t recognize how our care for folks at the margins of life (whether at its earliest stages or last extent) is as much about who we are in our community with them as it is about what’s in some reductionistic utilitarian calculation “good for them”. The roles we play are a practiced confession of who we think we are in the world. I’m reminded of Gilbert Meilaender’s starkly counter-culture essay: “I want to burden my loved ones.”

    Bret Lythgoe
    September 16th, 2010 | 2:13 am

    This is very good to hear. Providing compassionate, competent care, for those who are terminal, is about
    just that: care, NOT killing!

    HistoryWriter
    September 16th, 2010 | 4:31 pm

    I would love to comment on this article, but Wesley can’t make assurances that he won’t censor that with which he disagrees.

    safepres
    September 17th, 2010 | 12:02 am

    HW-I would love to tell you how annoying it is to read that same whiny comment of yours on several of Wesley’s posts, so I am!

    HistoryWriter
    September 18th, 2010 | 8:01 am

    safepres: are you REALLY, REALLY annoyed, or only mildly so? I wouldn’t want to disappoint you by not annoying you to the fullest. If I’ve let you down I’m sorry; I’ll just have to try harder. HW

    safepres
    September 18th, 2010 | 10:29 pm

    Hmmm…I think that your recent plethora of repeated comments ad nauseum ranks about 7.5/10 on the annoyance scale in terms of my life reading this blog, and about 2.5/10 in terms of my life in general.

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact