
ellens wrote:It does all come back to demography, ultimately, but in the short term I think what we see today in the US and in Europe is a fatigue with the inadequacies of democracy. Especially in a media-driven society, where reputations can be made and lost with amazing speed, politicians want to please their constituents at all cost. This is in spite of the abundant evidence that the constituents are mostly ill-informed and myopic. California is now going bankrupt because its voting public decided decades ago that they wanted lower taxes and more services. That is exactly the situation at the Federal level, writ large.
After WWII, the writer Bertold Brecht was informed that the communist party of East Germany had lost in an election. His response was not that we need to change the leadership in the communist party, or a new party altogether, but rather, we need to change the people! We need a new voting public.
So, in that spirit, I vote for replacing the American electorate with a new group of people who will be more sensible and far-sighted in their approach to politics.
ellens wrote:
..................... we need to change the people! We need a new voting public.
So, in that spirit, I vote for replacing the American electorate with a new group of people who will be more sensible and far-sighted in their approach to politics.
Booklady wrote:Very perceptive, Simple Minded.
Simple Minded wrote:ellens wrote:
..................... we need to change the people! We need a new voting public.
So, in that spirit, I vote for replacing the American electorate with a new group of people who will be more sensible and far-sighted in their approach to politics.
Hear Hear! Seems a age old solution to a timeless problem......
In the last two days the Republicans have been shown to be a do nothing party of hostage takers, and the Democrats have been shown to be a weak kneed party of racists, at least according to the president and the MSM.![]()
That leaves the Tea Party and the Independents as the only viable voting blocks.... even with modern technology, cloning and genetic engineering will take decades to produce better people of voting age....

ellens wrote:It does all come back to demography, ultimately, but in the short term I think what we see today in the US and in Europe is a fatigue with the inadequacies of democracy. Especially in a media-driven society, where reputations can be made and lost with amazing speed, politicians want to please their constituents at all cost. This is in spite of the abundant evidence that the constituents are mostly ill-informed and myopic. California is now going bankrupt because its voting public decided decades ago that they wanted lower taxes and more services. That is exactly the situation at the Federal level, writ large.
After WWII, the writer Bertold Brecht was informed that the communist party of East Germany had lost in an election. His response was not that we need to change the leadership in the communist party, or a new party altogether, but rather, we need to change the people! We need a new voting public.
So, in that spirit, I vote for replacing the American electorate with a new group of people who will be more sensible and far-sighted in their approach to politics.

ellens wrote:Welcome back, Booklady, and a very happy Christmas to you.
ellens wrote:CD,
I totally agree with your conclusion, and that is very much a Collingwoodian approach to politics. The people will get the spanking they deserve.
The problem is, people who behave responsibly get dragged down by the ones who behaved irresponsibly. The current deep recession caused by irresponsible hyperconsumption perhaps is a "punishment that fits the crime" (another Gilbert and Sullivan ditty) but it seems to me, the investment bankers and mortgage brokers who engineered this mess still laugh all the way to the bank.
CognitiveDistoibance wrote:ellens wrote:. . The current deep recession caused by irresponsible hyperconsumption . .
. . Wherever I go, I hope to go as self-sufficient on food and energy as possible. What I don't need to spend on basic living expenses, I don't need to make. .
There are, it seems, two muses: the Muse of Inspiration, who gives us inarticulate visions and desires, and the Muse of Realization, who returns again and again to say "It is yet more difficult than you thought." This is the muse of form. It may be then that form serves us best when it works as an obstruction, to baffle us and deflect our intended course. It may be that when we no longer know what to do, we have come to our real work and when we no longer know which way to go, we have begun our real journey. The mind that is not baffled is not employed. The impeded stream is the one that sings.
— Wendell Berry
Marcus wrote:CognitiveDistoibance wrote:ellens wrote:. . The current deep recession caused by irresponsible hyperconsumption . .
. . Wherever I go, I hope to go as self-sufficient on food and energy as possible. What I don't need to spend on basic living expenses, I don't need to make. .
While probably most of us are guilty of irresponsible hyper-consumption, I'm not sure that's the root of the problem . . such indulgence is more likely the result of the problem. The real problem, at least as I see it, is the larceny in our hearts that makes inflation an expected and even welcome part of our social order. What home-buyer hasn't considered that, over time, his house payments will decrease as a result of inflation? Easy money in terms of inflation and usury are more the cause of our current condition, and I think we're all guilty. Over-indulgence is simply the result. Some obviously more guilty on that count than others.
Marcus wrote:Too, while simplification of one's lifestyle is a worthy goal, we all live at the end of a very long food chain, Self-sufficiency in any sense beyond growing a garden, doing with less, turning down the heat and such is pretty much an illusion. We're all in this boat together. Take it from one who has lived farther off the grid than most.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests