I’d just finished whipping out my credit card and donating to McCain/Palin again when I saw this, (H/T Lorie Byrd) and it almost made me donate again, except I’m broke.
This MAN – who I will not link to – suggests, with absolutely no knowledge of anything, because before 4 days ago Sarah Palin was not even a blip on his radar:
I DO think she [Palin] flew at a dangerous time in her pregnancy and then took her time getting to a hospital in an attempt to force a miscarriage, however. Or I suspect that’s the case, and there’s no way to prove that.
Again, so we’re clear: this is a MAN, who is suggesting that every woman who flies in the 8th month of her pregnancy is being reckless. This is a MAN who is presuming to know – or to more properly project his own inclinations into – Palin’s mind. This is a MAN (and I am no gender warrior, but let’s be clear that this is a so-called LIBERAL MAN) sitting there cheerfully assigning the most awful motives to a woman he does not know, but whom he hates with passion…apparently because she is a woman and a smart, strong woman who is also a conservative.
This is a LIBERAL MAN, who probably argues for abortion rights up to the ninth month of pregnancy, suggesting that a woman with four children, who knew her body, knew what her labors was like, and who called her doctor, conferred with him and made a DECISION with him, was actually just trying to kill her baby, which – suddenly – he seems to find an immoral idea!
And excuse me, but aren’t DECISIONS made between a woman and her doctor sort of…sacred, to these folks? Or have they been just yammering about this for 40 years and lying their heads off? Or are they just bloody hypocrites?
I cannot imagine that sane women from the center or the center-left can listen to this stunning misogyny, which flies in the face of four decades of powerful debate and rhetoric, and feel peaceful with this relentless attack upon a woman, launched immediately and chillingly at the very heart of her womanhood, before she had made one campaign stop. The message is: you women better know your place, and it is in the party, under the men who screwed Hillary out of her shot.
The hope, apparently, is that they will chase Sarah Palin away. They’d better hope they do not succeed. Because every thinking woman in America will have seen what they did, and how they did it, by attacking womanhood and motherhood and the private and career decisions of a gifted woman. And those women will look at their own lives and their daughters, and they will not sit there and take it.
Look at what their shocking hate is doing to these people. And they don’t even know Sarah Palin; they are so terrified of the tiny bit they’ve seen that they just went into immediate, rabid and unnatural attack.
The commenters at Dirty Harry’s Place do a good job of exposing his ignorance. Hello, an 8th month birth is a premature delivery, not a miscarriage. If she’d been in labor, her doctor would not have had to induce her.
I wrote about all this several days ago.
Unlike these creatures, who want to think nothing but the worst of Sarah Palin, all five of her children, her husband and – if she has one – her dog, I don’t want to believe the worst about Obama. But I am really starting to wonder about the weird co-incidence that the Koskidz started a rumor – based on nothing – about Palin, and her daughter Bristol, and then it turns out that Bristol is pregnant. We know now that the press knew about the pregnancy.
The press is in the tank for Obama, we know that. When I read Allahpundit a while ago, I thought, “no” – but now, I have to wonder: did the Koskidz bungle a leak from the Obama camp?
Anyone find it amazingly coincidental that Daily Kos went after Palin’s own pregnancy right out of the chute on Friday, with no apparent evidence whatsoever, and now we find out that her daughter’s actually pregnant? I usually scoff at the idea of party researchers planting memes with bloggers, especially since the nutroots is so paranoid about that happening on the right, but that’s a simply remarkable stoke of good luck on their part, no?
I don’t believe Obama would do it. But his “camp” might. Remember, his “camp” greeted the news of Palin’s addition to the ticket with nastiness and a distinct lack of common political courtesy or generosity. Obama had to walk it back.
The co-incidence is pretty neat, isn’t it? I wonder who leaked it.
Ace writes: Don’t believe a damn word the lefties write about the Palins.
Don’t worry, I won’t. Their credibility is finally, utterly, used up with me.
If there was ever a time to ask, “have you no shame. Finally, have you no shame,” this is it.
Rick at Brutally Honest: Notes the Goebbels tactics; a must read
Coincidentally, Mike’s Noise looks at all of this and sees how little these people understand about their opponents, and he cannot help but quote Jonah Goldberg from his book, Liberal Fascism
More:
Lorie Byrd: What I learned about the left this week
PJM: The Vetting Lies
Dean Bartlett: a Tale of Two Resumes
Matteo: They Strongly Defend Utter Absense of Principle
Ed Morrissey: Obama on Anderson Cooper; Laughable
Busted Halo: Tony Rossi on The Sarah Surprise
Kevin at Wizbang: Obama link to Palin Baby Lies?
Yes: I Still Want Her for My Vice President!
Melissa Clothier: “Post Partisan Politics?
Red State:Does Obama’s Denial Hold Water?
Schwenkler:I demand and investigation
Bookworm: Thoughts on the Unborn
STACLU: No, Palin was not a member of the AIP!
September 2nd, 2008 | 1:12 am | #1
I question liberal masculinity… but maybe that’s just me
September 2nd, 2008 | 1:31 am | #2
I suggest, as ordinary citizens, we rise up in big ways to support Bristol, reminding the country what REAL family values and Christianity look lik; LOVE AND WHEN NECESSARY, SACRIFICE. Bristol may well become the role model to every pregnant teenager. Even at the expense of her mom’s historical presidential election, LIFE still comes first; the epitome of moral courage
Between Trig and now Bristol’s baby, isn’t it intereting that this election, so crucial to pro life in America, may well be won by the love for two babies. Providing they don’t get exploited, it may well be in the end, that Roe V wade is overturned largely due to two Palin babies who many Americans would have “gotten rid of via abortion.” Most of all, even more important than Roe v Wade, this may finally be the answer to many prayers to “change hearts”, the most important necessity to true pro life America.
The best way to counter to the left is to embrace and support Bristol. After all, it’s the “pro life”, and Christian, thing to do!
September 2nd, 2008 | 1:34 am | #3
You are being too kind.
September 2nd, 2008 | 5:23 am | #4
Unnatural Leftist strategy…
I put this one in the Plainly Spiritual category because I think simply that we’re dealing here with principalities. Via Larwyn and Ace of Spades HQ comes this link to what the moonbats and their ideological cohorts are planning (have…
September 2nd, 2008 | 6:34 am | #5
Wonderfully said, Anchoress.
The liberal agenda has revealed itself for what it is: hopeless, changeless, tasteless, and shameless.
September 2nd, 2008 | 8:53 am | #6
From a working mother of three now-grown children who earned a Ph.D. while raising them, I NEVER want to hear again out of the mouths of liberal Democrats and journalists the words: equality for women. Never again, after the viscious, condesending, and moralizing way they are treating Sarah Palin. They have no credibility now. Hypocrites!!
September 2nd, 2008 | 8:54 am | #7
I’m completely aghast at the viciousness of these attacks on Sarah Palin and her daughter. And I’m even more aghast to realize that I share the same first name with that horrid man you describe in the first paragraph.
Lord have mercy on these people!
September 2nd, 2008 | 8:55 am | #8
Off topic, but it appears that the next hurricane may impact South Carolina, home of congressman Spratt who laughed along with Fowler about hurricane Gustav showing God was on the Dems’ side. Never anger the gods.
September 2nd, 2008 | 9:07 am | #9
[...] Keep it up you dumba** lefties…..more and more are sending in the money they can simply because you are so “foul”. (read the link to hear one very ticked off woman [...]
September 2nd, 2008 | 9:38 am | #10
We need to publicize this anywhere and everywhere we can! They need to be finally brought to account for their despicable words and actions. Enough is enough!
September 2nd, 2008 | 9:43 am | #11
Elizabeth i something to this effect to her army when the Spanish Armada was in sight: “I have the body of a weak woman, but the heart and the stomach of a king and a king of England at that.” I think Sarah’s got them too, but this would be an excellent time for her to give snarl. You listening, Sarah?
September 2nd, 2008 | 9:44 am | #12
Dear Miss A,
You are right, they are all hypocrites.
Regards,
Sarah
September 2nd, 2008 | 9:49 am | #13
You are absolutely correct in your thoughts and writing. Thank you for saying what all the rest of us would like to say and for saying it so clearly. I fear that if the left is put into office, we will be seeing more of this during their tenure. They will take their election as a license for this kind of attack — for this way of forcing people to keep their mouths shut — and to instill fear in anyone who has a desire to speak up against them and their policies. (I’m talking the so-called “Fairness” Doctrine, here.)
You say that you don’t believe Obama condones this sort of attack, but I am not so certain. Or, could it be that he has no control of his own campaign staff? If that is the case, America CANNOT have this man in the highest office of our great country.
I, too, have pulled out my checkbook for the McCain/Palin team. That and many prayers for our country.
September 2nd, 2008 | 10:05 am | #14
I posted about this on my blog, but what I find depressing — and I don’t want to depress anyone else — is that 1) Bristol is doing the moral thing by having her baby and marrying the father, yet so many people seem to think this is something she and her family should be crucified for; and 2) so many people seem to be completely oblivious to what is surely the most fundamental tenet of Christianity, Catholic, Protestant, or whatever. To quote Romans 3:23, “For all have sinned and come short of the Glory of God.” The more I think about it, the more depressing and mystifying it is.
I am praying for the Palins, especially Bristol, her fiance, and their baby.
September 2nd, 2008 | 10:10 am | #15
In calmer times, when libs are talking (or writing) amongst themselves, they tend to let their guards down and admit that liberal men often hold women in contempt. One manifestation of this is, of course, in sexual relations, where women are all too often simply used up and tossed aside after they have sexually gratified the liberal male (often without reciprocity – you can stain your blue dress, but I’ve got to go back to work). But in other areas as well, when they think that they are speaking alone, they admit that liberal men are often pigs.
And liberal women are, all too often, willing to thus objectify themselves and be the object of contempt.
However, this truth cannot be allowed to be made known in public, especially since their number one goal is power for themselves, so they project all of this contempt for women, this misogyny, to use one of their favorite words, upon conservatives. They project it all on conservatives and attack them for the very things that they themselves are guilty of.
I have to believe, however, that at some point, Middle America will wise up and see the libs/Dems for who and what they are. Indeed, I know that some already have, and have gone on to create blogs like this.
Sarah Palin is the face of Middle America, and they despise her with a passion, as they have made clear. Their contempt for who and what she is is indicative of their contempt for Middle America and Middle Americans at large. As for you personally Middle America, you mean nothing to them — you only mean something to them to the extent that you empower them; they only profess to care about you in order to acquire and exercise power, and they will give you things only in order to keep power.
p.s. What with McCain accepting public financing, which I think starts at the end of the convention, donated funds to the McCain campaign cannot be spent on the general election, so folks might send it to the party instead. The campaign might be able to give new donations to the party — I really know little about campaign finance law — but the point of this post script is that there may be a hitch in folks planning to donate to the mccain/PALIN campaign.
September 2nd, 2008 | 10:20 am | #16
But of course liberals and feminists attack Palin on the basis of her femininity. She has insisted on doing something so obtrusively, crudely, embarrassingly female as having lots of children — how vulgar! And she has become a successful politician as well, when we all know that children are nothing but roadblocks — even enemies — to any ambitious woman.
It’s a fine illustration of the contempt for women that lurks behind feminist ideology, isn’t it?
September 2nd, 2008 | 10:27 am | #17
Barack Obama’s Post-Partisan Politics Looking…Kos Krazy Partisan…
Before this weekend and week, most Americans still didn’t know what the Daily Kos was. Most still don’t know except for the break-through mentions in the TV media and even then, only on Fox will you hear the site mentioned…….
September 2nd, 2008 | 10:28 am | #18
[...] The Anchoress as always gets to the point (my apologies for the long quote, there is so much more you need to read there): Unlike these creatures, who want to think nothing but the worst of Sarah Palin, all five of her children, her husband and – if she has one – her dog, I don’t want to believe the worst about Obama. But I am really starting to wonder about the weird co-incidence that the Koskidz started a rumor – based on nothing – about Palin, and her daughter Bristol, and then it turns out that Bristol is pregnant. We know now that the press knew about the pregnancy. [...]
September 2nd, 2008 | 10:37 am | #19
The voracity of the opposition to this simple woman is astounding. If she is such an insignicant, ineffectual nothing, why such fierce attacks, why the blood-in-the-water shark attacks? I mean, you don’t kill a misquito with a nuclear bomb, but that is exactly what they — Dems and the media — have done, gone nuclear.
It all seems rather disproportionate to the threat, or is it?
September 2nd, 2008 | 10:58 am | #20
I think the brilliance of picking Palin as the running mate is in the reactions that we’re getting. Palin is like some bad code invserted into the liberal computer program. It’s caused everything to go haywire; nothing’s making sense. Every criticism of Palin rings wrong. There’s just no way they can go at her without slaughtering their own sacred cows. (Mixed metaphor!) I love this!
Klaire, in your comment above, you make an excellent point about the two Palin babies. Irony abounds.
I’m ‘gonna pop some popcorn, turn on the answering machine and just sit back and watch the liberals spontaneously combust.
September 2nd, 2008 | 10:58 am | #21
[...] Foul & Vile & Ignorant on Palin [...]
September 2nd, 2008 | 11:06 am | #22
What a disgusting and vile person.
My wife and I flew to Korea from the US when she was eight months pregnant with our son. Not ideal, but necessary, and he turned out great.
This, to me, is typical of the extreme far left, Daily kos-type crowd.
September 2nd, 2008 | 11:09 am | #23
Anchoress,
As soon as the attacks started, I gave money to the McCain/Palin campaign. The more attacks I hear, the more I’ll give to the Republican Party.
September 2nd, 2008 | 11:35 am | #24
Begging your pardon, ma’am. That is not a MAN. It may be apparently a male, but now way is it a man in any sense I can accept.
I fathered three girls back in the 1970’s at a time that “we” were beginning to learn that pregnancy is not a debilitating disease. (I already knew that some how–maybe from stories of ancestors squatting between rows of cotton to give birth, then hoeing or picking back to the end of the row before walking back to the house…..)
We didn’t have an Ob-Gyn–we had a group (Miller, Moss and Winch at French Hospital in San Francisco — http://www.motherearthnews.com/Natural-Health/1971-05-01/Natural-Delivery-in-Hospital.aspx?page=4 )—lord, the stories I could tell about them.
But I digress.
The doctors said that in the last month we should not travel farther than an hour from French Hospital. So the last week before that, we went to Yosemite in the dead of winter, rode a sno-cat from Badger to Glacier point (you have no concept of “rough ride” unless you have traveled up and down mountains crosscounrty on a 12-passenger sno-cat piloted by an testosterone-fueled cowboy)to “Mountain House” (burned down several years later, RIP). My God, what I would give to do that again!
I am not doctor of anything, but every recitation I have heard, even the most jaundiced, of the events preceding the birth of the current youngest in the Palin clan summarizes to me as “Makes sense to me.”
One quick MMW story. During the course of the pregnancy were required to see each of the three, even though W (if mI remember right) was “her” doctor because they were not all always “on-call”. One of the committments they made was that if we called before we left the house, no matter where we lived, the doctor would be at the hospital to greet us. (Their offices were next door to the hospital, big deal, right?) Turns out the big deal is during the night, if the “on-call” wasn’t busy, he was asleep in one of the labor rooms.
OK one-more–really more to the point. When my wife was in the hospital with the second one, the first one fell and broke here collar bone (in what became a family tradition). In the process of getting to the ER to deal with that, I called MMW (i don’t remember which I talked to) for guidance on how to explain my tardiness, the injury, et alia. He said “Call her and tell her, she has a ‘phone in her room (she was still there because it turns out “complications” required Cesaereans)., I protested that that would be upsetting. His answer was something along thr lines of “she’ll handle it. That is what mothers do.
September 2nd, 2008 | 12:14 pm | #25
As depressing as all this is, I’m very glad you have used the opportunity to give more to the candidates of your choice. I would encourage every one of your readers to do this. Frankly, too many people expect their candidates, or favorable events, to do all the real work in an election. For all such talk about “we rise up in big ways”, the only way to do that effectively is to get involved in the actual campaign, either financially or physically. The candidates, Presidential or Congresssional, are your surrogates and they are the only people that will make any of your social goals a reality.
Posting your anger on your blog or someone else’s comment page really isn’t enough to do it, any more than having “demonstrations” in the streets, or in front of abortion clinics, is enough to do it. All such things are simply preaching to the choir.
For all talk of “we”, it actually starts with “you”. I personally think Klaire is correct and this election is “so crucial to pro life in America”. Whether you believe it or not, there is a very real possibility of 12-16 years of Democratic dominance in this country, and it has nothing to do particularly with the news media, though they may encourage it. Your candidates and your cause are in that much trouble. Such a result will transform the Federal court system beyond all recognition and make your goal of outlawing abortion futile.
I will tell you straight from the shoulder that if you really believe this election is “crucial”, you will not win it by recommending books on “liberal fascism” by Jonah Goldberg. You will not win it by “reminding the country what REAL family values and Christianity are like”. You will win it, if it is winnable at all, by putting your money or your muscle to work for John McCain and Sarah Palin to win the Presidency.
You will win it by disabusing yourself of the notion that somehow a “real majority” of the American public is behind your social goals, any more than they are behind my social goals, and that through some magic and hypnotic power the MSM keeps them from expressing their will. The path to the voting booth is blocked by no one.
Both your views and mine are held by pluralities not majorities. Once upon a time your plurality was somewhat larger than mine. It is no longer. The last eight years have taken care of that. They are just about even. It is the 15% or so not in either of our pluralities that will decide this election, and both our candidates or yours have to be actively sold to them as good choices. And those candidates have to actively sell themselves. So far ours have and yours haven’t. If you do not wake up to and face this fact, they will lose.
On my side of the fence we figured all this out in 2002 and everything we have done since then has been preparation for this election where we no longer have to face an incumbent, with a decent amount of popular support, and all exterior circumstances largely breaking his way. And even with all these advantages, only about 60,000 voters in one of three crucial states gave him an electoral college victory. And lulled all his supporters into complacency by his painting the map so red. Paint it just a very little bluer and you have a Democratic victory. Paint it a little bluer yet, and you have an overwhelming Democratic victory.
A word to the wise…
- admin]
[Pushing books is a business decision, Joseph. If I don't start making some money - and soon - from this blog, I will have to stop blogging and go find a real job, somewhere. Given the time I put into it my take is probably less than minimum wage. Buy Monk Coffee!
September 2nd, 2008 | 12:29 pm | #26
Just hit the McCain/Palin donation site again. Best thing I’ve heard/read today is, “If the father of Bristol Palin’s baby was John Edwards, we wouldn’t be hearing about it.”
September 2nd, 2008 | 12:48 pm | #27
You know, I thought that, since we have an election coming up, we’d have to brace ourselves for two months of having bucketsful of rhetorical reheated vomit thrown in our faces, with the real bubonic-plague stuff saved for the last week before Election Day. So the monstrous accusations that have been hinted at (the ugliest SO FAR were hints that Bristol might have gotten pregnant because her father MIGHT have committed statutory rape with her) have enraged and disgusted me, but they haven’t really surprised me.
What surprised me was to see open male chauvinism, which I thought was dead with the 1970s, come roaring back with a vengeance. I mean, the Left has just hurled feminism away with both hands. And it’s only been, what, four days since Sarah Palin was introduced to the world as McCain’s VP pick?
When push comes to shove, the liberals don’t really believe all that feel-good stuff about helping women and minorities and other people they say need a helping hand, do they?
September 2nd, 2008 | 1:07 pm | #28
[...] enumerates many of the hypocrisies that are inherent in such a move (with additional commentary here): The party that has claimed that pre-marital sex is groovy and doesn’t matter, and — [...]
September 2nd, 2008 | 3:09 pm | #29
[...] Lib Men: Foul & Vile & Ignorant on Palin [...]
September 2nd, 2008 | 3:11 pm | #30
I’m not an American, so neither a Democrat nor a Republican and, in fact, my politics are significantly to the left of any Dem in the land, so you and me and your commenters disagree about many, many things. But I do agree that liberals doodz, Democrat men and even some women have treated Sarah Palin in an absolutely abominable way over her own pregnancy and that of her daughter, who isn’t running for any office last time I looked. No, misogyny isn’t just a problem among conservatives, it afflicts many people who live in this culture. However, you’re right, many who espouse progressive politics purport to have rid themselves of this scourge. I hope posts like yours wake a few people up, but my hopes aren’t high.
It’s NOT my view that Palin is fair game just because Hillary Clinton was the butt of some of the worst misogyny I’ve heard in years, nevertheless, it would be a good result if the experience that Palin is now having with the media and the blogosphere alerted everyone to that, if they managed to miss it.
Thank you for your post insofar as it defends Palin with respect to issues that ought not to be part of any political dialogue.
September 2nd, 2008 | 3:53 pm | #31
What has been done to Sarah Palin and her daughter has no other word to describe it: satanic. I totally agree with the guys at Brutally Honest. This is a purely spiritual thing, and those who dare to attack this woman and her daughter are showing their evil, rotten beings to all of us.
This cannot stand.
When I see what’s going on with Bristol, I think of my mother-in-law: she knew she had a hard life ahead of her with a child at a rather early age and only a high school diploma. She and my father-in-law did what they did: they raised their only child and gave him all of their love. They had some family support, but they had to stick on their own two feet, most of the time. They endured poverty and hunger. They knew the meaning of having no money for groceries and picking the (stolen) worst corn from the fields in order to feed themselves and their son. They even had to make-do with spaghetti and whatever combination of mushroom soup, ketchup or whatever else they could make for their spaghetti, because that was all they could afford to eat for a time. But they’re still together today. And their son is a very productive man. I’m sure Bristol can pull it off, with her husband-to-be’s support and that of her family. But what the media and those Dem/Leftist bloggers has done to her and her mother is nothing less than evil. Again, this cannot stand.
I think of my mom, too. She dropped out of high school to marry a man she didn’t love. Two kids and a divorce later, she and my father got together again since… high school. They survived on their own two feet. But my mother wanted to be a teacher since she was a child. My father supported her through it all, and when she finally graduated and began her teaching career, I was in kindergarten. She was named “Teacher of the Year” twice in her school. She’s retiring this coming May. I know that, were she following this right now (she lives in Puerto Rico, and news from here are not generally followed), she’d be as outraged as I am. And if those in PR like my mom were able to vote in these Presidential elections, they’d be so enfogonaos (”p***ed off”) at what we’re witnessing here that…
I’m afraid the Democrats, the MSM and the Leftist bloggers don’t know the giant they’re awaking by their evil actions.
If they don’t want to see a 49-state, 42-percent landslide defeat for Obama and Biden this November (the worst defeat since George McGovern in ‘72), they’d leave Sarah and Bristol Palin alone at once. But I’m afraid they really don’t know what they’re doing to themselves, because they have abandoned all sense of reason here.
September 2nd, 2008 | 4:10 pm | #32
They even had to make-do with spaghetti and whatever combination of mushroom soup, ketchup or whatever else they could make for their spaghetti
Make do?? Pasta with cream of mushroom soup and tuna is mighty tasty. Kinda takes the sacrifice out of Lenten Fridays.
As for Palin — attacks against her are Satanic? There is a large part of that at play here. But it is not really personal to her, not really. It is what she stands for. — “If the world hates you, remember that it hated Me first.”
September 2nd, 2008 | 4:42 pm | #33
I am very glad you used the term “lib men”…as a father of 2 girls, grandpa of 1, and husband of 33 years to the Short Girl I love them all and would go “to the gates of hell” with John McCain to stand up for them. Newton pretty much hits it when he comes up with Satanic. The biggest issue is that these “progressives” worship in the sanctuary of government, and political power is their sacrament. This isn’t an election to them, it is a jihad, and the infidels (AKA those not far left enough to be like them) must not merely be beaten, but destroyed. Meanwhile, for most conservatives, government service is that…service. A job which will, ultimately, never perfect humanity. That type of perfection really is above out pay grade. So, while we are horrified by what we see, we ought not to be surprised. After all, the garbage man doesn’t get surprised when he rounds the corner and finds garbage.
September 2nd, 2008 | 6:20 pm | #34
If I have any money after paying my Lord and paying myself (in that order), I will be donating to McCain and Palin.
Thank you, Joseph, for making the case so well. ‘All that it requires for evil to triumph is for good men to _do_ nothing.’ Most people highlight ‘nothing’, but the ‘do’ is just as important.
September 3rd, 2008 | 12:49 am | #35
I’ve known this Faraci character was a douche of incredible proportions for five years now. The gradual de-evolution of C.H.U.D. (the website he writes for) was my first real, upfront exposure to Bush Derangement Syndrome.
September 3rd, 2008 | 4:00 am | #36
The 2008 political soap opera continues…
PDS (Palin Derangement Syndrome). Also, Anchoress on the hatred. Plus Anchoress with a blog summary of the nonsense.Obama campaign is behind the smears. This "new politics" of personal destruction could backfire.Biden caught in yet another li…
September 3rd, 2008 | 10:42 pm | #37
Hard to believe this know-nothing- b-face is up at the podium delivering her lame speech to thousands of stupid, frothing republicans. If ANYONE, in this day and age personifies the Wicked Witch of the West, it’s her. And I can’t even remember her stupid name. And, one week ago, none of you republicans knew, either. So stick your heads back into the sand and go back under the rocks you came from. Oh – look – there’s her pregnant, underage daughter, showing quite a bit of a lump, along with the baby’s gum-chewing father, followed, of course, by Mr. McCain, looking ever the fool. My nephew who lives in Minneapolis/St.Paul has told me quite a bit about how these drunk republicans hide their faces as soon as a TV camera appears, right outside of the bar they’ve been getting drunk in. Chicken, and hypocritical repubs! You people are the ABSOLUTE WORST of America! And I’m sure the rest of the free world would agree.
September 13th, 2008 | 10:01 pm | #38
[...] anyone else finding it challenging to find coverage of the real issues? Hint to the media: Sarah Palin is not THE issue or even AN issue. Energy, jobs and the economy, terrorism, border security, pork, the list goes on, [...]
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact