Ads


Sign up for our
Email Newsletter

Remembering 1989

For the ten years beginning in 1982, I had the privilege of serving on the Board of Radio Free Europe (for East-Central Europe) and Radio Liberty (for the vast Soviet Union). President Reagan had declared it the goal of the United States to win the Cold War, not just accept it as our long-term fate, and our job was to report the realities on the ground as accurately as we could. Our listeners loved getting these tastes of reality and they increasingly helped us with every bit of information they could.

By late 1988, we had free dial-in capacities from most parts of our two regions. And the telephone calls poured in: calls of increasing daily frustration, anger at local injustices, descriptions of the conditions of loved ones in named local hospitals, fresh examples of local official lies, accounts of local outbreaks of protest. Almost half of all hospitals had no hot water; patients were frequently assigned two to a bed; relatives had to bring food to sustain them.

At our springboard meeting in Munich in 1989, our key people reported that all signs pointed to the lid blowing off the Soviet Empire before the end of the year. The huge volume of incoming calls and their despairing tone, plus detailed reports from our growing number of stringers in the whole dispersed broadcast area made even our most hardened and jaundiced editors believe that something new was up. One story our people reported was the appearance of a novelty among street vendors in Moscow: a market in burned-out light bulbs. Why buy burned-out bulbs? To take to the office, unscrew good bulbs to take home, and screw in the useless ones for the office.

As soon as I came home, I wrote up a short magazine article conveying this prediction, and warning readers that, whatever they were hearing from most of the media and university Russia experts, the end was nigh. My pieces usually got into print quickly in the religious journals I chose. This time, no editor would believe me. At least five times the piece came back.

Thus I turned to Steve Forbes at Forbes magazine—he was chairman of the RFE/RL Board, so he understood. I worked my longer piece into three one-page articles, using new information as it unfolded. My intention was to help readers anticipate the coming events and to place each in the unfolding larger narrative. I started off the series on July 24.

By the spring of 1989 it had begun to be said openly—even Gorbachev said it—that the USSR might have a first-world military, but much of the rest of the economy was third-world. This could no longer be disguised. Even the manufacture of soap was unreliable. Food shortages were being reported, with worse to come (Russian experts said) during the 1989 winter months. Some experts even predicted famine.

President Reagan had called the Soviet Empire “an evil empire” in 1983. He did so with express forethought, against the advice of nearly all his important advisors, and to immense hand wringing by Western journalists. Reagan knew it was inevitable that some day a journalist would ask Gorbachev if he agreed. When the time finally came, Gorbachev admitted that some of the things done in the 1930s were wrong. From then on, everything the Soviets did was subject to the one thing Communists hated: moral evaluation. Until that time, Communists had disdained “bourgeois morality” and insisted that the only moral good was to advance the progress of Communism, and evil was to resist it. Now everything they did could be scrutinized morally, in language legitimated by Gorbachev himself. “Openness, Glasnost,” was daily becoming a sharper pin in the regime.

The first gigantic explosion against the empire was struck—where else?—in Poland. Lech Walesa, the electrifying electrician of the labor union Solidarity inspired a massive outbreak of public protests throughout the nation, and General Jaruzelski was obliged to bow to the parliamentary elections, which this time could not be rigged. In August, democracy once again worked its peaceful magic in a stunning transition of power.

The real magic had arrived ten years before, when the new Polish pope, the young and vigorous John Paul II, had (through his own unrelenting insistence) been invited by an unwilling Polish Communist government to make a pilgrimage to his native land. When the crowds, sometimes in the millions, gathered round him, a stunning awareness came over them: There are more of us than there are of them. “Be not afraid!” was the pope’s repeated theme. During the next ten years and more, the Polish people were not afraid.

It turned out that the pope had a great many more divisions than Stalin. And that the arms of the spirit are more empowering than military weapons. Alas, many in the West still could not believe that the whole Soviet empire was falling down.

And then the center of the action shifted to Czechoslovakia, where more than 200 courageous writers and priests and physicists had signed a 1977 charter of human rights that landed many of them in jail or got them booted out of their jobs. One physicist with a highly promising future was sentenced to shoveling coal in the basement of an apartment building—he discovered that during most of the day he could read (and pray) and years later told of his punishment’s paradoxical benefit. The future cardinal of Prague, Cardinal Vlk, was sentenced to wash windows on apartments and office buildings—and many later recognized his face on television after his elevation.

By the summer of 1989, under the charismatic leadership of the former prison inmate and dramatist Vaclav Havel, protests in the old part of Prague in Wenceslaus Square, increased in numbers and intensity. If Poland could win a change of regime, why not the Czechoslovak Republic?

Finally, on a day that will live in history, November 9, 1989, the demonstrations reached a climactic point. A young worker in a brewery near the Square stood on a box and urged his fellows to join the protests, and was reported to have declaimed in a dramatic flourish, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, among these the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness!” Students and poets protesting is one thing, but when workers join the demonstrations, all pretenses of Communism collapse. The government resigned, Havel was acclaimed interim president, and in a matter of days, if not hours, the great ugly wall that had separated Christian Europe into two branches (as the pope put it) came pounding down, hammer blow by hammer blow.

The roots of Christian Europe were again nourishing a single tree.

Michael Novak, a member of First Thingseditorial and advisory board, holds the George Frederick Jewett Chair in Religion and Public Policy at the American Enterprise Institute. His most recent book is No One Sees God.

Comments:

11.6.2009 | 10:40am
John says:
nice article!
11.6.2009 | 12:19pm
Fred says:
I remember reading an article--I wish I could remember what periodical it was in and who wrote it--in about 1986. The thesis of the article was that the Soviet Union was on the verge of collapse and the main focus of the article was on what would come next. The author's best guess was some sort of military coup, though he didn't completely dismiss some type of more liberal government. I remember thinking at the time, "Boy, that's wishful thinking if I ever saw it" and promptly forgot about it. Three years later the Berlin wall fell and two years after that the Soviet Union. Anyway, there were people predicting the collapse of the Soviet Union, but I don't think many expected it to happen when it did.
11.6.2009 | 12:30pm
What a fine tribute to that tremendous set of events leading to 1989. The people involved, John Paul II, Ronald Reagan, Vaclav Havel, Margaret Thatcher, and Lech Walesa, will be long remembered. Having recently read George Weigel's biography of John Paul II, I'm convinced that the Pope was the leading player in this drama.

Too bad that Pres. Obama turned down Chanc. Merkel's invitation to the 9 November celebration of this event, though it spares him the self-inflicted pain of having to recognize the great sacrifice and treasure spent by America in defeating the Evil Empire.
11.6.2009 | 3:38pm
Paul K. says:
In 1989, I was in my mid 20's, a novice regarding things political. My fiancee and I were to be married in days and I remember seeing the television pictures of the wall being torn down. I knew it was historic, but I didn't know just how significant a broken down wall meant. Now, I know and I thank Michael Novak for the reminder of events 20 years later.
11.7.2009 | 7:22am
Mark says:
Thank you, Mr. Novak, for remembering the events of 1989.

Fear is the main weapon true communists used to maintain their filthy power. To help make fear come alive, they backed it up by murder, tangible threats, plus action against individuals and their loved ones.

I see President Ronald Reagan, Pope John Paul II, and Chairman Gorbachev as the main actors in this drama. The courage to not forget those in need, to call evil by its name, to end the ineffective Ostpolitik, to promote a vision of freedom from fear, to find concrete ways to exorcise that fear, and to run this race to the finish, I see as the legacy of the first two men. The repudiation of the Brezhnev doctrine, the promotion of glasnost, and standing by these decisions to the end, I see as the legacy of Gorbachev.

I thank the Holy Spirit for recruiting these players for this, once thought to be impossible, drama.
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact