Ads


Journey’s End?

It is a long journey from nineteenth-century nativism to twenty-first-century secularism, but that is precisely the journey that St. Vincent’s Hospital has traveled during more than 150 years of service to Catholic New York. Now that the journey appears to be coming to an end, as the exhausted institution edges closer to closure, Catholics of a certain vintage can’t help but look back with nostalgia and gratitude on the Church of their childhood—a Church that embodied Archbishop John Hughes’ vision of a separate-but-equal Catholic world of hospitals, schools, orphanages, and other brick-and-mortar institutions.

It’s hard for a Catholic who grew up in New York in the 1950s and 1960s to imagine Greenwich Village without St. Vincent’s—indeed, to imagine New York without any Catholic hospitals. If St. Vincent’s does, indeed, close, an era that began before the Civil War will end, for St. Vincent’s is the last Catholic hospital left in New York’s five boroughs.

The Catholic hospital system, like the parochial school system, owed its existence to the culture wars in New York during the 1840s and ’50s, when nativist enmity and violence led then-bishop John Hughes to build separate facilities for his mostly immigrant flock. A recent exhibit at the Museum of the City of New York, entitled “Catholics in New York,” charted the progress of Hughes’ vision. Within a century New York was home to hundreds of Catholic grammar schools, dozens of high schools, several colleges and, of course, a vast and well-regarded health-care system.

The Sisters of Charity ran St. Vincent’s, reminding us of the opportunities the Church allowed women religious—opportunities denied women in the secular world. Nuns not only provided care and education; they ran the institutions that John Hughes and his successors built. Indeed, in the early twentieth century, a remarkable Italian immigrant named Mother Frances Xavier Cabrini used her considerable willpower and devotion to build Columbus Hospital on Manhattan’s East Side. In the early 1970s Columbus was renamed in honor of its most prominent founder. A few years ago, however, Cabrini Medical Center closed, foreshadowing the fate that seems to await St. Vincent’s.

These institutions—and the city’s hundreds of vibrant parishes—made up a parallel universe for New York Catholics for more than a hundred years. Urban Catholics, in New York and elsewhere, identified their place of residence as a parish, not a neighborhood. They were born in Catholic hospitals, educated in Catholic schools, married in their home parishes, and buried in a Catholic cemetery.

That world is slowly—actually, not so slowly—disappearing. That’s not to say there are no vibrant parishes left in New York. Nor is it to say that Catholic schools are doomed. But New York Catholics who grew up in the 1950s and 1960s can’t help but feel a tug as they read, not only of St. Vincent’s plight, but also of the state of Catholic education and other services. The world has changed, and, many would argue, not for the better.

The New York Times summed up the undoing of St. Vincent’s—and, perhaps, of many other Catholic institutions—in a sub-headline on the front page on February 3: “Hospital Was Loyal to a Mission that Limited Profits.”

There is something noble about that sentiment—something that, surely, Archbishop John Hughes would have approved.

The hospital’s mission—indeed, the Church’s mission—has not changed, nor should it. There will be casualties, and there will be change. But would any Catholic, no matter how nostalgic, prefer a Church that would betray its mission for the sake of unlimited profits?

Terry Golway is the director of the Kean Center for American History at Kean University in Union, New Jersey.

Comments:

2.10.2010 | 11:34am
Henry says:
As avolunteer who recently experienced the transition of BonSecour's here in the Detroit area to secular, I felt moist under my glasses reading about St Vincent's. That's not to say that I wouldn't have regardless of being a red-coat volunteer.
2.10.2010 | 12:01pm
jm says:
As I understand it, St. Vincent's is a good example of the havoc that caring for uninsured patients wreaks on a hospital.

Would it be on sounder financial footing with universal health care? Probably.

Many props to St. Vincent's for the selfless care provided for the HIV/AIDS populations in NYC from the 1980s to the present. And even more props for the superb care and attention paid to casualties of the World Trade Center bombing.

On a side note - the West Village community is up in arms about St. vincent's closing. Many in that community were up in arms when St. Vincent's wanted to tear down an architectural monstrosity of a modernist buildling to build a new hospital.

what is klling St. Vincent's? A combination of selfless Christian charity, lack of universal health care, and overzealous preservationists.
2.10.2010 | 12:51pm
jm says:
As i understand it, St. Vincent's has been a victim of its Christian charity. Their care of the uninsured has been extraordinary. In particular, their care of the undocumented immigrant population serves as a model of charity. However, it does not pay the bills.

One wonders what would be if there were universal health care?

There is an ironic aspect about St. Vincent's possible closure. Several years ago, SV tried to raze an architectural monstrosity of a building (but apparently a reasonale example of ugly post-war modernist architecture). The locals and historic preservationists HOWLED about how St. Vincent's should not be allowed to tear down an important architectural specimen and build a new hospital, freeing up other land for condos/other real estate development.

The same community is now mortified that St. Vincen'ts may close as a hospital.

Many props to St. Vincent's for the tireless care provided to people with HIV?AIDS from the early 80s to the present. And let us not forget its role in caring for those injured in 9/11.
2.10.2010 | 12:52pm
JM says:
As i understand it, St. Vincent's has been a victim of its Christian charity. Their care of the uninsured has been extraordinary. In particular, their care of the undocumented immigrant population serves as a model of charity. However, it does not pay the bills.

One wonders what would be if there were universal health care?

There is an ironic aspect about St. Vincent's possible closure. Several years ago, SV tried to raze an architectural monstrosity of a building (but apparently a reasonale example of ugly post-war modernist architecture). The locals and historic preservationists HOWLED about how St. Vincent's should not be allowed to tear down an important architectural specimen and build a new hospital, freeing up other land for condos/other real estate development.

The same community is now mortified that St. Vincen'ts may close as a hospital.

Many props to St. Vincent's for the tireless care provided to people with HIV?AIDS from the early 80s to the present. And let us not forget its role in caring for those injured in 9/11.
2.10.2010 | 1:26pm
SMG says:
As someone who has two children who were born at St. Vincent's (with another born at another closed Catholic hospital in Queens) this is a sad day. I know first hand that you could find many doctors at St. V's, both Catholic and non-Catholic, who supported the culture of life, which can be a difficult thing to find.
2.10.2010 | 6:42pm
amanda says:
In my Eastern Orthodox church children are part of the service. We have a place
for a parent to take children who are too unruly till they calm down and then
reenter the service. It has been a real blessing to me to see how these young
parents love their children and lovingly teach them how to behave in a church
service. These children are not punished for behaving as their age dictates, only
if they are truly disobedient and then it is done in a loving and quiet way.
I am amazed at how much some of them participate beginning at a very young
age because they have positive examples set before them.
2.10.2010 | 6:46pm
Thankfully, the president's universal health-care bill is dying a well-deserved death. Under Obama, Pelosi and Reid, Catholic hospitals would've been put out of business all over the country due to the Dem's plan 1) to make taxpayers fund abortions, 2) to insist Chritian hospitals dispense contraception pharmaceuticals and devices and 3) to stomp out every existing conscience clause for Catholic health providers and to stop any new ones from becoming law.

Many bishops noted that Obamacare would've put almost all of the nation's Catholic hospitals at risk of closing. So, again, we can only be thankful that the president's health-care reform was delivered a death blow by the president's own party, the Democrats. Think of how many people that particular "life-saving" program would've killed.
2.10.2010 | 9:09pm
JM says:
My apologies for the numerous posts of the same material.
I thought my computer was taking a snow day each time I pressed "Submit Comment", but like the US Postal service, nothing would stop my computer from delivering its post through snowy weather.
2.10.2010 | 9:26pm
Universal health care would save St. Vincent's? Not likely. Has it saved Catholic hospitals in the UK? How could it remain Catholic with the total federal government interference in its operation? Maybe it is time to recognize that church-based institutions that are disappearing is inevitable--that they served their purpose for the time they were effective.

Just a thought. Nothing lasts forever.
2.11.2010 | 11:37am
Henry says:
If universal health care is to be what saves hospitals like St Vincent, I can forget about the moist under the glasses. It would be more like a deluge of tears.
2.14.2010 | 8:54pm
The current situation that is faced by St. Vincent's is nothing less then sad. This institution has stood to help those in need since before the civil war and deserves better then it has received. Many pay homage to the lose of "the catholic community" and lack of faith that has lead to St. Vincent's downfall. This is simply a scenario painted to make the current situation appear more nostalgic or romantic. St. Vincent's downfall is a result of mismanagement that began in the late 1990's, when against advice of Ernst and Young, the then president moved forward with a merger to join with several other Catholic facilities in Queens and Brooklyn that were clearly suffering as a result of their geographic locations. In my opinion, the desire to be the "lead executive" in a larger system outweighted what was in the best interest of the hospital.
This hospital has always provided outstanding care that resulted in incredible surpluses prior to the merger. Those surpluses were used up during the first few years of the merger and began the downward spiral.
I am so proud to have worked at this facitlity and having worked in many leading faciliities around the country, I can tell you, there was no place like St. Vincent's, the level of care was second to none. Most employees that have worked there or do work there have the same level of pride. I worked there through the 9-11 crisis and saw the whole left in the north tower of the World Trade Center from my office window. I came to work the following day when only my SVH ID would get me past 12th St.
I do believe that under the right management SVH has the building blocks to profit and to continue it's legacy of providing outstanding and cutting edge care. I believe it should be given a chance and I am grateful to the Sister's of Charity for running such a great facility, their daily presence was a source of inspiration and pride.
Many of us who had family enter this country via New York had family that was treated at St. Vincent's and thus we all have a legacy to the facility.
I think it would be great, if we, the ancestors, could help one of the first hospitals in NY that made it possible for our families to flourish....
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact