Ads


The Soldier’s Rough Charity

I have been used to calling the national holiday we celebrated yesterday—most of us as a Monday off, a good time for gardening or cookouts—“Oblivion Day,” when we Americans all forget the men (and now some women too) who have died in our wars, to establish our nation in freedom and to keep that nation free. When I was a child, it seemed that every little town expressed our pride in parades. My little town did. My cousins and I would get up early in the morning to follow the men in uniform up to the Protestant cemetery on the hilltop, where we heard them fire a twenty-one gun salute, followed by a bugler playing Taps.

Then we hopped on a fire truck and proceeded with the parade through town, ending up at the Catholic cemetery on the mountainside opposite, for another salute, and a memorial Mass. It all ended up at the American Legion, for free doughnuts and orange juice.

It's been more than thirty years since the last Memorial Day parade there, and I'm sure that my town is hardly alone in that regard. But parades or no, I think we are witnessing a certain revival of Memorial Day, along with a revival of something better than the disdain or the grudging respect with which the veterans of the Vietnam War were greeted. That something is a real gratitude for our soldiers, even affection.

Last night my children and I were part of a packed stadium in Pawtucket, Rhode Island, to watch a minor league ballgame, and then to see the Memorial Day fireworks. There was, throughout, that American assumption, still alive and well, that ordinary and sane people believe in a God to whom one can pray.

So, before the seventh inning, the male quartet that had opened the game with the National Anthem (during which everyone, men and women, young and old, stood at attention, sometimes with hands over the heart, and often singing), regaled the crowd with “God Bless America.” After the game was over, they came back onto the field, this time with a soprano lead, to sing “America the Beautiful,” with that petitionary subjunctive that I'm sure everybody mistakes for an indicative statement of fact, “God shed His grace on thee.”

Then during the fireworks, the loudspeakers again played patriotic music, including the pop tune heard everywhere after the bombing of the Twin Towers, “God Bless the USA.” The scoreboard flashed the pictures and names of local men and women who were serving in the military.

Most were but privates, but some were sergeants, and some, it was clear, had been in the service a very long time. Some of the photographs were portraits of the men in uniform, straight shots, no smiles. Others were informal; a father holding a baby, a mother beaming alongside her small child, three friends sitting beside a tank. Every once in a while someone in the crowd would holler or whistle, in honor of someone he knew.

What has changed, since the often shameful treatment of the men who returned from Vietnam? I'm not entirely sure, but I'd like to venture a few suggestions. For one, the soldier represents an ideal of honor and self-sacrifice that is hard to find elsewhere in American life. Elsewhere, one is told to “make something” of oneself, meaning study hard, not for the sake of knowledge, but to earn the pedigree needed to enter the world of well-remunerated work.

Yet we hunger for what such dismal utilitarian habits cannot supply. So we look to the soldier, who may well make his career in or from the service, yet who endures privations we can hardly imagine, and puts his life on the line for his fellows. It is a kind of rough charity, and immensely appealing. All those faces upon the scoreboard were of people who had volunteered to enter the service, knowing that they might well be sent to dangerous lands far away.

Another possible cause is the peculiar makeup of our armies. We now have women in khakis and flak jackets. It is hard for the snarlingest despiser of the American military to look at the smooth chins and slender physiques of women in uniform and call them baby-killers or imperialists or whatever the insult of the day may be. I have a hunch that their presence has roused a certain protective feeling on the part of us civilians, exactly as when people used to call soldiers “our boys.”

Now I am not saying that there is any military use for women in combat, nor do I believe it marks an advance in our civilization that we send mommies in uniform overseas. But it is hard even for my fellow college professors to look at a Private Marcie and sneer, and that may well keep them from sneering in turn at Private Kyle and Sergeant Keith.

Still another cause may be the passing of the men who fought in the Second World War. This so-called Greatest Generation, of those who struggled through the Depression as children, who fought the bloodiest war in man's history, and who returned to rebuild the United States, has received from even the self-absorbed generation that followed them (mine) an astonishing degree of gratitude and honor. It is, I think, a perfectly healthy thing, to look back with forgiving kindness upon the virtues of one's forefathers.

Whatever the cause, I am cheered to see Memorial Day reviving. Those secularists among whom I have spent my whole professional life may find it atavistic to sing to God, and to pray that he may bless our nation. They have preached a faculty lounge Marxism that costs them nothing, while smiling with contempt upon young people, even their own students, who wish to give their all for their country.

But the people, the common people, the people who go to minor league baseball games, as ill-taught as they are, still know that their country is something to be loved, that they had better pray for God’s blessing, that they owe much to men and women long dead, and that the soldier with all his faults is to be revered. And they are right.

Soldiers, if some of our elites despise what you do, remember that we salute you, on Memorial Day of course, when we might think to say so, but also on this day after, and on every day. God bless you.

Anthony Esolen is professor of English at Providence College, a senior editor of Touchstone, and the translator of Dante’s Divine Comedy and other works, as well as the author of Ironies of Faith. His webpage can be found here.

Comments:

6.1.2010 | 7:48am
The main reason Memorial Day has revived, along with respect and liking for those in the armed services, is 9/11. For years leftists were successful at painting the military as an expression and tool of the U.S.'s imperialism and a place of last resort for losers. After 9/11 most Americans realized we need our armed services, and even though the subsequent wars have not been supported by everyone, at least they have some connection to threats against our country.

I think too that the alternative media have helped greatly -- Fox News constantly featuring military heroes, soldiers able to tell their stories on talk radio and the internet, YouTube giving voice to anybody who wants to sing a patriotic song, or make a patriotic video with flags, eagles, and all the other symbolism that stirs many Americans' hearts.

That's the point -- most Americans would have continued to celebrate Memorial Day if they had not been shamed out of it. People have found their voice, and ordinary patriotic feelings and thoughts have asserted themselves.

The towns near where I live in Maryland have always had Memorial Day parades. This year I walked in the Sharpsburg parade carrying a sign for a candidate for state delegate who was walking and throwing candy to the children, in front of a red convertible with his signs on the sides. There were about 80 entries in the parade, from local brass bands to little baton twirlers to local businesses with flatbed trucks from which people threw candy. (Candy is a big deal in parades.) People were packed along the main street, waving and calling out to the people they knew in the parade. The best part was that after we walked through the town of Sharpsburg, we went a block up a hill and ended up at Antietam national cemetery, where some of the dead from that battle are buried.
6.1.2010 | 8:39am
Michael says:
Good article. However, and I apologize for the provincialism, I mostly read it because I grew up in RI and have gone do dozens of games at McCoy stadium. :)
6.1.2010 | 10:24am
Art says:
So many of us are consumed with our own little world not realizing that are own little world was made possible by the grace of God through the folks who have served in our armed forces. Thanks for this article and when we sing God Bless America or America the Beautiful, may they not just be words but prayers.
6.1.2010 | 11:52am
Jesurgislac says:
Vietnam veterans were treated shamefully, but the last sustained public attack on a Vietnam veteran was the Bush campaign's "Swift Boat Veterans for Truth" which engaged in a political slander of John Kerry's military service - as far as anyone can tell, primarily as a diversion from public discussion of George W. Bush's desertion from the military during the Vietnam War.

(The moral difference between left and right; John Kerry served honorably and well in Vietnam, and the response from the right was to slander his service when he ran for President. John McCain has traded on his period of captivity in Vietnam for his entire political career, but the left kindly let him do so, respecting his experience and his service, rather than unkindly pointing out his many failures.)

Remember that it wasthe Republican National Convention who mocked the Purple Heart award by wearing "purple heart bandaids" to indicate their contempt for Vietnam veterans who had received this award, merely because the Democratic candidate for President that year was a decorated vet - and the Republican candidate was a deserter.

That said, I don't doubt that people are more willing to celebrate Memorial Day when, as now,the times are hard, stop-loss is in operation, and people are more likely than they were in past decades s ince the last year of conscription to know someone who is currently serving overseas.
6.1.2010 | 1:08pm
John R T says:
Dear Jesurgislac,

We are all blessed with this moderator: your willful ignorance and pitiful self-deception are a gift to all. Your tribe of narrow-minded bigots will be always with us. We need you. I trust that few children are exposed to your anger and hate. Adults can find in your disturbing screed another reason to reach out in love to the blind.

Thank you, moderator, for giving us this reminder.
6.1.2010 | 3:51pm
Dave says:
Re John Kerry: the swift boaters were the real Vietnam heroes who outed John Kerry as a liar and an opportunist. The chief swift boater whose name escapes me now was a democrat who opposed George Bush. Reading their book might help (or not) Jesurgislac get in touch with reality. On a more positive note, I went to a Memorial Day parade in Milford, Michigan which was started 17 years ago by the local American Legion post. 10 people showed up for the first one but it is a big deal in a small town and hundreds show up and every veteran, no matter where they're from, is invited to come march in the parade and gets a medallion saying "thank you honored veteran for your service" (there was even a Polish veteran of the Polish army in WWII).
6.1.2010 | 5:49pm
Matt says:
I think Jesurgislac's comment was a suitable response to Judy K. Warner's divisive little screed. John Kerry fully deserves to be honored on Memorial Day. God bless every one of our veterans, whatever his or her political orientation. Let us not sully the commitment of any one of them by politically-motivated mud-slinging.
6.1.2010 | 9:07pm
wjyoder says:
Greetings!
I'm surprised how nasty some of you respondants are to this article. What's the point? Is this again a sign of the present fractured nature of our country?

For me, I served two years in post-WWII Europe rebuilding what that terrible war had destroyed. I seek to follow Christ in all of life. Let the nation-state do what it has to do; my loyalty is to the church.

Thank you and let's pray for those lead out in all nations.
6.1.2010 | 10:38pm
Woody Jones says:
I was asked lately by a Staff officer whether a soldier falling in a righteous cause — and our cause is such, to demonstration — is not virtually a martyr. Well, he is not a martyr in the rigorous theological meaning of the word, inasmuch as he dies in arms, whereas the martyr delivers himself, undefended and unarmed, into the hands of the executioner. But if I am asked what I think of the eternal salvation of a brave man who has consciously given his life in defence of his country's honor, and in vindication of violated justice, I shall not hesitate to reply that without any doubt whatever Christ crowns his military valour, and that death, accepted in this Christian spirit, assures the safety of that man's soul.

"Greater love than this no man hath," said Our Saviour, " than a man lay down his life for his friends." And the soldier who dies to save his brothers, and to defend the hearths and altars of his country, reaches this highest of all degrees of charity. He may not have made a close analysis of the value of his sacrifice; but must we suppose that God requires of the plain soldier in the excitement of battle the methodical precision of the moralist or the theologian? Can we who revere his heroism doubt that his God welcomes him with love?

Christian mothers, be proud of your sons. Of all griefs, of all our human sorrows, yours is perhaps the most worthy of veneration. I think I behold you in j'our affliction, but erect, standing at the side of the Mother of Sorrows, at the foot of the Cross. Suffer us to offer you not only our condolence but our congratulation. Not all our heroes obtain temporal honors, but for all we expect the immortal crown of the elect. For this is the virtue of a single act of perfect charity: it cancels a whole lifetime of sins. It transforms a sinful man into a saint.

Assuredly a great and a Christian comfort is the thought that not only amongst our own men, but in any belligerent army whatsoever, all who in good faith submit to the discipline of their leaders in the service of a cause they believe to be righteous, are sharers in the eternal reward of the soldier's sacrifice. And how many may there not be among these young men of twenty who, had they survived, might possibly not have had the resolution to live altogether well, and yet in the impulse of patriotism had the resolution to die so well?

Is it not true, my Brethren, that God has the supreme art of mingling His mercy with His wisdom and His justice? And shall we not acknowledge that if war is a scourge for this earthly life of ours, a scourge whereof we cannot easily estimate the destructive force and the extent, it is also for multitudes of souls an expiation, a purification, a force to lift them to the pure love of their country and to perfect Christian unselfishness?

Desiree, Cardinal Mercier (Primate of Belgium in WWI)
“Patriotism and Endurance”
6.3.2010 | 2:00am
Max says:
Dear Prof. Esolen,

Thank you for your thoughtful reflection. I am on my second deployment with the 1092d EN BN (Iraq 2003-2004, now Afghanistan 2010-2011). I carry three names of the fallen in my memory that I served with (2004, 2004, 2010). It is looking like that list will likely be added to this year if trends continue. I greatly appreciate your sentiments on this matter.

One of the most difficult things I witnessed personally after returning home in 2004 was seeing a group who call themselves "Patriots for Peace" in my hometown of Charleston WV display the names of the fallen on banners as an argument for withdrawal. I read them the riot act as not one person among them could tell me the date and circumstances of the deaths of the two (at that time) that I knew (or any of them for that matter). I assured them that both of them would vehemetly object to their names being used for such purposes and tha the group had no right whatsoever to exploit the names of any fallen without the consent of their next of kin. But I digress.

Thankfully, as you point out, the vast majority of our people seem to be re-connecting with the sacrifices, final and otherwise, being made by our troops.

I wish you had been one of my college professors, it would have been a welcome respite from the class of 1968 I dealt with.

Woody, thank you too for the WWI quote from Cardinal Mercier.

Best regards,

MAJ J.C. (Max) Wilkinson
XO, TF Red Dragon
Sharana, Afghanistan
6.4.2010 | 9:47am
Mike says:
I am another university faculty member who, like Professor Esolen, daily faces the snide cynicism of my bien pensant colleagues. But I'm also one who gets a lump in my throat every May when our town has its Memorial Day parade, from the high school to the local cemetery.

Partly this is my pride in my daughter, who has been a drummer in the local fire department band since she was 16 - she understands what others have sacrificed that she can be free. Partly it's in remembrance of my dad and uncles who served in the Army, Navy and Marines in WWII - they had no desire to fight, but when called to do so, they did. And, finally, it's my respect for the fine young men and women of today who served and died with honor to defend our country.
6.7.2010 | 6:51am
Jesurgislac says:
Max: One of the most difficult things I witnessed personally after returning home in 2004 was seeing a group who call themselves "Patriots for Peace" in my hometown of Charleston WV display the names of the fallen on banners as an argument for withdrawal. I read them the riot act as not one person among them could tell me the date and circumstances of the deaths of the two (at that time) that I knew (or any of them for that matter). I assured them that both of them would vehemetly object to their names being used for such purposes and tha the group had no right whatsoever to exploit the names of any fallen without the consent of their next of kin. But I digress.

No, I think this exactly the point:

A few years ago, an online friend was killed in Iraq. A regular blogger at a site I follow, he had written a "Last Post" for us. One of the specific things he asked of us was that we cite his death neither as a reason for withdrawal from Iraq nor as a justification for continuing - he did not wish his death to be used as a political trading point for either side.

Anthony Esolen's post is not politically divisive. Judy's comment was. As were the disgusting attacks on John Kerry's service when he ran for President.

One thing is always true, or ought to be: death ends all politics. The dead ought not to be made use of to serve anyone's political ends.

While I daresay I agree more with your Patriots for Peace group than I might generally with you, I agree absolutely with you that they ought not to have used the names of those who died in Iraq on their banners, unless they themselves had a personal connection with them and knew they would have been Okay with that.
10.20.2010 | 1:58am
I think Jesurgislac's comment was a suitable response to Judy K. Warner's divisive little screed. John Kerry fully deserves to be honored on Memorial Day. God bless every one of our veterans, whatever his or her political orientation. Let us not sully the commitment of any one of them by politically-motivated mud-slinging. For me, I served two years in post-WWII Europe rebuilding what that terrible war had destroyed. I seek to follow Christ in all of life. Let the nation-state do what it has to do; my loyalty is to the church.
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact