Ads


David Bentley Hart

view all featured authors »

New Year’s Titanic Gods

Since other writers on this site have already declared their indifference to or hostility towards New Year’s celebrations, I suppose I should avoid doing the same, if only for variety’s sake. The truth is, though, that my family never observed the day when I was growing up, and always made a point of going to bed well before midnight on New Year’s Eve.

In part, I think, this was simply because everyone in my family tends to be of a somewhat reclusive temperament, and so is generally averse to loud noises, close crowds, or forced jollity. In larger part, though, I think we always saw New Year’s Day—when treated as a kind of feast day of its own—as a profane intrusion on the twelve days of Christmas, which was by far our favorite time of year. From Christmas Eve to Twelfth Night, we were fairly good at keeping the festal flames alight and really had no need of any other excuse for our good spirits.

There is, of course, a feast of the Church traditionally celebrated on January 1st: to wit, the Feast of the Circumcision, considered important not merely as a commemoration of an episode from the biography of Christ, but as a remembrance of the first blood shed by Christ for the sake of the world’s redemption. But that obviously has nothing whatever to do with the arrival of the new year. In fact, throughout the Middle Ages, there was little firm agreement regarding what day really marked the inauguration of a new year, even though the Roman mensal calendar was in continual use.

Anyway, now that I have a family of my own, we do observe the changing of the calendar year in our own tepid way. A glass of champagne at midnight on New Year’s Eve, a few mince pies—that sort of thing. My wife, being English, also likes to scare up a few Christmas crackers to pull open, for the amusement of our son, who quite likes having a reason to stay up late.

But, on the whole, it is still a minor observance for us, and nothing to compare to the celebrations we like to hold on Twelfth Night, the eve of Epiphany, when the last of the Christmas presents are opened, games are played, and the decorations come down from the tree. (I know many Americans think of Christmas as a single day and like to clear away the trappings of the season well before the fifth of January, but that is sheer barbarism, if you ask me, morally only a few steps removed from human sacrifice, cannibalism, or golf.)

The long and the short of it, then, is that I have really nothing much to say about New Year’s Day. But I thought I might offer a little in the way of New Year’s trivia, just to make my small contribution to the day’s festivities, for those disposed to observe them. And, since it is essentially a rather pagan sort of celebration, I thought I would confine my remarks to things pagan.

Admittedly, there have been no practicing pagans in my family since the death of my great uncle Aloysius Bentley, who liked to welcome in the new year by sacrificing a goat or a couple of woodcocks to the gods Janus and Dionysus on a small altar he had had fixed up in his back garden, and then devouring the oblations with copious quantities of Greek wine. But one does not have to be an adherent of that kind of old time religion to take an interest in its folklore.

The oldest Roman calendar of which we know comprised only 304 days and began in March. The winter season was left in a sort of extra-calendrical limbo until the months of Ianuarius and Februarius were added either by King Numa around 714 BC or by the Decemvirs around 450 BC (Roman histories differ upon this point).

January took its name from Janus, a rather uncanny deity associated with all things liminal, whose name is cognate with the Latin words ianua (which means the door or entryway to a house) and ianus (which means an arcade or covered passageway). It was also Numa who built the walled shrine of Janus—the Ianus Geminus—whose gates—the Portae Belli—stood always open in times of war, and were closed only in times of peace.

How old a god Janus is we cannot really say, but some speculate that he was quite a prominent member of the Roman family of deities in very ancient times. Whether he was always depicted as a god with two faces or two heads is difficult to say, but it seems that he was always a god associated with great transitions. It was propitious to invoke his blessings at the beginning of any new undertaking or in the face of some great change in one’s circumstances: a new business venture, the purchase of land, the consecration of a new house, a military campaign, a birth, a marriage, a funeral, political promotion, and so on.

In the nineteenth century, a number of scholars even advanced the suggestion that Janus was one of the oldest of the Indo-European gods, and that he was in fact originally identical to the Hindu god Ganesha (that rather enchanting fellow with the elephant’s head that you frequently encounter at the door of Indian restaurants). The names are certainly similar, and of course both gods appear somewhat irregular above the neck (Saivite legend explains Ganesha’s unconventional good looks as the result of an accident involving his father Shiva’s contemplative “third eye,” but that may be a later development of the myth).

More importantly, though, Ganesha is also a god of passageways and gates, a liminal god, one whose blessing is invoked at the beginnings of new undertakings. So it is not at all unlikely that—just as, say, the old Vedic deity Varuna was originally one and the same with the Peloponnesian Ouranos—Ganesha and Janus might once have been some single titanic god of strange and terrible aspect.

Who knows, though? I do not, but it is the best I can come up with for this occasion. Whatever the case, I hope any of you who plan to spend tomorrow night chasing after strange gods will find something of interest in it. At my house, however, we will still be celebrating Christmas.

David B. Hart is a contributing writer of First Things. His most recent book is Atheist Delusions: The Christian Revolution and Its Fashionable Enemies (Yale University Press). His previous “On the Square” articles can be found here.

Comments:

12.31.2010 | 2:50am
While the dogwood trees in front of my house have been adorned with lights for two weeks or so, the free Christmas tree I procured on Christmas Eve remains buried under a foot of snow in my back yard. I'm going to set it up tomorrow, the seventh day of Christmas, and adorn it with the two unopened boxes of red lights I have!

Merry Christmastime to you and yours, David.
12.31.2010 | 6:19am
Supernova says:
It's interesting to note the history of an observance, but seems strange to base one's current observance on history.

Most of us associate New Year's celebrations with drinking and kissing, loud parties and friends. I don't personally know anyone who will spend the evening chasing false gods, just false promises and false hopes - those darned New Year's Resolutions.

Most of us were aware, even long before The Da Vinci Code, that the time of celebration over Christ's birth was changed to December for the sake of pagan worship of the winter solstice. Does anyone seriously have a problem with celebrating Christmas in December because of its history?
12.31.2010 | 9:10am
Stuart Koehl says:
From the children's television show, I learned what I had been missing all these years by turning in at my usual time on New Year's Eve:

1. The green flash at midnight.
2. The rush to change all the calendars before the arrival of the calendar police.
3. The meeting of all the parents and teachers at school, where they determine how much homework to give in the coming year.

And my favorite:

4. The wrestling match between the old dude with the beard, and the baby in the diaper. The baby is fast, but the old dude is tricky. If the baby wins, then the new year gets to begin. If the old dude wins, it's six more weeks of winter.
12.31.2010 | 10:26am
When the calendar system of Anno Domini was first introduced by Dionysius Exiguus in A. D. 525, he assigned the beginning of the new year to March 25, the Feast of the Annunciation, because the era of Grace began with the Incarnation of Christ.
12.31.2010 | 11:07am
cnb says:
Supernova, the story about Christmas being associated with a pagan festival should not be repeated with too much confidence. Wasn't there something about this recently at the FT blog? Yes, there was.

http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2010/12/23/how-december-25-became-christmas-2/
12.31.2010 | 12:04pm
Stuart Koehl says:
"When the calendar system of Anno Domini was first introduced by Dionysius Exiguus in A. D. 525, he assigned the beginning of the new year to March 25, the Feast of the Annunciation, because the era of Grace began with the Incarnation of Christ."

Little Denny was assigning a mystagogical interpretation to the civil practice of the Roman Empire. In the Calendar of Gondor and Arnor, the Fourth Age was said to begin on 25 March because that day marked the destruction of the Ring of Power.
12.31.2010 | 12:46pm
A Lyttle says:
@ Supernova

You seem to have read something into this column I missed. I didn't notice any serious recommendation against celebrating the New Year--just a confession of indifference. I did, however, notice a purely facetious tone throughout. I don't think Dr Hart believes that New Year's Eve celebrations are actually pagan, or that his Great Uncle Aloysius actually sacrificed goats to Janus in his garden, or that he really morally equates golf with human sacrifice. I think the point was: 'I don't have a column for you this week, so here are some fun facts. Happy New Year.'
12.31.2010 | 12:48pm
Supernova says:
@cnb

I don't hold this blog as a reference. Just because people can comment on each blog doesn't exactly make it "peer-reviewed" or scientific. A better reference, a clearly peer-reviewed and peer-edited one, would of course be wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christmas

But the timing of Christmas was merely an example. There are also Easter celebrations having to do with eggs and rabbits that are also related to pagan ceremonies about reproduction. Many people celebrate these traditions, despite their origins. My point was merely that this doesn't mean that anyone is trying to be pagan, or to chase after strange gods. It is done simply in the name of tradition.
12.31.2010 | 12:51pm
I totally agree. I struggle with how we confine Christmas to one day, or at most a day plus and evening! It is another example of "American Civil Religion" where consumerism is king. I often think that Christians should live by the Church year, not because it holds some mysterious trsansformative power, but because it aligns our life more with the redemption story. Plus it is a way to live faithfully in light of our increasing "secular" world.
12.31.2010 | 12:54pm
Aimee says:
cnb: In a word, yup. More recent scholarship connects the dating of Christmas to the dating of Easter--tradition long held that the annunciation and the crucifixion happened on the same day, March 25. So Jesus' birth was dated nine moths after. There's little actual evidence to suggest that the December date was chosen to correspond to pagan celebrations. That seems to be a happy coincidence, though a fortuitous one from the vantage point of conversion.
12.31.2010 | 2:32pm
Stuart Koehl says:
"More recent scholarship connects the dating of Christmas to the dating of Easter--tradition long held that the annunciation and the crucifixion happened on the same day, March 25. So Jesus' birth was dated nine moths after."

Except, of course, that this theory wilts in the light of liturgical scholarship demonstrating that all the feasts of the Nativity Cycle were once subsumed in a single Feast of the Manifestation (Epiphania) or Divine Manifestation (Theophania), which was celebrated on 25 December in the West and 6 January in the East. These encompassed all the events in salvation history when the Incarnate Lord manifested himself to the world--the Annunciation, the Nativity, the Visitation of the Magi, the Baptism in the Jordan, the Circumcision, the Presentation in the Temple, and even the Wedding Feast in Cana. Only much later were these broken out from each other and distributed around the liturgical calendar, the Nativity being assigned to 25 December during a fourth century exchange of feasts between the East and the West.

It's all moot anyway, since the Feasts of the Church do not celebrate or commemorate dates in salvation history; that is, these are not exercises in "historicism". The eminent Jesuit scholar, Fr. Robert Taft, has put it very succinctly:

***********************************

Contrary to what is always said, liturgical feasts are not celebrations of events in salvation history. They are celebrations of the mysteries of salvation revealed to us in the biblical narrative of those events. In the East, the original feast of the Nativity cycle was January 6. In the West, it was December 25. What both feasts celebrated was not the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem, nor his baptism in the Jordan, but the mystery of the manifestation, originally known as “epiphania” (manifestation) or “theophania” (divine manifestation); i.e., the appearance of God’s salvation in the Incarnation of his only-begotten Son. So, originally, each feast included all of the scenarios at the beginning of the Gospels that concern Jesus’ first manifesting this salvation, in some cases including even the Marriage Feast in Cana in Jn 2:1-11. Only later did the several biblical scenarios get redistributed between the two days, as a result of an exchange of feasts between East and West. This, then, is why the same richness of Scripture readings found in the East on January 6 are found in the West on December 25.

So, if both traditions wish to preserve their identity, the answer is not for them to imitate each other blindly, but for each to return to the roots of its own heritage. In this case, the West needs to stop thinking that Christmas is centered on a medieval Italian invention, Baby Jesus in the presepio. For there is no Baby Jesus; there is only the Risen Glorified Lord seated at the right hand of the Father, and He and his saving mysteries is what Christmas and Easter and everything is about. The Western January 6 feast is not a feast of the Magi, but of the manifestation of salvation to the Gentiles, a thematic which the East celebrates on February 2, the feast the West calls the “Presentation of Jesus in the Temple” as recounted in Lk 2:22-38—but which in Greek is called the Hypophante or “Encounter”, the meeting of the Savior with those He has come to save.

(Liturgy in the Life of the Church, 1999)
**********************************
12.31.2010 | 2:36pm
AL says:
@ Aimee

I think you mean 'fortunate', not 'fortuitous'. A common solecism these days.

But, after all, perhaps 25 March was chosen for the annunciation because it corresponded to two great pagan fertility festivals at the beginning of spring.
12.31.2010 | 3:21pm
Jewish, Old Testament culture, had - and still has - a festival New Year; Rosh Hashanha, the "head" of the New Year. Usually in September.

You are supposed to have a hearty good time, on that New Year's season. Says God.
12.31.2010 | 4:37pm
Joe says:
God of course, spells it correctly: "Rosh Hashanah."
12.31.2010 | 5:37pm
Stuart Koehl says:
Every culture has seasonal feasts. Rosh Hoshannah (there are many acceptable spellings) originated as a Fall harvest festival; Pesach (Pascha, Passover) as a Spring Equinox feast; both later received a theological interpretation within the history of God's Covenant with Israel. Christians, of course, appropriated these feasts unto itself, baptizing them with Christian significance. Thus, Passover marks God's deliverance of Israel from bondage in Egypt; Pascha marks Christ's deliverance of the New Israel from bondage to sin and death.

Why should it surprise, therefore, that the Jews, the Pagans and the Christians all have feasts around the Winter Solstice? In our festal cycle, we Christians participate in the events of salvation history marked by the Feasts; since these events perdure in the divine kairos, when the occur during the year is irrelevant. But man--and the Church--live in "chronos"--linear time--and therefore we are as affected by the changing of the seasons as everybody else. Associating the Festal cycle with the seasonal calendar serves to connect the spiritual world with the material world, for man of all God's creations is both a psycho-somatic entity and a microcosmos.
12.31.2010 | 9:35pm
Mark VA says:
Me thinks it's OK to enjoy a little jollity every now and then, when the occasion calls for it - didn't our Lord change a large amount of water into wine after, judging from the concerns of the chief steward, everyone in the party already had their fill of the cheaper kind? Provided that the abstimonious designated driver can stick to his puritan duties, that is.

Geesh, I don't think they'll be reading First Things on Milwaukee Avenue in Chicago tonight. Happy St. Sylvester's Eve!
12.31.2010 | 9:46pm
kentuckyliz says:
All I know is, after Epiphany, and the brief mid-January busy season at work, I go into a funk until spring, or at least Ash Wednesday. I wish it were cultural to keep the strands of lights blazing bright through the dark seasonal night of the soul. Sigh.

No, I don't worship at the Church of the Almighty Super Bowl, so that is no consolation to me.
1.1.2011 | 8:02am
Stuart Koehl says:
"All I know is, after Epiphany, and the brief mid-January busy season at work, I go into a funk until spring, or at least Ash Wednesday. I wish it were cultural to keep the strands of lights blazing bright through the dark seasonal night of the soul. Sigh."

For the Eastern Churches, 2 February is the Hypoponte (Encounter), which the West calls the Feast of the Presentation of Christ at the Temple. For us, it fills the same purpose as the Visitation of the Magi--the manifestation of Christ to the Gentiles.

Almost right after that, in most years, we move into the five Sundays of preparation for Lent, with the Sunday of Zaccheus. Every great feast is preceded by a fast, and its post-festive is followed by one, too.
1.2.2011 | 1:40am
"Atheist Delusions" Your reference to this book is amazing. (btw I have borrowed a bit from some other posters to make my points.)

All one has to do is read history, and see that almost all of the mass organized theft and murder we called wars were due to or supported by religion.

The catholic church joined with constantine about 400 AD. Launching the beginnings of the dark ages. A university study a year ago found that except for the rigidity of the church, we most likely would have had the Internet by the year 1600, instead of the Inquisition and torture of eg those who challenged the flat earth theory.

From 900 to 1500 AD the chuch and the catholic kings of Europe raped and murdered in the "anything but christian" crusades against the muslim peoples. And advanced for its time civilization that gave us Arabic numerals and advanced mathematics. Societyies have long memories, in case any of you have forgotten 9/11. the church poisoned the language, culture and religion o the muslims, and they haven't forgotten, even if they don't really remember their own holocaust at the hands of christianity.

The catholic church burned at the stake perhaps a million women as witches. To ensure male dominance and prevent the growth of a competing religion.

the catholic church murdered and tortured an estimated 100,000 during the inquisition. Anything and everything in the way of horror was accepted in an attempt to prevent what did become the still incomplete reformation of christianity.

The catholic church, hated the Jews. Hitler came to power on that hatred, and has yet to be EXcommunicated. And 55 millioin died. While hitler continually spoke of his christian values, many of his speeches preserved in a book in a large library which I have seen.

And now the catholic church demonizes gays. I guess gays are the next victim on the churches list to hate, just as hitler threw them into the ovens with the Jews and others.

Aethists such as myself have a simple belief: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you, or actually as put by Jesus, "love thy neighbor as thyself" Whch for my whole family and most of our friends, gay and str8 is our guiding light.

And if there is a God, I am sure we will be properly rewarded. But for the leaders who make a mockery of everything Jesus life was meant to be as a guide to mankind, I am sure that if there is a God he will judge. And my guess is it will be very very ugly.

And btw- don't give me the old "god gave man free will" BS> that if nothing else is a perfect example of why there most likely isn't a God.

If we could only take Jesus commandment = the words of a Jewish Rebbe from 2000 years ago, and enshrine it in our society, we'd be a truely decent and loving society.

all the rest of religion seems to be nothing but fluff and brainwashing, based on creating fear of going to hell if you don't do as you are told by often evil people. And the promise of heaven or paraidse, which btw in their theology was the driving force behind those who flew planes into buildings in the name of really the same God.
1.2.2011 | 5:42am
Michael PS says:
The date of the Annunciation is based on Luke 1:26 – “In the sixth month...” according to the Hebrew reckoning.

Here in Scotland, the celebration of Christmas was banned in 1583 under Presbyterian pressure and Hogmanay or New Year was celebrated, as a substitute. It was only in 1958 that Christmas day became a public holiday.
1.2.2011 | 10:40am
The material sense of religious feasts, was to fatten up the population, with harvest excess. Particularly, just before the lean months of winter. When there was less food around. And many might starve, without preparation.

A mid-winter feast, like CHristmas, would have help distribute food to marginal persons. Who might otherwise die of of hunger. Ritual fasting, would reflect what would have been the natural hunger of these populations.

Much of religion therefore, had a material function.

Something to cheer up your lean times?
1.2.2011 | 5:28pm
Ask the simplest questionms, get the craziest paranoid answers. Some readers of FIRST THINGS should be put away.
1.2.2011 | 5:47pm
Mark VA says:
Joe-James-etc:

Where is this atheist paradise, where cold determinism brings us spiritual comfort or temporal well-being? What is the atheist Sermon on the Mount to order our lives by?

Can atheism ever stand on its own two feet, or is it bound to feed itself solely on accusations, show trials, and class exploitation?
1.2.2011 | 11:18pm
T says:
A Prayer From Jesus

It's finally come down to this, I knew it would eventually. Unfortunately for YOU, who have missed the mark, which means you are going to hell. Your portion will be in the lake of fire. Don't be offended at me, it's your preacher, or that radio personality, even that man that told you that you are saved, blame them. Then again when your screaming in the pit it really doesn't matter whose at fault, does it. For it is your responsibility to know the way of salvation.

Why? You ask. Simply, you trusted man to lead you to Christ. Not once have you asked Jesus if you are saved. If you did you never waited for an answer. There is only one that we should ask on how to be saved, that is Christ Jesus.

Jesus has made it easy for you to know where you will stand on the last day. Pray this Prayer, and Jesus will answer all who diligently seeks Him.

These are the last days, This is your last chance.
Pray the Prayer, and KNOW!

- A PRAYER FROM JESUS -

This prayer is from Jesus that we may hear from Him, that He may speak to our hearts. It only consist of three simple steps.

1) We need to read one scripture. This will focus us in the word that brings everlasting life.

2) Since this prayer is from Jesus we need to direct our prayer to Him personally. Too often Christian focuses they're prayer's to G_D the father. Scripture proclaims that Jesus should be the focus of our prayer.

3) The simplest part of this Prayer is to ask Jesus one question. Please, all that is required for this question is that it should be simple. Let Jesus Himself finish the question when He gives you that understanding through this prayer.

The PRAYER

The scripture that is the focus of this prayer is "ACTS 2:38". It's not necessary to do any study into this scripture. Jesus Himself will give you the understanding that will resonate in your heart. Just read Acts 2:38, keep it in your heart and take this one scripture to prayer

The most important part of this prayer is that we need to direct our prayer directly to Jesus. If you normally would say Father in your prayer, change your focus from the Father to Christ Jesus, by lifting Jesus name up every time you would normally use Father in your prayer.

Maybe the hardest part of this prayer is the question that we need to ask Jesus. For man as we are, always trying to understand the question instead of listening to the answer. The simplest question is all that is required.

Simply ask Jesus 'WHY'

For those who are obedient
tsquare777(at)gmail.com
1.3.2011 | 1:02pm
@ The Webmaster of this page (Joe Carter, I believe),

For the love of God, do you have to let every comment through? Even the deranged ones? I have no idea who 'T' is, but you should not allow persons of unstable mind to make an exhibition of themselves in that way. It is not good for them, and it is certainly not good for the rest of us. It is uncharitable of you not to exercise a little prudent care. This is a discussion thread, and there is no need to include these blasts of psychosis from deep left field in the discussion.

@ James Murphy

Your ignorance of history is a wide and deep as the heavens. But your problems are emotional, not intellectual. You would not be susceptible to such hogwash if you were not deeply angry at...whom? Daddy? Mom? Fr O'Reilly? It doesn't matter.
1.3.2011 | 1:26pm
Carlo says:
James Murphy:

a million witches, eh? Man, they really covered their tracks really well... good you figured it out.
2.9.2011 | 4:05am
"More recent scholarship connects the dating of Christmas to the dating of Easter--tradition long held that the annunciation and the crucifixion happened on the same day, March 25. So Jesus' birth was dated nine moths after." For the Eastern Churches, 2 February is the Hypoponte (Encounter), which the West calls the Feast of the Presentation of Christ at the Temple. For us, it fills the same purpose as the Visitation of the Magi--the manifestation of Christ to the Gentiles.
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact