Ads


The Anxious Parent

The trampoline, that upset them. We bought one of the big round ones for our eldest’s sixteenth birthday a few years ago, and parents we knew (mothers more than fathers) were appalled that we’d bought such a dangerous thing and horrified that our children were allowed to jump on it when we were not there. Fortunately, no one ever asked how many children we let on the trampoline at one time, since sometimes all four jumped on it at once.

Being yuppies, some of these parents insisted on telling us that they were appalled and horrified, and on parading before us their own meticulous care for their children and their anticipation and avoidance of all the possible dangers with which this sad world is loaded. Like we cared.

Once at a cookout, our youngest son and another boy, both seven or eight, were bouncing from opposite sides of the trampoline and bumping into each other in the middle, laughing hysterically as they fell down. Neither was a physically adventurous child, and they collided very gently. They loved the game, and would have played it for hours.

The other boy’s father and I were talking while we watched them, when the boy’s mother came over, drew her husband aside, and dressed him down in one of those hissed conversations that carry farther than intended. She was shocked at his carelessness in letting their son do something so dangerous. He came back and broke up the game.

If our older son had played the same game at the same age with his friends, they would have been bruised and possibly bloody, and the bruises and the blood would have been part of the pleasure. (This would have been true of me as well.) I can hear him telling the story later, in an excited, slightly boastful voice, explaining how we were knocking each other down and then we ran into each other really hard and we both got bloody noses and, mom, there was blood all over the place! And he would have been a happier boy for it.

Sometimes I feel we are the only parents left who would enjoy hearing our son say that there was blood all over the place. I am tempted to believe that I, only I am left, but of course there are others. But in certain areas and in certain social circles, not many. And in certain family sizes, like those with one or two children, almost none.

I thought of the yuppie parents and the upset mother when reading the discussion on the web of a Yale law professor’s now famous article on being a Chinese “tiger mother.” It seems clear to me that so many people responded so strongly to the article because they fear for their children’s futures. As far as I can tell, many of her critics and her supporters react to her article from fear or anxiety: the first because they fear the effect of such techniques on their children, the second because they fear the effects upon their children of the alternatives.

The second, I think, suffer the most anxiety, because while they worry about the alternatives, they will not adopt the tiger mother style, which is just too alien, too different from the dominant, affirming style of affluent American parenting. Most of us would feel a little silly, if not false, talking like Professor Chua.

In any case, many parents are running scared.

I didn’t pay much attention when John Paul II was elected, nor to his first sermon as pope, but some years later when I first came across his declaration “Be not afraid,” I thought it a pretty lame declaration with which to start one’s work. It seemed to me a platitude like “brush between meals” and “eat more fiber,” not a call to arms. Yeah, sure, whatever, I thought. Biblical slogans are a dime a dozen.

But I was still young then and had not seen how many ways the world has to make you afraid. Just have children and a world of imagined and unimaginable horrors will present itself to you, and minor inconveniences or hurts will appear to be losses from which your child will never recover, and every decision and choice one that can lead as easily to misery as to success. Oddly enough, affluence does not necessarily make you feel more secure, but usually just multiplies the reasons you can find to be afraid and increases the triviality of the results you fear.

I had not seen how hopes quickly become fears, and how the deepest hopes become the worst fears, and how the fallen heart can manufacture reasons to be afraid even from blessings, like education. You might believe, sincerely, when your child is eight or ten that the only education you want for him is one that will teach him what he needs to know about literature and art and history, which can be provided at any number of schools, including the cheap and unknown ones.

You imagine him taking his degree from some obscure college, getting a job, and reading Shakespeare for fun in the evening. You can feel a little smug about the parents you know who spend thousands to get their children into the best schools and then put the decal with the school’s name on the back window of their car.

But when your child reaches sixteen or seventeen, you think of how hard the job market can be, and how soul-destroying are so many jobs, and how insecure and unstable they are, and how hard it will be to marry and start a family with that kind of job, and what advantages accrue from graduating from the better colleges, and how much better than others some of the better colleges are, and then how hard the best ones are to get into. You hear the horror stories of top students rejected, hear about the competition’s advantages, with wealthy parents buying their dullard all the tutoring and application-padding experiences he needs, hear about the notoriously hard and irrational grader your child has to take next semester.

Suddenly you fear that your child will only get into the obscure college and his life will be ruined, or at least that he will always have to struggle and will never be able to do what he could. You may know that this feeling is foolish, but knowing that you are being foolish does not make you any the less anxious. Suddenly you’re as neurotic and fearful and driving as the yuppie parents you used to look down upon.

And suddenly, if you’re blessed, you’ll hear our Lord say through the pope, “Be not afraid.” It will be no longer a platitude, but the Dominical instruction that directs your life to its proper ends. Your child can be a saint with a degree from the obscure college as well as the elite one, a truth fear quickly drives straight from your mind. The parent is happier who does not fear for the means because Christ has secured the end.

David Mills is Deputy Editor of First Things. His previous “On the Square” articles can be found here.

RESOURCES:

Amy Chua’s Why Chinese Mothers are Superior.
Todd Zywicki’s Roar of the Lion Father, comparing Dr. Chua’s view with Anthony Esolen’s, as contained in his book Ten Ways to Destroy the Imagination of Your Child.

Comments:

1.31.2011 | 5:16am
sanpietrini says:
Skinned knees and stubbed toes as a child are good things - just wait until you're older....
1.31.2011 | 7:38am
It's about courage, yes, and also about justice and wisdom. The "anxious parent" is not merely a coward, but one who has lost his grasp of human purpose. If children have no ends, or even only trivial ends, then there are very few children's enterprises for which it is worthwhile risking temporary discomfort, to say nothing of permanent injury or life.

Crudely, a risk-benefit index is the value of the positive outcome multiplied by the probability of that outcome, minus the cost of the negative outcome multiplied by the probability of the negative. If a parent perceives that his child has no purpose beyond survival and a degree of comfort, then the potential value of other outcomes---say, acquiring a certain boldness of spirit by jumping on a trampoline---will never justify the risk to life and limb.

David Mills betrays his own teleology---that is, the fact that he *has* a teleology: "You might believe, sincerely, when your child is eight or ten that the only education you want for him is one that will teach him what he needs to know about literature and art and history...." He needs to know something, and I suspect Mr. Mills means "needs" for other reasons than the anxious parent might mean the word.

Observe also the youth who enlist in the US military. They are not evenly distributed by family affluence or geography. I'd argue that they tend to come from families and communities achieving a threshhold number of people who perceive that boys have value and purpose, that they are called to become something, that the call endures regardless of their personal preferences or apparent success. And I grieve for those children who grow up in families where the only goal set out for them is an effectively nihilistic notion of self-fulfillment.
1.31.2011 | 8:04am
Rod Dreher says:
David, thanks so much for this. As the father of three small children, boy can I relate. Your conclusion reminds me of something one of Ken Myers's guests on the current edition of Mars Hill Audio Journal said: that authentic Christianity does not prepare one to succeed in American culture. What a profound statement, and a true one.
1.31.2011 | 8:11am
ferd says:
Mr. Mill's entertaining article is nibbling around the edges of the issue--fear. For example, George W. Bush often stated (I believe falsely) that all people long for freedom. It would have been much more accurate to say that all people crave security from fear--certainly FDR and Obama do.
In our Western culture, that is replacing a God of peace (and freedom born of Truth) for a god-free model of managed security, we are becoming a very worried people. Why? Because serious belief in God washes away all fear: I no longer worry so much about physical harm...only spiritual harm...and God's got my back.
Yes, a people that would reject God soon becomes obsessed with physical harm and safety. Isn't the root of post-modernism an attempt to bring security through a radical rejection of the building blocks of ideas...which might lead to ideals, identity and conflict? Isn't it obvious that our contemporary obsession with bubble-wrapping society (out lawing transfat, sugary drinks, "Happy Meals"...etc) just a neurotic attempt to hide from "the wrath of Him who sits on the throne".
Perhaps, when we find someone obessively worried about physical safety...we have found someone to share the peace of Christ.
1.31.2011 | 9:35am
I heard somewhere that the question is not whether you will screw your children up but how you will do it. Each age seems to produce different paridigms for raising children. It would appear that the result of this is merely a different baseline for the children in their struggles in life. The reality is that at some point they become responsible for their own lives and regardless of their successes or failures they must come to terms with how they dealt with their particular responsibilities. So I would say, be careful what you prepare your children for, then cross your fingers and pray for your children. One more thing, they should be so lucky if the dangers of trampolines is truly their worst fear.
1.31.2011 | 10:17am
hippocrates says:
I always thought the "Be not afraid" mantra was brilliant.
For someone who is grappling with Communism, it is grand advice.
It works also for Catholics who seek to push a counter-cultural agenda.
Christina Hoff Summers in The War Against Boys touches on the issue of violence that David raises. It is politically incorrect to let boys be boys.
But, alas, the blood-all-over-the-place thing in the era of AIDS does become problematic.
1.31.2011 | 10:33am
Ann Tiquity says:
Good meditation for the feast of St. John Bosco -- the teenage acrobat!
1.31.2011 | 11:40am
Matt says:
'Problem is that most paralyses seen by my good friend, an orthopedic specialist, come from skydiving and backyard trampolines, which is why I bought and installed a good, strong safety net for my kids' trampoline. There's a responsible middle ground between cowardice and neglect. When you have the safety net in place, you've done your job and really don't need to be overly anxious about minor bumps and bruises. The safety net issue is a good metaphor for setting limits and allowing freedom within boundaries.
1.31.2011 | 12:38pm
What a great piece! Oddly enough, I identify completely both with you and with the parents who were horrified by the trampoline. And I find that the older I get, the more JPII"s "Do Not Be Afraid" resonates with me and also instructs. And hey, the angels said it before he did!

I ended up writing about Chua and Esolen this week, too, with a grateful glance at Tim Dalrymple's excellent "Why We Have Children"
http://www.patheos.com/community/theanchoress/2011/01/26/us-vs-tiger-mothers-lion-fathers/
1.31.2011 | 12:52pm
Nora says:
My top three reasons for not getting a trampoline when they were all the rage had little to do with helicopter-parenting. A) They ruin your lawn, B) The neighborhood kids want to come hang out in your backyard and C) The working mommies who are more than willing to dump their kids in your backyard after school as some sort of free daycare tend to be the most litigious when something happens.

But I was more than happy to set up a beer pong table at my son's college graduation party as long as everyone agreed they'd either crash at our place for the night, get a ride from their parents, or let my husband or I drive them home.
1.31.2011 | 1:38pm
Ah, David, you wouldn't be either a decent person or my friend -- both of which you are -- if you didn't have these anxieties. They are well and lovingly placed. Nor do they ever go away, I can assure you from my grandfatherly perch. What do we do, though, in life if not take chances? Everything is risk, including crossing the street. We do the best we can and leave the rest to the Lord, who has given into our keeping the astounding power to share with Him in the joy of creation. "Be not afraid" is the best advice in the world. Next to that dispensed in the good old hymn we seem to have quit singing -- "This is my Father's world..And though the wrong be oft so strong, God is the ruler yet."
1.31.2011 | 1:43pm
Joseph C says:
Mr. Mills’ reflection is well in its place. The one thing that was omitted is the reliance on Divine Providence! What happened to that doctrine? We in the west act as if all depends on us and our actions, and we pray as if all depends on God! Alas, when would we learn to let Him drive and we co-pilot.
Yes, I have a daughter and I bought the shut-gun I was told I may need! But…but… my nightly prayer has been condensed to “allow me O Lord, to raise her in Your fear! Under Your Divine Providence, so that she may grow in Your love and glory. Amen." Then I check on her sleeping.. in a neurotic way... and close my eyes to sleep.
1.31.2011 | 2:03pm
Michael PS says:
I recall an incident in my childhood, over 50 years ago now, when I was thrown, going over a jump and the pony actually rolled over on me.

It must have stunned me, but as I became aware of my surroundings, I could see my doting parents soothing the animal, patting his neck and feeling his legs.

My father called to me, over his shoulder,

“You all right?”

I tried to sit up.

“Not really, I’ve hurt my arm.”

My father came over and called over to my mother, who was still holding the pony

“Pranged his collar-bone, by the look of it.”

“Oh, bad show!” Then, to me, “I do keep telling you, lower leg back, going into the jump.”

In fairness, they were both quite as breezy about their own, occasional tumbles, but I do think parents had a more robust outlook in those days.
1.31.2011 | 2:19pm
TXW says:
Add ankle fractures to the list of trampoline injuries. The worst change is not being able to let your kids go out side by themselves for more than 5 minutes. In the 70's "we would get on our bikes after breakfast and not show up until dinnertime". Those were good times, free times for boys with marbles, shotguns, slingshots, snowballs, frogs, minnows, trees, and a fort full of fighters. Yet, the predators were there, and those are the stories not told so much. And now that those are grown into parents, and every home has porn piped into it, the risk changes, sadly. Not too long ago, my cousin was allowed to be a boy, riding his bike up and down the hollers, he didn't do well in school so much, but I bet he loved chasing frogs. He ended up a dead boy in a wreck with a molester who had been recently released from prison. I want my kids to run around, and I can't stand hovering over them, but the fear of discrete evil doesn't leave.
1.31.2011 | 2:25pm
PaulR says:
"...when the boy’s mother came over, drew her husband aside, and dressed him down in one of those hissed conversations that carry farther than intended...."

I almost married this woman. Or possibly it was her sister. Anyway, I didn't, and Thank You for reminding me of one of the correct choices I made in life.
1.31.2011 | 4:19pm
Joseph says:
We humans are terrible at assessing risk, summed up in the joke about the overweight diabetic smoker who was worried about getting anthrax.

How many of those panicked moms are worried about modeling a life of fear to their kids? Or, getting a little more brutal, how many of those dads and moms will end up divorced, or having an affair, or otherwise subjecting their kids to adult-level traumas? The combination of parents hovering over a kid's physical life without being able to control their own emotional, moral and spiritual lives strikes me as particularly deadly.

I'm more worried, and with better reason and more evidence, that we're raising generations of frightened, cowed, conformist kids who will grow into good, obedient consumers of whatever is being sold.
1.31.2011 | 5:41pm
I LOVE THIS! Wow. I let my boys jump on our trampoline without a safety net (however, our priest blessed it at the same time he blessed our house so I'm a little safer than most) and I don't make them wear helmets when they ride their bikes. I had a bumpy, bruise filled, messy awesome childhood and would never deprive my boys of the same! I know (and truly love!) the anxious parents very well. But they are the ones who never let their kids play at my house :)
I love this so much. I didn't know I had a kindred spirit out there Mr. Mills.
1.31.2011 | 6:53pm
Sally Thomas says:
I always wonder how much of this anxiety is a function of fear that something bad will happen to the kids, and how much of it's a function of fear that someone else will perceive us as bad, neglectful, reckless parents and give CPS an anonymous phone call.
1.31.2011 | 6:56pm
Mark VA says:
I remember a sister (religious) once remark that children should be brought up in the state of carefully guarded neglect.

The older I get the more insight I see in this finely balanced advice.
1.31.2011 | 8:31pm
As Joseph says above, "How many of those panicked moms are worried about modeling a life of fear to their kids? Or, getting a little more brutal, how many of those dads and moms will end up divorced, or having an affair, or otherwise subjecting their kids to adult-level traumas? The combination of parents hovering over a kid's physical life without being able to control their own emotional, moral and spiritual lives strikes me as particularly deadly. "

Yuppies treat their children like valuable china: protected from all risk of breakage.

But, basically, the china doesn't care if you go away and leave it alone, have huge fights or affairs, abuse your spouse ...

So the kid is protected from all damage except the sort that can only happen to humans.
1.31.2011 | 10:22pm
Moriah says:
I'm not going to take the time to read all comments - I merely want to say that you may possibly be a parenting minority but definitely not alone. We're about to have our 5th child and our kids are ROUGH AND TUMBLE, and only one boy so far. Also, a huge tree fell into our trampoline one night during a storm -- so not only is the net shredded and gone, there's a huge hole in one side of the jumping mat. Someday we'll have the money to fix it. But for now we just tell them "don't go on that side!"
2.1.2011 | 5:36am
Michael says:
I am the father of two young girls, and I have to say: I don't know how to prepare them for the future. When I was growing up, my parents told me--and were correct--that a college degree would be the key to my future. They were right. But for my daughters? If a college degree isn't enough anymore, what's left? I am hopeful (and working hard at it!) that I can raise two moral young women who know God and will be good Christians. I am not at all optimistic, though, that I know how to prepare them for the more secular aspects of their future. The world is changing with near blinding rapidity; I feel as though I am looking out the window of a train that is going faster and faster, and is heading for God knows where.
2.1.2011 | 2:21pm
Kuz says:
God gave us His Son to take the ultimate risk. Where would we be if He were not a fearless Parent? Where would we be if Mary had forbidden Jesus to hang on the cross?

With three cantankerous boys I had no choice but to be fearless and even fearless mothers lose sleep at night worrying about their children. They had plenty of cuts, bruises and stitches to show for their thrills. The important thing is that they've grown into courageous, fun loving young men with only a couple of permanent of scars and huge, loving hearts!

Christianity (and parenting) is not for the faint of heart!
2.1.2011 | 6:06pm
afraid says:
I am the parent who tried to be like mine and let my kids try adventurous things. My 2 year old was riding a horse I was leading and she fell off when the horse stepped sideways reacting to a door slam. Emergency room doctor read me the riot act and I spent the next month in fear of every phone call since he'd promised to turn me in for "abusive neglect" by putting my child on a full sized horse (horse was 19 and VERY gentle). On come the helmets and only leading when another adult was available to walk next to the child holding them on. For a girl who grew up riding constantly on a Montana ranch, I was very cowed by the demand to over-hover and make sure my children never do anything that risks injury. Add 3 more kids to the list and I'm getting better, but my now 6 year old is still not comfortable on a horse because my over-watching has made her less adventurous.
2.1.2011 | 7:05pm
Joseph says:
After my wife gave birth to our second boy, we become much less "paranoid" about our children. All we need is one more boy, then maybe I'll completely get over it and allow my children to have the same childhood I had. One of discovery and freedom. I think there is a correlation between the number of children and the level of paranoia, at least in my case.
2.1.2011 | 9:37pm
Nora says:
@afraid

There are reasonable risks and unreasonable risks. I have ridden all my life from the time I was a very young girl and I question the wisdom of putting a two year old on a full sized horse, saddled or unsaddled, without an adult next to the child while another is leading and, worst of all, without a helmet. To me, doing this is clearly putting your very small child at very great, unreasonable risk. That the horse was seasoned and "gentle" and this happened only proves the wisdom behind wearing a helmet -- even seasoned, gentle horses are unpredictable and two year olds haven't the physical ability to handle a startled horse.

I see these back-and-forths between the Purell-basting crowd and the free-range crowd often these days, and it seems to me that a very great number of parents from both camps are guilty of politicizing their kids.

Yes, we live in a society in which too many parents are way over-involved in their kids' lives, where too few kids even know how to just play anymore. OTOH, there are parents I've known who pride themselves on never supervising their kids, or allowing their kids to do very foolish and dangerous things and then bragging about it afterwards.

Sure, we should trust God more and listen to the PC police less, but God expects us to bring something to the table, too -- God entrusted us with our children and He expects us to cherish those children, to nurture and guide them, to protect them and to teach them the difference between reasonable risk and foolhardiness.
2.1.2011 | 10:38pm
edmond says:
TXW: I empathize with you and the other parents who grew up at a time when rough and tumble was the only way a kid knew how to grow up. Yet the "neighborhood" has
obliquely changed since then. There are less or no "nosey" neighbors who look after
your kids when they bike past their yards or take the time to call you on the phone to tell you your kid the sped by or popped in to grab a cookie. There are less God-fearing parents who will not stop a gang fight (or maybe because the gangs have uzis now)
or even just pull the cigarette off the lips of your thirteen year old.

Parenting is more challenging now because media has brought into our living rooms
a slew of confusing ideas. I was telling my kids that the roles have changed in the families
today. Dad is no longer the head of the house nor protector, he has switched roles with Mom. So too with sons and daughters. Life is no longer simple, the original version of has been face-lifted, botoxed, cross-dressed into the convoluted complication it is
today. In fact, the dysfunctional "modern" family is now glamorized on TV. Will
blunders never cease?
2.2.2011 | 10:36am
Nora says:
@edmond

True -- we all knew our neighbors, and all the parents were on the same page. We knew our priests, too -- they'd walk through the neighborhood wearing a soutane and greet us by name when they ran across us (city neighborhood). We knew someone was watching. And the mothers, with rare exception, stayed home. They knew who "belonged" and who didn't -- if a questionable person showed up, one or more mothers took note.

And mothers were around to patch up the cuts and bruises and even to put a stop to anything that was getting out of hand.

Sometimes I think this "free-range" parenting thing is about no parental involvement at all (because mommy and daddy are too busy "fullfilling themselves" (usually with vodka...) rather than a sort of behind-the-scenes, unobtrusive sort of supervision, which is what I recall being the norm. Not that there wasn't sometimes vodka involved in that, too, unfortunately, but that's another story...
2.2.2011 | 2:35pm
Karen says:
My son, now almost seven, is a climber. Trees, rocks, fences--if it can be climbed, he'll climb it. He's been this way since he was a toddler. As he gets older, he climbs bigger things.

This is the beauty of it, for me. I think it's good for him to grow and to learn to use his body this way. It's also good for me. As I watch him, I practice letting go. I practice being with my fear that he'll get hurt. I think this practice is preparing me for the time when he gets his driver's license. I think it's preparing me to watch him make life's big decisions on his own. I think it's preparing me for the time when he lives away from me. If I weren't growing in my ability to let go in spite of my fear for him, I don't know how I'd handle the progressively bigger moments of letting go.
2.4.2011 | 3:23am
BobRN says:
Certainly there's a middle ground between anxiety-ridden and laissez-faire parenting when overseeing our children's activities. It's called reasonable caution. As a former pediatric ER nurse, I've seen more than my share of traumas and deaths suffered by children, the vast majority of them directly related to the poor decisions, neglect, criminal behavior or downright stupidity of adults.

A friend was scandalized when I told another who asked my advice that I saw no problems with their purchasing a trampoline for their children, provided reasonable safeguards were in place: level ground (amazes me that this isn't obvious), only one child on at a time, no flips (the back yard isn't a gym, after all) and adult supervision always. Sadly, a bloody nose is the least of concerns when you mix children with devices that loft them into the air.
2.6.2011 | 10:20pm
edmond says:
Nora, Karen & BobRN, I've had my generous share of glass cuts, fractures, sprains, dogbites, you name it, sometimes i was far from home and there would always be soem good guy to come around to walk you to the nearest clinic or if you could make it,
home to Mom's first aid cabinet. Those are not just good ol days gone by, they are experiences I hold close to my heart, ideals that I share with the kids and their friends with the hope that in the future the "standard" for morality and family will be revived. Godspeed!
2.20.2011 | 4:41am
"...when the boys mother came over, drew her husband aside, and dressed him down in one of those hissed conversations that carry farther than intended...." I almost married this woman. Or possibly it was her sister. Anyway, I didn't, and Thank You for reminding me of one of the correct choices I made in life.
2.20.2011 | 12:03pm
There are reasonable risks and unreasonable risks. I have ridden all my life from the time I was a very young girl and I question the wisdom of putting a two year old on a full sized horse, saddled or unsaddled, without an adult next to the child while another is leading and, worst of all, without a helmet. To me, doing this is clearly putting your very small child at very great, unreasonable risk. That the horse was seasoned and "gentle" and this happened only proves the wisdom behind wearing a helmet -- even seasoned, gentle horses are unpredictable and two year olds haven't the physical ability to handle a startled horse. Ah, David, you wouldn't be either a decent person or my friend -- both of which you are -- if you didn't have these anxieties. They are well and lovingly placed. Nor do they ever go away, I can assure you from my grandfatherly perch. What do we do, though, in life if not take chances? Everything is risk, including crossing the street. We do the best we can and leave the rest to the Lord, who has given into our keeping the astounding power to share with Him in the joy of creation. "Be not afraid" is the best advice in the world. Next to that dispensed in the good old hymn we seem to have quit singing -- "This is my Father's world..And though the wrong be oft so strong, God is the ruler yet."
5.19.2011 | 5:56pm
It must have stunned me, but as I became aware of my surroundings, I could see my doting parents soothing the animal, patting his neck and feeling his legs. As Joseph says above, "How many of those panicked moms are worried about modeling a life of fear to their kids? Or, getting a little more brutal, how many of those dads and moms will end up divorced, or having an affair, or otherwise subjecting their kids to adult-level traumas? The combination of parents hovering over a kid's physical life without being able to control their own emotional, moral and spiritual lives strikes me as particularly deadly. "
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact