The trampoline, that upset them. We bought one of the big round ones for our eldest’s sixteenth birthday a few years ago, and parents we knew (mothers more than fathers) were appalled that we’d bought such a dangerous thing and horrified that our children were allowed to jump on it when we were not there. Fortunately, no one ever asked how many children we let on the trampoline at one time, since sometimes all four jumped on it at once.
Being yuppies, some of these parents insisted on telling us that they were appalled and horrified, and on parading before us their own meticulous care for their children and their anticipation and avoidance of all the possible dangers with which this sad world is loaded. Like we cared.
Once at a cookout, our youngest son and another boy, both seven or eight, were bouncing from opposite sides of the trampoline and bumping into each other in the middle, laughing hysterically as they fell down. Neither was a physically adventurous child, and they collided very gently. They loved the game, and would have played it for hours.
The other boy’s father and I were talking while we watched them, when the boy’s mother came over, drew her husband aside, and dressed him down in one of those hissed conversations that carry farther than intended. She was shocked at his carelessness in letting their son do something so dangerous. He came back and broke up the game.
If our older son had played the same game at the same age with his friends, they would have been bruised and possibly bloody, and the bruises and the blood would have been part of the pleasure. (This would have been true of me as well.) I can hear him telling the story later, in an excited, slightly boastful voice, explaining how we were knocking each other down and then we ran into each other really hard and we both got bloody noses and, mom, there was blood all over the place! And he would have been a happier boy for it.
Sometimes I feel we are the only parents left who would enjoy hearing our son say that there was blood all over the place. I am tempted to believe that I, only I am left, but of course there are others. But in certain areas and in certain social circles, not many. And in certain family sizes, like those with one or two children, almost none.
I thought of the yuppie parents and the upset mother when reading the discussion on the web of a Yale law professor’s now famous article on being a Chinese “tiger mother.” It seems clear to me that so many people responded so strongly to the article because they fear for their children’s futures. As far as I can tell, many of her critics and her supporters react to her article from fear or anxiety: the first because they fear the effect of such techniques on their children, the second because they fear the effects upon their children of the alternatives.
The second, I think, suffer the most anxiety, because while they worry about the alternatives, they will not adopt the tiger mother style, which is just too alien, too different from the dominant, affirming style of affluent American parenting. Most of us would feel a little silly, if not false, talking like Professor Chua.
In any case, many parents are running scared.
I didn’t pay much attention when John Paul II was elected, nor to his first sermon as pope, but some years later when I first came across his declaration “Be not afraid,” I thought it a pretty lame declaration with which to start one’s work. It seemed to me a platitude like “brush between meals” and “eat more fiber,” not a call to arms. Yeah, sure, whatever, I thought. Biblical slogans are a dime a dozen.
But I was still young then and had not seen how many ways the world has to make you afraid. Just have children and a world of imagined and unimaginable horrors will present itself to you, and minor inconveniences or hurts will appear to be losses from which your child will never recover, and every decision and choice one that can lead as easily to misery as to success. Oddly enough, affluence does not necessarily make you feel more secure, but usually just multiplies the reasons you can find to be afraid and increases the triviality of the results you fear.
I had not seen how hopes quickly become fears, and how the deepest hopes become the worst fears, and how the fallen heart can manufacture reasons to be afraid even from blessings, like education. You might believe, sincerely, when your child is eight or ten that the only education you want for him is one that will teach him what he needs to know about literature and art and history, which can be provided at any number of schools, including the cheap and unknown ones.
You imagine him taking his degree from some obscure college, getting a job, and reading Shakespeare for fun in the evening. You can feel a little smug about the parents you know who spend thousands to get their children into the best schools and then put the decal with the school’s name on the back window of their car.
But when your child reaches sixteen or seventeen, you think of how hard the job market can be, and how soul-destroying are so many jobs, and how insecure and unstable they are, and how hard it will be to marry and start a family with that kind of job, and what advantages accrue from graduating from the better colleges, and how much better than others some of the better colleges are, and then how hard the best ones are to get into. You hear the horror stories of top students rejected, hear about the competition’s advantages, with wealthy parents buying their dullard all the tutoring and application-padding experiences he needs, hear about the notoriously hard and irrational grader your child has to take next semester.
Suddenly you fear that your child will only get into the obscure college and his life will be ruined, or at least that he will always have to struggle and will never be able to do what he could. You may know that this feeling is foolish, but knowing that you are being foolish does not make you any the less anxious. Suddenly you’re as neurotic and fearful and driving as the yuppie parents you used to look down upon.
And suddenly, if you’re blessed, you’ll hear our Lord say through the pope, “Be not afraid.” It will be no longer a platitude, but the Dominical instruction that directs your life to its proper ends. Your child can be a saint with a degree from the obscure college as well as the elite one, a truth fear quickly drives straight from your mind. The parent is happier who does not fear for the means because Christ has secured the end.
David Mills is Deputy Editor of First Things. His previous “On the Square” articles can be found here.
RESOURCES:
Amy Chua’s Why Chinese Mothers are Superior.
Todd Zywicki’s Roar of the Lion Father, comparing Dr. Chua’s view with Anthony Esolen’s, as contained in his book Ten Ways to Destroy the Imagination of Your Child.
Comments:
Crudely, a risk-benefit index is the value of the positive outcome multiplied by the probability of that outcome, minus the cost of the negative outcome multiplied by the probability of the negative. If a parent perceives that his child has no purpose beyond survival and a degree of comfort, then the potential value of other outcomes---say, acquiring a certain boldness of spirit by jumping on a trampoline---will never justify the risk to life and limb.
David Mills betrays his own teleology---that is, the fact that he *has* a teleology: "You might believe, sincerely, when your child is eight or ten that the only education you want for him is one that will teach him what he needs to know about literature and art and history...." He needs to know something, and I suspect Mr. Mills means "needs" for other reasons than the anxious parent might mean the word.
Observe also the youth who enlist in the US military. They are not evenly distributed by family affluence or geography. I'd argue that they tend to come from families and communities achieving a threshhold number of people who perceive that boys have value and purpose, that they are called to become something, that the call endures regardless of their personal preferences or apparent success. And I grieve for those children who grow up in families where the only goal set out for them is an effectively nihilistic notion of self-fulfillment.
In our Western culture, that is replacing a God of peace (and freedom born of Truth) for a god-free model of managed security, we are becoming a very worried people. Why? Because serious belief in God washes away all fear: I no longer worry so much about physical harm...only spiritual harm...and God's got my back.
Yes, a people that would reject God soon becomes obsessed with physical harm and safety. Isn't the root of post-modernism an attempt to bring security through a radical rejection of the building blocks of ideas...which might lead to ideals, identity and conflict? Isn't it obvious that our contemporary obsession with bubble-wrapping society (out lawing transfat, sugary drinks, "Happy Meals"...etc) just a neurotic attempt to hide from "the wrath of Him who sits on the throne".
Perhaps, when we find someone obessively worried about physical safety...we have found someone to share the peace of Christ.
For someone who is grappling with Communism, it is grand advice.
It works also for Catholics who seek to push a counter-cultural agenda.
Christina Hoff Summers in The War Against Boys touches on the issue of violence that David raises. It is politically incorrect to let boys be boys.
But, alas, the blood-all-over-the-place thing in the era of AIDS does become problematic.
I ended up writing about Chua and Esolen this week, too, with a grateful glance at Tim Dalrymple's excellent "Why We Have Children"
http://www.patheos.com/community/theanchoress/2011/01/26/us-vs-tiger-mothers-lion-fathers/
But I was more than happy to set up a beer pong table at my son's college graduation party as long as everyone agreed they'd either crash at our place for the night, get a ride from their parents, or let my husband or I drive them home.
Yes, I have a daughter and I bought the shut-gun I was told I may need! But…but… my nightly prayer has been condensed to “allow me O Lord, to raise her in Your fear! Under Your Divine Providence, so that she may grow in Your love and glory. Amen." Then I check on her sleeping.. in a neurotic way... and close my eyes to sleep.
It must have stunned me, but as I became aware of my surroundings, I could see my doting parents soothing the animal, patting his neck and feeling his legs.
My father called to me, over his shoulder,
“You all right?”
I tried to sit up.
“Not really, I’ve hurt my arm.”
My father came over and called over to my mother, who was still holding the pony
“Pranged his collar-bone, by the look of it.”
“Oh, bad show!” Then, to me, “I do keep telling you, lower leg back, going into the jump.”
In fairness, they were both quite as breezy about their own, occasional tumbles, but I do think parents had a more robust outlook in those days.
I almost married this woman. Or possibly it was her sister. Anyway, I didn't, and Thank You for reminding me of one of the correct choices I made in life.
How many of those panicked moms are worried about modeling a life of fear to their kids? Or, getting a little more brutal, how many of those dads and moms will end up divorced, or having an affair, or otherwise subjecting their kids to adult-level traumas? The combination of parents hovering over a kid's physical life without being able to control their own emotional, moral and spiritual lives strikes me as particularly deadly.
I'm more worried, and with better reason and more evidence, that we're raising generations of frightened, cowed, conformist kids who will grow into good, obedient consumers of whatever is being sold.
I love this so much. I didn't know I had a kindred spirit out there Mr. Mills.
The older I get the more insight I see in this finely balanced advice.
Yuppies treat their children like valuable china: protected from all risk of breakage.
But, basically, the china doesn't care if you go away and leave it alone, have huge fights or affairs, abuse your spouse ...
So the kid is protected from all damage except the sort that can only happen to humans.
With three cantankerous boys I had no choice but to be fearless and even fearless mothers lose sleep at night worrying about their children. They had plenty of cuts, bruises and stitches to show for their thrills. The important thing is that they've grown into courageous, fun loving young men with only a couple of permanent of scars and huge, loving hearts!
Christianity (and parenting) is not for the faint of heart!
There are reasonable risks and unreasonable risks. I have ridden all my life from the time I was a very young girl and I question the wisdom of putting a two year old on a full sized horse, saddled or unsaddled, without an adult next to the child while another is leading and, worst of all, without a helmet. To me, doing this is clearly putting your very small child at very great, unreasonable risk. That the horse was seasoned and "gentle" and this happened only proves the wisdom behind wearing a helmet -- even seasoned, gentle horses are unpredictable and two year olds haven't the physical ability to handle a startled horse.
I see these back-and-forths between the Purell-basting crowd and the free-range crowd often these days, and it seems to me that a very great number of parents from both camps are guilty of politicizing their kids.
Yes, we live in a society in which too many parents are way over-involved in their kids' lives, where too few kids even know how to just play anymore. OTOH, there are parents I've known who pride themselves on never supervising their kids, or allowing their kids to do very foolish and dangerous things and then bragging about it afterwards.
Sure, we should trust God more and listen to the PC police less, but God expects us to bring something to the table, too -- God entrusted us with our children and He expects us to cherish those children, to nurture and guide them, to protect them and to teach them the difference between reasonable risk and foolhardiness.
obliquely changed since then. There are less or no "nosey" neighbors who look after
your kids when they bike past their yards or take the time to call you on the phone to tell you your kid the sped by or popped in to grab a cookie. There are less God-fearing parents who will not stop a gang fight (or maybe because the gangs have uzis now)
or even just pull the cigarette off the lips of your thirteen year old.
Parenting is more challenging now because media has brought into our living rooms
a slew of confusing ideas. I was telling my kids that the roles have changed in the families
today. Dad is no longer the head of the house nor protector, he has switched roles with Mom. So too with sons and daughters. Life is no longer simple, the original version of has been face-lifted, botoxed, cross-dressed into the convoluted complication it is
today. In fact, the dysfunctional "modern" family is now glamorized on TV. Will
blunders never cease?
True -- we all knew our neighbors, and all the parents were on the same page. We knew our priests, too -- they'd walk through the neighborhood wearing a soutane and greet us by name when they ran across us (city neighborhood). We knew someone was watching. And the mothers, with rare exception, stayed home. They knew who "belonged" and who didn't -- if a questionable person showed up, one or more mothers took note.
And mothers were around to patch up the cuts and bruises and even to put a stop to anything that was getting out of hand.
Sometimes I think this "free-range" parenting thing is about no parental involvement at all (because mommy and daddy are too busy "fullfilling themselves" (usually with vodka...) rather than a sort of behind-the-scenes, unobtrusive sort of supervision, which is what I recall being the norm. Not that there wasn't sometimes vodka involved in that, too, unfortunately, but that's another story...
This is the beauty of it, for me. I think it's good for him to grow and to learn to use his body this way. It's also good for me. As I watch him, I practice letting go. I practice being with my fear that he'll get hurt. I think this practice is preparing me for the time when he gets his driver's license. I think it's preparing me to watch him make life's big decisions on his own. I think it's preparing me for the time when he lives away from me. If I weren't growing in my ability to let go in spite of my fear for him, I don't know how I'd handle the progressively bigger moments of letting go.
A friend was scandalized when I told another who asked my advice that I saw no problems with their purchasing a trampoline for their children, provided reasonable safeguards were in place: level ground (amazes me that this isn't obvious), only one child on at a time, no flips (the back yard isn't a gym, after all) and adult supervision always. Sadly, a bloody nose is the least of concerns when you mix children with devices that loft them into the air.
home to Mom's first aid cabinet. Those are not just good ol days gone by, they are experiences I hold close to my heart, ideals that I share with the kids and their friends with the hope that in the future the "standard" for morality and family will be revived. Godspeed!


