Ads


George Weigel

view all featured authors »

Cardinal Baum: A New Record-Holder

Something quite remarkable happened recently: Cardinal William Wakefield Baum—emeritus Archbishop of Washington, emeritus Prefect of the Congregation for Catholic Education, emeritus Major Penitentiary of the Catholic Church—passed the late Cardinal James Gibbons of Baltimore (who died in 1921) to become the longest-serving American cardinal in history. It’s an astonishing record that drew little public attention. Yet that’s just the way Cardinal Baum, who exemplifies evangelical modesty and genuine Christian humility, would want it.

William Wakefield Baum was born on Nov. 21, 1926, in Dallas, Texas: a biographical fact that has always struck me as more than a little ironic, given that there are few people on the planet less “Texas” and less “Big D” than this gentle scholar and pastor. Ordained a priest for the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph, Father Baum became an ecumenical pioneer, an advisor at Vatican II, and the first director of the U.S. bishops’ committee on ecumenical affairs before being ordained bishop of Springfield-Cape Girardeau, Missouri on April 6, 1970.

Three years later, Bishop Baum was appointed Archbishop of Washington as successor to the legendary Cardinal Patrick O’Boyle (who was, de facto if not de iure, the first archbishop of the nation’s capital). Created cardinal in the consistory of May 1976 and given the church of Santa Croce in Flaminia as his Roman parish (or “title”), Cardinal Baum participated in the two dramatic conclaves of 1978, the “year of three popes;” indeed, in the conclave of 2005, Cardinal Baum, along with Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, was the only cardinal-elector who had been in conclave before.

John Paul II appointed Cardinal Baum as Prefect of the Congregation of Catholic Education in March 1980, a post he held for 10 years until his appointment as head of the Apostolic Penitentiary—the man overseeing the Church’s penitential life or, as Cardinal Baum put it, the servant of “the Lord’s mercy.” He retired from that position after 11 years, thus preventing any further confusion in my office when I would send letters to the cardinal and some of my evangelical brethren would say, “I didn’t know they had a prison in the Vatican.”

Cardinal Baum remained active on various curial congregations until his 80th birthday in 2006, and exercised a quiet, but often important, influence in the deliberations of the Congregation for Bishops, responsible for episcopal appointments in the developed world. Of the many Americans who worked in the Holy See over the past 20 years, he was held in a unique respect by his colleagues, including the locals: He spoke excellent Italian, he was not edgy, he was an old-school gentleman, he was deeply learned and manifestly holy. And so, despite never making it onto the media radar screen, he was a genuine “player” in Vatican affairs.

He was a gracious host in one of the Vatican’s great apartments: just above St. Peter’s Square, looking straight at the basilica. The apartment was lined with bookcases, overflowing with volumes of history and biography as well as theology. He always remembered his time in Maryland with affection, and kept prints of the “Ark” and the “Dove,” the two ships that brought Lord Baltimore’s Catholic colonists to the new world in 1634, in his living room.

Like John Paul II, whom he revered, Cardinal Baum has borne great suffering with even greater patience and nobility. Macular degeneration has rendered the pleasure of reading difficult for this great reader; a variety of other ailments have left him in serious pain for months on end. Yet in the 23 years I’ve been privileged to know him and call him a friend, I’ve never heard a word of complaint from Cardinal Baum. Again like John Paul II, he’s always much more interested in finding out how you and your family are doing than in cataloguing his own ailments and sufferings.

A deeply patriotic American, the cardinal was often saddened in recent years by the encroachments of the culture of death across the land. Yet he always urged others to continue the fight for the right things. His courage gave, and gives, us courage.

George Weigel is Distinguished Senior Fellow of the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, D.C.

Comments:

3.16.2011 | 1:49pm
Henry James says:
It is said here, that this cardinal opposed the "culture of Death." Which is an interesting statement.

The term "culture of death" - usually applied, but seemingly only recently, to a liberal culture that allows abortion primarily - is a strange term for Catholics to be using ... in a negative way. Since elements of the Church often presented death in an almost positive way. Indeed, St. Paul said "to die is gain."

Some say that St. Paul meant "to die is gain," 1) metaphorically: "dying" to or cutting ourselves off from, the low passions of the flesh. Though in fuller context, Paul seems to have considered that even literally, physically dying (in prison, in his case), might be a postive thing. 2) Since - as many thought dualistically - physically dying, might free our souls to leave this evil "world," and join God, in a spirit, in Heaven. Indeed, many elements of Christianity - ascetic branches - in fact, considered the "mortification of the flesh" - and even physical death - to be good.

So that in effect, there has always been a deeply respected "culture of death" in monastic life.

Yet to be sure? Even Paul, thinking over the Christian embrace of the culture of death, decided that after all, for "your sakes," for the sake of the living people on earth who needed his guidance, Paul would not decide to die; but would remain on earth to help others.

It would seem that this deeply patriotic American cardinal, who spoke against the culture of death - at least privately to our author here? - was to be sure, sophisticated enough to work and live in at least two or three cultures: Rome, the Vatican, and America. And seems realistic enough to know finally, that perhaps he should not embrace the approved Catholic/ascetic "Culture of Death" after all. But should remain, for a very long lifetime. Doing practical works. Here on this earth.

For that we might well be grateful. That he resisted the "culture," the glamorization, of Death. That has always been found deep within the Church itself.
3.17.2011 | 12:17am
Dan says:
What a fine column!
3.17.2011 | 2:04am
Don Roberto says:
God bless Cardinal Baum and all those priests who continue to do God's work as long as they live. In my Parish (Oakland, CA) we are blessed with a priest (Fr. McDonald) who was ordained 63 years ago. He is quite frail (and uncomplainingly so), but he assists in two Masses each week. He's full of wisdom and historical knowledge, and he exudes love.

3.17.2011 | 11:45am
Willard says:
Overseeing the Catholic Penitentiary? That office involves primarily granting indulgences, and dropping many excommunications.

For abortion and so forth?

The Cardinal seems to regret ... that?
4.15.2011 | 3:15am
The term "culture of death" - usually applied, but seemingly only recently, to a liberal culture that allows abortion primarily - is a strange term for Catholics to be using ... in a negative way. Since elements of the Church often presented death in an almost positive way. Indeed, St. Paul said "to die is gain." Yet to be sure? Even Paul, thinking over the Christian embrace of the culture of death, decided that after all, for "your sakes," for the sake of the living people on earth who needed his guidance, Paul would not decide to die; but would remain on earth to help others.
8.22.2011 | 6:38pm
Some say that St. Paul meant "to die is gain," 1) metaphorically: "dying" to or cutting ourselves off from, the low passions of the flesh. Though in fuller context, Paul seems to have considered that even literally, physically dying (in prison, in his case), might be a postive thing. 2) Since - as many thought dualistically - physically dying, might free our souls to leave this evil "world," and join God, in a spirit, in Heaven. Indeed, many elements of Christianity - ascetic branches - in fact, considered the "mortification of the flesh" - and even physical death - to be good. The term "culture of death" - usually applied, but seemingly only recently, to a liberal culture that allows abortion primarily - is a strange term for Catholics to be using ... in a negative way. Since elements of the Church often presented death in an almost positive way. Indeed, St. Paul said "to die is gain." Yet to be sure? Even Paul, thinking over the Christian embrace of the culture of death, decided that after all, for "your sakes," for the sake of the living people on earth who needed his guidance, Paul would not decide to die; but would remain on earth to help others.
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact