Ads


The 2011 Arts & Faith Top 100 Films

“Of making many books there is no end,” wrote Qoheleth in Ecclesiastes, and the same can been said about the making of lists. In fact, it’s precisely because of the endless production of books, along with films and music, that a whole genre of lists exists—the familiar top 10’s, top 50’s and top 100’s. The virtue of lists is that they are finite—they offer a roadmap to a seemingly endless landscape, and a guide to artistic landmarks.

Every year a flurry of new movie lists starts around November and runs to last week’s Academy Awards. Among this year’s crop is the Arts & Faith “Top 100 Films” list—not an annual list, but an all-time top 100 films list chosen by the community at the Arts & Faith discussion board.

Sponsored by Image Journal, a Christian magazine of the arts, Arts & Faith is a forum for open discussion about the arts, notably movies, that has roots going back a dozen years. The community began as a discussion among Christian cinephiles, and today includes film critics, novelists, professors, playwrights, Hollywood professionals, and movie buffs from all walks of life.

Originally called the Arts & Faith “Top 100 Spiritually Significant Films,” the list is not confined to explicitly religious subjects, but spiritual and moral concerns are a unifying principle. The list honors films not simply for technical achievement or historical importance, but because they reflect profoundly on the mystery of man, and often because they have played some significant role in the personal journeys of the voting members. The following titles give a good sense of the character of the list:



  • The Passion of Joan of Arc (Carl Dreyer, 1927)

  • Ikiru (Akira Kurosawa, 1952)

  • Stalker (Andrei Tarkovsky, 1979)

  • Tender Mercies (Bruce Beresford, 1987)

  • The Son (Jean-Pierre and Luc Dardenne, 2002)

  • Diary of a Country Priest (Robert Bresson, 1951)

  • A Man For All Seasons (Fred Zinnemann, 1966)

  • My Night at Maud’s (Éric Rohmer, 1969)

  • Chariots of Fire (Hugh Hudson, 1981)

  • Close-up (Abbas Kiarostami, 1990)


But even the A&F “Top 100 Films” list continues indefinitely, with several iterations of the list since it first appeared in 2004. The ten films listed above are among the perennial, canonical classics that have appeared on every list to date, but other films come and go with alarming regularity.

The 2011 list alone adds 24 new films never before seen on previous lists, including a number of Golden-Age Hollywood films (Make Way For Tomorrow, How Green Was My Valley, The Searchers), Japanese anime (Grave of the Fireflies, Spirited Away, Paprika), and even a pair of moving ethnographic documentaries (Born into Brothels, The Story of the Weeping Camel).

In spite of the influx of Golden Age and other Hollywood films, English speakers will notice that foreign-language films dominate the list, particularly the top 20. It’s a curious irony that a country as comparatively religious as the United States should have produced comparatively few spiritual masterpieces akin to The Passion of Joan of Arc or Diary of a Country Priest. Even the piety of the Golden Age was seldom of that caliber; The Song of Bernadette and On the Waterfront (both honored on previous A&F lists, though not this year’s) are among the best examples one could name.

This verdict is borne out, incidentally, by another notable list: the 1995 Vatican film list, which honors 45 titles from cinematic history, subdivided into three groups of 15 under the headings “Religion,” “Values” and “Art.” Although American cinema is well represented under the headings of “Art” and “Values,” the “Religion” heading includes only one Hollywood film, Ben-Hur.

Of course, the addition of new films means that films honored in previous lists have dropped off. What about films that appeared on every A&F “Top 100” list until this year, including Open City, Solaris, Derzu Uzala, The Sacrifice, and The Wind Will Carry Us? What about other films that appeared on previous lists but not this year’s, including The Mission, Witness, Groundhog Day and The Last Days of Disco? What about a little film called The Passion of the Christ?

One could also point to deserving films that have never been included. My own shortlist of neglected films would include Monsieur Vincent, Grand Illusion, The Tree of Wooden Clogs, Raiders of the Lost Ark and The Incredibles. Take The Tree of Wooden Clogs: a 1978 film that mesmerizingly captures the rhythms of peasant life in turn-of-the-century Italy, with ample attention to the centrality of family, the holiness of marriage, and the role of religion in everyday life. There is simply nothing like it. Others might wonder: What about Citizen Kane?

There are always new films worthy of consideration, as well. Xavier Beauvois’ Of Gods and Men, now in limited release, is an outstanding example: the true story of French Trappist monks kidnapped in Algeria in 1996 by Muslim extremists, and ultimately beheaded. It’s one of the most artistically and spiritually beautiful films I’ve ever seen. What about the Coen brothers’ take on True Grit, passed over for all 10 of its Oscar nominations? It would have had my vote.

The perfect Arts & Faith Top 100 list eludes us. Still, there’s a lot to be said for this year’s list—and for the list website, which includes capsule-length write-ups on each film. For those interested in landmarks of the good, the true, and the beautiful in the landscape of cinematic history, the 2011 Arts & Faith “Top 100 Films” will reward thoughtful engagement.

Steven D. Greydanus is film critic for the National Catholic Register and Decent Films, the online home for his film writing. He also writes for ChristianityToday.com and for various print publications, and is a regular guest on several radio shows.

RESOURCES

Arts and Faith Top 100 Films (2011)
Steven Greydanus’ Decent Films Guide
The 1995 Vatican Film List


 



Comments:

3.7.2011 | 3:41pm
i think "magnolia" by p.t. anderson deserves its #16 place; and it is quintessentially american.
3.7.2011 | 4:17pm
Henry James says:
Probably every movie ever made, is about our spirit, our emotions.

Movies are all about addressing our emotions, in a deep way.
3.7.2011 | 4:28pm
Tyler says:
The reason several of the "dropped off" films weren't on this year's list is because the rules were changed to only allow 3 films from a given director on the list.
3.7.2011 | 5:07pm
SDG says:
@ Robert Ghrist: Your high opinion of MAGNOLIA is widely (though not uncontroversially) shared at A&F; it's one of the quasi-canonical 34 films that have appeared on every A&F Top 100 list to date. I don't think that undermines the case that Hollywood is comparatively short on spiritually significant masterpieces.

@ Henry James: It seems to me doubly reductionistic to claim, first, that "movies are all about addressing our emotions," and second to implicitly equate emotional with the spiritual. It could be argued that a film is all about an experience. That experience may have an emotional component, and often enough the emotional component is very important, but it's not necessarily the most important component.

Sometimes emotions may be secondary to aesthetic, intellectual or spiritual considerations. For example, A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS is not first of all a movie about emotions, or a movie that is loved primarily for its emotional impact (considerable as it might be). As a more extreme example, RUSSIAN ARK isn't a particularly emotional experience at all, except as a side effect of its aesthetic and technical achievement.

Emotional power and spiritual depth can and often do go together, but there is no direct relationship. Many movies play on the emotions, but leave you spiritually unchanged in the end. And spiritual experiences can be comparatively unemotional, yet move you to your core.

@Tyler: Yes, and that was a good rule change, and it accounts for some "fourth" and 'fifth" films that dropped off the list, but not for OPEN CITY, DERSU UZALA or THE WIND WILL CARRY US, among others.
3.7.2011 | 5:15pm
Michael says:
Yes, I agree—“Magnolia” is a magnificent film, and Anderson is one of our best. He’s not a religious thinker, though, and the film suffers whenever it tries to think religiously. Far more successful is “Dead Man Walking,” which gets better with each viewing. Grace has never been depicted so well.

When I think of films that achieve something of Bresson’s marvelous austerity, the first to come to mind is Joseph Anthony’s “Tomorrow,” which stars Robert Duvall in the same year he made “The Godfather.” There’s also Kim Ki-duk’s “Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter, and Spring.”
3.7.2011 | 5:37pm
Benchwarmer says:
Beautifully written Steven. I will be checking this site regularly to catch any of your future pieces. Hopefully the "Arts and Faith" website will continue to receive more and more attention in future.
FWIW, Having watched "To Kill a Mockingbird" last night, I can't help but hope that that film will be given some consideration next year as well.
3.7.2011 | 7:03pm
MaGabhann says:
About equating the emotional with the spiritual, or the psychological with the spiritual, would someone please explain the difference?
3.7.2011 | 11:45pm
Patrick says:
MaGabhann: pretty subtle question! I'll give it a shot. Psychology is the study of how the human mind works. It is essentially an empirical science. Aristotle defined the soul as the "form" of a material being, although the soul is not material. The mind is intricately linked to the soul, but, for those who believe in souls, the discipline of psychology is inherently limited by its basis in statistics, repeatable experiments, etc. Although spirituality certainly includes the study of emotions, motivation, etc. it goes further to attempt to understand human beings as a whole being, particularly their relationship to God, love, and death which psychology (being strictly empirical) cannot quite answer.

There are other senses of "spirit" or "the spiritual" which I think aren't quite what is meant here. One is some kind of ghost or ectoplasm. I think the "spiritual" as used in this context is not some kind of phantasmagoric apparition, but rather something which is an essential part of humanity.

Another sense would be the "warrior spirit" or "fighting spirit," esprit de corps, or perhaps "German spirit." It is in this sense that we say "spirited discussion" and this may be related to the English word "spirits" in the meaning of a potent alcoholic drink. But, again, the morale of a military unit isn't, I don't think, what is meant by 'spirituality" here.

You might find this book interesting.
3.7.2011 | 11:55pm
Patrick says:
Oops forgot book link: http://ndpr.nd.edu/review.cfm?id=22729

:D
3.8.2011 | 2:08am
Patrick says:
Another film I would recommend is "", Ugetsu monogatari, or Tales Of The Pale And Silvery Moon After The Rain. It is a harrowing story of the folly of ambition, the transience of worldly things, and the value of family.
3.8.2011 | 9:41am
AL says:
Good to see The New World and Days of Heaven on the list, but The Thin Red Line should be there too.
3.8.2011 | 9:56am
Dorothy says:
I would suggest "How to Train Your Dragon" - and not just for children. It's an animated masterpiece with a wonderful image of a sword being beaten into a "plowshare" (prosthetic fin); a young boy teaches his community how to respond to "the enemy" with love and understanding instead of fear and violence.
3.9.2011 | 3:33am
Nick Milne says:
First, Steve, I'm very glad to see you here. Your film writing and 'First Things' is a pairing I had always hoped would occur, and I'm pleased to see you bringing this excellent list to a wider audience. Here's hoping you appear under this masthead (whether in print or digitally) in many more days to come.

Next, I would second Dorothy's recommendation of 'How to Train Your Dragon', though I would never claim it to be among the top 100 films of all time. Nevertheless, it is quite beautiful in its art direction, magnificent in its score (go to YouTube and search for "Coming Back Around" from the score - best three minutes I've spent all year), and unexpectedly lovely in its morals. Also - and this is maybe more important to me than it would be to others - even though it really does offer the (perfectly fine) lessons Dorothy describes above, it is also unambiguous about the legitimate need for men under arms and a martial response to certain sorts of threats. Not all dragons are created equal, after all.
8.29.2011 | 3:38am
Next, I would second Dorothy's recommendation of 'How to Train Your Dragon', though I would never claim it to be among the top 100 films of all time. Nevertheless, it is quite beautiful in its art direction, magnificent in its score (go to YouTube and search for "Coming Back Around" from the score - best three minutes I've spent all year), and unexpectedly lovely in its morals. Also - and this is maybe more important to me than it would be to others - even though it really does offer the (perfectly fine) lessons Dorothy describes above, it is also unambiguous about the legitimate need for men under arms and a martial response to certain sorts of threats. Not all dragons are created equal, after all. @Tyler: Yes, and that was a good rule change, and it accounts for some "fourth" and 'fifth" films that dropped off the list, but not for OPEN CITY, DERSU UZALA or THE WIND WILL CARRY US, among others.
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact