Ads


Sign up for our
Email Newsletter

Russell E. Saltzman

view all featured authors »

The Pastor as Political Appointee

It annoys me to no end, church leaders occasionally given to touting political influence within the circles of government. Hubristic self-service is a phrase that comes uncharitably to mind. Put not your trust in princes is another.

So there was a press release some little while back in early February from the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America announcing the coming appointment of Presiding Bishop Mark S. Hanson to the Advisory Council on Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships. This is a presidential appointment from Barack Obama to Hanson for a one-year term. All twenty-five council members serve one-year terms, or at the president’s pleasure until he gets around to naming a replacement.

This could be a fairly long gig for the bishop, if there is a second Obama Administration. Bp. Hanson and the other appointees were described by the president as “experienced and committed individuals” who “have agreed to join this administration.”

Oh, I hope they have not “joined” the administration. But given that the membership has or at one time did include Episcopal Presiding Bishop Katherine Jefforts Schori and Sojourners publisher Jim Wallis, maybe “join” is the exact word. To be fair there are a smattering of Jews, Evangelicals, and Orthodox on the council, along with a nun and a lesbian elder from the Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches. But to “join” an administration suggests a whole level above “advising” one.

Mind you, this is pretty much the same business created by President Bush’s executive order in 2001 with a couple new flourishes by President Obama. It grants faith-based community organizations access to federal program funds for their projects, given an absence of proselytization. This was the Bush Administration’s foray into “compassionate conservatism,” aimed to aid religiously-inspired community social service groups. It also inspired several orders of howling by Americans United for Separation of Church and State and the American Civil Liberties Union and the Freedom From Religion Foundation and, sure, even a pagan group expressed some reservations.

Under the Obama Administration the name got changed a bit and the business was expanded to include creation of the advisory council. So far as I can tell, the appointees are unpaid, save their expenses traveling to meetings where they do the important work of advising the president. The main job of the council, as the Obama Administration’s executive order puts it, is to:


identify best practices and successful modes of delivering social services; evaluate the need for improvements in the implementation and coordination of public policies relating to faith-based and other neighborhood organizations; and make recommendations to the President, through the Executive Director, for changes in policies, programs, and practices that affect the delivery of services by such organizations and the needs of low-income and other underserved persons in communities at home and around the world.

This is laconically reduced in the press release to “make recommendations to the government on how to improve partnerships.” I’m sorry, and I’m not trying to diminish the ego rush that goes with a presidential appointment, but doesn’t President Obama already have a lot of people doing exactly that, “coordinating public policies,” “recommending,” “improving implementation,” and such? Well, it is certainly the case that a great many people think he needs far more help in those tasks than he’s presently getting, so perhaps this will be a good thing all in all.

Maybe by asking I am answering my own question, but why did Bush take such a drubbing on allegedly mixing religion and politics, church and state, and Obama’s expansion of the faith-based initiative goes off with nary a whisper? Possibly people just got used to having it around.

Following the ELCA press release on the bishop’s appointment came another release a day or two later. Here the bishop asserted that his appointment “strongly affirms the involvement of ELCA members” in serving their communities. “We are known as a church,” the bishop is quoted, “whose members roll up their sleeves, get to work, solve problems and give generously. The [advisory] council will provide new opportunities for us to expand partnerships in local and global contexts and to address priorities for our nation.”

Oh, wow. That’s some of that good old American can-do spirit we need to hear more of from the bishop, and all due to his advisory appointment.

So, do I have this right? Hanson’s place on the advisory council “affirms”—let’s use one of my real parishioners—Margaret’s volunteer work with Meals-on-Wheels through our local ministerial alliance Community Assistance Council? Does that mean that without Hanson’s appointment Margaret’s Wednesday morning deliveries somehow suffer from poor affirmation? Thankfully, Hanson’s appointment is just the sort of recognition Margaret needs. If she doesn’t already take Christ for an example, I must make a point of telling her about Bp. Hanson’s appointment.

Say—small subject change here—did you know there is another federal appointee from the ELCA? Richard J. Meier, pastor of Alpine Lutheran Church, Rockford, Illinois, got the job serving on the Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee in 2007 as the appointee of then-Speaker of the House Dennis Hassert.

A numismatist of some distinction, Meier and his colleagues render final recommendation on all U.S. coinage designs—the new quarter dollar national park series for instance. They look over designs proposed by the Bureau of the Mint, thumb them up or down, and then pass their decisions directly to the treasury secretary, Timothy Geithner. More often than not Geithner orders the mint to make the design they approved.

Regrettably, the ELCA never issued a press release on Meier’s appointment to the Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee of the United States. Of course the press office may not have known about it because Pr. Meier, I guess, just never got around to telling them. I knew about it because I read Coin World. But this is really just uncanny but I remember thinking at the time, Meier’s appointment was a wonderful affirmation of ELCA members who carry around pocket change.

Russell E. Saltzman is pastor of Ruskin Heights Lutheran Church, Kansas City, Missouri. His previous On the Square articles can be found here.

Comments:

3.17.2011 | 10:10am
Rev. Saltzman:

If you're suggesting that clergy forego involvement in worldly matters such as politics, and stick to fulfillment of their parishioners spiritual needs, I couldn't agree more.

But to address the question of why former president Bush took a drubbing and president Obama isn't taking one, we need to look at the motivation behind the programs. Republican strategists have been working overtime, beginning in the Reagan years, to transform American evangelicals into an enormous GOP political club. That they've succeeded in doing it is indisputable --- even though they've promised you the moon where all those hot-button issues near and dear to evangelical hearts are concerned, but have done little to make good on their promises after garnering your votes. Democrats, having been anathematized by the evangelical community for the past three decades, have little to gain politically by cozying up to you; thus one might, with good reason, be less suspicious of their motives.

I think an important first step for the evangelical community to take is to realize that you've been had. The GOP has used you, and will continue to use you, by paying lip service to your theological concerns while enacting policies that are inimical to your parishioners' economic interests. There's a saying you folks should heed: watch your enemies, but keep a closer watch on your "friends."
3.17.2011 | 12:01pm
Wendell says:
I'm not informed on the exact details of this new council. But it might have the opposite effect to what you are suggesting. That is we might now see LESS interference by politics, in religious affairs.

Note that adding a new "advisory council," doesn't necessary EXPAND the involvement of politics in religion. It could in fact have the opposite effect. Since whereas formerly, various Christian agencies had rather more direct access to, and more direct and immediate involvement in, political affairs, as of the formation of this council, now there is an intermediary agency to deal with. One that applies a moment of critical re-evaluation of the need to support this or that program. In order to assess the proper amount of government involvement.

This note, could result in LESS involvement of/interference by politics, in religion; not more. Since an "advisory council" might well after all, decide some former involvements should be dropped, as inappropriate.

Likely in fact, the Obama administration will begin stepping back the too-high levels of political/governmental interference/sponsorship; the too-high levels set by the previous, Bush administration.
3.17.2011 | 11:36pm
Jim Belll says:
Jesus commanded us to "render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's, and to render unto God what is God's."

That doesn't mean "get into bed with Caesar."

No one benefits when Christians go to work for Caesar.

For Paterfamilias: I agree the GOP was using Evangelicals for political purposes. It was political cynicism at its worst. Do you really think the Democrats aren't trying to do the same thing?

People of faith must always be suspicious of all politicians. They only want us because they think hanging around with us makes them look good. Anybody who falls for their line deserves to be taken.
3.18.2011 | 1:05am
Steve Martin says:
I think the ELCA should just become a social welfare organization and be true to itself, and quit masquerading as a church.
3.18.2011 | 9:53am
Wilby says:
Steve:

And Jesus should have stopped healing all those sick people?
3.18.2011 | 4:53pm
Steve Martin says:
Jesus didn't heal a LOT more people than he healed.

His coming wasn't a program for getting your life back together in the here and now, his program was a salvation program. Why do you think he turned and left them (the 5,000) when they came back for more the next day? And if were really about fixing everybody's situation for the moment, don't you think jesus could have waved his hands and healed everyone in the world?

And the few he did heal, or raise again...died (again) anyway.

There is nothing wrong with healing people. It is a good thing to do. We should all work for the betterment of the neighbor. The trouble comes when the church makes that it's #1 priority, instead of spreading the gospel of the forgiveness of sins through Christ Jesus.

Thanks.
3.18.2011 | 5:13pm
Steve Martin says:
PS- I happen to belong to an ELCA congregation.

If you can't criticize your own, then what good are you?
7.30.2011 | 1:36am
If you're suggesting that clergy forego involvement in worldly matters such as politics, and stick to fulfillment of their parishioners spiritual needs, I couldn't agree more. People of faith must always be suspicious of all politicians. They only want us because they think hanging around with us makes them look good. Anybody who falls for their line deserves to be taken.
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact