ROME—Strange as it may seem, I’ve been vaguely worried about the beatification on May 1 of a man with whom I was in close conversation for over a decade and to the writing of whose biography I dedicated 15 years of my own life.
My worries don’t have to do with allegations of a “rushed” beatification process; the process has been a thorough one, and the official judgment is the same as the judgment of the people of the Church. I’m also unconcerned about the fretting of ultra-traditionalists for whom John Paul II was a failure because he didn’t restore the French monarchy, impose the Tridentine Mass on the entire Church, and issue thundering anathemas against theologians and wayward politicians. No, my worries have to do with our losing touch with the qualities of the man. When the Church puts the title “Blessed” or “Saint” on someone, the person so honored often drifts away into a realm of the unapproachably good. We lose the sense that the saints are people just like us, who, by the grace of God, lived lives of heroic virtue: a truth of the faith of which John Paul II never ceased to remind us.
So what would I have us remember and hold fast to about John Paul II?
First, I hope we remember that everything he did was the accomplishment of a radically converted Christian disciple. His resistance to the Nazi occupation of Poland; his abandonment of his youthful plans in order to enter an underground seminary; his dynamic ministry in Cracow as priest and bishop; his philosophical and literary work; his efforts at Vatican II; his epic pontificate and its teaching; his role in the collapse of European communism and in the defense of the universality of human rights—all of this flowed from his radical conversion to Christ.
Why is this important to stress? Because it’s his connection to the rest of us. There are over a billion Catholics on this planet; very few of us will enjoy the range of intellectual, spiritual, literary, athletic, and linguistic gifts that God gave Karol Wojtya. Because of our baptism, though, all of us share with him the possibility of being radically converted Christian disciples. All of us can be Christ’s evangelical witnesses in our families, our work, our neighborhoods. All of us can live as though the truth John Paul II taught—that Jesus Christ is the answer to the question that is every human life—is at the very epicenter of our own lives.
The second thing I hope the Church holds onto, as it enrolls John Paul II among the blessed, is the significance of the date of his beatification: Divine Mercy Sunday. John Paul’s fondness for the Divine Mercy devotion, and his designation of the Octave of Easter as Divine Mercy Sunday, struck some as a Polish imposition on a universal Church. Those who thought this were mistaken.
John Paul II had an acute sense of the gaping holes that had been torn in the moral and spiritual fabric of humanity by the murderous cruelties of the 20th century. A century that began with a robust human confidence in the future had ended with a thick fog of cynicism hanging over the western world. As he wrote in his striking 2003 apostolic letter, “The Church in Europe,” Christianity’s historic heartland (and, by extension, the entire western world) was beset by guilt over what it had done in two world wars and the Cold War, at Auschwitz and in the Gulag, through the Ukrainian hunger famine and the communist persecution of the Church. But having abandoned the God of the Bible, it had nowhere to turn to confess this guilt, seek absolution, and find forgiveness.
That, John Paul II was convinced, was why the face of the merciful Father had been turned toward the world now. The insight came from Poland; the need was universal. That was why he created “Divine Mercy Sunday.” That is why we should remember that he was beatified on that day.
Thank God for such a life, in our time.
George Weigel is Distinguished Senior Fellow of the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, D.C.
Comments:
If the only tangible evidence we have of the man's life is "his resistance to the Nazi occupation of Poland; his abandonment of his youthful plans in order to enter an underground seminary; his dynamic ministry in Cracow as priest and bishop; his philosophical and literary work; his efforts at Vatican II; his epic pontificate and its teaching; his role in the collapse of European communism and in the defense of the universality of human rights," then the filthy little prostitute lying in a slum somewhere is absolutely correct to see no connection between herself and that great man. The evidence for the late pope's sanctity is concrete, empirical and embodied in the records of history, the many volumes of writing he left behind and his extraordinary praxis. The evidence for the late pope's connection to the rest of us, mired here in the squalor, is the product of fantasy; an ad hoc mental mirage quite credibly constructed for no other reasons than to minimize or excuse the depths we've allowed ourselves to sink to and that the late pope likely never knew.
He seems to dismiss any criticisms as coming from those, you know..."ultra-conservatives."
I am an Orthodox Catholic (I do not consider myself ultra-conservative) and I cannot get beyond the incident at Assisi where the statue of Buddha was placed on top of the tabernacle (in the very presence of His Holiness), an act which Arch-Bishop Lefebvre called "diabolical." Nor can I get the picture out of my mind of JPII kissing the Quran. And what about the joint prayer services with the pagans?
And then, of course, there is the condition of the Church under his watch. Need I say more?
Of all the popes- saints before JPII, would any of these things have happened under their watches? Does it preclude his sainthood? Should it? I don't know the answers. But these are valid questions that cannot summarily be dismissed as "ultra-conservative" as Mr. Weigel attempts to do.
I do not doubt his holiness, I could see the light of God in his very face, and this was just in pictures. And maybe if I could vote, I would vote for his sainthood. But, really, what is the rush? And why can't we discuss some of the mistakes without being dismissed as a kook?
PAX
One may recognize any saint while understanding that all of them were also fallen human beings.
I think you are missing the point. John Paul II gave himself over to the will of God through prayer and through the taking of Holy Orders. Not all, indeed, are called to preisthood or monastic life, but all Christians are called to that life lived in submission to the crosses they are given.
I think his life is a testimony to what good can come when one freely takes on this yoke. That is his example of humility and the constant seeking and acceptance of a divine will that we are to associate with. This example is universal. This example we can yearn to follow.
a calling that many a man and woman often disdains in our own times ..thus loosing out the many moments to call on His Name and power , on behalf of every negative thought , to cast out the enemy and to live in The Spirit .
God invited the Pope , to have the world consecrated to His Mother - thus inviting her Motherly role over human affairs ...and he possibly trusted that, that role would unfold - inspite of ..after all , he is also The Fatima Pope , for whom trust in her words
' My Immaculate Heart would triumph ' would have meant much !
'We know there are no idols ' - thus , for the Pope , Buddha could have meant littlle more than some other unbaptised yet rather holy yet misled kind of person ; unlikley he would have known that the statue was going to be on the tabernacle and possibly , did not mention anything negative afterwards , out of charity .
Same for the Quran kissing controversy ; he could have kissed it for The Name of our Lord , The Lord who saves , being in there ..as well as of His Mother ..and out of respect and love for the Moslems , in spite of the errors in their beliefs and practices .
The Apostles did not know about Judas - inspite of there being only 12 of them ; they too had miraculous powers ; God allowed that too , may be for instances such as that of Fr.Maciel so that he and those in his order would have continued to be blessed by the powerful presence and (? silent exorcism ) prayers of a holy pope ...till the time was right , for things to be dealt with diffrently ..
A praying Pope , who loved The Eucharist and promoted Adoration ..thanks to whom , now there are Adoration chapels in many places , where any one who goes in even with a mustard seed of faith would come to know that there is peace ..and unity , with God and His people , even in a more abundant way there ..
a Pope whom the doves of peace seemed to not want to leave ..and very likely that in that Assissi meeting , if there were any one with powers of evil in them , unlikely they put out their heads , other than to be crushed by the Woman , who would have carried all the prayers , in her bosom , to The Father !
Amazing to see the Hands of Providence , that the beatification takes place , in a year in which people of the original Pentarchy ( Catholics and Orthodox ) celebrated Easter on the same date and now , The Octave of Easter , the ancient but revived Feast as Feast of Mercy ! Church unity and the related fruits of faith in the world - a cause for which the Holy Father prayed and suffered and got to see amazing results, even if there are long ways to go ..
May the joy in heaven for 5/1/11 be reflected and reverberate through all our lives !
"True religion is the summit and perfection of false religions; it combines in one whatever there is of good and true separately remaining in each ... So that in matter of fact, if a religious mind were educated in and sincerely attached to some form of heathenism or heresy, and then were brought under the light of truth, it would be drawn off from error into the truth, not by losing what it had but by gaining what it had not, not by being unclothed but by being 'clothed upon." True conversion is ever of a positive, not a negative character."
There can be no doubt that Pope John Paul II understood and lived this passage from the writings of John Henry Newman; that he prayed with all the power of his great soul that "whatever there is of good and true" in the beliefs of others would be 'clothed upon" with holiness. This is lived caritas.
He experienced the evil of two horrible ideologies and saw and warned against the ascendence of secularism wed to libertinism. The reaction to which is soft governmental and corporate control. The Right and the Left. His answer, articulated by he and his successor is a return to God, to His Mercy. In some ways so simple. How many complex economic, political and biomedical conflicts would dissolve with an openness to life and the changed demographic that would bring, a stable family structure, and an understanding that this life is a stage for eternity.
Bangwell Putt - Thank you also for your post and your humble reliance on the wise words of John Henry Newman in preference to sounding-off as so many of us do so often!
Christ is indeed Risen!
With all due respect to John Henry Newman, true religion is not the combination of various elements that may be considered good and true that exist separately in each of the religions to form one. The fullness of Truth exists within The One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. While there may be elements of truth in other religions, there are also elements of error. True conversion is a positive because in Christ, there is no lie. There is only ONE Truth of Love.
I think there is much confusion over what Christian charity is or what it should be. Many view it as a call to be nice. Except nowhere in the Bible are we called to be nice. Rather, Christian charity is a call to truth, His Truth.
No Catholic should ever kiss a book that denies our Lord’s divinity or resurrection. It may be unkind to say, but it is the Truth. And even if we can agree that all these were simple mistakes, which I’m open to, how do we dismiss the state of our beloved Church under JPII? Forget that only one in four Catholics goes to mass or that 97% agree with or practice contraception or that a majority support abortion rights and cohabitate at the same rate as the rest of the culture. Forget that for a moment.
Let’s talk about real devastation. I come from the archdiocese of Milwaukee under Rembert Weakland, an active homosexual, pro-abortion, pro-gay marriage, heretic bishop that paid his lover half a million of our money and raped our Cathedral, moving the Holy Tabernacle to a side garage and the Blessed Mother to a back corner on the way to the bathrooms, all while Weakland’s ugly mug hangs from a prominent place on the top wall of our formerly glorious Cathedral. And this is a “bishop” that JPII left in power –and he knew, the Vatican knew, because good and holy Milwaukee Catholics were crying out, begging for help. And here is the uncharitable truth that we faced: no one helped us.
So sorry if I’m not too nice, (and yeah, Mr. Wiegel, I sure am ticked that no “thundering anathemas” were issued) but I guess reality does bite sometimes and the truth can hurt. I love JPII, I really do, but some serious mistakes were made under his watch. I know because I lived under one of them. But again I can't help but ask, why the rush with this?
Please allow me to offer this criticism as a prayer, that from his heavenly perch God will allow JPII to work to restore our beloved Church to its former glory and that this restoration begins with the Milwaukee archdiocese. Amen.
Urban,
You have exactly my sentiments! I am happy to live in a time where the Traditional Latin Mass has found its way back, where Traditional Orders are overflowing with seminarians, where Pope Benedict will deny inter-religious worship at Assisi this October, where courageous archbishops and cardinals are trying to restore the Church in their Dioceses, where there is a Transitional Novus Ordo Mass in place with the new missal, where I attend a parish that has a Traditional minded priest to the Core, where I know a Traditional minded priest who cares about getting his parishioners souls to Heaven!!!
+PAX+
What is needed is a miracle, and every miracle requires an act of Faith. Our Lady of Fatima, hear our prayers for the unification of your Son's One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church, so that the world will believe.
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Pope-Benedict-XVI-Catholic-Prudence-Counsels-NOT-to-Canonize-JPII-in-Haste/192580334096734



From "a man-on-the-street" vantage point of a lapsed Catholic at his installation as Pope in 1978, who evolved back to the faith, I saw John Paul II develop his papacy into greatness over a 25-year period that only beheld increasing surprises--his defeat of Communism, his evangelization, and his promise to young people.
I count myself lucky to be a part of his age.