Ads


Great Uncle Aloysius

In one of my columns last January, I mentioned that there had been no practicing pagans in my family since the death of my great uncle Aloysius Bentley (1895-1987), who liked to welcome in the New Year by sacrificing a goat or a pair of woodcocks to Janus and Dionysus on the small marble altar he kept in his garden (carved for him by a sculptor who specialized in funerary monuments). It was only a passing reference, and one I did not expect would attract much notice; but apparently some readers found the story somewhat outlandish, even to the point of doubting its veracity. I suppose I understand their suspicions. After all, how many men are really named Aloysius?

I should point out, however, that in all things onomastic my great uncle’s parents were given to exotic turns: they called his older sister Fiammetta Celesta, his younger brother Antoninus Impius, and their favorite Great Dane Apollonius Maior. Actually, his full personal name was Aloysius Gaius Stilicho, but most people knew him simply as Al, while his wife and a few other of his particular intimates called him Wishus; by the time I came to know him, when he was in his seventies, he had legally added Philostratus to his collection of gaudy appellations and had taken to signing all official documents and correspondences “Phil.”

Of course, I imagine some skeptical readers were reacting more to his religious predilections than to his name. This too, I suppose, I understand. He was not raised pagan, however. The Bentleys were Quakers for the most part, and that was the tradition in which he was reared. He was always grateful for his early religious formation, he would say in later years, because it taught him an abhorrence of dogmatic formulations and because, once he had discovered his true spiritual path, it required only a short, elegant jeté on his part to cross the distance between the Friends’ attendance upon the indwelling light of Christ and the later Platonists’ mystical contemplation of the inner light of nous.

He was also glad he had never been baptized, he said, as it meant that his conversion did not amount to actual apostasy; as far as he was concerned he had never really been a Christian in the full sense. He deeply disliked the prejudice against Christianity that he found among so many his fellow Maryland pagans, and it would have grieved him to say that he had in any sense rejected the Church. Rather, his was the view of Symmachus: that there cannot be only one path to the great mystery of God. All that said, though, I imagine his choice of creed marks him as a man of peculiar temperament.

He was, it is true, something of an eccentric. As a boy, he had received so rigorous and exhaustive a classical education from his father that he never really knew how to live on cordial terms with the modern world. He refused to learn to drive. He believed that mechanical watches were an offense against nature and the “divine cyclophoria” of the heavens. He was an avid sailor, but would not allow an outboard motor to be attached to his boat (a converted skipjack), even for emergencies; his piety dictated, he said, that he submit himself entirely to the will of Poseidon and Aeolus. And, in general, his tastes in all things were irregular. For instance, he came to believe that Sacheverell Sitwell was the greatest writer in the history of English letters, and privately published a monograph on the subject entitled Whom Shakespeare Might Envy.

But he was a sincere and thoughtful man, and he was anything but a wanton syncretist of the New Age variety. He detested the factitious neopaganisms of his time; groups like the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, with their occult fixations, he regarded as sordid fairground frauds; he called Margaret Murray a charlatan and a demoness; and in general he saw neopaganism as a garish and graceless mockery of true religion. Only an authentic and genuine restoration of the old ways, he said, would lure the gods back from that hidden place to which they had retreated some centuries before.

Consequently, the liturgies he constructed for his garden rites were drawn from sources of (in his words) “uncorrupted antiquity.” Admittedly, in his twenties, just after his conversion, he dabbled a bit in Iamblichan theurgy and relied overly much on the Chaldean Oracles and Julian’s hymn to Lord Helios for his devotions; but he soon began to favor older and (as he would have it) more “rustic” observances, feeling they were closer to the authentic soil of Peloponnesian religion, and he began drawing instead on the Homeric Hymns and the Sibylline Oracles.

I have fond memories of that walled garden behind his dilapidated townhouse in Towson, with its riot of ungoverned flora, and its quaint little statues of satyrs and nymphs peering out from under tangles of vines or the shadows of hedges. Often we would dine there, when the weather allowed, and it took only a few glasses of wine to render my great uncle buoyantly loquacious. He would hold forth on his metaphysical speculations, the two or three rapturous visions of Apollo that had been granted him in his thirties, his hopes for finding funding for a Vestal college in Glen Burnie or La Plata, and his admiration for Algernon Swinburne (whose entire corpus of verse he seemed to have committed to memory). The food was always delicious.

His wife was called Polly, originally because her Christian name was Mary, and later because she had had her name changed to Polyhymnia. The two were exquisitely well matched, and the tenderness of their affection for one another was resplendently evident even when they were well into their eighties. They had met in 1922, at a St. Trifon’s Day parade in Baltimore’s Little Bulgaria, and within a few weeks were engaged; within two months, they were married. She was a great beauty in her youth, and was still a woman of striking aspect and bright eyes when I knew her.

For the most part, nothing in my great uncle’s religion made him any more unusual than the average Presbyterian or Freemason. There were a few embarrassing incidents—the time a neighbor caught a glimpse from an attic window of him and his wife dancing naked around their garden altar, or the time I visited him during the Dionysia and he came to the door wearing a ritual ornament that, divorced from its religious context, seemed rather lewd. But in general he cut a rather ordinary figure in the neighborhood.

His funeral rites were probably a little on the illegal side; but we executed his wishes to the letter. He was not much interested in Northern European paganism while he lived, but he keenly wanted to punctuate his life with a kind of Viking envoi. The director of the crematorium had been his friend, and had attended the same temple in Catonsville, and so he helped arrange for the pyre and the cortege of sails that processed down into the broad southern expanse of the Chesapeake Bay. The sight of my great uncle’s boat, the Zeus of Salamis, burning on the waves—a golden and tremulous blossom of flame against the amethyst dusk, undulously reflected on the darkening blue and silver waters—was one of the most stirring spectacles I have ever been privileged to witness.

What became of Great Uncle Aloysius thereafter I cannot hope to know in this life. I rarely think about such things. Perhaps his ghost was sent wafting off blissfully among the asphodel of the Elysian Fields, or was granted a berth in the Limbo of the Virtuous Pagans (even if Dante believed it a place reserved only for those born before the Christian dispensation). But who can say? All I know is that I have met few men more devout than he, and that his faith—unlike a great many of the most distinctive forms of American Christianity—had some actual basis in history and tradition. And surely an indulgent providence might take that into account in determining his final abode.

David Bentley Hart is contributing editor of First Things. His most recent book is Atheist Delusions: The Christian Revolution and Its Fashionable Enemies (Yale University Press). His other “On the Square” articles can be found here.




Become a fan of First Things on Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and follow First Things on Twitter.

Comments:

7.8.2011 | 7:53am
Thomas R says:
If this story is for real what a remarkably interesting person to know. And as I recall Dante had Saladin in Limbo and Saladin clearly lived after Christ.
7.8.2011 | 9:04am
You had me up until the Viking envoy.

You couldn't help yourself, could you?

Quick, somebody sign David Hart to a book contract for "The Memoirs of Alyosius Hart"
7.8.2011 | 10:14am
All I can say is...they don't make pagans like they used to.
7.8.2011 | 11:48am
Patrick says:
Too right, Thomas R; that is one of the more distinctive features of Dante's Limbo. To Saladin you may add Dioscorides, Galen, Avicenna, and Averroes (Seneca might be excused though he lived across the cusp).
7.8.2011 | 11:59am
AL says:
Dear Thomas R,

I think it unlikely that Baltimore has a Little Bulgaria where St Trifon's Feast is observed (Trifon is a thinly Christianised version of Dionysus, incidentally), or that there really are other Maryland pagans with a temple in Catonsville, etc. So I think we can safely assume that this is just Dr Hart in one of his frequent facetious moods.
7.8.2011 | 12:17pm
S.L. Hersey says:
Let's not hound Dr. Hart for further bona fides. It's impolite, and I, for one, would be crushed if it weren't mostly true. Sometimes it seems that the universe requires a minimum cohort of heathens; if so, let us have more of Uncle Aloysius' kidney!

And as my sainted mother (a Southern grande dame to the core) always taught me: it's very rude to tell a lie, but it's even RUDER to bore one's audience.
7.8.2011 | 12:53pm
Not only is every word of my brother's piece to be accepted as the unvarnished truth, but I'm somewhat mystified by a few of his omissions. There is no mention of Uncle Aloysius's circus years, for instance, or his peculiar (consequent?) fascination with midgets. Nothing about his outlandish claims to have survived both the Battle of the Little Bighorn and the Charge of the Light Brigade. Nary a word to suggest that he had a hook for a left hand (the fleshly one having been eaten by a ravenous dog in the Arctic, he claimed), or that he never wore socks (they made his feet swell, he said), or that he insisted on eating at the table standing ("Always be alert!" he would warn us - "They shot Hickock in the back because he didn't heed that first rule of survival!").

My brother seems mostly preoccupied with his religious and literary oddities. A typically egg-headed focus, I'm afraid. Perhaps David will give us a fuller account of our remarkable relative someday. The old boy merits a book really, not a measly column or two. Get cracking, bro.
7.8.2011 | 1:00pm
Mr. Hart....though it seems outlandish on the suface to connect neo_platonism with the Society of Friends there does seem to be some connection between the nous and the inner light of the Quakers via the Oxford Platonist John Norris,whose devotional writings were widely read among dissenting sects...so much so that the royalist and high anglican Norris (who was rector of Bemerton after George Herbert) had to clarify matters by writing anti-Quaker tracts!
7.8.2011 | 1:13pm
TBH says:
Can First Things please sign up Addison as a regular contributor?
7.8.2011 | 1:29pm
PRH says:
Patrick, Thomas R.,

But does "Christian dispensation" mean AD, or the period of the Christian empire, or the period after a culture's evangelization? That would, admittedly, still leave the question of Saladin open; but just because Dante breaks his own rule and lets in a few later infidels, technically his limbo for virtuous heathens is meant for those who never heard the gospel.
7.8.2011 | 2:16pm
I have been misunderstood.

This essay is even *better* if its author shaves Aloysius every morning.
7.8.2011 | 10:38pm
Phil says:
I think I'll name one of my chickens after your uncle.
7.8.2011 | 11:01pm
Steve S. says:
The column, and the subsequent remarks by the author's brother, has left me speechless. Any chance we could see a FT exchange between the Brothers Hart?
7.8.2011 | 11:57pm
Ben Embry says:
This is all very interesting! Very likely, Mr. Hart and I are distant cousins, what with his kinfolk and mine both having found their life companions in the Little Bulgaria neighborhood. We'll put you on the mailing list for the next reunion!

Also, I liked the irony: laying before adherents of certain "distinctive forms of American Christianity" the challenge of considering history and tradition by invoking a fictional (or embellished) history and tradition from your own family. Well done.
7.9.2011 | 10:40am
ouine says:
"...with no light or guide
but the one burning in my own heart."

St. John of the Cross
7.9.2011 | 11:29am
David Hart says:
Two quick replies:

1) Thomas R is correct that Dante's "minimum security" hell includes post-Christian figures, most strikingly Saladin, off by himself apart from the other noble warriors in limbo. In Canto IV of The Inferno, Virgil speaks of those pagans who, despite their virtues, were never baptized and who lived before the arrival of Christianity and so failed to adore God properly. But later in the same Canto, we find post-Christian figures from late antiquity and the Muslim middle ages there as well.

2) My brother Addison is free to treasure what memories he wishes regarding our great uncle; my fondest memories are of different things. He ought not to garble his anecdotes, though. Great Uncle Aloysius did not claim to have lost his left hand to a ravenous dog in the arctic, but to an arctic fox in a ravine (in Peru, I believe). A small detail, but one that speaks volumes.
7.9.2011 | 1:21pm
Many scholars have commented on St. Paul's "pagan" Platonism. Much of what he said, is a description in favor of the "Greeks," explicitly. And more specifically, of Plato's famous Theory of Forms.

Paul's language often held to the vocabulary of a typical hierarchical Platonistic dualism. Wherein it was said that all the universe was composed of two things: 1) matter, flesh, in the world, vs. 2) spiritual or idea "forms" or "models" in "Heaven." Of which things here on earth, being made of inferior matter, were mere "perish"able "copies," "shadow"s. All language in the Bible - and also straight from Plato's Theory of Forms.

Perhaps St. Paul was a bit like your uncle? Adding Greek Platonism to Judaism, to form Christianity.

By the way? The Church recognizes that the Greeks had some kind of partial revelation of God, before Christianity proper formed.
7.9.2011 | 2:39pm
Peter says:
Your uncle sounds like some Unitarians I've known.
7.10.2011 | 1:27am
Robert Hart says:
I am surprised at both of my brothers. How could they forget that, near the end of his life, Uncle Aloysius became a member of the Episcopal Church (in honor of his late friend Clarence Day Sr.)? He said he was delighted because no conversion was required. He merely added another layer to the richness of his religious experience.

Also, I am very glad that we live in a day and age when family contacts with Little Bulgaria may be discussed openly without shame.
7.10.2011 | 2:41am
Robert Hart says:
Come to think of it, it would be helpful for people to know how the man could afford the time for his many adventures. Early in life he acquired massive wealth from patented inventions, such as the automatic potato peeler, the hand-cranked corn husker and the Do it Yourself Appendix Remover. Not a few lawsuits were averted because of the boldly (and dare I say, cleverly) emblazoned "Caveat Emptor" on each package (inasmuch as some of the first batch of corn huskers proved defective). What a shame that all his worldly goods and assets, including Great Aunt Polyhymnia, had to take that last journey with him down the Chesapeake Bay. Such was devotion to authentic praxis.
7.11.2011 | 12:19am
Naomi says:
Okay. So this is a true story. While I'm reading this story I just thought this is just a story. But when there are Brothers Hart shown up their voice as posters, I know then this is the real one. I would say that uncle Al should be someone who has more passion in life. He must be an interesting person to know.
7.11.2011 | 12:35am
Riris says:
So, uncle Al should be someone that I want to meet to. I may not know him at all but from your story I can see that he is someone who put more respect on life. Someone who loves to take every chance in life for doing something "wild" or at least something that he and those around him couldn't forget about.
7.11.2011 | 1:05pm
Art Hart says:
I have a picture of a hook-armed man in my basement. I am relieved to finally know this mysterious stranger's name.
7.20.2011 | 1:48pm
It is the (inadvertently?) original contribution of Dr. Hart to Religious Studies, to think of pagan but also even Christian spirit, as being related more to being "spirited," than "spiritual." To think of Christians or spirituality, as being responsive to the wider range of human and/or divine emotions and spirits; far beyond mere, singular, quiet piety. Or a quietly-suffering, otherworldly Platonism.

I don't know if Dr. Hart does this deliberately. But it's an interesting and potentially revolutionary idea; I'd like to see Dr. Hart address this issue explicitly. That is, the matter of "spirited" vs. "spiritual": feeling the full variety of life and emotion, vs. the more monastic ideal of trying to simply shut off the wider range of emotions and sensations.

Certain varieties of Christian existentialism seem to have allowed this, in some cruder way. But hearing the fuller implications from Hart would be interesting.
8.2.2011 | 1:36am
I don't know if Dr. Hart does this deliberately. But it's an interesting and potentially revolutionary idea; I'd like to see Dr. Hart address this issue explicitly. That is, the matter of "spirited" vs. "spiritual": feeling the full variety of life and emotion, vs. the more monastic ideal of trying to simply shut off the wider range of emotions and sensations. Come to think of it, it would be helpful for people to know how the man could afford the time for his many adventures. Early in life he acquired massive wealth from patented inventions, such as the automatic potato peeler, the hand-cranked corn husker and the Do it Yourself Appendix Remover. Not a few lawsuits were averted because of the boldly (and dare I say, cleverly) emblazoned "Caveat Emptor" on each package (inasmuch as some of the first batch of corn huskers proved defective). What a shame that all his worldly goods and assets, including Great Aunt Polyhymnia, had to take that last journey with him down the Chesapeake Bay. Such was devotion to authentic praxis.
8.11.2011 | 4:36pm
And as my sainted mother (a Southern grande dame to the core) always taught me: it's very rude to tell a lie, but it's even RUDER to bore one's audience. So, uncle Al should be someone that I want to meet to. I may not know him at all but from your story I can see that he is someone who put more respect on life. Someone who loves to take every chance in life for doing something "wild" or at least something that he and those around him couldn't forget about.
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact