Recently I came across two items which superficially would seem to have nothing at all to do with each other. The first was an advertisement: a religious sister was promoting a women’s retreat about “finding oneself” and “coming to a place of ‘centered’ peace.”
Highlighted within the ad was a sort of inverted pyramid using decreasing-sized fonts to illustrate exactly how Sister intended to lead these women back to themselves, and center their peace:
Y-O-U
OTHERS
GOD
The second article discussed an alarming trend of teenagers debasing themselves physically, materially and spiritually on their prom nights, thanks to parents who provide the ways and means for every sort of excess imaginable—from exorbitantly priced gowns to beach houses rented (but largely un-chaperoned) by the parents so that the party can continue through the weekend.
Reading these two very different items, I marveled at how upside down the world has turned in the last forty years, and I wondered if the inverted pyramid from item one may have a great deal to do with the tawdry details outlined in item two.
Flashback, forty-some years: as my friends and I prepare to make our first confessions God is very much on all our minds, as are the notions of sin and shame and forgiveness.
Contrary to modern thinking, we six year-olds are not little dopes incapable of comprehending moral concepts. Knowing that we will soon be kneeling in a confessional and facing up to all of our smallish venial sins (“told a fib, fought wit’ my bruddah, used the good spoons for diggin’ up moss”) we decide that for the whole exercise to be really worth while, we will need an honest-to-God mortal sin on our souls.
We settle on theft, anticipating additional penance for follow-up lies, and proceed to steal a large bottle of grape juice from Mrs. Garfinkle’s fridge.
We’ve stolen juice, and even as we drink it down under a shady tree we are preparing our lies. We know exactly what we’re doing, and how wrong our actions are. In fact, the knowledge that we are both stealing and planning to lie gives the whole endeavor an added patina of glamour and sophistication. We are edgy little mavericks, brazen in our purple-lipped defiance.
Enter Zeyde Garfinkle, grandfather of our non-Catholic consort, Joey. He approaches our tribal base behind the tallest pine trees and pretends not to notice our quick maneuvering as we hide the empty bottle behind us.
“It’s chilly in the shade! What are you children doing, here behind the trees?” he asks.
“Nuthin,” we answer, convinced that we are sly.
“Nothing,” he corrects, stressing the hard g. Peering through his glasses he tsks in concern. “But you children must be cold, your lips are purple!”
Gasp! We criminals exchange wide-eyed looks, noting for the first time the shared, incriminating, violet mustaches. Tongue-tied, we can offer no plausible excuse. It requires a lie we have not planned!
I won’t describe the subsequent projectile vomiting of purple grape juice brought on by pricked consciences, overfull bellies and the workings of fully engaged sympathetic nervous systems. Suffice it to say, between that and Joey Garfinkle’s bawling admission of our collective guilt, we children learned a lesson about the consequences of sin. Our cavalier attitudes about confession disappeared too. If Grandpa Garfinkle’s gentle probings could produce such a messy, stinging rebuke to our consciences, how would we survive Fr. Valentine?
I submit the Caper of the Grape as evidence that forty years ago children were being raised with an unambiguous sense of right and wrong, and a distrust of rationalization and relativity. It was not an unusual thing for the sacred and the secular to intersect in our lives on a daily basis, and that such intersections, rather than burdening children (and adults) with excessive guilt and shame, brought us balance and insight—insight which seems to be lacking in the lives of those pitiable, spiritually impoverished prom-parents, and balance that simply cannot be achieved by an inverted pyramid.
In 40 years our society has traveled from knowing with absolute certainty that even the smallest actions could impact our spirits for good or ill, to believing with equal certainty that everything is subjective and that small stuff ought not be sweated.
But really, there is no such thing as “small stuff.” We learn right judgment in small ways, so we needn’t learn it in larger, more brutal ways.
Reading about parents who facilitated the prom excesses, I wondered if their decisions were born not of recklessness but of plain old helplessness. Parenting to the conventional wisdom, perhaps they had allowed too much “small stuff” to go un-sweated, missed too many opportunities to instill values of personal dignity and human consideration, for fear damaging self-esteem. If that were the case, how would they suddenly know how to teach boundaries?
When parents balance praise with an honest recognition of smaller errors, they help their children understand limits more readily. After all, one mild reprimand was enough to forever erase thievery from my career plans. The trick lies in knowing how to correct the young in ways that are forthright, but also spiritually and mentally healthful.
Grandpa Garfinkle was a master in healthy teaching. When we children next encountered him, he noted our discomfort and did not try to excuse us. The juice had been meant for others, and we had been thoughtless and selfish. But the old man knew how to reinforce a lesson with kindness.
“Now, listen all of you, because your priest is going to tell you this too: there is one very best way to live your life. First, you love and serve God, and you keep the commandments. Then, you look around at everyone else and see where you can love and serve them. Then, if you have any energy left over, you can think about yourself. This,” he said, raising his finger to emphasize the point, “is the way you walk on a road made with diamonds, by forgetting yourself, and what you want. It is the diamond path.”
Elizabeth Scalia is the Managing Editor of the Catholic Portal at Patheos and blogs as The Anchoress. Her previous articles for "On the Square" can be found here.
Become a fan of First Things on Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and follow First Things on Twitter.
Comments:
That is something quite different from today's parents spending 10,000 bucks on prom night. Parents going nuts for prom is just a sad expression of the materialism of our society, where we measure worth by wealth. These parents are just overgrown children (probably raised 40 years ago, during pre-lapsarian times) who probably enjoy the prom drama ("proma") as much as their spoiled kids.
True to form, the Pignato kid squealed . . . and the consequence was swift and memorable: the "swipee" had to consume every last candy in that pumpkin under mom's eagle eye, which naturally led to a monster bellyache. "Swipee" then had to do chores to replace candy and return it to its rightful owner's mother, admitting guilt.
While the actual punishment was only visited on one of us, the lesson stayed with us all: Trick or treating really WAS the devil's handiwork. :-) (Oh, yeah, and the "no stealing" thing, too.... )
If you don't mind, I'd love to point Granderson's readers to your piece.
Tom N
(And some of the comments on that article are disturbing; for instance, the ones claiming that autism is "made up", and just an excuse for parents to let their kids act badly.)
Here are some examples of what seem hateful to me in Granderson's article:
"I do not love your child." No kidding, but thanks for the clarification.
"The rest of the country does not love your child either." That's overly broad. But even so, shouldn't my wife and I be the target of your bad feelings. After all, we're the ones to blame.
"...we want to kill you for letting your brat ruin our dinner." I hope LZ isn't a big proponent of the death penalty.
"Or the other adult-oriented establishments you've unilaterally decided will serve as an extension of your toddler's playpen because you lack the fortitude to properly discipline them, in public and at home." Venomous and presumptuous.
"And whenever a kid throws a temper tantrum in the middle of the shopping mall it's just as bad as his soiling his pants to spite his parents, and it stinks just as much." Clever, but mean spirited.
"You wanted them, deal with them." That's the perfect way to end a cold, selfish, hateful article.
On the other hand, here's a fine way to conclude a wise and well-meaning one on a similar topic: "'This,' he said, raising his finger to emphasize the point, 'is the way you walk on a road made with diamonds, by forgetting yourself, and what you want. It is the diamond path.'"
The rosy world of moral assurance of the 1960's which you describe, was a world of moral absolutes, of cowboys in white and black hats, which existed largely in the minds of those people who had living and mature experience of World War II and Korea. They were better off financially than any Americans before them and were living through an era dominated by dictators of unspeakable human evil and by overwhelming fear leading to a sense of common purpose.
"Grub first, then ethics." [Berholt Brecht] They had the grub, and they had the genuine insulation from moral ambiguity that comes from having the grub, as well as from the collective sense of having evil enemies of great power in the world beyond. It was one of the few periods in our history where a majority were not in thrall to home grown poverty, crime, violence, and corruption.
But is was artificial insulation and not the essential human condition. That condition simply is one of moral ambiguity. Why? You will find moral certainty among those with religious principles, but you will also find that not everybody's religious principles are compatible with one another. There is as little moral relativism in Saudi Arabia as in the Holy See, but little tolerance or respect between the religions involved.
Outside the world of specific and absolute religious beliefs, those with eyes have noticed something: there is no place left for any of us to go where we do not have to deal with everybody else. Our planet is truly a lifeboat, a well-stocked lifeboat but not an endlessly stocked lifeboat, and too much agitation of the boat is likely to drown us all.
Like it or not, tolerance of others is just about the only way now to keep the boat afloat. And tolerance of others means tolerance of many things you may think morally wrong. Your inverted pyramid is actually a square balanced on it's point:
me
OTHERS
God
Unfortunately, "believing with equal certainty that everything is subjective" does not describe the real condition of our lives. If it were that simple, one could, as you suggest, merely exchange the wrong certainty for the right one. But, as stated, it is both logically and actually contradictory. The real condition is "having no certainty because there are so many different certainties to choose from". And, in these days, being too certain, too aggressively, is the surest way to making our world intolerable for everyone, even ourselves.
As the parent of a gifted child with impulse control issues, I've run into numerous times when my child is screaming "No!" and even times when he's started wacking me or when I've had to restrain him. I'm sure those with health children look at me and think I'm a narcissitic marshmallow parent.
When things are going well, people complement me on how manture my son is, are amazed at how adult his manners are and and especially what an exceptional vocabulary he has.
Alas, when his blood sugar is low, he is dehydrated or just plain tired, the kid I call rage-boy emerges. I then get the "you should discipline him more" condescension from those who have no experience with exceptional children.
Yes, we live in an age of bad parenting, but folks must remember that some kids behave badly for other reasons. Do not be quick to judge.
@Elvis: I, too, have raised an exceptional child with such gifts and challenges. As we prayed and established routines, disciplined and above all loved this child, we also experienced the condescension of which you speak. It is painful, and yet those incidents provided many opportunities to remind our son how much we loved him, no strings attached. Correct the behavior and shower them with love.
Let us all be slower to judgment, swifter to pray for one another, especially the ones who are visibly struggling, and enduring in patience with young parents and their children. Ours might be the one encouraging word a frustrated young mother or father will encounter in the course of the day. Let our words and actions be those of Jesus.
Lord have mercy on us all.
Thank you, Bee. What beautiful words! My husband and I have on occasions been challenged by our Asperger's child -- nearly always in very public places like airports and supermarkets, where our child became overwhelmed by the level of stimulation. We had to work so hard with this little one and to endure so much disapproval from others (and we sympathized with those others, believe me!). Our "difficult child" has grown up to be the sweetest, easiest teen imaginable, I'm happy to say. I never expected others to be particularly tolerant of our child. I understood their perspective and tried so hard to avoid letting out child bother other people. However, I deeply sympathize with any parent who is working with a special needs child. I don't think one can appreciate the hard work and exhaustion until one has experienced the situation first-hand.


