Ads


Aloysius Bentley’s Melancholy

Certain readers have requested in various ways (pseudonymous emails, menacing telegrams delivered in the dead of night, and so on) that I supply a few more details from the biography of my great uncle Aloysius Bentley (1895-1987). As you may recall, he was the last practicing pagan in my extended family; once his obsequies had been performed, and the last flickering embers of his funeral-bark had disappeared beneath the waves of the Chesapeake, the old faith had no remaining votaries in the clan.

I am not sure, however, that I have much to tell—at least, not without excessive preliminary explanation. It occurred to me, however, that I might say something about a particularly significant episode from his life, and provide a few specimens from his own poetic record of those days. You see, Aloysius Bentley was a poet of sorts, and I am (by default) his literary executor. His verse, of which he published only a few samples in his lifetime, was of a fairly traditional and formalist kind. Most of it was written in heroic couplets, probably because of his special devotion to Pope (“The only Pope to whom I would bend my knee,” he would quip in his rare fractiously sectarian moments).

By far, the longest poem he ever produced was his immense, unfinished discursive epic (about 38,000 lines as it stands), Theophaneia, whose title was a reference to the yearly unveiling of the sacred images in the inner sanctuary of the Apolloneion at Delphi, to celebrate the god’s return at the end of winter. He wrote most of it in the summer of 1920, when a fit of deep depression had driven him into retreat at the Bentley summer home in Dorchester County, out on the Eastern Shore. I know I have said that his conversion to paganism from Quakerism was, in his eyes, a natural and largely uneventful transition; but he did mention now and then that his complete commitment to “the way of the gods” was occasioned by a brief “passage through dejection.”

He was twenty-five, and he was suffering from an acute abhorrence of what he saw as the special evils of modernity: the disenchantment of nature, the reduction of the world to a soulless machine, the hideousness of modern architecture, the decline of the arts, the rise of a crass materialism. His mood had been exacerbated, moreover, by any number of recent events: the Great War, the Spanish Influenza, the Volstead Act, and so on. And he had come to believe that the pathologies of modern society could not be healed by what remained of “cultural Christianity,” which he saw as a paradox that had always been imperiled, from its inception, by internal forces of dissolution.

Only if the old gods returned, he concluded, would the world speak to Western humanity again. But an intellectual conviction is not yet faith. When he arrived on the Eastern Shore, he was a pagan merely by disposition; by the time he left, he was a pagan in his heart; and his poem describes how he emerged from doubt and despondency into that condition of radiant cheerfulness that characterized him throughout his later life.

Unfortunately, only the roughly 1400 lines of the poem’s prelude in three cantos, entitled “Melancholy,” are written out in a final fair copy. The rest of the chapters exist as a tumult of variant texts, festooned with revisions and often illegible marginal notations. To extract something like an authoritative text from those pages will require a slow and laborious process that I have not yet had the time or courage to undertake. But the “Melancholy” section is a rather wonderful portrayal of the state of mind that carried my great uncle across the bay, as well as of the first faint glimpses of that “heathen grace” that he believed was beckoning him out of his despair. It is worth quoting at some length.

Part One is called “The Fall of Night,” and begins by setting the scene:


The lambent sapphire of the sky of day
In trembling streams has melted quite away;
The West now dons crepuscular attire
And wraps himself in gold and crimson fire;
The chaste moon through the turquoise twilight pours
Her pearl-pale light upon our lustrous shores,
And by her glassy essence opaline
Makes strand and surf with iridescence shine;
Now silver stars, cold, fair, and wanly bright,
Are scattered on the sable cope of night.

Eternal order rules despotic time:
The sky is beautiful, the sea sublime—
On high, the primum mobile rotates,
In my great clock the moment pendulates—
And ever down the scale of nature flow
Sidereal magics, guiding earth below.

The westward wind is fragrant with fresh brine
And perfumes from the swaying groves of pine;
Here on the Eastern Shore of Maryland,
Where mighty trees above flat acreage stand,
The stridulations of the insects make
A music full of bliss and ardent ache;
Gold fireflies glisten on the wine-dark night,
And float, and burn: small gems of ghostly light.
I take up—hearing ocean’s surge afar—
My ruddy wine, my dusky sweet cigar;
My great bay windows open lie—I gaze
Out over fields dissolving in a haze,
And silhouetted on night’s blue I see
The stern colossus of my black gum tree;
The rarest airborne orchid of the night,
A Luna moth, floats by, jade-green and white.
All should be peace within, the fretful heart
Should rest in idle calm, and fears depart—
And yet it is not so: my thoughts are grave;
I find that I am melancholy’s slave.

The poet now ponders the causes of his disaffection, but can find no diagnosis in the books he consults (“Hermetic manuals, treatises on sin…”). Then he considers what cures he might attempt, quickly dismissing pharmacology, psychiatry, and “positive thinking”; he lingers over the possibility of contemplative prayer, but ultimately concludes he is not equal to its demands:


So many demons vex the mystic’s night—
Pride, sadness, wrath, the worm of appetite,
The noonday devil (akedia), desire,
And visions of the everlasting fire—
Were I to contend with that chthonian host,
Ingloriously the field would soon be lost.

And so he resigns himself to a state that today, I suppose, we might call “bi-polar”:


I am a ship adrift on passion’s seas,
My every want I’m eager to appease:
I am a roisterer, a sybarite,
Orgiastic Bacchus, drunken, all delight . . .

And then Prometheus, torn by eagle’s claws,
Not knowing my transgression, or God’s laws . . .

Finally he begins to fall asleep:


Tobacco’s opiate, abetted by drink,
Makes me vertiginous, my senses sink;
Fatigued, lulled by dark nepenthes, I feel
A languid Ixion on a sluggish wheel.

There follows a long allegorical dream that concludes with a vision of the old gods departing into a hidden realm (“From the barren earth, through the empty heavens”).

Part Two, “Late Morning,” resumes the narrative the next day, in a voice that seems a little, so to speak, hung over:


Drunk with the torpor of midsummer light,
I should be free from demons of the night—
The throbbing bombinations of the bees,
The treetops swaying in the humid breeze,
As woodbine’s balm comes dropping through the air—
A day too heavy for such heavy care . . .

Yet still the shadow lurks within and tells
My secret mind of all its million hells.

This section is the poem’s longest, and contains a remarkably exhaustive survey of my great uncle’s indictments of the modern world’s morals, arts, and politics, including a now rather dated critique of Spengler’s recently published Der Untergang des Abendlandes. At the end of this elegant rant, the poet grows calm by looking at the beauty of the countryside around his house:


                               . . . I require no device
Of art to praise this earthly paradise.
Just now a citron-blazoned swallowtail
Across my garden flutters, starts to sail,
Then vanishes amid rose-haunted shadows,
To float off to his honey-colored meadows.

Part Three, “Late Afternoon,” merely recounts a long walk the poet takes “Between the river and the skirting woods,” to clear his thoughts before dinner. Here the poem continually wavers back and forth between frank examinations of the poet’s state of mind and fleeting reveries. In one of the more charming passages, the poet imagines himself as Actaeon hunting in the forest:


The flush, the quickened, then the slackened pace,
And all the sweet elations of the chase:
Dew-silvered woods, the mist-gray light of dawn,
The violet shade, the grazing doe and fawn—
Then morning’s sky puts off its somber hue
And through the branches breaks a fiery blue—
The mournful belling of the stag, the bays
Of loping hounds, the sun’s green-golden rays,
The plash of ferns, the splash of blood, the gleam
Of dancing daylight in a stony stream,
The arrow loosed, the dreadful wound, the horn
Whose echoed note grows ever more forlorn,
Until at last the quarry’s flight is stayed,
And silence fills the green sun-dappled glade . . .

He adds that, could he be vouchsafed a glimpse of Artemis, he would happily then submit to her wrath, to be “rent asunder by the hounds of love.”

The canto ends with the poet arriving at the shore’s edge (actually the shore of the Choptank, an estuary of the bay, but here he takes a few geographic liberties):


Continuing on, I see the sprawling ocean,
The surge of its eternal massive motion.
From here, sky’s blue looks richer on the waters,
Like the Aegean, where sport Poseidon’s daughters;
Upon its pearled horizon billows coil
And glimmer in the sun like silver foil;
The nymphs sing sweetly in their limestone caves,
While ceaseless thunders roll across the waves;
I see beyond a gauzy mist of rain
A rainbow’s gleam, a sky like cymophane . . . .

At this moment, the poet confesses, he cannot tell if he is on the edge of madness or at the threshold of some transforming revelation. After a short, probably ill-advised discourse on the delightful cuisine of the bay region (“The fair rockfish whose flesh could not be moister,/ The succulent blue crab, the mollid oyster…”), he leaves the reader with an image of himself standing upon the shore:


          A melancholic, but not lame or halt . . .
The air is sharp with the cruel tang of salt . . .
          How fierce my demon when he vaunts and raves . . .
How wild the joyous sparkling of the waves . . .
          I shall be well, if I can only sleep . . .
A crystal swell unfolds the azure deep . . .

Anyway, for what it may be worth, I hope some day to have time to produce a proper edition of as much of the poem as Great Uncle Aloysius completed. I was very fond of him, whatever doubts I may have entertained regarding the cogency of his personal philosophy, and so I hope the poem’s appearance might constitute something of a literary event.

David Bentley Hart is contributing editor of First Things. His most recent book is Atheist Delusions: The Christian Revolution and Its Fashionable Enemies (Yale University Press). His other “On the Square” articles can be found here.

RESOURCES

David Bentley Hart, Great Uncle Aloysius

Become a fan of First Things on Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and follow First Things on Twitter.

Comments:

9.2.2011 | 8:00am
Adam G. says:
Some of those passages on the natural settings are quite lovely. Your relative may not have been a consistent under-par player when it came to poetry, but he was close to scratch.

His message reminds me of what someone said about Poul Anderson, and what I have found to be true of the best environmental writing, that he found in immanence a near kin to transcendence.
9.2.2011 | 10:07am
Many thanks for again sharing something of the life and work of your
Great Uncle Aloysius, one of the most charming people I have never met. The scholar/critic does not yet exist who can do justice to the Theophaneia but I eagerly await further revelations.
9.2.2011 | 10:30am
Paige says:
How does one do this? Effortlessly? How?
9.2.2011 | 11:31am
AL says:
All hail Aloysius! But a humble question: will DBH write anything serious here again, or has he entirely lost interest? If he has, fair enough.

Good stuff at the beginning of a long weekend.
9.2.2011 | 12:36pm
Serious? Sure, but not on Fridays, please. Let the rest of the week feed the fickle Pensioners of Morpheus their fill of seriousness. Leave Fridays for the likes of Uncle Aloysius.
9.2.2011 | 12:54pm
Brooke says:
Dr. Hart has a constitutional aversion to discussing things not of a wholly trivial and inconsequential nature on Fridays, but I think I have our solution: let's get the powers that be at 'First Things' to make him watch an entire season of 'Jershey Shores' and write about it.
9.2.2011 | 1:26pm
PRH says:
Yeah, and what is "serious" anyway? Good writing is serious, while a lot of boring commentary, rehashing the rehashed hash, is not. I'm just grateful someone out there remembers old Aloysius Philostratus Gaius Stilicho Bentley, a truly great Marylander.
9.2.2011 | 3:31pm
Nathan Duffy says:
While this piece is quite excellent, I echo AL's sentiments. I know Hart has an aversion to addressing "serious" issues on Friday, but his column is a Friday column. Not that I don't adore his more lighthearted fare, but I like the "serious" stuff as well.
9.2.2011 | 4:24pm
My eldest uncle fought the Germans and was wounded in the Battle of the Bulge. He learned several languages, and it was rumored that he worked for the CIA in post-war Europe. He talked incessantly, including a still-memorable twenty-minute monologue on pancakes. He amazed us with his recall of facts such as a spontaneous recitation of names--in order--of the 30-odd Roman Caesars that was never repeated. He traveled around the U.S. and the world and sold many products to many people, probably including stints as a *gasp* telemarketer. But alas, he had the ordinary name Raymond, never wrote picturesque poems, never danced naked except perhaps if a bee stung him in the nether regions on a trip to the Montana outhouse, and never forsook his Christian faith. Such greatest generationers were a dime a dozen, fortunately.
9.2.2011 | 6:43pm
Paige says:
Dear Dean from Ohio,

Your point is....?
9.2.2011 | 7:16pm
primo44 says:
An elegy that uses sonorous language, clear imagery and insightful metaphor and similes that touches your heart.... Great work!
9.2.2011 | 7:51pm
RussianSteve says:
Thanks for sharing that, Dean.
9.2.2011 | 10:20pm
Mark VA says:
An indigestible mixture of cotton candy and something like "Ein musikalischer Spaß".

Humor, like dissonance, is best as a seasoning, not as a main course.
9.2.2011 | 10:43pm
PRH says:
To Mark VA,

I can't help but notice that you are suffering from acute bad taste. It is unfortunately an incurable condition. The best therapy for palliating the symptoms, however, is practice in silence. It also helps reduce the danger of contagion.

The "mollid oyster" line had me laughing, by the way. A nice absurd touch to a deadpan piece.

By the way, there was a serious aspect to this column. At least, I think the paragraph about "cultural Christianity" and the remarks about modernity were wryly stated, but slyly stated as well.
9.3.2011 | 8:02am
Mark VA says:
Thanks PRH, everything you wrote is true. I'll try your remedy, even if, alas, only for palliative ends. But before I do, let me say this: the problem is, I can't take terminal rhymes, except in short puns, and even then only sometimes. Like weird twins with mischievous grins they drill into one's head and there they spread and then man spread some more till they reach the brain's core where they set up shop and cultivate their mad crop until all good taste is gone just like a scaredy fawn and all you can bleat out is: "help me..."
9.3.2011 | 11:21am
AL says:
I'm sorry I brought up 'seriousness' at all. It was just a question. It seems like several months since the last non-satirical DBH piece, and I was wondering whether this was a philosophical decision on his part or just an indication of his current state of mind. But I don't think seriousness is a virtue. And maybe the refusal to be serious is itself a kind of commentary on the current conventions of commentary. It was a question.
9.3.2011 | 2:04pm
Paige says:
Mark VA,

Doesn't that cut you off from about 90% of the great poetry in English? If you don't lie rhyming couplets, moreover, how do you read Chaucer or Dryden or Pope (etc.)? What about French poetry: how can you read Racine or Moliere for instance? Or other European poetic traditions from the medieval to modern periods? That's a hard condition to be in.

I think couplets are the hardest and most delightful kind of verse, especially when one wants a playful effect, as here. But, whether in couplets or not, without terminal rhymes you have only a few poets after the ancient period worth reading.
9.3.2011 | 4:47pm
Mark VA says:
Thank you, Paige, for your kind comments. This is a hard row to hoe. I didn't choose terminal dyspepsia - for some fickle reason, it chose me. I cope by sticking to Mozart's plays and Shakespeare's music. I also like the theatre of the absurd, for the same reason I like bicarbonate of soda.

By the way, Paige, pray tell: "If you don't lie..." - pun, or one cool Freudian slide?
9.3.2011 | 5:38pm
Echoes of Borges, reminiscences of Nabokov, but all DBH.
9.4.2011 | 11:39am
Paige says:
Mark VA,

One uncool typo.

But the terminal rhymes of the heroic couplet are a delight to those who like an elegant game at times. If all verse were heroics (like Racine's Alexandrines, which do get tiresome after a while, I suppose), then verse would be nothing more than a little night-music, over and over again. But, if there were no heroics, verse would not know how to laugh at itself or stand off at an ironic distance.

Read The Rape of the Lock aloud to yourself twice and then tell me if you really don't enjoy it. It's certainly better the The Prelude.
9.4.2011 | 7:59pm
Mark VA says:
Thank you Paige, the The Rape of the Lock poem is really interesting. A quick analyses of its quantifiable aspects yielded some interesting preliminary results:

The structure here consists of five parts, with an average of 11.8 stanzas per part, and with a grand total of 726 lines of verse. The range of the number of stanzas is from 5 in part 3, to 14 in parts 1 and 4. As expected of its terminal composition, all stanzas were even in the number of lines - no surprises here.

Now, for a more dynamic analysis - 726 lines of terminal verse translates into 363 couplets. Assuming an average reading speed of 22 lines per minute for this particular poem, the reader will be subjected to about 11 couplets per minute (cpm) - in other words, in about 33 minutes, the reader will have read all 363 couplets. I'm not sure how you feel about this, but a rate of 11 cpm seems pretty steep to me. The control of the cpm rate seems to rest with the number of filler words between couplets, in an inverse relationship.

In the future, it may be interesting to do an analysis of the couplets themselves. For example, are there any duplicates, and does that lead to any meaningful modes (most common words used in all the couplets - note, a skewed distribution may emerge here, especially with the lesser poets). Also, is there a discernible variation in the reading speed in certain parts of the poem in the reader sample, and what does it mean?

Some more advanced research may analyse the filler words between the couplets, but as at first glance these words appear to be totally random, this would be a foray into terra incognita.
9.4.2011 | 11:23pm
AL says:
Mark VA

That's almost amusing. Almost. Or perhaps I should say:

A wanton wit, a nimble jackanapes,
The lord of sots, the envy of all apes.

Not that I really mean to insult you. That's just the best I could come up with in a semi-Dryden vein.

Seriously, though, if you don't enjoy 'The Rape of the Lock', there's something deeply amiss with you. Say it ain't so, VA.
9.6.2011 | 7:22pm
Mark VA says:
It ain't so, Al, it just ain't so.

It's just that poetry ain't my cup of tea, if you know what I mean. A bloke tried to teach it to me once, and to this day I can hear him yell: "What's the poet trying to say here, just what is he trying to say?!!" A question like that can really stick to you, if you know what I mean, especially when you're at a sensitive age. I mean, it can almost give you nightmares, maybe even make you impotent for a while later in life. Yeah, "deeply amiss", that's a good one, really nice, rhymes with abyss and kiss, and a few other things I won't mention.
9.8.2011 | 3:23am
Byron says:
I'm a fan of both Mr Hart's writing, and of poetry in general; however, I find the previous hilarity of the Uncle Aloysius joke wearing a little thin this time, and find myself wishing with other readers, that we might enjoy more generous helpings of DBH's prodigious talents from First Things in a more serious context. Even if this was posted on a Friday, the week rolls around to Monday soon enough, as I'm sure Uncle Aloysius himself poignantly observed in his own day.
9.8.2011 | 6:30pm
Mark VA says:
Ditto.
9.10.2011 | 5:21pm
PRH says:
Byron, Mark VA,

May I remark, knowing the man personally, that observations of that sort are only likely to provoke him to even more perverse refusals to be serious? He does not not write to order.
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact