Ads


Sign up for our
Email Newsletter

Russell E. Saltzman

view all featured authors »

Sermonizing Children

Liturgical purists hate them, children’s sermons. I have a friend in New York who positively sneers whenever I mention that, yes, I do children’s sermons. He doesn’t like red barbecue sauce, either, which puts him in a special class of culinary philistines. His critique of children’s sermons is not without merit but, as with barbecue sauce, I have chosen to ignore him.

Besides, I think they do belong. Not the kind he describes, granted, or some that I’ve heard the Rev. Happy Pastor give to those cute innocent little sweeties: “Hey, boys and girls, can you tell me why Jesus is like a catcher’s mitt?” I don’t remember the answer. Who—even a kid—would want to? And whatever the message and whatever the object employed, sermons like that almost always conclude “Now, let’s all promise to try and do that this week for your Mommy and Daddy.” One may insert substitutes: your brother and sister, your teacher, your parole officer; whoever fits. Of course they’ll promise. At that point they’d promise most anything to shut the idiot up.

Object lessons seem to be the default setting for most children’s sermons. There are preacher’s websites devoted to object lessons for children. One I ran across involved real flowers and fake flowers for the object, point being some Christians are real and some aren’t. The pastor was to suggest examples of both. If the child returning to your pew gives you a hard appraising look, now you know why.

But object lessons are easy, too easy. They are almost always “law,” an important distinction from “gospel” for a Lutheran guy like me. They end with exhortations to be better, do better, practice hard and study well and keep their rooms clean, and get along with other people. Take this one from a real children’s sermon: “And I want you to remember not to fight with one another, not to be ugly, and to do as God asks.” Tell you what. Tell the adults first. Maybe if they get the hang of it, it’ll have a better chance of filtering down.

The beginning of a good children’s sermon is one that shuns objects and lessons, especially when combined with moralistic gotchas. Instead, like any good sermon, a children’s sermon should head straight for the heart, straight for gospel, and include the unerring declaration “God made you and, in Christ, God loves you without reservation.” That’s pretty much my consistent approach; that’s what I aim for, at any rate, even if I don’t always achieve it.

I figure, they already know how to behave, generally. I don’t think they need a Sunday dose of ego deflation, being told yet again—even by inference—that they aren’t like Jesus or the catcher’s mitt and that they must pledge to do better. After another week in school trying to figure out how they fit with their peers and more often learning how they do not, they probably have their failures, real and imagined, sorted out pretty well.

So I concentrate on preaching the gospel, the good news of what happens after they misbehave, of who and whose they really are when they think they don’t fit in, and when they’ve heard something cruel and momentarily cannot remember that their real worth is found in baptism. These are the themes, and others like them, I try to keep in mind talking with children, and if I get repetitive, so what? Some things bear repeating.

If a pastor isn’t good talking with kids, and some aren’t, don’t talk.
Show them things in the church instead. These are the only objects fit for use. I invite children to come and watch every baptism and I’ll pick a kid to be my book stand. I explain what baptism is, what is happening and why, and show them how to make the sign of the cross so they can remember their baptism every morning and evening like Martin Luther said to do in his catechism.

I will tell them what the Paschal candle is for, what the spikes represent, and the seasons and times when it is lighted. I will explain the scenes depicted in the stained glass. I’ll call the first communion class forward for an impromptu examination of the Real Presence, maybe asking them to explain the difference between impanation and transubstantiation. Of course I haven’t covered it. I just like to watch the panic come over their faces; eventually I get to the point: The sacrament is “given and shed for you.” No ifs, ands, or buts, and I’ll remind them, like grandma said, you are what you eat.

I don’t ask open-ended questions hoping to get something cute the grown-ups can laugh at. It’s a sermon for kids, not entertainment for adults. (This reminds me, arrange the kids so you are talking to them, not through them to the grown-ups.) But I will ask dumb questions trying to provoke smart answers. “Easter is when Jesus comes out of his tomb and if he sees his shadow we have six more weeks of winter, right?” Typically dubious, they will undertake my instruction. Or one of my favorite gambits, I’ll state “The Lord’s prayer starts out, ‘Dear Ralph.’”? Kids are all over that one.

I was fortunate. I got over object lessons early, thanks to a kid. I once was trying to describe the Ten Commandments as an operator’s manual, directions for doing something right. My object was a small balsa wood airplane glider. I ripped it out of the package and told the kids I didn’t have time to read the directions. I was just going to stick it together the way I wanted and ignore any directions that came with it. The result was about as bizarre as I could make it. I told them I think this will fly. They disagreed. I tossed it and of course it didn’t fly. Then I told them their lives were like that airplane. The Ten Commandments tell us how to put it together. You gotta follow the directions God gives you if you expect life to work out for you.

Nice object, nice moralism, stupid pastor. One of the girls went back to her seat, I later learned, and when her dad asked if she’d learned anything replied “Not a thing. I already knew how to put an airplane together.”

Russell E. Saltzman is the mission development pastor of Trinity Lutheran Church, Gothenburg, Nebraska, and the author of The Pastor’s Page. His previous On the Square articles can be found s previous On the Square articles can be found revious On the Square articles can be found here.

Become a fan of First Things on
Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and follow First Things on Twitter.

Comments:

9.29.2011 | 2:29am
Rick says:
It's a special gift to be able to communicate with kids in a way they will genuinly understand. Often, we use language or references that we think are obvious, but that are interpreted in quite a different way by children. Like the boy who came home from Sunday school and was asked by his mom what he did. "Oh, we sang a song about a bear." "Really," his mother asked. "Yeah, and he was cross-eyed, and his name was Gladly." It took the mom a minute to figure out that they had been singing "Gladly, the Cross I'd Bear." Just don't try to get too pious with kids!
9.29.2011 | 9:34am
Chris says:
Thanks for sharing your experiences of children's messages in practical and theological terms. I always struggle with my children's messages, wondering what "object" I should use each Sunday, when the real objective should simply be giving them Jesus. Blessings!
9.29.2011 | 9:50am
Thanks, Pastor. You really have a gift for getting to the heart of things. My pastor (Catholic) likes to remind us constantly that we are loved, not rejected, by God.

Your essay reminds me of the time in the Gospel when Jesus settles the argument about who is the greatest. He pulls a kid to his side and tells them the least will be the greatest. I've never thought about it, but that must have made the kid think about himself in a whole new way.
9.29.2011 | 10:13am
Brian says:
So, your main theme is "God made you special and He loves you very much." Seems like I've heard that before... those eminent theologians, Robert and Lawrence?
9.29.2011 | 10:54am
Don says:
Nail down a theme based on the day's readings, then speak as you would to adults except using words and reasoning the kids can understand. The point of education is to lead people out of childishness into mature thinking. If you challenge kids with mature wisdom, they'll take to it. Kids are far smarter than one would sometimes prefer to think.
9.29.2011 | 1:24pm
DennisM says:
Perhaps it's not object lessons that are the problem, but the frequent emphasis on one's behavior instead. Still, it's good advice that the children deserve a serious message, too, even if it must be delivered in simpler language.
I'll be sharing a children's story in church this week, and now I'll be careful to make the message clear that God has ways to help us that we cannot even imagine -- as I put one of the children through a hole in a 3x5 index card!
9.29.2011 | 1:58pm
I’ve never liked the concept of the children’s sermon, myself. However, in a rural Baptist church I attended for a number of years, it fell to me to give the weekly children’s sermon over the course of a year. I decided that I could either try to do it well myself or let someone else do it badly. So after looking through several books of hopelessly banal children’s sermons in the church library, I began making up my own. Some were failures, and some were measured successes. The first thing I recognized was that, although I must always be speaking directly to the children, I was also addressing the adults indirectly. In fact, some of the adults hinted that they got more out of some children’s sermons than they did out of some regular sermons. So like it or not, I found myself addressing the whole church. Often I would address each audience in turn, more out of necessity than out of principle.

When choosing a subject, I usually used object lessons (and here I must disagree with Saltzman on object lessons), but I developed a few principles in choosing the objects. First, if I could, I would simply reenact one of Jesus’s parables, or point out a simile or metaphor found elsewhere in Scripture. A lost sheep, a seed in the ground, an unexpected guest, a bushel basket . . . they worked. The point was not to make a moralistic point, but merely to make Scripture memorable. Secondly, if I could not draw an object lesson straight from Scripture, I would at least draw it from my own experience. In other words, when I perceived an analogy in my own life between a concrete event and a spiritual truth, I shared that with the children. A hurricane lantern, a carving chisel, a dirty shop rag, an electric skillet . . . they worked (and I’ll leave you to wonder what the lesson was in each case). Thirdly, I always tried to think through the lesson from the child’s skeptical perspective. What holes could a clever child poke in the lesson? Could I make use of the hole, or should I discard the lesson entirely? If nothing else, it was an exercise in personal humility. The “faith of a child” may be naïve, but it is also skeptical and pragmatic. Finally, I decided that I would not moralize. Most children’s sermons revolve endlessly around three or four simplistic morals—obey your parents, you are special, go to church, God loves you. I was determined to find better “lessons.” I tried to find imperatives in Scripture, to describe attributes of God, and to define specific virtues. I didn’t always succeed, but I was determined that, if my lesson failed, it would at least be my own failure, and that I would learn from it.
9.29.2011 | 2:59pm
DennisM says:
Steve_S -- I would love to purchase your book about creating children's sermons, and I hope it will also include at least several of your personal favorites!
9.29.2011 | 3:13pm
habeas says:
As a children's liturgy teacher, one of the questions I struggle with is: Why do we bring young children to church, not just today, but in general? Our faith is extraordinarily complex and rich, and difficult to simplify for children, especially the youngest between 3-7. It would be wonderful if attention was paid to teaching the pre-literate more than the simplistic morals Mr. Schuler describes above. I can tell you one reason it's not: children's liturgy teachers are uncomfortable going beyond these very generally agreed upon morals because we often don't get much guidance on what our highest priorities should be. Before First Communion and Confession age, we could use some rubrics for what should be taught to various age groups. But first we should discuss: why are children here, in church? Especially young children? If we could agree on the purposes of their presence, in catechizing our youngest, it might lead to more agreement on what the most important teachings of our faith are to convey to the very young.
9.29.2011 | 3:45pm
I just got an invite through old fashioned mail to subscribe to First Things. If Russ Saltzman is a contributor, I think I just might follow through and do just that!
Thanks for helping remember some really awful childrens messages I have heard and shared over the years. This and the devotions at the dementia care unit are among the most daunting preaching assignments one can be given. Although, with a large preschool attached here, I really enjoy the opportunity to share with 4's and 5's. Three year olds are still a realllllly tough go, though.
9.29.2011 | 8:11pm
Dave says:
I like how in your article you bring up some great fun ideas for children's sermons and also some things that we need to improve on as a church when it comes to giving children's messages. The greatest importance as you mentioned being substance, and giving a message that means something, not a cheesy lesson on what you should do, but what God does. I do disagree with your take on object lessons. We are a very visual learning society and it is an awesome way to learn about Christ, as God himself uses object lessons in the Bible to teach his people (ex. in Jonah the fig tree, Caesar's coin, to the disciples using there vocation as fisherman for teaching them about being fishers of men.) God takes objects to teach a truth about the kingdom of heaven or about himself. As far as your example with hearing what the one child said after an object lesson, that is a weak excuse to ditch them. What about the children who hear it and get it. There may always be one or two who don't get it, but perhaps our next step would perhaps be to mix it up and not always have object lessons. Also, the example you gave, your illustration didn't match your teaching point so its not the object but the failure to use the right one. It is also important with object lessons to choose objects kids relate with in life. Perhaps part of the failure is choosing objects that are too adult. One last thing, I think its awesome grownups get a lot out of children's messages and sometimes more than a child. There is nothing wrong with that. God's Word never ceases to work in the lives of all ages.
9.29.2011 | 9:10pm
TeeJay says:
I choose to only do children's sermons, ever since I elaborated on proverbs and platitudes to adults.., and a youngster asked to see my platypus. :)
9.29.2011 | 9:59pm
Pauline says:
Object lessons fail when they require a level of abstract reasoning beyond the grasp of the young children who are generally the most eager to go up for the children's sermon. They see the object for what it is, an object, not a symbol fo some abstract quality that can be related to a spiritual reality.

Like others, I use an object if it illustrates Scripture, especially the parables Jesus told. I like doing the lesson of the four kinds of soil (the parable of the sower), taking in samples to show. (I use a chunk of asphalt for the "path" and tell the kids right out that they didn't have asphalt in Jesus' time but the seeds wouldn't grow on their paths any better than on asphalt.) I use a fan to illustrate Jesus' point about not seeing the wind (or the Spirit) but seeing and feeling its effects.

I try to give a good message at the children's level. But even when some of my efforts fall short, I think it's a positive thing to have the children's sermon, because the children are eager to have their special place in the service. I want them to be there for worship with older youth and the adults, so that they don't feel out of place when they do start attending (as happens in churches where they go off for their own program during worship). Having that children's sermon they can look forward to helps, I think, for them to feel worship is for them too, not just something they have to sit through.
9.30.2011 | 5:55pm
Bill Tammeus says:
Wonder if it would improve the "adult" sermons if the preachers, in preparation, imagined them as children's sermons. Maybe.
10.1.2011 | 12:57pm
This interim shepherd recently was called to a flock where both the Psalm and the Children's message had been eliminated from Sundaqy liturgy for, get this, purposes of TIME! This has now been corrected, to the delight of all who are voicing their comments concerning said recovery. We manage to have the full communion liturgy, with a congregation that's growing in attendance, including the previously eliminated elements, and an additional temple talk on something or another of importance to the community, and we're still done in about 70 minutes. Enough time for a quick cup of coffee before Christian Education hour begins. The trick -- use the children's message as a gambit for the adult message to come ... make it pretty seamless ... and even have the children teach the adults something (like a memory verse) once in awhile. If there's a mission guest doing a temple talk, tell the kiddies about the mission in terms they can understand and then have them bless the temple talker -- complete with laying on of hands and a repeat-after-pastor prayer. How easy is that?
4.26.2012 | 2:05pm
TinyRev says:
I am winding down a year-long pastoral internship, and so far I have done two of the three required children's sermons. I used object lessons in the first two, one of which worked quite well because it was the story of how unless a seed dies and is planted, it cannot bear fruit - enter seeds for cat grass, which coincidentally sprouts three days after planting, ala the Resurrection! The second sermon illustration was for Palm Sunday, and although my prop was old and new palms, I don't think the kids got it. My final children sermon will be this Sunday, and I'm considering taking Russell's advice and showing the children the stained glass Good Shepherd since that is the lectionary gospel reading.

I have always been suspicious of the efficacy of children's sermons. I suspect it objectifies children. I do take to heart, however, the comments from those who maintain that the children really look forward to it and feel special because of it. That may be true, but I don't know if I will ever be entirely comfortable with children's sermons.
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact