The Evangelical Church in Germany is a theological muddle, being a federation of Lutheran, Prussian Union, and Reformed (or Calvinist) Protestant communities. Still, it must have been a moving moment when the Council of this federation met with Pope Benedict XVI last month in the chapter hall of the former Augustinian priory at Erfurt: the place where Martin Luther had studied theology, had been ordained a priest, and had, as the Pope put it, thought with “deep passion” about one great question: “How do I receive the grace of God?” As Benedict, himself one of the great theologians of this or any other era, put it in his winsome way, “For Luther, theology was no mere academic pursuit, but the struggle for oneself, which was in turn a struggle for and with God.”
One hopes the Catholic Theological Society of America was listening.
Benedict then went on to note that, in bringing Luther’s question to life again in the twenty-first century, there were new realities to be confronted. One, which is killing Europe, is spiritual boredom, a kind of ennui about the wonder of being itself. Moreover, in trying to preach the Gospel today, what Benedict called the “mainstream Christian denominations” themselves face a new situation. For the “geography of Christianity” had “changed dramatically in recent times, and is in the process of changing further still.” There is a “new form of Christianity, which is spreading with overpowering missionary dynamism, sometimes in frightening ways … a form of Christianity with little institutional depth, little rationality and even less dogmatic content, and with little stability.”
By which, I think we can assume, the Pope meant the explosion of evangelical (in the American sense of the term), Pentecostalist, and fundamentalist Christianity throughout the Third World. “What is this new form of Christianity saying to us, for better and for worse?”, the Pope asked his mainline German Protestant audience. Perhaps I might venture an answer to that question.
The first thing that is being said is that preaching Jesus Christ crucified and the transforming power of personal friendship with the Risen Lord is going to win out, every time, over enticing men and women into a religious trade union or cultural club. Surely Benedict XVI, whose pontificate has been characterized by the theme of intimate friendship with the Lord, knows that. One hopes he is saying it, firmly, to the “bishops from all over the world” who are “constantly” complaining to him about evangelical inroads into their flocks.
Take, for example, Latin America. The Catholic Church has been active in Latin America for over half a millennium. If it has poorly catechized that vast expanse of territory, such that the Church cannot retain the loyalty of traditionally Catholic peoples, it should look first to its own incapacities and failures, rather than blaming well-funded American evangelical and Pentecostalist missions for its problems. As scholars like David Martin and Amy Sherman have demonstrated, it is the power of these missions to change self-destructive patterns of behavior through radical conversion to Christ that has given them their purchase in areas where five hundred years of Catholicism have failed to build a culture of responsibility—especially male responsibility. More recognition of that, and less complaining to the Pope, would seem the appropriate Christian response from Catholic bishops in the world’s most densely Christian continent.
The second thing this “new form of Christianity “ is saying is that the old ecumenism—the bilateral dialogues between Catholicism and mainline Protestantism—is over. Throughout the world, mainline liberal Protestantism is dying from its own theological implausibility. The serious ecumenical dialogue of the twenty-first century is with these “new forms of Christianity.” They may well lack “dogmatic content.” Some may be unscrupulous proselytizers. But at least some among them are searching for a deeper, richer theology—and they are finding it in serious conversation with Catholics, as the theological dialogue fellowship called Evangelicals and Catholics Together has demonstrated in the United States.
The times are indeed “a-changin’.” What remains unchanged is the power of the Gospel. Preach it, and they will come.
George Weigel is Distinguished Senior Fellow of the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, D.C.
Fall Web Campaign: Please donate to support the online mission of First Things.
Comments:
The bishops don't own the "regalia." They're trying to bring a vision, a sneak peak, of Heaven down to Earth. Same with the Church's art and architecture. The poorer you are, the more beauty your soul needs to see--both natural and man-made--to compensate for the dreariness of a life in poverty. You can live without five-course meals, but you can't live without beauty...somewhere in your life.
Resh: would the group's founders have better served the world to call it "Evangelicals and Catholics Calling Each Other Names Together"?
And here is where the ecumenical rubber meets the road, so to speak. If the crucial matter is Jesus Christ, and Him Crucified and Risen from the Dead, it would seem that some manner of common cause with the 'sheep-seducers' would be called for, to help foster the theological depth that our 'separated brethren' lack. . .
It's also hard to "convincingly preach the gospel" while at the same time slandering your brothers in Christ. Jack Chick has found a worthy successor.
As a Catholic, I have my doubts about the merits of Catholics and Evangelicals together. At least Confessional Lutherans have retained the historic paradigms of Word and Sacrament whereas American Evangelicals, with their "decision" theology are sometimes more Pelagian than the Catholic Church has been in the past. Their lack of historical roots in the liturgy (although I understand some are revisiting this), literalist view of Scripture and lack of comprehension of "lex orandi, lex credendi" is a challenge for Catholics.
Time will tell, I suppose. Meanwhile, I certainly commend the Evangelical zeal in evangelizing, but let's not forget that it is ultimately the work of the Holy Spirit to convert. As Our Lord said, "You have not chosen me, but I have chosen you." Still, I acknowledge that Catholics must be evangelized as well as sacramentalized.
Outside His Church, there is no Salvation.
~Philippians 1
Good discussion here, and I am encouraged by the Pauline exhortation Infiniplex gives us. Indeed! Let us all preach the Good News of salvation in Christ from God who "saved us, not because of works done by us in righteousness, but according to his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit, whom he poured out on us richly through Jesus Christ our Savior, so that being justified by his grace we might become heirs according to the hope of eternal life." - Titus 3:5-7.
As an Evangelical, I'd appreciate some clarification on a few points. It seems that a very significant impetus for evangelizing missionary work around the globe for Evangelicals is a modification of Cyprian's quote offered by Nancy D.: "Outside of Christ, there is no salvation." Evangelicals have traditionally interpreted Scripture to mean that, outside of "personal friendship with the Risen Lord" gained through belief in "Jesus Christ crucified" from hearing the Gospel preached, no one can be saved. Union with Christ through faith (justification and divine election arguments aside, if we can) is necessary for salvation, and this comes about through explicit faith in Christ through the Gospel of God preached. People must know Christ to be saved, we confess.
Now, I'll admit that I have only a rudimentary familiarity with Catholic soteriology, so please correct me if I am wrong here, but it is my understanding that, through baptism by desire and implicit faith, or some other means, a person may be saved apart from faith in Christ through the preaching of Christ crucified. I'm not over-interested in a defense of this position, but only in an examination of its effects. I can't help but feel that the legs are cut out from under the missionary zeal of Christians by the notion that such missionary activity is not essential for the salvation of those who would hear the message. If people who would have explicit faith in Christ having heard the Gospel preached already possess an implicit faith unto salvation, then why go through all the trouble of going to preach that Gospel?
Last, I think the relative freedom in church-planting among Evangelicals has enabled a more robust missionary effort in recent years, particularly in places where there is no established Christian church, than could be possible in a Catholic framework. A missionary and his family can preach the Gospel and establish a new Christian community anywhere in the world in the Evangelical schema. Support from home is necessary, of course, but any family or individual could do this. I think, within a Catholic context, lay interest in missions of this sort is held back by the more rigorous ecclesiological demands on bringing Christianity to new places, namely that it can only be done by the clergy with approval from the magisterium. As such, individual Christian Catholics, especially laypeople and families with a desire to do missions are hindered from doing so. Are there avenues for lay Catholics to do this sort of evangelizing work in areas where the Catholic Church has not yet expanded? Would it do any good for a Catholic to spread the Gospel in a place where the new Christians could not form a Christian community since doing so apart from clerical activity is not licit?
For all that Nancy D. is right about needing an authority and the weight of historical considerations, these two things, more than anything, probably, have hindered any further consideration of Catholicism from me. That the Lord is using Evangelicals to preach the Gospel to all nations (Matt. 24:14) says to me that Evangelicalism is the place to be if you want to grow the Kingdom. Evangelization and sacramentalization of post-Christian areas is an important task, to be sure, and is ably done by Catholics, and moreso recently, I think, but my feeling is that Evangelicalism is for the Christless world. Any thoughts and clarifications you all can offer would be appreciated.
Peace and hope.
Drew
"I Pray not only for them, but for those who will come to believe in me through their word."-Christ
Christ revealed Himself to His Church in the trinitarian relationship of Sacred Tradition, Sacred Scripture, and The Teaching of The Magisterium, so that all who would come to believe through His Church would know that He is The Christ, The only Son of The Living God, sent to lead us to Salvation by God Who Loves us and desires Salvation for His beloved. There is only ONE Word of God, ONE Body of Christ, ONE Spirit of Love.


