Ads


Sign up for our
Email Newsletter

Elizabeth Scalia

view all featured authors »

Benedict’s Christocentrism: Realities of a Primary Order

Pope Benedict XVI will be 85 years old next April and, while the pontiff is fully in his wits, we can see a loss of weight; it is reported that he feels a quite understandable fatigue born of pain, age, and heavy responsibility. A few days ago the Associated Press, noting “a decline” in the Holy Father, immediately focused on “. . .questions about the future of the papacy given that Benedict himself has said popes should resign if they can’t do the job.”

One gets the impression that the drama-hungry press would love to see Benedict step down, both for the sheer novelty of it (the last pope to resign was Gregory XII, in 1415) and for the narrative reinforcement such a move would lend to utilitarian philosophies lately in vogue, especially among those medical and economic planners for whom a person’s usefulness is a primary measure by which both cash and care are dispensed.

In the Catholic press, there is less guessing about a pending retirement; some Vatican-watchers instead wonder whether Benedict has been too retiring and disengaged all along? Last week–responding to observations of a papal “governance gap” made by the Holy Father’s supporters and critics alike–Vatican analyst John Allen pondered “The Perils of a Part-Time Pope”:


The governance gap occasionally erupts in the form of a public meltdown, such as the cause célèbre over a Holocaust-denying bishop, or explosive public commentary from some Vatican officials on the sex abuse crisis. More routinely, the gap registers in a quiet lack of direction and disengagement from the issues of the day. Declining media interest in the Vatican and the papacy over the last six years reflects this reality; in effect, the Vatican has become largely a Catholic insider story, a stark contrast with the John Paul years. [...] The key lies in grasping that Benedict XVI sees himself as a teaching pope, not (at least, not primarily) a governing pope.

Political action is perceived as glamorous. It has about it an illusory aura of perpetual primacy; to the world, political engagement is the ultimate vehicle of utility. Benedict’s predecessor, Blessed Pope John Paul II, was happy to practice political messaging both subtle and subversive; his colossal global presence helped enlarge the very definition of a “governing pope.” Not particularly interested in acting as a manager and Vatican overseer, John Paul steered the papacy toward the geopolitical stage, and it is clear from Allen’s piece that some believe a pope who lacks the interest, or the calling, toward such engagement is somehow only half on the job.

One would be mistaken to think of the papacy as, first of all, a political or governing entity. It is that, but only in the minor. In the main, the papacy is a priesthood writ large: a calling to sacramental service and clear, unambiguous instruction. John Paul’s broad focus served a time and purpose unto heaven. Times have changed. Our faith in the Holy Spirit should reassure us that Benedict’s Christological fixation, which can seem narrow and provincial to some, indeed suits heaven’s purposes, today.

There is a story, possibly true, from the memoirs of Günter Grass that I like very much. The future novelist writes that he was held in an American prisoner of war camp during World War II, along with a sixteen-year old seminarian named Joseph Ratzinger. They would shoot craps together, the younger man reciting Saint Augustine as they played: “I said, ‘there are many truths;’” Grass wrote, “he said, ‘there is only one.’”

Pope Benedict has served Christ and the Church for very nearly his whole life, and it seems that even in the infancy of his ministry he was called to deliver a clear and unambiguous message against relativism, which he many decades later famously (and rightly) referred to as a “dictatorship.”

Perhaps the Holy Spirit understands more than those worrying about a “governance gap” that while we watch governments and nations founder and fail in the fogs of their own contrived and faulty gospels, the pope we need right now is the one who will keep reminding us that there is only one truth, and one constant reality.


. . .the Word of God is the foundation of everything, it is the true reality . . . We must change our idea that matter, solid things, things we can touch, are the more solid, the more certain reality. . . .The one who builds on sand builds only on visible and tangible things, on success, on career, on money . . [But W]e can see this now with the fall of large banks: this money disappears, it is nothing. And thus all things, which seem to be the true realities we can count on, are only realities of a secondary order . . . Only the Word of God is the foundation of all reality, it is as stable as the heavens and more than the heavens, it is reality. Therefore, we must change our concept of realism. The realist is the one who recognizes the Word of God, in this apparently weak reality, as the foundation of all things [and] builds his life on this foundation, which is permanent.

During World War II, two middle-aged sisters from the Netherlands were arrested for hiding Jews; they were sent to the notorious concentration camp at Ravensbrück, where brutality was doled out by deliberate design and also in the casual cruelties of a moment. In her book The Hiding Place Corrie Ten Boom recounts one of those moments: A guard mocks her frail sister Betsie; when Betsie laughs at herself in acknowledgement, the guard–clearly furious that her contempt has not stung its target–slashes her face and neck with leather crop.


. . .A red stain appeared on Betsie’s collar; a welt began to swell on her neck. Betsie saw where I was looking and laid a bird-thin hand over the whip mark. “Don’t look at it, Corrie. Look at Jesus, only.”

We live in a brutal and mocking age, one full of utilitarian instincts and content to shrug off the dignity of the human person. The sands are shifting all about us. The pope we need today is the one who will say to a world distracted and clinging to whatever looks safe of a moment, “look at Jesus only.”

Elizabeth Scalia is the Managing Editor of the Catholic Portal at Patheos and blogs as The Anchoress. Her previous articles for "On the Square" can be found here.

RESOURCES

Ravensbrück

Pope Heads into Busy Christmas Season Tired, Weak

The Perils of a Part-Time Pope

The Reality of Pope Benedict

Meditation of His Holiness Benedict XVI at the Opening of the 12 Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops, 2008

Become a fan of First Things on Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and follow First Things on Twitter.

Comments:

12.20.2011 | 5:36am
Don Roberto says:
Amen. Jesus is Truth. I have "Jesus of Nazareth" at my bedside, and can attest o the extraordinary impact of this "teaching pope." As my kids would say, "our rock rocks."

12.20.2011 | 6:48am
Felapton says:
I personally would rather have Benedict tired, weak, wrinkled and working a ten-hour-week than any other prelate alive even in full youthful vigor. If the Pope must play secular politics, he should simply appoint a Secretary for Political Posturing and Machinations. I believe Silvio Berlusconi is available.
12.20.2011 | 1:47pm
Thank you for this wonderful and necessary essay. I am frequently distressed when the Holy Father writes or preaches with power and relevance and few, if any, in the mainstream media pay attention. I suppose this is because he is engaged in a conversation that few are comfortable with: the beautiful dialogue between revelation and current affairs.

May God bless Pope Benedict XVI. And may the world dare to listen to his words.
12.20.2011 | 2:04pm
Randy says:
I wouldn't like to call it a benefit of war, but Pope Benedict and his predecessor both got the honors-level crash course in what's important in life (and what's not) from World War II. The only disadvantage to the West's recent peace and prosperity is that we don't learn much or appreciate much the darkest loneliest parts of life--seeing hard death after hard death, from injury, contagious disease, or cold, or just plain starvation. Under those conditions you learn that love is the only currency that counts. The only one that goes up in value when you're in pain.
12.20.2011 | 2:45pm
Neil says:
I don't wish to take the side of "utilitarians" or "the drama-hungry press." And I'm hardly unsympathetic to the pope.

But there is a curious assumption in this article - that there is an opposition between being "a political or governing entity" and being an entity that reminds us "that there is only one truth, and one constant reality."

Why should this be the case? The figures in John Allen's article argue that the pope would be a more effective teacher if there were no "governance gap" - no "cause célèbre over a Holocaust-denying bishop, or explosive public commentary from some Vatican officials on the sex abuse crisis" to distract his audience and move them to question the credibility of the Catholic Church.

Furthermore, the pope could better argue against relativism if he were more visible as a figure on the "global stage" opposing "distorted forms of religion" and championing human rights.

I don't think that this article really deals with this sort of argument at all. Looking to Jesus does not necessarily mean dismissing this world in which we must speak, act, and love.

Thanks
12.20.2011 | 5:31pm
I seem to remember that after the death of John Paul II, the mainstream media were encouraging the elevation of a Pope who would be more in step with modern secular culture, especially pertaining to issues like same-sex relationships and women's ordination.

Today's media are more concerned with a world that is fading away before our eyes. The one holy, catholic and apostolic church needs to keep its eyes on the eternal -- Christ in all things.
12.20.2011 | 5:47pm
Robert says:
Amen to Neil's comments. I was raised with an old saying: "Pray as if everything depended on God, but work as though everythng depends on you". We must all be involved in the world about us as well as continue "Looking at Jesus".
12.20.2011 | 10:05pm
Ben says:
Elizabeth, incredible article!!!- Towards the end it played my 'heart strings' (sent it to friends as Bill is right, its VERY MUCH needed). My only sadness about Pope Benedict XVI is that he can't personally handle every problem the church encounters.

Randy is right too. I live in one of the wealthiest areas of the world and most people around Here have experienced so little hardship that another opinion is what they have to offer the world. No love, just solutions like "he's a cult leader", "He's out of touch" or "too old" or "too teachy"... I found out about the current Pope by hearing "well the catholic church elected it's attack dog Pope", so yea, the press IS EXTREMELY drama hungry.

Thank God that, like the Pope so often does, this article speaks Truth!!!
12.28.2011 | 1:21pm
Thanks Elizabeth for a really great article, I think. And the comments are worthy of it too. Feel very comforted by it all. GBPBXVI
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact