Ads


Elizabeth Scalia

view all featured authors »

Bong! Boring; Say Something New

When I am feeling all out-of-sorts—not just distracted, but traipsing toward disorientation—I regain a sense of order by pulling from the bookshelf a favorite book that has lain dormant for perhaps a decade, lifted only for dusting or for consideration when I am putting together a donation to our local library.

Sometimes, one cracks open the dusty pages and discovers that the book’s attractions have not held; what spoke deeply to one’s sensibilities at age 40 suddenly seems, at age 53, to be so much twaddle. This is productive; not only does the realization clear space on the shelf, it gives a reassuring hint that one has not grown stagnant but is still evolving. One’s orientation, like the arrow-tipped minute-hand of a timepiece, has moved, no matter how minutely.

Other times, one settles into a book with abandon only to be smacked into self-awareness on the strength of a single line. That happened to me this past weekend, as I reacquainted myself with Miss Jane Eyre who, wandering restlessly in her institutional chamber confided, “I tired of the routine of eight years in an afternoon.”

And there is was; the niggling sense of restlessness that has contributed to a scorching case of writer’s block, rendering my publisher’s hair gray and plunging my blog into near-blackout status. With something like horror I realized that I—the news junkie whose earliest memories involve sitting on the floor, transfixed as Nancy Dickerson read the afternoon headlines and the iconic black and white images burned themselves into my imagination; the girl who had devoured political and religious stories and had made a happy career out of the chomping; the woman whose greatest joy after family was the perpetual wellspring of the internet where one could read something, bang out a reaction and then click the mouse and do it again, ad infinitum—had become bored beyond endurance.

I am bored by the same people saying the same things, week after week, and by their dismaying contempt for curiosity, and by my own, too.

A few days ago, the gaffe-prone (far more than the press will admit) President Obama said, “the private sector is doing fine.” Opposition predictably jumped on it; sympathizers predictably worked to spin it; all of the same people who have been in our faces for decades were in our faces again—on television, on the radio, in social media—and their busy words, predictably, boiled down to “shut up; other opinions are unconscionable and do not belong at our lunchtable.” No one seemed remotely curious to ask, “does the president actually believe this? If so, why? Is his brain all right?”

This morning, in my capacity as editor, I rejected a submission touching on the interesting story of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith’s disapproval of Sister Margaret Farley’s 2008 book, Just Love. Rather than ask whether theologians should wander as they wonder about theological issues without being overly encumbered by doctrinal dictates, the writer’s curiosity had been stalled by an indulgent need for venting resulting in 1,100 boring, extraneous words that amounted to, “shut up; you only need those mitres to hold all the poop in your heads.”

Because the Farley story is so interesting, and I am curious about the theologian’s role, I read the relevant comment threads on both “conservative” and “liberal” Catholic sites and found more predictability: on one side, automatic condemnation being conferred upon the sister’s entire body of work, often without a word of it ever having been read. The other side, naturally, conferred automatic approval of her every past-and-future syllable, rendered with promises to buy her previously unheard-of book “as a political act”, because curiosity, apparently, wouldn’t otherwise compel the purchase.

Then I read Sally Quinn’s shallow comments on the story, which hauled out overplayed feminist tropes for the purpose of mere validation. Asking the most boring of boomer questions, “is the human body not to be admired? Why shouldn’t our own bodies give us pleasure?” Quinn cannot sustain enough curiosity to examine why the church teaches as it does before giddily skipping over to an astrologist whose celestial readings are ever so much more compelling than the “contorted thinking of celibate men,” who can have nothing of interest to say to her.

As an old English professor of mine would pronounce: Bong! Boring! Say something new!

Beyond predictable responses to the very interesting Farley story—interesting at its depths, where few dare swim—my email yielded the truly pathetic news that 53 year-old Madonna, desperate for an approval she still has not found, had exposed her nipple to a concert crowd. As we have been free to look at her nipples anytime these past three decades, nothing could be more worthy of a professorial “Bong; boring…” except perhaps, the screaming approval of a crowd, perpetually stalled at age 13 and willing to pretend titillation.

Familiarity breeds contempt. Incuriosity makes us predictable and boring, and our media outlets, whether old or new, establishment or alternative, are crammed with things we have already heard, already seen, already thought of. Say something new? What is there left to say?

As I write this, the carrilon at our church is telling the hour. Bong, goes the digitized bell, set to its quietest level, barely heard off the church grounds, because a newcomer to the neighborhood took offense at its reverberations. Bong, sounds the Angelus, a call to prayer no longer familiar, and barely permitted to be heard. Bong, it goes again: come to Adoration; now is a chance to worship, a chance to listen in silence, where I will tell you something different, something that will re-orient you toward what is real, and ever-new; something that will never bore you because I reveal it daily, in my being, and in my body, into which you are invited, and I pronounce it in so many original ways, and present it in a mystery so simple, and so paradoxically complex.

See, I make all things new.

Elizabeth Scalia is the Managing Editor of the Catholic Portal at Patheos and blogs as The Anchoress. Her previous articles for "On the Square" can be found here.

Become a fan of First Things on Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and follow First Things on Twitter.

Comments:

6.12.2012 | 2:59am
Rick says:
Of course, you are right. Far too many people pore over news, blogs, and gossip just to find something that will reinforce whatever preconceived notions and prejudices they are addicted to.

What struck me, though was this: "...what spoke deeply to one’s sensibilities at age 40 suddenly seems, at age 53, to be so much twaddle."

I've had the exact same reaction to finding something I thought was weighty and brilliant 20 years ago. Now, at the age of 69, it looks completely different. But then the chilling idea crosses my mind: If I survive to 90, will I look back at what I am thinking and reading and writing now and laugh in derision? It's a sobering thought.
6.12.2012 | 10:00am
Your problem is that you think curiosity is a virtue. The natural result of over-indulging in curiosity is an inability to appreciate and focus on what is really important. In this day and age it is vitally important to tune out the drivel so you can see the eternal.
6.12.2012 | 10:01am
The Moz says:
Another timely reflection on modern living. It really is all so dim and dull isn't it. The same talking heads, the same inane arguments and all for no apparent puropose other than to dull our senses, to make us ever more compliant.

A week ago my wife and I decided to get off Facebook for good, and you know what? We feel freer and happier. What I wouldn't give for an hour in quiet contemplation of Christ in place of 1 hour of HBO's finest product.
6.12.2012 | 10:21am
Jan says:
Yes, yes, yes. Amen and amen.
6.12.2012 | 10:49am
This is one of the deeply frustrating things about public discourse; it's generally the same people trotting out the same tired arguments and polemicisms. There may well be some deeply interesting things in her connection of love with justice; I've heard some more orthodox folk connect love with chastity, and it can be a fruitful endeavour. We needn't throw out the baby with the bath water!
6.12.2012 | 11:08am
James Smith says:
George Weigel has an interesting article on NRO today regarding the Margaret Farley dust-up.
6.12.2012 | 11:35am
Thank you for never being boring. And at least you only have bells, and can therefore summon up a semblance of non-noise-ordinance-violating Angelus. The secular carillon at a nearby park marks the canonical hour of Noon with "These Are a Few of My Favorite Things."
6.12.2012 | 12:50pm
david lebeau says:
amen
6.12.2012 | 1:29pm
Mark says:
I liked this one. The only thing I ask my agnostic friends is to give what the Church is saying the consideration deserved by a body of thought and accumulated wisdom much, much experienced than you. It seems like that is a tall order now a days.
6.12.2012 | 1:58pm
Sister Farley and Sally Quinn deserve one another. Pity poor Ben Bradlee.
6.12.2012 | 2:51pm
John J says:
Thanks Elizabeth,

Sounds like you're feeling exactly what I've been feeling this past month. I'm so bored by internet discourse that I sometimes want to crawl out of my skin! But my job dictates that I am on social media and surfing the internet all day. I crave my mornings and evenings when I can delve into a book, or pray, and actually THINK about something...deeply!
6.12.2012 | 3:06pm
And, with our Redeemer God so full of new and gracious
blessings for us, how can we not be curious in all ways?
6.12.2012 | 3:09pm
MacLaverty says:
This is a wonderful post and I agree with you entirely. So much of what we read is just a rehashing of the same old positions--on all sides of the ideological divide--with no wondering about how those positions came to be held in the first place. It is a kind of warfare, and fundamentally it lacks not only curiosity but also charity. Might there be something to an opponent's position? Very few people stop to consider this. Your insights are inspiring.
6.12.2012 | 4:31pm
Mary says:
"what is known is rejected, because it is not sufficiently considered that men more frequently require to be reminded than informed" Samuel Johnson
6.12.2012 | 5:13pm
PIH says:
Re: "No one seemed remotely curious to ask, “does the president actually believe this? If so, why? Is his brain all right?” Someone did ask that: Rush Limbaugh. He devoted quite a bit of his show time to that question.
6.12.2012 | 5:43pm
Mark Magas says:
I very much enjoyed your article. I agree with you. However within your article is an illustration of just how hard it is to be open minded and respectful. Referring to Obama the question you asked,"Is there something wrong with his head." Showed that you dismissed that it was possible that there was any validity to what he was saying. The truth is there is usually some validity to what most people say if you take the time to examine it.

Now I am no friend of Obama's but I get it. The private sector is profiting and stock prices are increasing. Indeed hiring in the private sector is up during Obama's presidency while only public sector jobs are lower than when he took office. To you and I that does not feel alright and indeed it isn't. This is a jobless recovery. I believe it is the third and unlike previous jobless recoveries there is no easy credit so consumer confidence is down.

That is all very complicated and having said that it does not prove or disprove that Obama is a good president but neither is it "Boring" knee jerk.

Lest I sound too sanctimonious let me say that I have caught myself doing this often and try really hard to monitor for it. Unfortunately I slip as I do with most of the sins to which I am prone.
Thank you.
6.12.2012 | 10:10pm
Mike says:
Well said and well written. As one who has contributed his own share of noise, I am suitably admonished.
6.13.2012 | 10:28am
Dana Laviano says:
I can completely relate to your feeling of ennui with The World and its endless loop of willful ignorance and unproductive arguing. But, you have already latched onto the secret for such blocks: literature. Keep reading Jane Eyre, then perhaps read all the Brontes again, and if you like this sort of thing, I highly recommend some fairy tales. Sometimes leaving this ruined world for the land of Faery is just the palate cleanser one needs.
6.14.2012 | 8:29am
Steve says:
Buck up girl. Whenever I see an article or post by Elizabeth Scalia, I read it. I read it because it is always well-considered and contributes clarity to often mangled and malign dialogue. I, too, often am overwhelmed by the harangue of ideology- promoting verbiage and find that I must just tune it out for a time. But I feel a gratitude to those who do battle, day in and day out, with the disingenuous commentary that is so prevalent, particularly from the liberal left. For decades they owned the airwaves and were undisputed and that has had disastrous results. Today they continue the barrage of mindless rhetoric, but there is an increasingly powerful antidote. That would be you and others like you. What you do is valuable and effective. So have a cup of chamomile tea or take a week off or read a book or whatever, but please re-charge your batteries and get back to work.
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact