Ads


Fortnight for Freedom-U.S. Catholics and Religious Liberty: The Origins


Several months ago, I came across a two-volume history of the Church in the United States I’d never read before: Theodore Maynard’s The Story of American Catholicism, first published in 1941. Maynard was not a professional historian and his telling of the American Catholic story has a bit more of the apologetic edginess of early-20th century Catholicism than a 21st-century audience might find congenial. Yet Dr. Maynard manifestly did his homework in the pioneering tomes of such giants of U.S. Catholic history as John Gilmary Shea and Peter Guilday; his judgments are usually judicious, even if his ecumenical sensibility is not overly developed; and every once in a while he comes up with an insight that is truly refreshing—and very neatly put.

Take, for example, the following passage—a bit baroque rhetorically, but nonetheless worth pondering:


[It] is very curious that men who admit no dogmatic bias in their own lives or their concept of the universe should so often retain a sentimental attachment to the legend that, because certain dissenting Protestant groups sought, among other things, their own liberty of conscience, they were the architects of American religious liberty. There is no special need to complain that, when in a position to enforce their will, they refused liberty to those with whom they happened to disagree—and particularly to Catholics…Instead, it may be gratefully acknowledged that their stern adhesion to their personal convictions contributed in the end greatly to bring about an extension of religious liberty to all. . . [Yet] such Catholic groups as came to the American colonies never thought of religious liberty as something that should be exclusively enjoyed by themselves. In this respect, the Catholic settlers of Maryland were Americans from the beginning, whereas the Puritans became Americans only by slow degrees.

As Theodore Maynard readily admits, the legal construction of American religious freedom during the Founding was the work of many hands, most of which were Protestant and Deist hands. Yet it is also true that, from 1634 and the beginning of the proprietary colony of Maryland, Catholics were committed to a broad notion of religious freedom: a true “first liberty,” not just “liberty for us.” That was, of course, a matter of both conviction and pragmatic necessity, given the Catholics’ small numbers. But the convictions should not be forgotten. Because of their own theological tradition, Maryland Catholics (and their brethren in Pennsylvania) could have embraced something resembling the First Amendment in the days when New England Puritans were teaching their children to sing, “Abhor that arrant Whore of Rome/and all her blasphemies/And drink not of her cursed cup/Obey not her decrees.”

As the Catholic Church in the United States begins a Fortnight for Freedom to strengthen Catholics’ resolve to defend religious freedom for all, it’s good to remember that, from the Founding on, the Catholic embrace of the First Amendment’s guarantee of the “free exercise of religion” has been unhesitating—and it has been principled. Maynard again, in High Baroque form:


[The] Church . . . has always maintained that, whatever may be the accidental inequality of gift and station between man and man, they are all essentially equal in the sight of God. It is only upon such a doctrine that democracy can repose. It is only democratic institutions that put that doctrine into visible practice. For despite the Declaration of Independence, with its’ ‘self-evident’ truth that all men are created equal, the thing is not self-evident at all. On the contrary, it seems to be at variance with self-evident facts. It is really a mystical dogma, and the one institution we can be perfectly certain will never renounce that dogma is the Catholic Church.

But perhaps “mystic” is not quite right. There is a chain of ideas here, and it can be traced. From Thomas Aquinas to Robert Bellarmine to the Anglican divine Richard Hooker; then from Hooker to John Locke to Thomas Jefferson: That’s one plausible intellectual roadmap to the Declaration and the First Amendment. The American Thomas–Jefferson–owed the Scholastic Thomas–Aquinas–more than the Sage of Monticello likely ever knew.


George Weigel is Distinguished Senior Fellow of the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, D.C.

Become a fan of First Things on Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and follow First Things on Twitter.

Comments:

6.20.2012 | 1:49pm
There is a lot more to the history of Catholic fostering of religious freedom in the US Colonies beyond the Maryland efforts detailed by the author. When Oliver Cromwell, the leader of the Protestant bigots who won the English Civil War, died, and his son was pushed out of office, King Charles II regained his throne. Charles II and his brother and successor, James II, later became converrts to the Catholic Religion and both sought to push through religious liberty in England and the American Colonies. As a result, Declarations of Indulgence were promulgated throughout their reigns, but they ran into unalterable opposition from the Protestant bigots who controlled Parliament.

Charles and James nevertheless promulgated religious liberty in the Colonies by making Religious Dissenter, William Penn, the proprietor of the newly founded Pennsylvania colony, where again liberty of conscience was permitted.

Another effort by the Stuart brothers to advance religious liberty was their naming of the first Catholic Governor of the NY Colony, Thomas Dongan. Under his leadership a colonial assembly was formed in 1683 and one of its first acts was passage of the NY Charter of Liberties which guaranteed freedom of conscience to all christians. That act, though, never took effect because of a restructuring of the colonies and the eventual "Glorious Revolution of 1688" which overthrew James II who himself had promulgated yet another Declaration of Indulgence promoting religious liberty in 1687-88. James II had committed the unforgivable sin of siring a boy child successor who wsa baptized in the Catholic Religion.

The victory of the Protestant bigots in 1688 ended the efforts to permanently permit religious liberty in the Colonies. Among other things, the Protestant bigots of Virginia invaded Maryland and threw out the Catholic proprietors. For the next century, Anglicanism was on a revanchist tear that led to suppression of Catholics worse than any other group, even though Catholicism was clearly the oldest and widest spread of all the Christian churches. Indeed, it had been present in the US since before Jamestown..
6.20.2012 | 4:26pm
Wasn't the Church/State relationship in pre-reformation Christendom based on temporal rulers swearing an oath of obedience to the universal Church, while the protestant reformation resulted in recognizing a state religion based on the religious supremacy of the temporal ruler in each state? The modern idea of separation of Church and State in the USA and elsewhere seems to be a correction, but more to the reformation model than the earlier Catholic one. The question may be whether secular humanism is becoming a de facto state religion.
6.20.2012 | 9:36pm
Mister H says:
US Catholic "Fortnight for Freedom" starts tomorrow!

To help kick off the campaign, CatholicVote.org has released this outstanding short video.

The 90 second video can be viewed at this link:

http://www.allhands-ondeck.blogspot.com/2012/06/us-catholic-fortnight-for-freedom.html
6.24.2012 | 12:21pm
Michael says:
Weigel's piece contains the usual slight distortions found in any piece of soft partisan cheerleading. The Roman Church was the first Christian Church after all to burn heretics and to launch crusades against its own. Maryland was preceded by Henry of Navarre and others. Jefferson might have been surprised by his inheritance from Aquinas, but high-church Protestants have always acknowledged the entire Latin tradition.

What's interesting is how this soft partisan cheerleading becomes amplified in at least some of the comments into accusations of bigotry nearly as virulent as Puritan chant Weigel quoted. The Puritans felt that they had been driven out of their country. I don't know what is behind the current comment.
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact