Ads


Jews, Catholics, and Our Bonds of Unity

The entry of Christ into history is the greatest blessing the world has ever known, but the beauty of that event is never matched by the practice of Christians. Perhaps nowhere is this more painfully apparent than in Christian conduct toward Jews. The Passion narratives were long abused as part of a polemic against “the Jews,” who were blamed, collectively and of course wrongly, for the death of Christ. The “deicide” myth, as it became known, led to the equally destructive idea that Jews would be forced to wander the earth forever, because they had not accepted Christ.

William Doino Jr.Simple Christian decency, and better Biblical theology, should have prevented such toxic ideas from ever taking hold, but tragically they spread, and the anti-Jewish polemic took on a life of its own.

The Christian conscience, however, was never wholly absent during these times. When St. Ignatius of Loyola was accused of being Jewish, because of his faithful religious observances, he turned the accusation around, saying he would be privileged to share in Judaism’s heritage: “What? To be related to Christ Our Lord and to Our Lady the glorious Virgin Mary!” It was the perfect Christian reply.

The Council of Trent not only rejected the deicide myth but stressed that we are all responsible for the death of Christ, and Christians even more so, since they profess him Lord and Savior, yet violate his teachings at will.

“If this understanding of the crucifixion had been widely preached and taught,” writes Phyllis Goldstein, an expert on anti-Semitism, “history—particularly the history of anti-Semitism—might have taken a different course.”

A number of Catholic leaders did try to protect the Jewish people—and sometimes succeeded—but their voices were often overwhelmed. Pogroms, enforced ghettos, and insane charges about “ritual murder” continued. In 1858, Edgardo Mortara, a young Jewish boy who had been secretly baptized by his Catholic maid, was taken away by the papal authorities, and raised a Christian, with his parents permitted mere visitation rights.

A few decades later, Captain Alfred Dreyfus, a Jewish officer in France, was falsely accused of leaking state secrets, and had to wait twelve years before his name finally was cleared. Only a minority of Catholics had the courage to defend him, though Charles Peguy, the most noble among them, did say his country was in a state of “mortal sin” as long as Captain Dreyfus remained framed.

The emergence of a racist (as distinct from religious) anti-Semitism, created an environment more dangerous for Jews than ever before and led, ultimately, to the Holocaust. The Shoah was a pagan—and certainly diabolical—event, but it cannot be denied that many Christians were blind to that fact, and contributed to its creation with their own “teachings of contempt” toward Jews.

It’s very difficult to write fairly and accurately about Jewish-Catholic relations, with all their complexities and sensitivities. But two historians who have are Cecil Roth and Sir Martin Gilbert. Both recount, with unflinching honesty, the deprivations of and crimes committed against the Jewish people—often at Christian hands—but they do so without ever losing sight of what Roth calls “the best teachings of Christianity.” This is particularly true of Catholic rescue during the Holocaust.

“Frequently, the lead was taken by priests and nuns,” writes Roth, in his classic History of the Jews, “following the example set by the Vatican itself.” Sir Martin, a renowned authority on the war years, wrote an entire book honoring such rescuers, The Righteous.

The heroic deeds of righteous Christians, however, cannot blot out the sins of those who permitted it. As the late Cardinal Bernardin said, in a speech at Hebrew University, Catholics “must not minimize the extent of Christian collaboration with Hitler and his associates”—even as we recognize the “Christians” who did so were totally unworthy of the name. “It remains a profound moral challenge,” said the Cardinal, one “we must continue to confront for our own integrity as a religious community.”

Step by gradual step, the postwar Catholic Church began laying the groundwork for a new relationship with the Jewish people. Freed from needless restrictions by Pius XII’s ground-breaking encyclical, Divino Afflante Spiritu (1943), Biblical scholars began exploring the New Testament anew, disproving anti-Jewish interpretations of it, and linking Christianity ever more profoundly with Judaism. Pius himself, building upon the good will he had established during the War, had a series of meetings with Jewish leaders, which marked a new chapter in the Holy See’s relationship with Jews, tentative but productive.

His successor, John XXIII removed insensitivities toward Jews in the Catholic liturgy, and famously embraced his Jewish brethren with the words, “I am Joseph, your brother.” Blessed John also convened the Second Vatican Council, which, under Pope Paul VI, promulgated the historic Nostra Aetate declaration (1965), which underscored Christianity’s vital bond with Judaism. The year before that, in his encyclical, Ecclesiam Suam, Paul praised Jews for their faith and taught they are “worthy of our respect and love.”

The last two pontificates, of Blessed John Paul and Benedict, have taken the Jewish-Catholic dialogue to new levels of depth and reciprocity. From their respective visits to Auschwitz, to John Paul’s ground-breaking visit to Rome’s synagogue, to Benedict’s acclaimed exegesis of Jews and Christians in the New Testament, their good will and appreciation is recognizable to all. One of their most valuable marks has been to highlight the importance of the state of Israel. For decades, the Catholic Church had a very uneven attitude toward Israel, with some Catholics expressing sympathy and support for it, while others harbored hostility. John Paul and Benedict have made clear that, while people of good will disagree on how best to handle the conflicts in the Middle East, indifference to the security of Israel and the fate of the Jewish people—as well as the Palestinians—is inadmissible. “Spiritually, we are all Semites,” as Pius XI taught.

In one of his last messages to the Jewish community, a year before he died, Blessed John Paul II said: “During the Second Vatican Council, the Catholic Church clearly and definitely reaffirmed her rejection of all expressions of anti-Semitism.” However, the sincere “condemnation of those hostilities directed against the Jewish people . . . do not suffice; we must also develop friendship, esteem and brotherly relations with them.”

The bond between Jews and Catholics has now become so strong that, whenever tensions do arise—as they inevitably will, even in the best relationships—we can speak to one another frankly, heart to heart, and work out our differences together.


William Doino Jr. is a contributor to Inside the Vatican magazine, among many other publications, and writes often about religion, history and politics. He contributed an extensive bibliography of works on Pius XII to The Pius War: Responses to the Critics of Pius XII.


RESOURCES

The Saint for Shalom: How Pope John Paul II Transformed Catholic-Jewish Relations, edited by Dr. Eugene Fisher and Rabbi Leon Klenicki (2011).

The Bible, the Jews and the Death of Jesus: A Collection of Catholic Documents, Bishops’ Committee for Ecumenical and Religious Affairs (2004).

The Holocaust, Never to be Forgotten: Reflections on the Holy See’s Document We Remember, Commentries by Avery Dulles, S.J., and Rabbi Leon Klenicki (2001).

A Convenient Hatred: The History of Anti-Semitism by Phyllis Goldstein (2012).

A History of the Jews by Cecil Roth (Revised edition, 1970).

Cecil Roth, Historian Without Tears: A Memoir by Irene Roth (1982)

The Righteous: the Unsung Heroes of the Holocaust by Sir Martin Gilbert (2003)

Israel: A History by Sir Martin Gilbert (2008)

Anti-Semitism: The Historical Legacy and the Continuing Challenge for Christians,” Speech at Hebrew University (Jerusalem), by Joseph Cardinal Bernardin, March 23, 1995.

Jewish-Catholic Dialogue Since Vatican II by Cardinal Kurt Koch, President of the Pontifical Commission for Religious Relations with Jews, May 17, 2012.

Become a fan of First Things on Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and follow First Things on Twitter.

Comments:

6.18.2012 | 4:19am
Rick says:
I'm old enough to have lived through a sort of revolution in Protestant attitudes towards the Jews. When I was in high school in 1960, I listened to the emminent pastor of our Presbyterian church (he had even had his sermons read into the Congressional Record) blast liberal Presbyterian ministers for inviting rabbis to address their congregations. "As long as I am pastor of this church," he thundered, "no Jew will speak from this pulpit!" It crossed my mind at the time that if Jesus himself had knocked at the door of the sanctuary and said he had a word for the congregation, our pastor would have sent him packing. Such an event would be almost unimaginable among conservative or evangelical Protestants today. In fact, the attitudes have swung so far in the opposite direction, that even mild political criticism of the state of Israel is considered unacceptable.

Much of this transformation was related to the near universal acceptance among evangelicals of an updated form of the premillenialism preached by the Englishman John Nelson Darby in the late 19th century. This eschatological vision includes the creation of the state of Israel and the gathering together of God's people, the Jews, into their homeland before the return of Jesus, the Rapture, and the Tribulation. Darby, in fact, even invented the term "Rapture." The degree to which Darby's particular literalistic interpretation of the Book of Revelation is now widely accepted by Evangelicals as unchallengeable truth is rather amazing. But I have to wonder how much they know of the highly secularized, and even Marxist, origins of the early Zionist movement that led to the founding of modern Israel?
6.18.2012 | 12:11pm
Randy says:
Rick,

I think the Evangelical Christian support of Israel is much deeper, and less eschatological, than you think.

Read this, and see if you change your mind a bit:

"Ani Yisraeli: I Am An Israeli"
By: Pastor John Hagee
The Jewish Press, August 11th, 2010

http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/front-page/ani-yisraeli-i-am-an-israeli/2010/08/11/0/

Excerpt: "Our world is divided into two groups: those who support Israel and those who do not. There is no middle ground. Because the ghost of Hitler now walks the earth in a renaissance of anti-Semitism and because the enemies of Israel sense America’s reluctance to defend Israel against a nuclear Iran, those who stand in solidarity with Israel and the Jewish people must send a loud and clear message to Israel, to Iran, to the UN and to the world: We stand with Israel today, tomorrow, and forever."
6.18.2012 | 2:26pm
brownson says:
This would be an alternative view, from E. Michael Jones. I wonder what to make of it:

"One hundred years after the French Revolution, the editors of Civilta Cattolica, the official voice of the Vatican on political affairs, came to a startling conclusion: any country which turns away from laws based on the teaching of the Catholic Church and God's eternal law will end up being ruled by Jews. These three articles, originally published over the fall of 1890, explain in detail why this is so, for both France in 1890 and America today. The assertion that Jewish political power:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B007BSCYOE/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=cultwars-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B007BSCYOE
6.18.2012 | 2:53pm
Rick says:
@Randy:

Thanks for the link. The one thing Hagee says in the excerpt that I can agree with is the reference to a renaissance of anti-Semitism. That is certainly true. However, the assertion that there are only two types of people on earth, those who unquestioningly support everything Israel does and, conversely, Israel's enemies, is just silly. Why did God continually have to chastize or even devastate the Israel of the Old Testament? BECAUSE THEY WERE FALLIBLE MORTALS WHO ALWAYS FOUND A WAY TO DISOBEY HIM AND BETRAY THEIR CALLING. Why should we suppose that the Israel of today is any more infallible? I have known and befriended many Jews, and they are people like you and me. No better and no worse. We all stand in need of correction and improvement.
6.20.2012 | 12:59pm
Nathan says:
@Rick:

Just to clarify, Hagee does not suggest that one side of the Israel question are those who "those who unquestioningly support everything Israel does." However, there are those who think that granting the Jewish people a state in 1948 was an illegitimate act of imperialism. Such folks do not recognize Israel's right to defend itself. Their criticism is not isolated to questionable incidents of violence or policy perpetrated by the Israeli government and its citizens. Rather, from such a perspective, the very existence of Israel is invalid.

I think this is what Hagee is referring to when he identifies two sides with no middle ground. It is possible to support Israel without necessarily being a "Zionist." One might consider this to be a middle ground; supportive but also critical. On the other hand, if someone goes so far as to be identified as "Anti-Zionist" then they have crossed the line into the other group.
11.14.2012 | 9:53am
Brownson, I know this is late, but you should reject such conspiracy-mongering. The ADL has a very good profile. In regards to the actual article on this page, I am grateful to see Christians acknowledging a troubled, messy history and try to find a way to transcend it.
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact