Ads


Sign up for our
Email Newsletter

Russell E. Saltzman

view all featured authors »

Shopping With the Poor

All my clothing comes from stores with names like “Community Thrift Store,” “Family Thrift,” and “Vintage Value.” These are places several retail notches below Macy’s or Target, and even further down the retail chain from all the “dollar” stores. If “cheap used clothing” has an endearing ring for you, these are the places to shop. Here “second hand,” if not “third hand,” is an honored and expected description. And “clean,” clean is a nice word to run across.

I’ve been shopping in places like that for years. My weight fluctuates five or ten pounds either side of 165, thanks to diabetes. The more effectively my insulin pump works, the more emboldened I am to eat what I like and ignore a proper diet. Bad, I know, but I must be nimble and quick tending to my sartorial standards. So I have “fat” pants and “skinny” pants, two inexpensive wardrobes to accommodate the ups and downs as they happen.

Match slacks with a shirt from Community Thrift Store, and for seven bucks I’m good to go. If I need to suit up, add nine dollars for a suit coat. The only clothing I won’t buy second hand is the sort of second hand thing you wouldn’t want that close to you in the first place.

My favorite shop recently upscaled a bit. I’ve been going in and out of it for almost ten years and it was always cash only. Two years ago the owner added credit and debit card services. He mentioned business had more than tripled since the 2008 crash and more of the customers coming in expected to use plastic. Now he can afford the service while keeping prices about the same. He still won’t take a check, though.

All his clothing and home items arrive as donations or he makes bulk purchases. Before 2009 he could be picky about what he accepted. By the next year he was taking almost everything just to keep stocked. He and his clerks get it all cleaned up, presentable, and on the racks. It is a lot of work for the two-ninety-five shirt and four dollar slacks I’m likely to buy.

This, I figure, is the place people frequent when even Walmart seems too expensive. Laura Heller, a retail analyst, remarks in a Forbes online article that most Walmart shoppers have annual incomes under fifty thousand dollars. They are unlikely to have or use credit cards, and they shop Walmart from a budgetary imperative.

But in small rural towns, you will be hard pressed to find a Walmart. You are more likely to find one of the ubiquitous “dollar” incarnations: Dollar General, Dollar Tree, or Family Dollar.

If it is a standalone community with nothing bigger nearby, likely you will also find a Pamida along the main highway. Pamida, set to merge with Shopko this year, locates in communities of three to eight thousand. These stores along with the dollar stores serve what Heller respectfully calls “fly over country,” places where flags and parades mark our national holidays.

The dollar stores whether urban or rural, says Heller, serve the lowest-earning people in the United States, with incomes typically under twelve thousand dollars. Dollar Tree, Dollar General, and Family Dollar all report nearly identical customer characteristics. That, she explains, is why Macy’s, Nordstrom’s, or Target isn’t for everyone.

When I began assembling my diabetic closet, even the prices in Walmart and the dollar stores seemed formidable, certainly more than my chintzy soul wanted to pay for the privilege of adding a few pounds now and again. But I have a choice in the clothing I buy and, certainly, where I buy it. There is a sharp contrast existing between me and many of the people I shop with at Family Thrift.

Seems funny to put it like this but in a strangely twisted way, I am wealthy enough to afford the luxury of cheap clothing. A—let’s be honest—charmingly eccentric diabetic searching out second-hand four-dollar Dockers is amusing; okay, maybe nutty.

But as Heller reminds me to remember, for a lot of folks where they shop isn’t a matter of value or choice or anything else but absolute necessity. Shopping poor is sometimes “the difference between feeding and clothing their family or not.”

Russell E. Saltzman is dean of the Great Plains Mission District of the North American Lutheran Church, an online homilist for the Christian Leadership Center at the University of Mary, and author of The Pastor’s Page and Other Small Essays. His previous On the Square articles can be found here.

RESOURCES

Laura Heller on shopping

Become a fan of First Things on Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and follow First Things on Twitter.

Comments:

6.7.2012 | 11:18am
TeeJay says:
I highly recommend the book shelves there as well. I peruse them thoroughly for theological fare. Last year I found a duo of "Cost of Discipleship" and "Letters from Prison" paperbacks, while my wife did her Christmas shopping. Now I am looking into the abyss for Tillich. :)
6.7.2012 | 11:52am
I also wear clothing from "Vinny's Boutique" (St. Vincent DePaul's resale shop) and am glad to save the bucks. I also donate a lot of stuff there. But I have nothing against Walmart. In fact, I find it to be the only place here in Green Bay where I might truly bump into anyone. There are no (or very few) restaurants, stores, clubs, or even public parks where the mayor, a Packer player, a recently released prisoner, an illegal immigrant, a soccer mom, etc. might all be in the same room on the same day. Except Walmart (and perhaps McDonald's). The cultured despisers of these places despise the only things that unify our culture. Walmart is the secular equivalent of a large Catholic parish.
6.7.2012 | 1:52pm
Bob says:
As a retired Lutheran pastor, I was unaware that I wear clothes purchased in a store one or two levels below Walmart. Thanks, Russ for questioning my clothing.
6.7.2012 | 5:57pm
Ellyn says:
I find that I am continuously thankful for the people who insist on shopping at Macy's, Nordstrom and better. Their kind donation of cast-offs to the Salvation Army has enabled me to dress my family quite splendidly for pennies on the dollar. Clothes that show up obviously worn but no worse for the wear have an implicit endorsement of quality. Even when it has not been necessary to "shop poor" the thrill of the chase makes shopping much more entertaining. Anyone with money could walk into Brooks Brothers and purchase a fine button-down shirt. But to find one for $1.50 is an event!
6.7.2012 | 8:36pm
Ben Finiti says:
Teejay does well to remind us of the “book value” of thrift stores. I prowl through thrift stores in search of forgotten books and forgotten authors. I do find lots of surprises, from theology and philosophy to obscure arcana on the obscurest of topics. But the real goal of my pursuit is a category of books which was invented and flourished in the dreadful 20th century: the survivor’s tale of witness to the inhuman atrocities that reached such a peak (so far) in the recent past.

Some names are well known in this category: Solzhenitsyn, Wiesel, Chambers. But who now remembers Victor Kravchenko? Peter Deriabin? Jan Valtin? Earl Weinstock?

When I find a book like Earl Weinstock’s The Seven Years, I not only avail myself of an amazing story of human tragedy and triumph; I also feel the joy of restoring a forgotten witness to at least a small amount of remembrance.

You can read more about these Forgotten Books of Witness at my website: benfiniti.com.
6.7.2012 | 9:05pm
greggo says:
as I age (65) I find clothing less and less important.In the rural area where I live two generations ago bib overalls were acceptable seven days a week. Sunday required a white shirt and tie. Today blue jeans are acceptable seven days a week. Maybe a tie for baptisms, weddings and funerals. Not required though for Sunday worship. I see the functionality of religious habits.
6.7.2012 | 10:22pm
Mr. Speckard: The problem with Wal-Mart is that they prey on small rural towns by undercutting prices on items that local vendors also offer, driving them out of business. Of course, you usually can't do this without depressing the local economy, and once the Wal-Mart begins to lose business, they leave, and leave the area devastated in their wake. Beyond that they are no better and no worse than most large businesses. There are many places, some not specifiable in a Christian and family venue such as this, which equally unify our culture, mostly through things bought and sold. For this reason it strikes me as much more sensible to compare Wal-Mart to them rather than to a large Catholic parish.

Also, the one thing I would suggest to the author is that while he is at the thrift store (or even the Dollar Store) he spend some time listening (or even eavesdropping) to the poor with whom he is shopping. I suspect there may be far less of a contrast between he and they than he implies, particularly in regard to "first things".

G.K. Chesterton once remarked that a poor man is one who has not got much money--no more and no less than this. The moment you call this man one of "the poor" you have asserted a moral and spiritual difference between the two of you, whether you realize it or not. We all should think very carefully what this implies for our religious life.
6.8.2012 | 10:15pm
Please come to Livingston Montana to see how we've reinvented the thrift store. In a town of 7,000 we've managed to give away $200,000 in proceeds to nonprofit activities in our community.

http://www.stayclassy.org/stories/from-impoverished-to-high-impact-philanthropist-thrift-store-redefines-charitable-giving
6.12.2012 | 10:44pm
Sachiko says:
From what I've seen in my life, whether one shops at thrift stores speaks more about the priority clothing has in one's life rather than just what you make. When my husband was enlisted in the military, the people who wore the nicest clothes or drove the newest cars were sometimes those who could afford it least.

I felt this way for many years--when each paycheck feels like the last, it's easy to think, "Well, if I'm going to be poor anyway, why not look good?" Or, "If I'm putting food on the credit card, then why not clothes, and why not really nice clothes?"

We are civilians now, and have a mostly middle-class life. I find the more money we've made, the more money I'm interested in saving, because, unlike before, my scrimp/pinch efforts actually bear visible fruit now. Most of the other people I know who shop secondhand are, like me, middle-class matrons. (I'm 32; that means matron, right?)

Now I would never, ever dream of buying clothes full-price at the Gap or Gymboree for a kid and then giving it away at the end of the season. I'm too cheap. I'd feel too guilty. It would be a reversal of all my painfully acquired financial austerity.

But it's thanks to folks who do spend more on retail, that my 6 kids have jeans without holey knees, and I can sew nice diaper covers for the baby from donated cashmere sweaters. If secondhand stores depended on donations only from families like mine, there would be nothing but stained rags on the racks. Thank heavens for generous and foolish spenders! I couldn't be thrifty without them.

Also, a small detail--I can tell you from repeated experience that secondhand Gap or Gymboree jeans will outperform brand-new Walmart-brand jeans, and are cheaper besides; the difference is vast once the same jeans are handed down to siblings. In the long run, Walmart clothes are pretty expensive. Not that anyone asked.
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact