Dear Readers,
First Things is a non-profit. For more than twenty years readers have provided donations that have sustained the journal. Now the electronic age presents new challenges. I’ve written to our subscribers, who have responded with generosity. Now I’m writing to you directly on the web. We need our web readers to step up and provide support as well.
Don’t let a secular mentality dominate our culture. More than twenty years ago Richard John Neuhaus and his colleagues founded First Things to project a confident, informed, engaged, and religious voice into the Public Square. It was necessary then, and it remains so today. Donate now and help us become even stronger. Your support keeps First Things a vital voice in public debate.
First Things depends on all her supporters, large and small. Over the years countless readers have given, some $50, some $500, and some $1,000 and more. These gifts have made the difference. Yours will as well.
With gratitude for your support,
R. R. Reno
Editor
They occasionally populate New Yorker stories–characters on the peripheries of the narrator’s life, somehow only half human, almost surreal, because they’re single, celibate, and plan to stay that way until, someday, they marry. But the someday hasn’t arrived, and in the context of postmodern fictional settings, the chaste represent objects of repression, pity, and derision. Of the multitudinous lifestyles deemed acceptable and worth defending today, celibacy for singles stays off the list, almost as if its very existence threatens the well-being of the world as we know it.
I spent most of my twenties single, and am not devoid of empathy for friends who graduated from their church young adult programs without finding a spouse. Their unfulfilled yearning for marriage and despair over unrealized fertility has sometimes left me wordless in offering comfort. Yet, I would hardly call any of their lives wasted, let alone anomalies of nature. I’m thinking of a single friend my age whose rich and full life includes literature, art, film, a job teaching at-risk teens, and a family consisting of siblings, nieces, nephews, co-workers, students, fellow volunteers, priests, and parishioners.
A quick perusal of religious websites for singles confirms my experience, that people who defy the sexually active lifestyle while single find their own sense of liberation and purpose. “Celibacy can be a radical testimony to God’s love and provision,” summarizes one articulate voice, Christine Colon, associate professor of English at Wheaton College, “because it reminds us that our ultimate fulfillment has to be union with God . . . there are always going to be these longings unfulfilled here on earth.” Other online chastity advocates include websites like Notes from the Sisterhood of Perpetual Singleness and Celibrate, which aims to replace negative stereotypes of celibacy with positive testimonials and examples.
But those promoting virginity have their work cut out for them, especially when the chaste themselves buy into the notion that they are somehow trapped in perpetual adolescence and repressed by a religion intent on arresting their development. The New York Times ran a column entitled, “Single, Female, Mormon, Alone,” in which an eloquent poet delineates her trajectory from dating as a virgin–which was far too much for the men to handle since “It was weird for them (some would say ridiculous) to suddenly be thrust into eighth grade”–to her ultimate liberation in a quasi-religious experience at Planned Parenthood. “I would have an IUD instead of children,” she exults.” I would have intellectual and spiritual freedom; I would write poems and finally live inside my body.” To which the majority of commenters gave a rousing thumbs up, grateful to see another human being set free, according to one reader, “whose life had been perverted [by] the idiocy of organized religion.” Muslim, Jewish, and Catholic women chimed in their endorsements as well.
Still, a few readers found her choice questionable, among them a self-described “happily married old physician” who asked “Who told you that sexual experience makes you a mature person? Who told you that copulation is love?” I also appreciated a Times reader who had “lived the reverse life from Nicole” and remarked that “all the sex I had before [joining the LDS Church] left me nothing but broken-hearted, lonely, and depressed.” Reaction in the Bloggernacle, or Mormon blogosphere, consisted mostly of sympathy for the pain of those on the fringes of our family-oriented church, but also included some skeptical observations. Among them: “We aren’t stunted in growth by being single. We are stunted in growth by sin. If I’m single because I sin, I’m stunted. If not, I’m not missing anything the Lord can’t provide for me.”
I asked two middle-aged single friends how they felt about remaining celibate. The first, who’s gone back to school for a PhD in Biblical studies, told me, “Honestly, it’s just the way I live. I don’t even think about it anymore . . . but then again, I haven’t been tempted in so long, I haven’t had to think.” She sent a quote, as an afterthought, from Peter Marshall’s sermons: “It seems to me that behind every sin, every vice, every mess, is a lack of self-discipline . . . of God’s discipline.” The other friend, who remained single after an early divorce, said she learned the hard way that sex void of a marital commitment “is actually what makes you feel like half a person, not celibacy.”
Maybe that’s why even people without religious convictions choose chastity. According to the New York Post, various urban singles’ disgust with “the New York version of fast-food sex” has led some to abstain from sex altogether. I even ran across one of those literary magazine essays recently, this one ominously entitled “Virgin” by (who else?) a Mormon writer full of ambivalence—shared by her more experienced boyfriend—regarding her innocent state. With trepidation, I waited for her exit story from the faith, but toward the end, she goes to church wanting a sign that her unique situation gives her a pass to sleep with her boyfriend. Instead, during the sacrament—our version of communion—she remembers her commitments to God, and knows there’s “no getting around it. . . . whether I like it or not, my sexuality has to do with my relationship with God.” She decides to keep her promises and, pain and angst in tow, stay chaste.
Betsy VanDenBerghe is a writer specializing in family and religious issues and lives in Salt Lake City. She can be reached at betsyvandenberghe@gmail.com.
Become a fan of First Things on Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and follow First Things on Twitter.
Comments:
It's simple--darkness hates light, as Jesus and the scriptures say.
In more specific terms, a conscience that is disregarded or ignored doesn't just go away; it metastasizes and becomes a cancerous factory of evil that propels a person caught in sin to try to remove all reminders of the standard of righteousness, truth, goodness and beauty.
Read all about that process in an incredible essay, The Revenge of Conscience by J. Budsiszewski here: http://www.firstthings.com/article/2008/12/001-the-revenge-of-conscience-38. He also wrote a related essay, "What We Can't Not Know."
P.S. This is a great essay by Betsy VanDenBerghe. I will add that marriage and children are incredibly fulfilling, but are also one of the most direct paths to showing us how selfish we are, as our motivations and actions are exposed in full view of the innocent bystanders in our own family. And anything we give up for the sake of God and the gospel in this life, God will reward extravagantly in the next.
And you can bank on this:
"You have made known to me the path of life; you will fill me with joy in your presence, with eternal pleasures at your right hand." Psalm 16:11
chastity requires I give my longing to Christ to use as He pleases in His unimaginable economy of salvation. it's an experience of fasting & learning to see my sisters as sisters rather than competition for the available men. chastity teaches me to experience men as strong caring, intelligent adults rather than the dangerous, one dimensional beings years of liberal education, mindless media & abuse led me to believe they were. when sex is not in the picture, it's easier to identify those who are abusive & those who are not. I've come to realize that because of my past, marriage would be hard & this extended time of chastity is a gift that allows me to see the truth of my own life. if marriage is not the right choice for me, I no longer fear living chastely. when I'm tempted, I hide myself in Jesus' wounds & all is well. it would seem to me that when 1 in 4 women & 1 in 6 men have been sexually abused at some point in their lives, chastity would be touted as a safe, healing oasis where the madness of being used ends.
Do you really think that the point of the essay is that that's the "main threat" they face?
And yes, there are people in Afghanistan and Congo who'd be happy if the "main threat" they faced was all kinds of things we find intolerable and unacceptable, but that's not really the point, is it? You can find someone worse off to minimize just about anyone's injustices, if you really want to. Going through life socially marginalized albeit physically safe wasn't supposed to be an acceptable option for any virtuous, law-abiding person in our society, was it?
Not everyone who is chaste as a single intends or desires to remain single, and yet chastity in that context is still a challenge and still an anomaly in our society. It isn't only those who choose to remain celibate who face the issues of chastity in full force.
Yes, I'm quite aware that in many circles, celibacy is regarded as weird or even perverse. I've *still* never heard of "celibate bashing". My point is *not* that mocking celibacy is hunky dory, but rather I'm simply contesting the idea that celibacy is uniquely maligned.
You're bucking cultural norms that have existed in the US for generations, norms that accept and promote sexual experience before marriage and which have only intensified over the years. And there was a gender difference too, with boys encouraged to get that experience but girls cautioned against getting a bad reputation. No more, as both are now expected and encouraged to explore sexual experiences whenever they feel ready, and being ready is left to personal decision even for young teens, as long as they care for their partner. So kids who have an emotional meltdown over a friend's offhand comment are ready to decide when to have sex; it's absurd on its face. Gender differences come into play here, too, as boys and men find it much easier to objectify their female sexual partners and go after sex as just a physical release and personal enjoyment, with little thought of love, caring and commitment. Women are now moving in that direction, too, with the popular media pushing it in movies and TV. But generally speaking, men don't approach the subject with the same amount of emotional and spiritual introspection as your female examples do. It's likely different for men brought up to believe in principles of sexual purity before marriage, to be sure, and that's not the majority. Most men do grow up and their emotional maturity improves, and there's less of the stud mentality.
Churches offer the best hope against this trend as God's principles are pretty clear. With the exception of a few faiths, however, many churches have caved to popular culture and the lack the courage they exhibit is discouraging. In any case, Betsy, you've made an excellent point that a happy, fulfilled life is indeed possible by staying true to timeless principles.
While undue opprobrium exists against many lifestyles, I can't think of another (not deemed criminal) that is less likely to have any outspoken, mainstream defenders -- or that is treated so "cutesily" or even greeted with a negative reaction from supposed mainstream sources -- when one B-list defender pops up now and then.



PS How come our culture celebrates people who "embrace" a lifestlye that is demonstrably unhealthy but bullies people who are chaste and proud? Just a thought.