Ads


Sign up for our
Email Newsletter

William Doino Jr.

view all featured authors »

Pope John XXIII: Conserver of Tradition

Blessed John XXIII is one of the most beloved popes in all of history—and quite possibly the most misunderstood.

Almost from the moment he was elected pope, Angelo Roncalli—or “Good Pope John,” as he came to be known—captivated the world. There was something about Roncalli’s ways—his buoyant personality and self-deprecating humor; his willingness to affirm rather than condemn—that attracted so many to him. But his personal magnetism, admirable as it was, has led many to romanticize his pontificate as if he were some kind of papal Santa Claus. Roncalli the man has given way to Roncalli the legend.

The great error in this mythology is that Cardinal Roncalli, once he became Pope John, set out to upend the entire history of the Church.

The theme of “John the Revolutionary” reverberates throughout the literature on Blessed John’s life. In his book, Pope, Council and World, Robert Kaiser assures us that “Pope John XXIII was a quiet and cunning revolutionary.” E.E.Y. Hales titled his book, Pope John and His Revolution. The historian Paul Johnson described Blessed John as not simply liberal, but a “radical shepherd.” Peter Hebblethwaite and Thomas Cahill, in their respective biographies, largely agree.

The media also embraced the narrative. When John XXIII died in 1963, Life magazine declared that he had “started a revolution which, from his long deathbed, he repeatedly wished his successor would continue.”

From the standpoint of history, this is mistaken—Blessed John wanted to renew Catholic tradition, not eviscerate it—but it is even more wrong on a theological level. The only true “revolution,” in Christianity is the Incarnation; nothing that occurs on earth can ever change that fact; and no one knew this better than Angelo Roncalli.

Born in 1881, to a large Catholic family, in the Italian village of Sotto il Monte, Angelo Roncalli was anything but a rebel. The diocese of Bergamo, in which it resides, was among the most faithful in Italy. As Pope John’s life-long assistant Archbishop Loris Capovilla said of the region, it was “solid in its faith, unshakeable in its traditions; jealous of its religious and civic heritage.”

Bergamo’s vibrant Catholic culture strengthened Angelo’s religious aspirations. “I cannot remember a day,” he would later say, “when I did not want to serve God as a priest.”

Roncalli obtained that privilege in 1904, when he was ordained after a dozen years of seminary training. During that time, he began his famous Journal of a Soul, a life-long diary describing his pursuit of holiness. The themes of prayer, penance, sacrifice and purity of heart fill its pages, as do his desire to imitate Christ. Father Angelo lived an austere Catholic life.

The young priest’s first assignment was as secretary to the new bishop of Bergamo, Giacomo Maria Radini-Tedeschi, a man of deep faith and social action. It was from his kindly Bishop that Roncalli learned how to resist error without being a reactionary: fiercely combating the Marxists, while defending the poor, through papal social teachings; and praising legitimate advances in theology and scholarship, while denouncing the errors of the Modernists.

The gifted young priest caught the attention of the Holy See: Roncalli was brought to Rome to head the Society for the Propagation of the Faith (1921); raised to the episcopacy, becoming an apostolic representative to Bulgaria (1925), as well as one to Turkey and Greece (1934-1944), where he bravely intervened for endangered Jews and the War’s many victims, then appointed papal nuncio to France (1944). Pius XII made him a Cardinal in 1953, and also the Patriarch of Venice.

By the time of Pius XII’s death, in 1958, Cardinal Roncalli—contrary to the idea he came out of nowhere to become pope—was actually one of those favored to be elected. He was well known, well liked and trusted.

More things have been said about Blessed John’s pontificate than can be imagined, but a common observation is this: “The Church expected to get a ‘caretaker pope,’ but what she got instead was a holy shock.”

But there was nothing shocking about John’s pontificate, nor his call for an ecumenical Council. Courageous and pro-active, yes, but not shocking. Ever since his days as a young priest in Bergamo, he had venerated St. Charles Borromeo—the renowned archbishop of Milan, and champion of orthodoxy, who had implemented the reforms of the Council of Trent with great discipline and zeal. Pope John saw a similar need to address the problems of our own day, with equal vigor. His reverence for the reformer was such that he arranged to have his coronation as pope on the saint’s feast day (November 4, 1958), just a week after John’s election.

Blessed John knew, as does Pope Benedict, that Christianity is not simply a series of negative “No’s,” but an uplifting series of ringing affirmations—rooted in ultimate truth, designed for our salvation—and this is why he placed an accent on the inspiring side of the Gospel, in order to attract new believers, and strengthen the old. But John could warn and censure with the best of popes, and whenever he needed to, he did. He decried the errors of Communism, even as he welcomed productive dialogue during the Cold War; he vigorously opposed sexual immorality (and had strict requirements for seminarians), but treated everyone so tempted with Christ-like love; he opposed religious indifferentism, but welcomed common ground with non-Catholics; he cautioned exegetes and warned about technology, but approved modern advances in harmony with the faith.

Of his eight encyclicals, only two of them (Mater et Magistra and Pacem in Terris) are well known, but all breathe with the language of the saints. They are deeply anchored in the Gospel and papal social teaching, and correct errors both secularists and libertarians make. John, in fact, had a deep devotion to many pre-Conciliar popes, including the traditionalist Pius IX (beatified on the same day as John), and those who followed: Pius X, Pius XI and especially Pius XII. Of the latter, John wrote in his final spiritual testament:


I wish to profess once more my complete Christian and Catholic faith, belonging and submitting as I do to the holy, apostolic and Roman Church, and my perfect devotion and obedience to its august head, the supreme Pontiff, whom it was my great honor to represent for many years…and for whom I have always felt a sincere affection.

On top of all this, John XXIII published an Apostolic Constitution, Veterum Sapientia, celebrating Latin as the official language of the Church.

Given this record, how is it possible that some still refer to Blessed John as a liberal progressive, if not a leader of a revolution? The answer is that they downplay his ascetic life, ignore or edit away his fundamental teachings, and pour into his legacy their own fashionable ideas and passions. They think the Church can change its essential teachings, and so assume Blessed John would agree with them. They confuse his orthodox reforms with their own heterodox dissents. The result is a massive case of mistaken identity. Blessed John XXIII was not a fashionable rebel, but a faithful hero, and the man who knew him best, Archbishop Capovilla, recently confirmed this.

“For all the changes that Blessed John ushered into the Church,” said the Catholic News Service story, “and notwithstanding arguments that his reign marked a radical break with the past, Archbishop Capovilla says that the pope saw himself as acting in full continuity with Catholicism’s millennial teachings and traditions. ‘Precisely because he was a great conservative,’ the archbishop says, ‘he was able to bring the world a message of love, of hope and of faith.’”

William Doino Jr. is a contributor to Inside the Vatican magazine, among many other publications, and writes often about religion, history and politics. He contributed an extensive bibliography of works on Pius XII to The Pius War: Responses to the Critics of Pius XII.

[Editor's Note: Due to an editorial error, the wrong version of this article was originally posted.]

RESOURCES


Pope John XXIII (Vatican website).

Beatification Homily for John XXIII by Blessed John Paul II, September 2, 2000 (Vatican website).

John XXIII: The Official Biography by Mario Benigni (vice postulator of Blessed John’s cause) and Goffredo Zanchi (Pauline Books, 2001).

Journal of a Soul by Blessed John XXIII (Image, 1999).

Church State and Society: An Introduction to Catholic Social Doctrine by Brian Benestad (Catholic University of America Press, 2011); includes discussion of Blessed John XXIII’s social teachings.

At 96, Blessed John XXIII’s Secretary Tells Tales of his Famous Boss,” Catholic News Service, May 12, 2012.

John XXIII’s Secretary,” Video interview with Archbishop Loris Capovilla, Secretary to Blessed John XXIII, Catholic News Service.

Reformer: Saint Charles Borromeo by Margaret Yeo (Kessinger Legacy Reprints, 2007).

Veterum Sapientia: On the Promotion of the Study of Latin, Apostolic Constitution of Blessed John XXIII, February 22, 1962.

Become a fan of First Things on Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and follow First Things on Twitter.

Comments:

7.2.2012 | 3:07am
Don Roberto says:
Thank you, Mr. Doino. I hope this will become more widely understood. The sudden success of paganism in the wake of the Council was not caused or encouraged by the changes promulgated by the Church. Rather, the Church was attempting to meet the spiritual needs of a changing world, and in many realms this has been a success. (Would the spread of the faith in the southern hemisphere have been as great in the absence of the changes? My guess is that it would not.) Social forces have pulled liturgical celebrations much too far toward entertainment, and far too many Catholics have no idea what the Church teaches; but I am hopeful that the pendulum is starting to swing back toward a focus on reverence and proper catechesis. In the end, the Holy Spirit will lead us to Truth, beauty and obedience.

7.2.2012 | 6:09am
Jim says:
Another little biographical detail that the "Peace and Justice" crowd likes to overlook about Good Pope John, is that he himself was a military chaplain during WWI. That's right, the author of the encyclical, Pacem in Terris, engaged in the enterprise of war, albeit, while fulfilling a non-combatant role. Still, chaplains (and medics) are uniformed soldiers, aiding their country's military cause.
7.2.2012 | 7:33am
"[H]ow is it possible that some still refer to Blessed John as a liberal progressive, if not a leader of a revolution? The answer is that they downplay his ascetic life, ignore or edit away his fundamental teachings, and pour into his legacy their own fashionable ideas and passions." In like manner, the same people will invoke "the spirit of Vatican II", endowing it with the meaning of their own ideological fixations.
7.2.2012 | 11:12am
"Father Angelo lived an austere Catholic life." That is a stretch. His appearance certainly pointed in the direction of a man who, in classic Catholic fashion, thoroughly enjoyed the pleasures of the table. Years ago a papal diplomat who had been Roncalli's secretary at the Paris nunciature told me that his boss once lamented being so overweight. "It's no wonder," the secretary said, "if you will put 4 cubes of sugar in your demi-tasse of coffee." To which Roncalli replied: "Oh well, I'll put in only 3." While still a young priest Roncalli did indeed "catch the eye of the Holy See," as Doino writes. They were soon keen to get rid of him - sending him to Bulgaria (where there were few Catholics) on what he was told was "a temporary assignment." He languished there 10 years, his mail unanswered. Finally appointed in Dec. 1944 to a major post (nuncio to Paris), but only as second choice, he was called "an old fogey" by a curial official, in answer to the enquiry of a French journalist. Those who elected him expected him simply to keep the papal chair warm, reading speeches written for him by others, until a worthy successor could be found for the great Pius XII. Happily Roncalli, like so many other popes - and like U.S. Chief Justices -- confounded the expectations of those who selected him. Doino is correct, however, in stressing John XXIII's loyalty to Church tradition. Unlike others in his day, however, he had a keen sense that tradition was not confined to the recent past, but extended over two millennia.
7.2.2012 | 11:51am
vito says:
I'd suggest reading the pope's own "Journey of a Soul" to discover the man.
7.2.2012 | 11:55am
vito says:
I should have said "Journal of a Soul."
7.2.2012 | 12:02pm
jason taylor says:
"That's right, the author of the encyclical, Pacem in Terris, engaged in the enterprise of war, albeit, while fulfilling a non-combatant role."

That is a reach saying chaplains and medics are engaged in the enterprise of war. It is true that chaplains attend to morale and medics return men to service or at least convince them that the state has minimal humanitarian concern for them. However that is so indirect that the claim would be like a warlord pointing out that a charity that feeds peasants in his rivals turf is increasing his revenue. The purpose of chaplains and medics is that soldiers are suffering.

That is shown by the attitude taken to medics in the customs of war. In North Africa during World War II there were occasions during battles when a hospital was overrun by each side several times. The medics in the meantime ignored the issue of battle and during all this time cared for the wounded impartially, ignoring both the uniform of the wounded and whether they were theoretically prisoners at the time. This was an unusual circumstance brought on both by the leadership of the opposing sides and the environment where they fought but it shows that this duty is carried on where it benefited both sides equally. Carried on because, the sacralization of personal attending to the spiritual and physical healing of soldiers has plenty of precedent in the customs of war despite the fact that it will tend to favor one side or another and despite the fact that such personal are not asked to separate patriotism from their vocation.

If you say, "he was not a pacifist in the literal philosophical sense though he was certainly a peace-lover" you would probably right. However serving as a chaplain would not necessarily be evidence of that. It would only be evidence that at minimum he did not think soldiers should be excommunicated for being soldiers. You need further evidence.
7.2.2012 | 1:18pm
gm says:
The eminent Italian philosopher Roman Amerio, in his magnum opus- Iota Unum, affirmed that Pope John XXIII was no liberal or progressive. The Pope’s attempt to steer the Roman Synod at the beginning of the VII council toward a renewal of Catholic tradition/ praxis, not just re-affirming doctrines, demonstrated his understanding of the continuity of tradition. According to Amerio, what John XXIII wanted was Latin, Gregorian chant maintained in the Liturgy, a call for the republishing and wide distribution of the Catechism of the Council of Trent, the need to baptize infants ASAP, the tabernacle in the traditional form and position, and no liturgical innovations. However, what Pope John got was something entirely different, which, "fell into the Erebus of oblivion, and is indeed tanquam non fuerit (As if it had never been).
7.2.2012 | 2:38pm
It has always seemed to me that the Traditionalists (note the capital T) and the Liturgical Liberals have always agreed on one thing, that the Church was intentionally changed drastically with Vatican II. One says it ended; the other that it started. Indeed the "church" that they knew did so change. For the former, it led to schism for some. For the later, it led to joining a different church for some. But the Gates have not prevailed. Pope Paul VI distilled wisdom disrespected in the First World. Pope John Paul II slowly pulled the focus back onto the Church as received from Christ. But then, why should it need a revolution? Christianity is as radical today as it was back when Jesus taught the twelve.

I think of the biopic about Bob Dylan where the man is played by multiple actors supposedly tracking how he's drastically changed himself several times. The writers and probably many of the viewers just couldn't see out of their own little Klein bottle. Dylan is no doubt the same man he has always been, just as Pope John XXIII was.
7.2.2012 | 3:25pm
Jim says:
@ Jason Taylor -

You wrote,"If you say, 'he was not a pacifist in the literal philosophical sense though he was certainly a peace-lover' you would probably right." Agreed! You could make a similar statement about most people who serve in the US armed forces today.

And being a military chaplain myself, I can assure you that chaplains and medics do very much engage in the enterprise of war - just a different dimension of it.

I leave you with this quote from JS Mill - one that I believe Blessed John XXIII could concur with:

"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."
7.2.2012 | 7:43pm
Pope John XXIII was a true phenomenon. For those not alive during his papacy (I was a teenager) it's difficult to imagine his transcendent impact upon all peoples. Following an austere and diplomatically gifted Pope Pies XII, John bubbled over with love and humor. He had the rare gift of making each person feel "the Pope loves me and wants me to love others".

The shock of such a man bursting on the scene, combined with his call for a Council to address the challenges of the modern post World War II world, made it very easy to overlook his doctrinal and theological continuation of the teachings of the Church's Magisterium.

The author is to be commended for placing John in his true context.
7.3.2012 | 2:35am
GAZokal12 says:
An excellent article Mr. Doino! Until about three or four years ago, I was one of the many people who viewed Blessed John XXIII as “some kind of papal Santa Claus”. He was an amiable man to be sure I thought, perhaps a little too laid-back for a man in his kind of position, but kindly to a fault. Luckily, through reading some of the various literature that is available on the man (including this article), I have a better understanding of this Pope’s complexity. It is unfortunate that he has gotten such a bad rap from “conservatives” and “traditionalists” for his supposed liberalism and it is equally unfortunate that progressives within the church have claimed him as a figurehead of their own, personal ideologies.

To add to Jim’s comment on the aspects of Pope John that the "Peace and Justice" crowd like to ignore, it might be useful to point out that in 1960 Pope John wrote an Apostolic Letter promoting a deeper devotion to the “Most Precious Blood of Our Lord Jesus Christ.” Such a letter refutes, I think, the idea that the Pope was only concerned with social advancement and welfare as opposed to more purely theological and spiritual concerns. What is perhaps most telling about Pope John’s thinking however, is in my opinion the Episcopal Motto that he chose for himself, Obedientia et Pax ("Obedience and Peace"). My own interpretation of that motto is that in order for a person (or society) to gain a true, and real peace, obedience to the Lord and His truth is mandatory. Perfectly in line with the traditions of the Catholic faith if you ask me.
7.3.2012 | 3:51am
GAZokal12 says:
I would like to add briefly that I think a Pope who might be misunderstood just as much as John XXIII is his successor, Paul VI. Although I think that there are a number of legitimate criticisms that can be brought against Pope Paul regarding his handling of the continuation of the Second Vatican Council and his oversight of the bishops, I believe that too many are willing to accuse Paul of being overly “lax” in the assertion of his papal authority. Charles Coulombe, a Catholic author who I highly respect, has written in his book Vicars of Christ that Paul VI “did not really assert his authority against dissent within the Church, and he allowed each national conference of bishops to do as they pleased.” The only exception to this general trend that Coulombe presents to the reader is Paul’s “rather violent” dealings with those who were opposed to his liturgical reforms. While much of this is sadly true, it ignores the larger picture of a Pope who, just like John XXIII, was in love with the Catholic faith and took seriously his duty to defend it.

It is impossible to have a complete picture of Paul VI without looking at his very firm and important encyclical on contraception, Humanae Vitae. Even more contradictory to the image of a weak Pope Paul offering passive leadership is his emphatic defense of transubstantiation in the encyclical Mysterium Fidei. Although mostly ignored at the time of its publication, the encyclical demonstrates an obvious condemnation of several theological ideas that Paul asserted were doing harm to the practice of pious reverence toward the Eucharist. Karl Rahner’s transfinalization theory was one example of this. As Pope Benedict XVI said of Paul VI in September of 2007, “he was prudent and courageous in guiding the Church with realism and evangelical optimism, fueled by indomitable faith.”
7.3.2012 | 10:42am
jason taylor says:
"I leave you with this quote from JS Mill - one that I believe Blessed John XXIII could concur with:"

The point was not that I am advocating pacifism. The point was that it is possible to be a medic or a chaplain, not consider oneself to be engaged in war, and not be inconsistent. And that therefore we need other sources to know whether in fact Pope John was engaged in the enterprise of war.
7.3.2012 | 11:34am
Anthony says:
I was involved with the Charismatic movement about the time he went to S America,where he publicly rebuked those who had espoused liberation theology. I think he handled that very badly. Many Spirit-filled believers left the Church after that. It was a pivotal moment in my life.
7.3.2012 | 3:13pm
Greg says:
What may not be so-well known is the fact that it was Pius XII who layed the groundwork, for the most part, for Vatican II. It was his ardent desire to have a council to deal with the catastrophic consequences of communism's infiltration in the Church as well as its persecution throughout the world after World War II. Another alarming trend that Pius XII was also aware of was the creeping secular humanism and atheism in western civilization. But Pius XII died before a council was ever able to get off the ground.
Enter Roncalli as pope, and one who was to continue the desire of the previous pontiff for a council. But instead, John XXIII put his own unique signature on Vatican II by making it a pastoral council to better reflect the great mercy of God. It has always been my opinion that the world and the Church would be in worse shape today were it for the keen pastoral insight and guidance of the Holy Spirit during Pope John's decisions.
7.4.2012 | 2:13pm
Mike Petrik says:
Re Anthony's recent post:
Did John XXIII rebuke liberation theology? I did not know that. While that misguided movement had indeed been born in the 1950s I did not know that John addressed it at all
Further, I did not know that the Charismatic movement had even begun within the Catholic Church until after John's papacy.
Can someone confirm whether Anthony is correct?
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact