Ads


Banking on the Fringe

Does this look like a United States coin to you? Federal prosecutors said it did and called it a counterfeit.

I don’t see the similarity. It’s too pretty in the first place and in the second place it is composed of one troy ounce of .999 silver. There hasn’t been any silver in circulating U.S. coins since 1964.

The Liberty Dollar, as it is named, was designed and promoted by Bernard von NotHaus, a self-described “monetary architect.” He promoted it as a “private volunteer barter exchange currency.” From 1998 until his arrest in 2008, thousands of Liberty Dollars were issued, sold, and collected.

A few of them may even have been spent. That struck me as supremely dumb. They are beautiful pieces of numismatic art. I collected them. Only an idiot would want to actually spend one.

But spend them is precisely what von NotHaus wanted people to do (yes, some detractors have suggested “NutHaus”). He wanted to do with the Federal Reserve System what FedEx did with the postal service: compete. That required a circulating “voluntary alternative” currency. (He also minted one ounce copper “Ron Paul Dollars,” but maybe that was just for fun.)

An automotive repair shop owner in my neck of Kansas City accepted them, along with almost every other sort of silver token or medallion, U.S. or not. But you wouldn’t receive a Liberty Dollar back in change if you paid conventionally.

Von NotHaus incidentally wants to abolish the Federal Reserve System and the Internal Revenue Code along with it, and, I dunno, maybe some other things, too. He is not without ambition.

It was the “currency” part that got him in trouble. The Liberty Dollar is not “current” money and cannot be used as legal tender. Federal prosecutors said he promoted it in that exact way. He was convicted in 2011 on counterfeiting and, among other charges, of conspiring against the United States. Prosecutors described him as a “domestic economic terrorist.” He is free on bond pending sentencing and has filed appropriate appeals.

The Liberty Dollar has turned out to be a precursor to the contemporary “community currency movement.” Liberty Dollars inspired a lot of wannabes who have produced an array of alternative if not exotic currencies: Lakotas, Texas Republics, Cabools, Dixie Dollars, Boulder Gaians, and—this will warm Randian hearts—Galts. (The Lakota coinage, if you were wondering, has no connection with the Republic of Lakotah, but that’s a whole different story.)

Many of these alternatives are loosely leagued with the American Open Standard Currency project and, in some historical sense it can be said to replicate the “hard times tokens” that appeared during the Civil War when circulating coinage all but disappeared under the weight of paper currency used to finance the Union cause. Each to a degree is a challenge to the Federal Reserve System. You would think these enterprises could find happy lodging exclusively on the right of any political spectrum, yet Occupy Dollars have been proposed. When left meets right, it messes with my world view.

I do tend to put all this in my “interesting notes from the fringe” folder. It’s gotten pretty bulky and includes but is not limited to: Angel sightings, A Secret History of the World (can it still be secret if it is published), the entire cast of “ancient astronaut theorists,” a “miraculous natural holy image of Jesus & Virgin Mary on petrified wood” (available at eBay for fifty thousand dollars), cold fusion research, Zecharia Stitchin’s Earth Chronicles, Immanuel Velikovsky, most of the guests who appeared on the 1970’s era WNBC radio talk show hosted by the late Long John Nebel. I don’t mean to neglect Nessie and Bigfoot so let’s say I need a folder marked “I wish it were true.”

Occasionally, though, maybe fringe folks deserve a better hearing from the rest of us; from me at any rate. I knew a very sober, stable couple, church-goers, who swear their car was buzzed by a UFO and stopped dead on I-29 near Omaha. Had it been anybody else I might have just laughed. Once, I had a parishioner whose first words upon sitting down in my study were, “Now, I’m not crazy.” Her husband had died some weeks before and she was being haunted (her word) by a strange man appearing in front of her. I urged her to see her doctor, first, and go from there. It turned out, even stranger, to be a rare yet harmless medical syndrome related to vision, diagnosed by a very sympathetic physician. So I’ve learned to never dismiss anything immediately. It all goes in that bulky folder I keep.

Yet there is one thing that nags at me about von NotHaus’ Liberty Dollar. The one pictured is denominated at twenty dollars, roughly the price of spot silver when it was manufactured in 2005. I bought it for that plus a premium. With fake money, the victim is left stuck with nothing. But chart the value my Liberty Dollar against the price of silver, and I have made out like a bandit. That hasn’t happened with my ordinary dollars.

Russell E. Saltzman is dean of the Great Plains Mission District of the North American Lutheran Church, an online homilist for the Christian Leadership Center at the University of Mary, and author of The Pastor’s Page and Other Small Essays. His previous On the Square articles can be found here.

RESOURCES

Liberty Dollar

American Open Currency

Republic of Lakotah

eBay petrified Madonna and child

Occupy currency

Become a fan of First Things on Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and follow First Things on Twitter.

Comments:

8.30.2012 | 1:23am
Don Roberto says:
1967.
8.30.2012 | 7:53am
Ben Embry says:
Am I reading the article correctly? In a nutshell, firstly, there is a dispute between the US gov and a citizen because the gov considers nothaus's creations to be counterfeits of legal tender sanctioned by the gov while nothaus believes his creations to be private mediums of voluntary barter that are intentionally unrelated to the money sanctioned by the fed, meaning that his silver coin should not be judged a counterfeit of anything. Secondly, you think this situation is unusual. Thirdly, you observe with a measure of alarm that legal currency continues to decrease in value when compared to this allegedly counterfeit numismatic.

I can't tell if you have taken a side in this debate or are merely pointing out its existence.
8.30.2012 | 9:48am
@ Don Roberto. Ninety percent silver composition ended in 1964. Kennedy half dollars contained forty percent silver from 1965-70. Eisenhower dollars were forty percent silver from 1971-76. Ninety percent silver may still be found in U.S. mint proof sets, though obviously not intended for circulation.

@ Ben Embry. Oh, I have a side, but mostly I wanted only to take note of the matter.
8.30.2012 | 1:40pm
mmablaster says:
Unfortunately, his design was very similar to the Peace Dollar. He could have designed it differently. Still, it doesn't seem like the government would win on a counterfeiting charge.
8.30.2012 | 1:57pm
Scott Ju says:
The fact the Liberty Dollar is made of silver is immaterial with regard to whether or not the coin should be considered a counterfeit. Silver 1964 and prior coins are still considered valid currency and are accepted at face value. They do occasionally show up in circulation, but the public removes them because the value of their metal content is greater than face value.
8.30.2012 | 3:03pm
Jered says:
Very interesting reaction to this coin. Although the reverse looks a bit wordy, it is nice looking overall. Do you think it would have received as much attention if he avoided the use of "USA" on the coin?
Also, I believe the constant change in our change seems to bait counterfeits. Many folks wouldn't bat an eye if someone gave them change in quarters with the different planets on them! (an exaggeration, of course)
8.30.2012 | 3:07pm
Dan says:
hi...I was sold a counterfeit 1795 silver dollar for $2,500.00 on ebay about 7 years ago. saved my whole life to make this purchase. I tucked it away and 6 months ago, had it graded and it came back "questionable authenticity" I know who the seller is but yes, you guessed it....he won't own up. Ebay has the info as do I. they say it's to long for them to help me. Any advice?
8.30.2012 | 3:42pm
Mike Miller says:
Great article!
To be sure, Eisenhower or “Ike” silver dollars are tricky because there were two versions made between 1971 and 1976.
The first is the Eisenhower silver dollars that were made NOT for circulation. These were meant for purchase by collectors, were in special packaging and not released for circulation. These coins are composed of 60% copper and 40% silver. These coins will have an S marking on them indicating that they contain silver. In mint condition, an Ike Dollar will have 0.3162 ounces of silver.

The second, more common type of Ike dollar was also made between 1971 and 1978 and was the first dollar coin released for general circulation NOT made of silver. These are made of mostly copper and DO NOT contain any silver and are referred to as clad
8.30.2012 | 4:55pm
@ Dan. If the seller is a member of any of the major numismatic societies - ANA, ANS or the like - you may invoke arbitration by filing an ethics complaint.
8.30.2012 | 5:09pm
Peter says:
There are plenty of gold coins in circulation issued by other countries including the USAwhy make any new ones and why not leave off any pictures or words and just state the metal content
8.30.2012 | 5:34pm
Nate says:
"Domestic economic terrorist"--- That 'terrorist' word is all the rage these days. Hell, if you have a bag of fertilizer, a gallon of gas, acetone or bleach in your house, you have what the media would call "Bomb making materials". YOU'RE a TERRORIST!!!
8.30.2012 | 6:38pm
oldhonu says:
Mike Miller,

Good note except for one small point. The "S" on the silver Ikes is a mint mark and indicates that they were minted in San Francisco, not that they were made of silver.
8.30.2012 | 8:13pm
Robin says:
The "S" on 40% silver Ike Dollars indicates they were struck by the San Francisco Mint. Not because they contain silver.
8.30.2012 | 8:41pm
Rob Gray says:
One of the great things about silver barter currencies is that they appeal to the far left just as much as the far right. The "left" likes them because it helps consumers "go local" and the "right" likes them from a hard money perspective.

Regardless of policitical orientation, the bottom line is this: from an economic perspective, it makes sense either way. And so long as we have to (or choose to) deal with one another, we may as well do so by exchanging value for value.
8.30.2012 | 8:43pm
JDCrook says:
Ithaca Hours.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ithaca_Hours
8.31.2012 | 1:37am
Poor Trader says:
Doesn't look like a Peace Dollar at all to me.
Though if a Peace Dollar were bigger and .999 fine silver, and dated with a current date, and had a price on it of 20 dollars...And if anyone has ever seen one spent in recent memory.... Someone might get momentarily confused, just not enough to think it was counterfeit.

Was this a jury trial? No Judge would be that dumb, but anything can happen with a jury.
9.5.2012 | 8:08pm
Steve says:
Liberty Dollars are not a precursor to the community currency movement. Ithaca Hours were around a lot longer.
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact