Ads


Sign up for our
Email Newsletter

How Planned Parenthood Outwitted Komen for the Cure

It is a story of relentlessly unforced errors, also of profound naiveté bordering on at least misdemeanor incompetence. It is also the story of a masterful, even breathtaking, political takedown.

On one side was the much loved Susan G. Komen for the Cure, a foundation that in 30 years became the world’s largest funder of breast cancer research, founded by the striking Texan Nancy Brinker, a woman of the center right who nonetheless practically walked on water for liberals.

On the other side stood the highly controversial group Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in the country run by the equally striking Texan Cecile Richards, longtime darling of the farther left.

It is clear that Brinker never really had a chance against Richards. They were playing entirely different games and they ran organizations set up for entirely different purposes. One is a charity set up for cancer research, the other is a political operation well practiced in smash-face politics.

Karen Handel, until recently Senior Vice President for Public Policy for Susan G. Komen, tells this story in Planned Bullyhood: The Truth Behind the Headlines about the Planned Parenthood Funding Battle with Susan G. Komen for the Cure just out from Howard Books, an imprint of Simon and Schuster.

Over the years Susan G. Komen for the Cure had become a target of protest by pro-life groups and increasingly the Catholic bishops, who objected to Komen giving millions to Planned Parenthood. The campaign had taken its toll. Komen president Liz Thompson told me last summer she spent 50 percent of her time dealing with the boycott and she wanted “out of the culture wars.”

Komen also faced what they feared was a plateau in fundraising, and therefore they determined their grants had to become more effective in either breast cancer detection or in research for a cure.

They specifically targeted “awareness” campaigns and “pass-through” grants where the recipient did not do the actual work but passed it along to a third party. Most of the nineteen Planned Parenthood grants fell within one of these categories, described by Liz Thompson as “crappy.”

Komen officials grappled with how to uncouple from Planned Parenthood without a war. When AT&T defunded Planned Parenthood in 1990, the group went on the attack, even taking out ads in the New York Times. As Handel makes clear in the book, the federally funded nonprofit Planned Parenthood has truckloads of cash for advocacy and for attacking foes and even former friends.

Had Komen stuck to the rationale of the quality of grants, they may have survived the maelstrom that would be unleashed upon them. But here, Komen made perhaps a fatal error. In her book, Handel says they discovered an already existing policy that Komen could not give to organizations under investigation, and Planned Parenthood was under investigation at all levels of government, including by the Republicans in the U.S. House. Planned Parenthood partisans within Komen claim this was purely Handel’s invention. Against Brinker and Handel’s wishes, in the press this became the lead rationale for Komen’s defunding Planned Parenthood. It then became the hammer Planned Parenthood turned so deftly on Komen since they could say the investigations were all political.

Nancy Brinker thought she could gain a “gentle ladies agreement” with her old friend Cecile Richards and that Richards would not go nuclear. Six weeks later she discovered how wrong she was.

The Associated Press ran a story on January 31 and then came the deluge. Within three days Komen faced the real possibility that they would lose everything. Affiliates threatened to withdraw from the organization. Corporate donors threatened to leave. Massive pressure was brought to bear from Congress. Brinker’s friend Andrea Mitchell beat her up on national television. The American Association of University Women said they would no longer allow their students to work with Komen.

Less than seventy-two hours later Komen caved and announced that Planned Parenthood would continue receiving Komen funds. From Tuesday to Friday, Komen hardly knew what hit them. James Taranto of the Wall Street Journal said it best, calling it “analogous to a protection racket: Nice charity you’ve got there. It’d be a shame if anything happened to it.”

Handel believes the hit on Komen can only be seen in the context of the nascent “war on women.” At the time the Obama administration was embroiled with the Catholic bishops over the contraceptive mandate. And this was just another instance of Republicans—Brinker and Handel—selling out women’s rights.

Handel does not explicitly say who’s to blame, but the book clearly points to Nancy Brinker’s timidity and her fear of criticism from cultural elites, as well as Liz Thompson who was in “over her head.” But one tantalizing speculation in the book is that within Komen was a fifth column sympathetic to Planned Parenthood.

The woman hired by Komen to “handle” the left was Obama consigliore Hilary Rosen, who was also close to Cecile Richards and who was in business with former White House Communications Director Anita Dunn. Brendan Daly, an outside Komen adviser, once worked with Richards in Nancy Pelosi’s office. Handel believes there were leaks to Planned Parenthood from inside Komen all along.

Handel shows that Rosen was sympathetic to Planned Parenthood. On the day Komen caved, Rosen retweeted Nancy Pelosi’s gloating comments about Komen’s defeat. Rosen tweeted this herself: “Congrats to Susan G. Komen for the Cure. . . No room for politics in fighting cancer.”

Within a few days Handel was forced out. She was an easy target, a pro-life Republican from Georgia. She was demonized as the person who drove the Komen bus off a cliff.

Seven months later and they are still carting bodies out of the wreckage. Liz Thompson stepped down a few weeks ago and Komen founder Nancy Brinker resigned as CEO.

Only a case study in the Harvard Business School or novel by Danielle Steele could properly tell this story. But the lessons are fairly obvious. Never get into bed with Planned Parenthood, and if you’re in bed with them now, don’t even think about getting out.

Austin Ruse is president of C-FAM, a New York and Washington DC-based research institute focusing on international legal and social policy.

Become a fan of First Things on Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and follow First Things on Twitter.

Comments:

9.20.2012 | 9:26am
Jeannine says:
"Komen president Liz Thompson told me last summer she spent 50 percent of her time dealing with the boycott and she wanted 'out of the culture wars.'"

One moral of the story: nobody can get "out of the culture wars." And the leftist side is the aggressor.
9.20.2012 | 10:26am
Your last sentence, " Never get into bed with Planned Parenthood . . .." should be a lesson to the Catholic Church and the Archbishops within, e.g., "Never get in bed with the Democrat Party, and if you are in bed with them now, don't even think about getting out." For instance, letting themselves being used by the Democrat Party to support their "social welfare" policies, then being kicked in the teeth by this same Democrat Party over the ACA contraceptive mandates: Selling our souls to the beast and now suffering the consequences.
9.20.2012 | 1:53pm
Gil says:
In the realm of evil, Legion will always, first and foremost, protect the ritual of child sacrifice.
9.20.2012 | 3:09pm
Don Roberto says:
It is never morally acceptable to cooperate with evil. Planned Parenthood is an organization devoted to the promulgation of evil; the Deocratic platform is evil. †
9.20.2012 | 11:32pm
Confuscan says:
It is a demonstration of true literary creativity that Handel is somehow able to paint Komen as the victim and of course, we know that Handel will featured like a biblical martyr. The Komen/Planned Parenthood incident was an excellent example of backroom deals, manipulation and just plain evil being exposed to the public and of course, we saw the results. Unfortunately, in most cases, the intended victims are not like PP and unable to fight back with the same ferocity and focus. All that is left is for us to savor this victory and wait to enjoy the comical follow up by Handel.
9.25.2012 | 9:12am
Doug Wakeman says:
The Left has taken over the charity and now all funds collected will go into the promotion of evil. Watch where these grants start going now! What's the lesson? Never hire progressives. If you take on the king, don't lose.
9.25.2012 | 10:24am
The best course of action for Komen would be to salvage their integrity and founding purpose and dissolve the foundation before the SHTF. Then, in a few months, they reconstitute under another name with a new slate of employees and a new charter that precludes PP.
9.25.2012 | 2:33pm
Artaban7 says:
Komen made the mistake of forgetting that if you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything. If they'd stood their ground when they first defunded PP, they would've had new donors giving to make up for the initial loss. I was ready to give. Then they caved before I'd gotten around to doing so.

Now their reputation is so tarnished, their integrity so questionable, I can't in conscience give. When I read the cap on the Yoplait yogurt that was part of my lunch, and saw that I could mail in the cap and Yoplait would make a donation to Komen on my behalf, I chose to throw it away rather than see it go to PP.
9.26.2012 | 4:25am
tip says:
Hopefully, Komen Foundation is tanking financially, and a more trustworthy organization can take up the search for a cure. Pink ribbons on the graves of the unborn are unseemly.
10.27.2012 | 12:45pm
Michael says:
As soon as Komen caved to PP, I swore NEVER to support them in any way, shape, or form. Period. Just like I have always refused to give money to United Way, even though when I was still working some employers almost forced employees into contributing to them. I let them know, even though they tried not to hear me and other employees the very reason, PP support, is why we would never contribute, even if it meant our jobs!
10.27.2012 | 12:46pm
Michael says:
As soon as Komen caved to PP, I swore NEVER to support them in any way, shape, or form. Period. Just like I have always refused to give money to United Way, even though when I was still working some employers almost forced employees into contributing to them. I let them know, even though they tried not to hear me and other employees the very reason, PP support, is why we would never contribute, even if it meant our jobs!
11.20.2012 | 7:26am
Diane says:
I started boycotting Komen the minute I heard about them defunding Planned Parenthood - and organization that is the ONLY source of healthcare for millions of women in this country. Komen had/has a right-wing agenda that has only slowly become revealed in the media. Their 'charity' has an appalling rate of return to the actual funding of cancer research (while 83% of their money goes back into the charity, only a small portion goes into actual cancer research) - and their charwoman receives a hefty salary.
The people on this list seem to want to hide in a sense of moral indignation and/or self-righteous accusation in an attempt to defame Planned Parenthood. Try collecting some FACTS before throwing around terms like "Evil". Do you even know what Planned Parenthood does?
5.24.2013 | 1:13pm
Rich says:
What a one-sided, "fact-lite" view of this whole fiasco. Could it be that Komen reversed itself because it felt that it made a mistake in defunding Planned Parenthood?

"Handel does not explicitly say who’s to blame." She should look in the mirror.
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact