Today the Catholic Church celebrates the Feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe. On Saturday, we celebrated the Feast of the Immaculate Conception, and in just two short weeks we will celebrate the Feast of the Incarnation: Christmas. The Immaculate Conception, the Feast of our Lady of Guadalupe, and even Christmas are particularly maternal feasts. They recognize the key role that women—especially Mary—have played in the history of Christianity. And they recognize the degree to which the Church reveres the feminine genius, and the genius of motherhood.
A friend recently mentioned to me that it seems strange for the Church to spend this December celebrating women. “Women,” he said, “have had a difficult year with the Church.” He was referring to the “war on women” rhetoric that has been so pervasive in popular culture over the past twelve months. I suspect he was thinking specifically of the Church’s opposition to the HHS contraceptive mandate, and the rhetorical battle between America’s bishops and women like Sandra Fluke. My friend is an Episcopalian, and so he may have also had in mind the Church of England’s decision this November to restrict episcopal ordination to men.
The truth is that women have been at the center of our broad culture war for decades. Since the time of the sexual revolution, the term “women’s issues” has been synonymous with bitter social debates over sexuality, contraception, and the family. As with most election years, the rhetoric has been particularly heated, and particularly discouraging, this year.
Since the 1970s, the intellectual left has used trumped-up charges of gender inequality and oppression to advance an agenda of wanton sexual license and libertinism. The idea that women’s issues are only those concerning sexuality is shamefully reductive, and eerily dismissive of the idea that a woman might be more than just an object of sexuality.
Despite pockets of hope, the Church is mostly losing these culture wars. There is no other conclusion to draw from the election of a radically pro-abortion president, the expansion of homosexual civil unions and gay marriage, and the profusion of pro-contraceptive, anti-family media. Last week, a prominent Catholic university announced administration support for an on-campus GLBTQ club. Traditional moral norms are crumbling.
We need to continue the clear, unambiguous defense of traditional morality to which the Church, and many Christians, are committed. We are blessed with a host of articulate spokesmen and women making cogent arguments in favor of natural law. But despite the best efforts of excellent minds, the Church is largely unheard, and her arguments mostly distorted by a media that has lost its ability to think critically and examine empirical reality. The Church is being simply overrun by the pervasive rhetoric of relativism, false notions of equality, and the so-called “war on women.”
The irony of leftist cultural distortion is that Christian positions on social issues—abortion, contraception, marriage, most especially—are designed to protect the dignity and social standing of women. Women across the globe face abortion at shockingly disproportionate rates. In 2010, economist Tim Reichert demonstrated in these pages that contraception empirically harms female social status. And the disintegration of marriage will continue to contribute to the plight of single mothers raising children without ever hearing from fathers. But it is the Church and her allies, the left tells us, waging war on women.
Well-reasoned engagement with the forces of cultural destruction is necessary. But the lesson of the past twelve months is that we need to do something else. Reason alone isn’t winning battles. In fact the more we argue, the less we seem to be heard. The solution may be found in the image of Our Lady of Guadalupe, tenderly embracing the humble Juan Diego, and tenderly embracing a people.
The solution to ending the culture wars is motherhood—a deeper awareness of the obligation Blessed John Paul II termed “cultural motherhood.”
Motherhood is the art of finding potential, and fostering it. Motherhood is the craft of focusing on the good and trusting that the rest will fade away. Motherhood is the penetrating beauty of unwavering hope, and unflinching love. This is how John Paul II called women to love culture. In imitation of Our Lady of Guadalupe, who transformed a culture for Christ, women have the unique gift of cultivating the seeds of beauty. The feminine genius is the practice of literally growing goodness in spite of incredible obstacles.
We need to grow goodness in Western culture. We need to find pockets of good—vestigial echoes of truth—and foster them. We need to refute what is evil—undoubtedly. But we also need to cultivate every possible inroad of beauty, if we ever hope for a re-flowering of Christian culture. Motherhood is our great social cultivator.
We face incredible obstacles in contemporary American culture. Many of us are despondent. And in despondency we should look to our mother—the Blessed Mother—and encourage, foster, and promote the cultural motherhood that Mary demonstrates. “Beauty,” reflected Dostoevsky, “will save the world.” There is nothing more beautiful than a mother loving her child into goodness—and nothing we need more urgently.
The Most Rev. Samuel J. Aquila is the Archbishop of Denver.
RESOURCES
Timothy Reichert, “Bitter Pill”
Become a fan of First Things on Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and follow First Things on Twitter.
Comments:
So being a mother is neither "creative" nor "important"?
I feel like crying.
"When the church supports women's cultural and economic equality and drops the fiction that complementary roles are anything but inferior,"
Complementary roles are inferior? A little bit like saying that the heart is inferior to the lungs. I guess this is where feminists and the Church truly part ways. The Church defends to right of women to be women. Feminists defend the right of women to be men.
Reasoned, logical argumentation is NOT doing it because people simply don't care! They honestly really don't. Most of us, the entire western world in fact, is wallowing in it's consumer paradise and is simply too comfortable and lazy to make an effort. We really just don't care. Why fight these so-called battles when I am fed, entertained and satisfied?
No amount of scientific data confirming the destructive nature of some activities will ever convince people there is anything intrinsically disordered about some of those activities. Recently the BBC actually reported that today the ratio of men who have sex with other men infected with HIV in Britain is 1:20. That's right 1 in 20 is infected with it and yet there is no alarm being sounded. How do you argue with that? Well, I am almost ready to admit you don't, you can't. You walk away, as Jesus did, you shake the dust off your feet and move on to another town.
I could go on, but what's the point. The culture is extremely hostile to truth and beauty. It's a very, very strange time.
As for you're denigrating the maternal "vision of women" there is nothing passive about motherhood and it is more "creative" then most occupations. Or perhaps you are saying that being, say, a political activist, is more honorable then being a mother?
And what is this "important" stuff to which you compare motherhood. Being an office worker perhaps.
Feminist man-hating is bad enough. Mom-hating besides being disrespectful of an honorable vocation, is a denial of life.
Guiding members of another generation through the difficult process in which will, intelligence, bodily powers, desires, and emotions (or mind, heart, body, and soul) are integrated, producing a truly free "acting person;"
Creating a place of beauty where a father, mother, and children can practice the good graces of civility and order within the context of willed love and can bring these necessary qualities into the larger community and the nation ---
These things are "cowardly, weak, and dimwitted"?
A woman is perfectly free to choose otherwise and to have her choices respected, as Karen must know.
I do wonder about the source of such bitter invective toward a person who came to understand motherhood as something noble and beautiful and simply offers that understanding to others - not as the only choice but a good and fulfilling choice - among the options available to women who are free to choose.
So sad, Karen, to be incarcerated in the prison of ignorance and prejudice against the Church. Name calling only exacerbates that condition. If you're sincere, and you probably are, then do yourself a favor & go spend ten bucks on a Catechism. In the meantime, everyone on this thread will join in prayer for you.
The Blessed Mother, St. Perpetua, St. Felicity, St. Catherine of Alexandria, St. Hildegard of Bingen, St. Catherine of Genoa, St. Joan of Arc, St. Teresa of Avila, St. Therese of Lisieux, St. Teresa Benedicta of the Cross, St. Katherine Drexel, Dorothy Day...
I just read an article today that I found very interesting. http://www.christianpost.com/news/not-war-on-women-war-on-womens-fertility-scholar-says-86424/
We are not speaking strictly of biological motherhood. No, a 9 year old can be a physical mother. We are speaking of the feminine genious that is true motherhood--it is of the heart. It is a giving of self and is a nurturing and loving care of others.
We do indeed need God's intervention in our country that is morally and rapidly economically bankrupt. In the Aztec culture where hundreds of thousands were sacrificed to the gods yearly and one of 5 children murdered, God sent His Mother who we know as Our Lady of Guadalupe and she converted Mexico within a decade--what had been a bloodthirsty culture became Catholic.
In the United States about 4000 unborn children are murdered in their mother's wombs every day. For African-Americans, 2 of 3 pregnancies end in abortion. What will it take to end this slaughter? Not politics, not a man. Perhaps God will send Our Lady again....would we listen, can we even hear heaven?
If you think the Catholic Church doesn't value education in women, then I would refer you to the list of women I put at the end of my last post. Not only are those women educated, some on that list have been officially declared Doctors of the Church. In other words, the Catholic Church explicitly says that we have the most to learn from these women, who were geniuses in every sense of the word. I would encourage you to read and explore these women's lives and writings.
Finally, if I am ever blessed to have a daughter, I would hope that she could aspire to something more noble than "economic power". Whether my daughter ever were to become a mother herself is not for me to know or to decide. But I am sure of at least this: there is more dignity and humanity in a mother or father changing a dirty diaper than in every corporate boardroom in the world combined.
And why do you think women do not do the creative things. Is creativity only limited to the workplace? Do you have a negative impression of motherhood? Is that not as important to you as working in the marketplace.
Why do you have such a negative impression of motherhood? Don't mothers have extremely important creative roles in raising athe next generation?
Perhaps you have issues that previously, men did not give women the due they had coming to them.
Behind a successful man is a woman. We men need to recognize that. And recognize the importance women play in raising children.
It seems that you place more importance in women working than women rasiing children.
Foster one's own potential. Certainly women can delay marriage and childbearing and work. But if you limit the value of women to their contributions in the marketplace, then you are misrepresenting the nature of women.
I am sorry . Males I know do scrub toilets, clean floors, do dishes, wipe baby's bottoms and do all the denegrating duties you ascribe to women. It's a team effort.
Perhaps you had a father who did not do those things. Maybe he devalued your mother. Maybe your husband does not appreciate the work you do.
I am sorry for that. It should not be that way. Husbands need to love their wives as Christ loves his church. No subordination.
"Being a mother is a biological process that requires only having a functioning uterus and ovaries, and at least once having sex. It is no more creative than sneezing or peeing or sweating."
That is such a destructive understanding of the vocation of a mother that I sincerely hope that you do not have any children. Motherhood is essential to my very being, my very nature. That "functioning uterus" as you so crassly put it, is the first home of a fledgling soul (or souls for some of us!), the first encounter with love and nurturance, the first mediation with God. Being a mother is creative precisely because, like the Blessed Mother, one partners with God for the sake of another. It is creative because in the proper sublimation of all of one's petty desires and one's petty selfishness, one (ideally) becomes a total self-gift. Obviously, motherhood is a biological process -- but how is it that you have so little wonder and awe for biology? I, for my part, am amazed that God has entrusted so important a task -- the creation of new life -- to so fragile a process.
I think you are missing the point of the good Bishop and of Pope John Paul II and, frankly, so are some of who you call "conservatives."
The Bishop, as explicitely stated in the headline, is talking here not only about biological motherhood and motherhood within the domain of family, but also, and even more to the point, cultural motherhood.
He's asking "mothers" to apply their unique gifts and capacities in the broader culture so as to nurture beauty and goodness in the midst of cultural ruin that seems inpenetrable by human reason.
He is most certainly NOT saying women need to get back to the kitchen in their bare feet. He's saying what our culture needs to have any chance at restoration is women to engage it with those qualities that are necessary to create, nurture, and sustain love and life in the midst of nihilism and hedonism, which is not, typically, amenable to logic and reason.
You'll also note the number of women Saints, including my wife's (she's a physician and yes, I have cleaned toilets and changed diapers) favorite saint, Gianna, who was also a physician and had four children.
The Catholic world is full of profesional women who have been mothers at home and mothers in the culture.
I think that's what the good Bishop is asking all women to do - extend the feminine genius into the culture and nuture and sustain beauty and goodnes - to redeem the rubble.
What concerns me is the despondency of the Archbishop. What we need now is vibrancy and confidence in the Roman Catholic Church's Gospel message! As John Paul II so often quoted "Be Not Afraid!" Take heart, Archbishop! Read Romans, chapter 8, especially
37 No, in all these things we conquer overwhelmingly through him who loved us.
38 For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor present things, nor future things, nor powers,
39 nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.
Now, buck up and lead your flock! We need strong and joyous Bishops to lead the new evangelization!
Consider a prayer you may have heard: "Hail Holy Queen, Mother of Mercy, our life, our sweetness and our hope. To thee do we cry, poor banished children of Eve; to thee do we send up our sighs, mourning and weeping in this vale of tears. Turn then, Most Gracious Advocate, thine eyes of mercy toward us; and after this, our exile, show unto us the blessed Fruit of thy womb, Jesus..." †


