Ads


Russell E. Saltzman

view all featured authors »

The Calamity of Death

I remember Melisa’s mother grappling with her daughter’s death. There isn’t anyone who doesn’t try to make sense of death. We try to make sense of everything. We do not like not knowing, as if motivations, circumstances, some little sense of the casualties will help us scale the ever-elusive summit of “closure.” Some things make no sense and never will, not even after all the explanations have been made, as if anything in this life can close the gash of death.

In confronting death the temptation is to become an instant theologian, confidently explaining the ins and outs of God for this death. Instant theologians are almost always the worst theologians—not that all theology offered under the title Ph.D. is all that super either. But sloppy piety almost always mistakes God for the author of evil.

God is in charge of everything, and he has a plan. Doesn’t he? When inexplicable tragedy happens, it must be some part of God’s plan; it must be since he is in charge. He has reasons for permitting it to happen, and they are always good reasons even if we cannot grasp them. So it is said.

That’s why I remember Melisa’s mother and what she was told fifteen years ago when Melisa died. Melisa was an infant who died of an unsuspected heart ailment, living but twenty-two hours, almost to the minute. She was twin to Alicia, now a teenager clamoring for driving lessons. Melisa’s mother was told that God is a careful gardener. A crazed gardener is my characterization after hearing it.

If you have a flower garden, one of the nurses explained to Melisa’s mother, which blossoms would you take first? Would you choose the shriveled and twisted, or the brightest and best, the dullest or the most vibrant blossoms? Wouldn’t you select the blossoms that best reflect your deep love of color and beauty? Which blossoms would you want immediately from your garden? This is why God “plucked” your child, a perfect, unspoiled blossom.

The nurse’s message is touching, in a way, and altogether invidious otherwise. It casually dismisses the bleakness of death and the desiccations of grief. God becomes a creepy stalker, a child-killer in his pursuit of immediate gratification to satisfy his craving for visual beauty, as if in some way creation itself is insufficient. I found it more than a little sinister. Myself, I would rather God did a little weeding now and again, if God is in the habit of gardening.

Melisa’s mother repeated this to me. She liked it very much at first and thought it was fitting, her child as a blossom of God. But the implications went deeper as she thought more about it. Melisa, the perfect child snatched away by God, but her twin, Alicia, remains? What did this mean?

Most astonishingly, a member of the congregation speculated with me that it was just as well the baby died so soon and at the hospital. They otherwise might have become more “attached” to the baby if Melisa had been home for a time, making this whole thing even harder for them to handle.

In my life as a pastor I have seldom heard anything more trivializing of human loss and feeling. I have reflected on that for a long, long time. Finally, what we are talking about is the disposability of children in a manner of removal that creates the least regret. The earlier the better, if they die, and the sooner we can all move on. I know that is not what the man meant. He was thinking of the parents and what they were going through, hoping their grief might be lessened, given everything. That was his intention. But whatever he may have intended, it wasn’t what he said.

To treat the shooting at Newtown as “a national tragedy” likewise seems to trivialize the personal agony of each individual death. Death, even when it befalls many at once, is always inimitable and the death of one child, your child, is ever a calamity. A child’s death becomes a fixed moment. Time passes, of course, yet oddly it doesn’t. Melisa’s mother marks two birthdays every year on Facebook, for Alicia and Melisa.

Russell E. Saltzman is dean of the Great Plains Mission District of the North American Lutheran Church, an online homilist for the Christian Leadership Center at the University of Mary, and author of The Pastor’s Page and Other Small Essays. His previous On the Square articles can be found here.

Become a fan of First Things on Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and follow First Things on Twitter.

Comments:

12.20.2012 | 1:38am
Gian says:
Screwtape complains that God by letting so many people die soon, does not let the devils tempt them to the fullest extent and thus hinders the devils.

The death has also been compared to a journey that must be made. This view is prominent in Tolkien: Leaf by Niggle, though the death of solitary man there is no regretted by anyone. And also the the view of death as the Gift of God in the LOTR.
12.20.2012 | 8:26am
Stephanie says:
Re: Tolkien

In a letter he says of the idea of death as the "Gift of Illuvatar [God] to men": "It should be regarded as an Elvish perception of what *death*--not being tied to the 'circles of the world'--should now become for Men, however it arose. A divine 'punishment' is also a divine 'gift', if accepted, since its object is ultimate blessing, and the supreme inventiveness of the Creator will make 'punishments' (that is changes of design) produce a good not otherwise to be attained...."

Also, lest anybody bring up "the grey rain curtain of the world rolls back and all turns to silver glass," which is used to describe death in the movies, it's not actually about that in the book, but about Valinor in the West.
12.20.2012 | 10:30am
harry says:
Hello, Russell Saltzman,

"... the death of one child, your child, is ever a calamity. A child’s death becomes a fixed moment. Time passes, of course, yet oddly it doesn’t."

As one who has lost a child, I found it calamitous and beyond extremely painful at the time. Time passed. It wasn't “ever a calamity.” I think the key to spiritual closure is belief in the goodness of God, belief in the joy of the life hereafter, and realizing that we will be reunited to that child when we, too, arrive at our true home. I had to admit to myself that I could never have made little David as happy as God makes him in the home to which His perfect Providence brought him.

God doesn't will everything that happens, yet nothing happens without His permission. He allows things to happen that He doesn't will to happen. No matter what He allows to happen, He does so with infinite wisdom, goodness and love. He does this in a way for which we will eventually praise Him, even if we presently find doing so to be impossible.

I found it helpful to think of it this way: If we had a good earthly father, then there were times when we were small that we found it impossible to appreciate what he sometimes willed for us and sometimes allowed to happen to us. We were incapable of understanding at the time. We wailed and protested. Yet now as adults we look back and see the love and goodness of our earthly father in those circumstances and find ourselves dealing with our own children in exactly the same way – because we have the same immense love for them that our fathers had for us. We will see clearly the immense love our Heavenly Father had shown us and our child in allowing that earthly calamity when, as spiritual “adults,” we are home with our Father and the child who arrived there before us.

This earthly life is a life within a womb; it is not our true home. Just as the child in the womb wasn't made to live there, we were not made to live here. Just as that child has no idea what life outside the womb will be, eye has not seen, ear has not heard, nor has it entered our minds what God has prepared for those who love him (1 Cor 2:9). We have to look at what happens here with that in mind. All that really matters is that we are finally born to eternal life, not eternal death, which is the only thing that is “ever a calamity.”
12.20.2012 | 11:13am
Asa Kraut says:
I'd be more upset to hear that my dog had died than I was to hear about those poor children. Fact. From a rational level I know, of course, that the death of those children is more tragic, but this does not affect how I feel. 
To say that it is better for a mother that a child dies so soon after birth than after some time in which the mother has had an opportunity to "bond" with him is not to trivialize "human loss and feeling" as Mr. Saltzman would have it; it is rather to recognize the nature of the reality of human loss and feeling. 

I suspect that Mr. Saltzman fails to do this; that he is not altogether honest about it and that he feels guilty about it. In truth human life can be said to be "disposable". And we know this because we all recognize that it is more acceptable that certain human life be lost over certain other human life. Who honestly, if faced with the need to choose, would not choose to lose the life of a chronically disabled infant who would need constant and resource-draining support to continue living rather than the life of a perfectly healthy infant? 
12.20.2012 | 11:54am
A Reader says:
I thank God that, at least until now, no mother can be forced to choose death for a chronically disabled infant (I had one of those. Her life is worth the sacrifices) over the life of a perfectly healthy infant.

Again, thank God this "choice" has not been imposed upon us, again, at least not yet.
12.20.2012 | 12:06pm
In teaching my people how to minister to the grieving, I always stress the importance of distinguishing between the pain of others and our anxiety and pain about their pain. Most superficial, facile explanations of suffering and death are about lessening our discomfort over the suffering of others. They are more helpful to us than those we seek to help.

Often, the best caring is simply being with the person, suffering with them, rather than trying to come up with explanations. Some whys in life are never answered, and even if we had an explanation, it does not take away the grief over suffering and death.
12.20.2012 | 12:43pm
Come away, O human child!
To the waters and the wild
With a faery, hand in hand,
For the world`s more full of weeping
Than you can understand.
-- William Butler Yeats, The Stolen Child, 1889
12.20.2012 | 1:25pm
peg says:
" The earlier the better, if they die, and the sooner we can all move on. I know that is not what the man meant. He was thinking of the parents and what they were going through, hoping their grief might be lessened, given everything."

I was in this position 25 years ago, and it was my father-in-law advising me to not get attached to my sick newborn. Yes, he meant to preserve me from grief, but I was speechless with shock. He struck me as childishly self-centered. As far as I was concerned, if my child was only going to live for a few hours or days, she would know that her mother loved her. If my experience of motherhood was to be fleeting, i would have it. Nurses and doctors often caused pain in their efforts to help her, but I could and did comfort her.

This wasn't just or mostly about me. My child mattered most of all, and I had responsibilities to her. If she died (she did not), i would grieve as the parent and adult I was. she deserved that, and so did I.
12.20.2012 | 2:51pm
Don Roberto says:
Great essay and thoughtful comments. My own view (as one who has lost loved ones and whose beloved mother is currently near the end of her life) is, bluntly stated, that Americans (and "moderns" worldwide), mostly neo-pagan nihilists, are shocked/disturbed when deep reality intrudes into their lives. And because they hide from this reality (distracting themselves in a state of inexcusable ignorance), this intrusion (e.g., the tragedy in Connecticut, or, dare I say it, the death of a loyal dog) impacts them more than the real danger—which is final death (condemnation to perditon). Obama and his ilk sleep soundly while promoting abortion (several dozen took place while I read the essay), yet still call up tears quite easily over tragedies they *must* recognize (for whatever reason, be it political, or to not seem like an uncaring friend—or because they now have no motivation to walk around the block every morning with plastic bags in their pockets).

Death is a calamity in many respects, but death and all the sufferings of this life will be like a short rutted road once we are in our final home (heaven, God willing). †
12.20.2012 | 5:13pm
Victoria says:
"This wasn't just or mostly about me. My child mattered most of all, and I had responsibilities to her. If she died (she did not), i would grieve as the parent and adult I was. she deserved that, and so did I."
Thank God for the attitude of selfless parents like Peg, who see their children for the blessings and responsibilities they are, not just as accessories for our gratification.
The depth of our feelings about the tragedy at Newtown are irrelevant, we know the value of those lives and mourn them.
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact