Ads


Men of Steel and Flesh

Since Thetis dipped Achilles in the Styx, men (especially men) have dreamed hot dreams of invulnerability. The Greeks kept dreaming, but they knew these dreams couldn’t come true. Even Achilles—best of the Achaeans, half divine and a tornado of destruction in his aristeia, his moment of glory—this Achilles dies a pathetic death, ambushed and pierced by an arrow at his one narrow point of weakness. A heel of flesh marks the great gulf fixed between the glory of mortals and that of the immortal gods.

Peter J. Leithart We might think we’ve outgrown childish dreams, but the annual supply of superhero films suggests otherwise. Invulnerability is often the very definition of super-heroism. Superman cowers before the green glow of Kryptonite, but we know he won’t get hurt. A bullet to Superman’s eye smushes the bullet, not the eye.

Even human superheroes somehow escape the limits of flesh. No human could survive unscathed if he glided to the sidewalk from a skyscraper on bat wings, but Bruce Wayne does it all the time, and somehow doesn’t spend half his time in the hospital. At the end of The Dark Knight Rises, Batman has seemingly survived a nuclear blast and rapidly found his way to a Florence cafe to spend a lazy afternoon sipping wine with Catwoman. Spiderman is more vulnerable, emotionally as well as physically, but he bounces back from beatings and falls as if made of rubber.

Fantasy; escapism and wish fulfillment, waking dreams in vivid CGI. Of course. But it’s a fantasy to which Americans have devoted all our legendary pluck and ingenuity, not just at the movies. We’ve got the technology to remold bodies in almost any way we want—tuck here, enhance there, replant hair and pump those pecs and biceps, washboard those abs. The successful bodybuilder tries to exercise himself to robothood, until he wriggles free of his soft and pliable, penetrable and vulnerable fleshliness. We are the metal men, we are the iron men, exercising together, buns stuffed with steel.

And there are our efforts, at once brazen and pathetic, to evade aging. Some write, with straight faces as far as I can tell, about “curing aging,” perhaps within the next few decades. We erase wrinkles and excise excess flab, tighten cheeks and lift breasts and color hair. We fight aging with mental games and exercise and avocados. Maximize those antioxidants. If you’ve got the cash, you can try out an experimental monthly dose of human growth hormone. The one thing that we can’t do about aging is stop the ticking clock.

Our obsessiveness about exercise and health seems supremely anti-Gnostic. We love to love our bodies. But that’s only superficially true. We don’t love the uncooperative, aging flesh we actually have. We love the super-humanity we hope to make from it.


This is one place that the cultural radicalism of the gospel shows through with blinding clarity. In the prologue to his gospel, John announces that the divine Word, God’s own self-communication, who was with and was God, has become flesh to dwell among us. John immediately adds that the disciples of Jesus saw his glory as the glory of the only-begotten. According to John, God’s glory shines in the very vulnerability and weakness of flesh.

As the gospel continues, this glory in flesh is more narrowly specified. Jesus announces over and over that his hour of glory is coming, heightening anticipation that he will blast the Jews with more than words. When it comes, it looks suspiciously like an hour of humiliation. Where the aristeia should have been, we see instead arrest, torture, mob action, a travesty of a trial, three posts driven upright into the ground. Jesus never looks more fleshly than he looks at Gethsemane and Golgotha, never looks less like demi-divine Achilles. John doesn’t flinch. Jesus rises to glory, but the resurrection is the climax of an hour of glory that began when he sweat drops of blood. Before resurrection, God’s glory is already embodied humanly, in a crucified man.

The Spirit replicates the pattern in the ministry of the apostles. Paul’s glory is in an earthen vessel. He is afflicted but not crushed, perplexed but not in despair, struck down but not destroyed. The apostles bear the dying of Jesus so that the life of Jesus can be “manifested in our mortal flesh.” It works that way to make it clear that strength and power is from God and not from Paul.

If glory can show itself in flesh at all, it’s got to show itself as the glory of humiliation, the strength of weakness, the invincibility of passion. If that cannot be glory, then our lives are sad indeed: We face decades of increasing vulnerability, punctuated, if we are lucky, by a few moments of triumph. But the gospel says that glory refracts above all through the mangled body of Jesus, laying down his flesh for his friends, giving his flesh for the life of the world. If glory glows there, it can shine in my frailties, it can beam from white hair that the Bible describes as a crown, it can glow through the angularities and asymmetries of decaying flesh. That is good news indeed, because for the time being flesh is all we’ve got.

Peter J. Leithart is on the pastoral staff of Trinity Reformed Church in Moscow, Idaho, and Senior Fellow of Theology and Literature at New St. Andrews College. His most recent book is Between Babel and Beast: America and Empires in Biblical Perspective (Wipf & Stock). His previous “On the Square” articles can be found here.

Become a fan of First Things on Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and follow First Things on Twitter.

Comments:

1.18.2013 | 10:47am
ChrisZ says:
Another thoughtful post by a prolific writer I've admired for some time.

I'd quibble on the "pathetic" quality of Achilles' death. The very improbability of his end--i.e., brought down by a projectile (not a hand-to-hand combatent), fired with laser-like precision, by the hand of the unlikeliest, indeed most ridiculous, opponent (Paris)--is meant to underline that no human agency could take credit for Achilles' death: that he could only be brought down by the gods. The fact that this appears superficially pathetic, but is on reflection glorious, suggests an uncanny connection between Achilles and Jesus.

Peter's larger point, that the character of Jesus in the gospels represents something radically different from a predictable dream of human strength, is the kind of thing that can never be repeated enough, and indeed helps me to see the gospels as more of a reaction against what had previously passed for religion, as opposed to a summation or culmination of it.
1.18.2013 | 3:14pm
D Glover says:
It seems to me that in our creation of and fascination with super heroes, along with the projection of our desire not to age, not to die, not to be frail and subject to the forces of nature, is our inherent desire for a saviour to save us from evil and the curse. Every person, if they’re honest, has a basic sense that there are things in the world, forces in nature or people in power, which we often find ourselves powerless to fight against. But our heroes all fight crime, they all help in times of disaster, they all take on villains who are trying to take over the world. The evil masterminds, which are the arch-nemeses for each super hero, are types of Satanic force, trying to enslave or impoverish humanity in their lust for power and riches and global domination or wanton destruction. And humanity, represented by the citizens of Gotham or Metropolis or whatever, are ultimately unable to stem the tide of evil. They call out for a saviour, for someone to rescue them, to bring liberty and justice. People project the bat beacon into a night sky, calling out for deliverance. And Batman comes to their aid. Spidy’s spider senses tingle and he swings into action, arriving just in time, which is to say, in the fullness of time. Superman senses trouble and rushes to save. They do battle with the enemy, and frequently it looks as though the hero is on the ropes, like the evil villain has won. But the hero digs deep, calls forth reserves of strength, and fights back, ultimately triumphing. These miniature messiahs win the day and save an otherwise helpless and defeated people. The perennial popularity of super heroes is at least partially due to our innate knowledge that we need a saviour.
1.18.2013 | 5:11pm
ChrisZ says:
And yet, D, if superheroes are an indication that we know, deep down, that we need a savior, they are at the same time a sign of our avoidance, our revulsion even, of THE savior. After all, we can all see how any one of them might be called, promiscuously to be sure, "Christ-LIKE"; but not one of them does what Christ did, or makes the claims--for himself, and over us--that Christ claimed. Not one of them calls his "elect" to something greater; Lois, Jimmy, and Perry are the same people they always were, despite their acquaintance (one would think a life-changing acquaintance) with a creature from another world. Their salvation comes at no expense to them, and indeed ratifies who they are and their sometimes foolish behaviour, instead of causing them to search their hearts, or submit to a transformative power.

I think this divergence between the saviors of human dreams and wishes, and the savior God really provided for us, is the real and valuable lesson we can derive from the heroes, super and otherwise, of fiction. And I think that's what Peter was getting at here.
1.19.2013 | 12:36pm
MikeM says:
I hope it advances the discussion of this excellent column' s argument to point out the one American superhero who by his conduct, rather than his nature, becomes Christ-like in the best, most fallen-human sense of that term. Superman' s dedication of his life and abilities to good works on behalf of the people he lives among is itself a sacrificial act. His powers would tend to encourage the conqueror in all of us, yet he chooses the opposite course. He becomes not Nietzsche's superman, but takes the lower place of selfless service. The author's point here is an excellent one about American myth and the way it is manifested in popular culture - I especially like the plastic surgery illustration: 100% luxury tax, anyone? - but the most iconic presentation of the myth, in its substance and at its best, still faintly echoes something of our country's Christian foundation.
1.20.2013 | 10:10pm
MJ says:
I find the space wars shows and the detective shows more interesting than the superheros' shows. But, one thing that bothers me about the main characters in these shows is how they can escape death in almost every show by sheer coincidence or perfect timing of a rescue, yet not express any appreciation to God for watching out for them. It also bothers me to see the "good guys" watch many people dying without telling of them of the gospel.
1.21.2013 | 3:39pm
D Glover says:
Fully agree, ChrisZ. I'm not saying that our innate sense of our need for salvation points us to an accurate understanding of all we need to be saved from or toward a correct picture of what that saviour is truly like, or even that there really is a Saviour. For that, we need some intervention from and self revelation of that Saviour. However, only a people in need of saving could come up with such a wide spread theme in so much of our stories, whether literary or film. And the fact that Superman, Spiderman, Batman, etc., keep being reimagined and, if anything, less "super" and more "man" each time they are reimagined, probably shows (not just a postmodern bent but...) that one of the things we need to be saved from is projecting our own image into our expectations for a wished-for and much needed saviour. Man has always sinned by trying to mold God into our own image.
type the text above in the box below

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact